4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 1/5
1. Award: 10 out of 10.00 points
Score: 10/10 Points 100 %
SelfAssessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiveness
To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the assessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree that you do
each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compare it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team member
effectiveness.
Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare your subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your
effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which competencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average
for each and compare them. The averages are computed by taking the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items for that
competency. This will show you the relative strength of your team competencies.
Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yourself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school, work, or
other organization). Then, have a member of that same team evaluate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teammate,
identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness.
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
Di
sa
gr
ee
So
m
ew
ha
t A
gr
ee
Ag
re
e
St
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
N/
A
N
ot
A
pp
lic
ab
le.
..
* 1. Did a fair share of the team's work.
* 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team.
* 3. Completed work in a timely manner.
* 4. Came to team meetings prepared.
* 5. Did work that was complete and accurate.
* 6. Communicated effectively.
* 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner.
* 8. Provided encouragement to other team members.
* 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from
teammates.
* 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance.
* 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary.
* 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress.
* 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as
expected.
* 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team.
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 2/5
Contributing to the Team’s Work
0 10 pts. Feedback: Low contribution
Interacting with Teammates
0 12 pts. Feedback: Low level of interaction
Keeping the Team on Track
0 10 pts. Feedback: Not very skilled at keeping on track
Expecting Quality
0 6 pts. Feedback: Low quality expectations
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
5 7 pts. Feedback: Moderately relevant knowledge and skills
0 42 pts. Feedback: Less effective team member
Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Po.
1. 4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 1/5
1. Award: 10 out of 10.00 points
Score: 10/10 Points 100 %
Self-Assessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiven
ess
To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the as
sessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree t
hat you do
each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compa
re it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team memb
er
effectiveness.
Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare y
our subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your
effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which co
mpetencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your
average
for each and compare them. The averages are computed by takin
g the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items fo
r that
competency. This will show you the relative strength of your tea
m competencies.
2. Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yo
urself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school
, work, or
other organization). Then, have a member of that same team eva
luate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teamm
ate,
identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this
feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness.
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
Di
sa
gr
ee
So
m
ew
ha
t A
gr
ee
Ag
re
3. e
St
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
N/
A
- N
ot
A
pp
lic
ab
le.
..
* 1. Did a fair share of the team's work.
* 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team.
* 3. Completed work in a timely manner.
* 4. Came to team meetings prepared.
* 5. Did work that was complete and accurate.
* 6. Communicated effectively.
* 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner.
* 8. Provided encouragement to other team members.
4. * 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from
teammates.
* 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance.
* 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary.
* 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress.
* 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as
expected.
* 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team.
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 2/5
Contributing to the Team’s Work
0 - 10 pts. Feedback: Low contribution
Interacting with Teammates
0 - 12 pts. Feedback: Low level of interaction
Keeping the Team on Track
0 - 10 pts. Feedback: Not very skilled at keeping on track
Expecting Quality
5. 0 - 6 pts. Feedback: Low quality expectations
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
5 - 7 pts. Feedback: Moderately relevant knowledge and skills
0 - 42 pts. Feedback: Less effective team member
Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woe
hr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R
. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker,
“The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectivenes
s: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Se
lf- and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630.
Score : 7 pts.
Score : 9 pts.
Score : 8 pts.
Score : 5 pts.
Score : 5 pts.
Feedback score:
Score : 34 pts.
Range-based Feedback:
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important
information.
* 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work.
6. * 17. Expected the team to succeed.
* 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards.
* 19. Cared that the team produced high-quality work.
* 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a
good job.
* 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to
fill in if necessary.
rev: 03_16_2016_QC_CS-44758
Self-Assessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiven
ess
To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the as
sessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree t
hat you do
each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compa
re it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team memb
er
effectiveness.
Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare y
our subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your
effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which co
mpetencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your
average
for each and compare them. The averages are computed by takin
g the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items fo
r that
competency. This will show you the relative strength of your tea
7. m competencies.
Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yo
urself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school
, work, or
other organization). Then, have a member of that same team eva
luate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teamm
ate,
identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this
feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness.
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 2
pt
s.
So
m
ew
8. ha
t A
gr
ee
| 3
pt
s.
Ag
re
e
| 4
pt
s.
St
ro
ng
ly
Ag
re
e
| 5
pt
s.
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 3/5
Contributing to the Team’s Work
Interacting with Teammates
9. Keeping the Team on Track
This question accepts all answers.
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 2
pt
s.
So
m
ew
ha
t A
gr
ee
| 3
11. * 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team. (1wt.)
* 3. Completed work in a timely manner. (1wt.)
* 4. Came to team meetings prepared. (1wt.)
* 5. Did work that was complete and accurate. (1wt.)
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 2
pt
s.
So
m
ew
ha
t A
13. pt
s.
* 6. Communicated effectively. (1wt.)
* 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner.
(1wt.)
* 8. Provided encouragement to other team members. (1wt.)
* 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from
teammates. (1wt.)
* 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance. (1wt.)
* 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary.
(1wt.)
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
15. - N
ot
A
pp
lic
ab
le.
..
| 0
pt
s.
* 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress. (1wt.)
* 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as
expected. (1wt.)
* 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team.
(1wt.)
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important
information. (1wt.)
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
17. pt
s.
N/
A
- N
ot
A
pp
lic
ab
le.
..
| 0
pt
s.
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 4/5
Expecting Quality
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
Feedback:
Contributing to the Team’s Work
20 - 25 pts.
11 - 19 pts.
0 - 10 pts.
18. Interacting with Teammates
24 - 30 pts.
13 - 23 pts.
0 - 12 pts.
Keeping the Team on Track
20 - 25 pts.
11 - 19 pts.
0 - 10 pts.
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 2
pt
22. (1wt.)
* 19. Cared that the team produced high-quality work. (1wt.)
St
ro
ng
ly
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 1
pt
s.
Di
sa
gr
ee
| 2
pt
s.
So
m
ew
ha
t A
gr
ee
| 3
pt
24. * 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to
fill in if necessary. (1wt.)
FEEDBACK:
High contribution
FEEDBACK:
Moderate contribution
FEEDBACK:
Low contribution
FEEDBACK:
High level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Moderate level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Low level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Highly skilled at keeping on track
FEEDBACK:
Moderately skilled at keeping on track
25. FEEDBACK:
Not very skilled at keeping on track
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 5/5
Expecting Quality
12 - 15 pts.
7 - 11 pts.
0 - 6 pts.
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
8 - 10 pts.
5 - 7 pts.
0 - 4 pts.
Range-based feedback:
0 - 42 pts.
43 - 83 pts.
84 - 105 pts.
Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woe
hr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R
26. . Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker,
“The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectivenes
s: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Se
lf- and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of
Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630.
FEEDBACK:
High quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Moderate quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Low quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Highly relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Moderately relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Not particularly relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Less effective team member
FEEDBACK:
