Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility Analysis

Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility Analysis
The Illusion of Free Will or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace the Basic Argument Arguments pro et contra the possibility of free will
inevitably attempt to answer the question on whether or not moral responsibility is possible. In "Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" philosopher
Galen Strawson attempts to show proof that, not only is moral responsibility impossible, but it necessarily follows, whether or not determinism turns out
to be true or false. It is my contention that Strawson's argument is correct, and it is impossible for us to be responsible for our actions. As a result, it
is equally impossible to be morally responsible for those same actions. The consequence is simple; free will is an illusion. We hang tight to... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
our beliefs, desires, and predisposed psychological structure. Through this grand heuristically make up, we are able to perform certain tasks v.g.
anticipating opponents future moves in a game of chess, because we know the game of chess. It could be the case that we have played that
opponent before and we understand their beliefs, desires, and predisposed psychological structure. This model can also be used to explain why
some people act differently in a similar situation. They are a product of their beliefs, desires, and our predisposed psychological structure. In
contrast, it would be odd to think our actions were not a result of these beliefs, desires, and predisposed psychological structures. That would relegate
the actions people make to being a consequence of randomness and chance. Therefore, "You do what you do because of the way you are."5 Premise
(1) seems self
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Moral Responsibility
Naina Navni
Professor Adams
UCWR 110
21 October 2010
Moral Responsibility America would not be where it is without the laws that have been placed and the citizens who follow the laws. In order for this
to happen the knowledge and acceptance of the laws are needed to establish order. African Americans had been secluded in the past through harsh
laws of segregation. Although many believe disobeying the law is morally wrong and if disobeyed a punishment should follow, Martin Luther King's
profound statement, "One has the moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws" (King 420) leads to greater justice for all which is also supported by
King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail," Jefferson's " The Declaration of Independence," and Lincoln's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After King clearly demonstrated that segregation laws are unjust, it follows the immediate opening premise, "One has a moral responsibility to
disobey unjust laws" that we are obliged to disobey segregation laws (King 420). King shines a new light on the disobedience of the law by
expressing his belief that "An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in
order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law" (King 421). This therefore
means that conscientious disobedience of an unjust law, especially with the intention of overturning injustice, shows the highest respect for the law,
where just law is supposed to derive from natural law and God's moral order. King's language here echoes Jefferson, but particularly in the Declaration
of Independence where Jefferson argues that governments exist to protect basic human rights, "Deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed" (Jefferson 437). At time it appears that the letter might even surpass the Declaration of Independence in its importance and value, as the
letter speaks on behalf of all Americans as a unified "we" (Ess). Lincoln's famous "Second Inaugural Address" given in 1865, exemplifies what King
tries to explain in his letter. The main message gained is that all men are created equal, therefore

Essay on Causation and Moral Responsibility for Death
Causation and Moral Responsibility for Death
ABSTRACT: The distinction between killing and letting die has been a controversial element in arguments about the morality of euthanasia and
physician–assisted suicide. The killing/letting die distinction is based on causation of death. However, a number of causal factors come into play in any
death; it is impossible to state a complete cause of death. I argue that John Mackie's analysis of causation in terms of 'inus factors,' insufficient but
non–redundant parts of unnecessary but sufficient conditions, helps us to see that moral responsibility for death cannot rest on causation alone. In
specifying the cause of death, some factors can be considered alternatively as either causal factors ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Smith actively holds the child's head under water; Jones passively stands by and watches the child drown. If both the act and the omission are equally
reprehensible, as they do seem to be, then the mere difference between killing and letting die is not sufficient to decide the morality of the case.
Rachels concludes that if letting die is sometimes permissible then killing might also sometimes be permissible. (2)
There are several responses one might make. One might reply that it is the underlying intention to bring about death for monetary gain that makes both
Smith and Jones wrong, and not whether death results from action or omission. (3) However, one's intention for either killing or letting die might also
be to bring about some good such as the relief from suffering. One's intention alone does not determine the morality of an act. No objective system of
morality could sustain such a claim.
Dan Brock argues that at least part of the problem with the use of the killing/letting die distinction in common morality is that the notion of causality on
which the arguments depend has never been sufficiently clarified. (4) Howard Brody, however, suggests that neither intention nor causation will do the
moral work we ask of them; they are just elements to be considered in a casuistic analysis. (5)
I suspect Brody is right, but what I want to focus on here is the element of causation. An analysis of

Business Ethics : Moral And Social Responsibility
Business ethics are moral and social responsibility that a business is supposed to have towards the community in general. Many companies are
concerned about their social responsibility, particularly to the environment and their employees. Our values and morals are our personal guidelines that
help us make decisions about what is right and what is wrong. Most companies have policies and procedures it is important for managers and
employees to have guidelines to follow in the workplace. I think we all have encountered one of these bureaucracies throughout our lives such as
factories, department stores, banks, hospitals, libraries and churches they have rules, regulations and standardized procedures to follow. The reason
because there are... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An example is a person being victim of sexual harassment or discrimination in the workplace. This conduct is offensive and should not be tolerated and
the victim should take further actions by reporting these incidents to Human Recourse and contact the police to file a report against the other person. It
is advised that the person should document everything including date, time, persons involved and what was said and obtain all the evidence. But I
understand these situations can happen anywhere in the workplace, school and no one should be a victim of sexual harassment or discrimination. In
the education system, enforces policies and procedures that have built up over decades for community college and universities. I work in the admission
department helping prospective, new, and returning students to register for classes. Assisting students with the interpretation of policies and
procedures to succeeded in their education and meet their career goals. An example, it was registration month and it was going to be a busy month
with student rushing to register for classes. Each student I helped had a different question and the response to their questions it was either a positive or
negative feedback. I could observe students by their body language and eye contact some students were frustrated, calm and happy depending on their
situation. For instance, a

The True Nature Of Moral Responsibility
The theory that I find true to the true nature of moral responsibility and its relation to human freedom and determinism would be compatibilism.
Compatibilism is the claim that we are both determined and that we have moral responsibility (Lawhead 120).
It offers a solution to the free will problem. Free will goes along with determinism because of the moral responsibility and it is incompatibility
between each other. We are still held responsible for our voluntary actions and our actions are still determined. Because free will is typically taken
to be a necessary condition of moral responsibility, compatibilism is sometimes expressed as a thesis about the compatibility between moral
responsibility and determinism (McKenna). He or she can be morally responsible even if determinism is true, which there are logical reasons that
this could be true. In this paper I will defend how compatibilism is tied up with both freedom and moral responsibility and give some examples that
will support my argument for compatibilism. Also talk about the other two, determinism and libertarianism and give examples and then explain why
I still agree on compatibilism. Free will is like a box of chocolates, unless you do not eat the free will chocolates, you will not feel guilty. How can one
feel guilty for what they are compelled to do?
It also depends on how we explain free will; free will in this case is how one acts out on their own will. Our genetics can determine how we can act.
When our

The Great Society: Moral And Economic Responsibility
Every economy has up and down cycles of greater and lesser prosperity, and it is difficult to completely guarantee employment are regardless of a
person's environment and upbringing, and an economy with a hight percentage of unemployed citizens is not a sound one. Furthermore, as
Christians and as Americans it is our responsibility to care for the less fortunate around us. Hence it is both a moral and economic responsibility for
there to be a safety net put in place that aids the less fortunate in their times of need. When millions of people lose their jobs because of an economic
recession or depression and not because of personal fault or poor performance, there needs to be financial help to prevent people from starving and
becoming homeless.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Its goal is to control healthcare costs and ensure that every citizen owns health insurance promoting a safer society and smarter choices. Tens of
millions of uninsured people have access to affordable, high–quality health insurance through Medicaid expansion, their employers, and the Health
Insurance Marketplace. Furthermore, over half of uninsured Americans can get free or low cost health insurance, and some can get help on
out–of–pocket costs using their state's Health Insurance Marketplace. Although it would be smarter if this power was given to each of the states, and
advocate competition between different healthcare companies, the premise is still very

Antigone's Moral Responsibility
Martin Luther King Jr. once said, "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." In the face of immoral laws, Antigone did nothing more
than doing what she believed was right. Antigone did not deserve the fate she received, death. Her act was courageous, compassionate, and
altruistic. These are traits of an act worthy of reverence, not demise. When stuck between defying her uncle Creon's law and doing what she knew
to be morally right, Antigone was not dissuade by danger. She was the definition of courageous! She shows even more bravery when she is caught
burying Polynices, and is still not deterred. Her resolve is ever unfaltering, and even seems to grow stronger as the consequences of her actions
become reality. She can be quoted saying "And if I have to die for this pure crime, I am content, for I shall rest beside him; His love will answer
mine." (page 16). She is not afraid of dying, since she knows she is committing no real crime and her actions are completely justified and pure. She is
also comforted by the fact that she will be with her brother, and his love will be enough. Compassion can be seen clearly in Antigone's actions. Her
loyalty and devotion to her family is unquestionable.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She knowingly sacrifices her own life so her brother can be honored appropriately. When Ismene tries to take part of the blame with her, Antigone
denies her. She does this partly because she is hurt Ismene wouldn't originally help her, but she also does not want her sister to die. She doesn't do
what she does to gain anything herself. She does it knowing she will be killed for it, but also that is the right thing. When Ismene asks if she can
do anything Antigone says "Yes. Save yourself. I do not grudge your escape." (page 34). Antigone is saying that she should pay for the crime and will
not be upset at her sister for not paying the price as well, for she knows she will reap rewards in the

Moral Responsibility
(A)of the core moral responsibility
This is done by P. Pula Li (Peter Pratley)proposed. Pula Li believes that "the same as the implementation of quality management, companies also accept
the moral responsibility of the concrete. at the lowest level, the enterprise must take three responsibilities: (1) concern for consumers, such as the
ability to meet the ease of use, product safety And other requirements; (2)concern for the environment; (3) interest on the minimum working
conditions. "Platts these three kinds of responsibility as " a minimum core of moral responsibility ", and the core is divided into three levels of moral
responsibility : "First, companies assume an obligation to the most basic moral responsibility: to provide ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Such as corporate responsibility is at least on the environment: do not pollute the environment; active duty: protecting the environment; ideal
responsibility is to: promote and improve the environment. [14] (P229, 234)
(B)Of the pyramid of corporate social responsibility this is made by Archie B. Carroll. Carroll believes that corporate social responsibility means that a
particular period is entitled to community organizations, economic, legal, ethical and discretionary (philanthropic) expectations. Corporate social
responsibility equal to all economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility and the responsibility of the sum of the charity, which
means the profits of economic responsibility, liability refers to the law–abiding, ethical responsibility to do things that ethical, philanthropic
responsibility means to be a good corporate citizen, as to community donated resources to improve the quality of life. These four responsibilities
formed a pyramid, at the lowest level of economic responsibility, and the second layer of legal responsibility, ethical responsibility of the third layer,
the highest level of responsibility for the charity. [15] (P26)
(D) The enterprise of moral obligation
This is by the famous economic ethicists De Qiaozhi proposed. Him from the

The Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility
Moral responsibility is a concept that has, in some way, existed in every culture and civilization that recorded history can tell us about. From the Law
of Hammurabi to beliefs in judgmental gods mankind has always assumed some form of moral responsibility–whether metaphysical or within a society.
While pragmatic considerations of moral responsibility seem to be necessary for living within a society, the philosophic concept of moral responsibility
beckons many inherent problems that must be resolved. Galen Strawson in "The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility" presents a strong argument as to
why moral responsibility is impossible, while Susan Wolf responds to the problems presented, and argues that moral responsibility does exist in some...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He shows the argument in the way it exists in a person's life, which allows for more coherent discussion, and as he later states, "new forms of
objection" (314). One important note to make on Strawson's argument is his hard determinist stance. He believes that every decision and action of a
person is predetermined by their heredity and early experience. For him, no form of free will exists. While he does believe that a person is able to
examine their behaviors and tendencies, their ability to self–revise is predetermined by heredity and early experience. His determinist stance allows his
argument to be sound and extremely difficult to refute. Another important thing to draw from the Strawson argument is what is meant by moral
responsibility. For Strawson, true moral responsibility means that one is responsible to the degree that it is sensible to either punish one with eternal
torment in hell, or reward one with enteral bliss in heaven (314). His definition of moral responsibility is not confined to religious faith in heaven or
hell, but rather is used to convey an absolute nature of accountability. This concept of moral responsibility as Strawson presents is pivotal in
understanding his objection of moral responsibility. Strawson's argument is not against a legislative or judicial sense of responsibility, and does not
take the form of responsibility that a

Napoleon Bonaparte Moral Responsibility
Moral responsibility is "the status of morally deserving praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission, in accordance with one's moral
obligations." Since the foretelling of history began, many historians have placed their biased opinion on important events that took place in the past.
This can mean leaving out relevant information about an important event or person which causes an altered understanding on the subject. Historians
are faced with many different types of evidence regarding an event that took place in the past. As a result they can choose what they want to ignore or
accept based off of their personal morals. It is not appropriate for historians to distribute moral responsibility on events that took place in the past ...
For example, the events that took place while Napoleon Bonaparte was the emperor of France, may have caused historians to have different points of
views about his role as a leader. Historians that live in France today may characterize Napoleon in different ways that historians in other parts of the
world would not. The historians that support Napoleon would tend to over–emphasize his skill and talent as a military leader and highlight all that he
did to benefit France. The French considered Napoleon to be their savior for resolving the French Revolution and implementing a more stable
government. Napoleon said that "a leader is a dealer of hope." Napoleon said this to let his citizens know that he would give them optimism and
not let them down. They also admire him because of The Napoleonic Code. Since feudalism was removed from France, they had been without laws
since the end of the revolution. The code was based off of the Justinian's Code which was apart of Roman Law. The Napoleonic Code was divided
into three categories; one's personal status, property, and the acquisition of property. However, Napoleon's achievements may be ignored by a
historian that is from a different part of the world. That historian could entice people to dislike Napoleon by focusing on the negative aspects of his
reign. They would most likely emphasize the Napoleonic Wars, which lasted for 12 years. Also they may bring up the fact that five 500,000 out of
600,000 troops that he sent into Russia were slaughtered because he failed to notice that the Russians had been tricking him into coming further and
further into Russia. In doing so, the Russians slowly picked off his troops one by one. By letting their moral beliefs influence what facts they include
in their accounts of Napoleon, historians fail to report an accurate record of his

The Moral And Ethical Responsibilities At Timothy & Thomas...
Why do corporations believe it is natural to have children working in developing countries? Is Timothy & Thomas North America responsible for
causing harm if global guidelines are misused? If 60 Minutes conducted an interview, would Timothy & Thomas North America be proud of their
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices in Pakistan? There are many questions surrounding the moral responsibility of corporations, but how
can a resolution be reached? Currently, the moral and ethical responsibilities at Timothy & Thomas North America are being characterized as reckless.
One may question their sense of global values and ethical responsibility based on their actions to date. In the case study for Timothy & Thomas North
America, three models of ethical standards will be explored. From the Stakeholders article, decision–making guidelines will need to be understood for
Jonathan Stein, the new Vice President (VP) of International Contracts of Timothy & Thomas North America to have a clear vision of the company's
stakeholders' values. Exemplified in the article, The Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Owners, Timothy & Thomas North America has an
ethical duty to manage social problems, public welfare, and corporate responsibilities to strive for moral purity in Pakistan. Specified in the article,
The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact, the leaders of Timothy & Thomas should consider using these guidelines to measure how well they treat
each other and the

The Moral Responsibility of Leaders
Reflection
1. This chapter suggests that leadership has a moral dimension and that leaders have a responsibility to use their authority for the common good.
Do you agree? Discuss I agree with what the chapter suggests. In my opinion, leadership does have a moral dimension and as a leader, comes a
responsibility that he or she uses their authority to advance the common good. I believe, that as a leader, there is an obligation to uphold our moral
values and not use their authority for aggression, power, or getting ahead. Leaders should always use their resources to advance and promote those
that need assistance or a greater cause. For example, a leader promoting needs to reduce poverty. In addition, leaders not only need to be effective but
also must accept the moral dimension of leadership and as a leader; he or she becomes a role model for the community, employees, and all of the
stakeholders. Consequently, leader's actions influence those around them and therefore as a leader, we should use our available resources to help
improve the lives of others.
2. When you consider the character of a leader and what a leader does (the leader's actions), which of these two factors is more important with regard
to ethical leadership? Can a person with bad character be an ethical leader? Discuss your answers. Although it is often quoted that actions speak louder
than words, I believe that the character of a leader may be slightly more important than the actions of a leader.

Dorian Gray : Moral Responsibility Essay
In The Picture of Dorian Gray, by Oscar Wilde, it tells of a man's gradual downfall from innocence to corruption. Even the name of the main
character in Oscar Wilde's tale, Dorian Gray, is very symbolic because В‘gray' is the combination of black and white, of good and evil. In many ways,
Dorian Gray is the epitome of mankind. Dorian Gray, an innocent and naГЇve man, becomes corrupted after having one conversation with Lord Henry
Wotton. He shows how easily people can become swayed and changed merely by the words of others. Society plays such an enormous role in the
lives of people. As said by Thomas Babington, "The measure of a man's character is what he would do if he knew he never would be found out." How
much of how we act is influenced... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You will suffer horribly.... Ah! realize your youth while you have it. Don't squander the gold of your days, listening to the tedious, trying to improve
the hopeless failure, or giving away your life to the ignorant, the common, and the vulgar. These are the sickly aims, the false ideals, of our age. Live!
Live the wonderful life that is in you! Let nothing be lost upon you. Be always searching for new sensations. Be afraid of nothing. . . . A new
Hedonism–– that is what our century wants." Through him, Dorian faces the harsh realization that his physical attributes are ever fading. Upon this
sudden insight, he dreads the physical burden of aging. He envies the perpetual beauty of Basil's masterpiece. As Dorian says, "If it were only the
other way! If it were I who was to be always young, and the picture that was to grow old! For that – for that – I would give everything! Yes, there is
nothing in the whole world I would not give! I would give my soul for that!" The materialization of this wish and the metamorphosis it will ensue are to
bring his demise. Dorian's figure remains immaculate while the picture bears his abhorrent transformation. This is first confirmed following his
amorous relationship with Sibyl Vane, an actress he meets at an infamous theatre. Like him, she is characterized by an entrancing beauty and a youthful
naivety. Mesmerized by one another, they promptly exchange vows of fidelity. Dorian invites Henry and Basil to

Free Will : Moral Responsibility
Free will is the ability of a representative to make individual choices and/or act upon them in their own desired way. People make choices every day
in their lives, maybe with a little incentive here and there, yet in the end, it's the people's choice. Free will has been a commonly debated subject
throughout history. Not just if it's true, but ultimately the real meaning of it. How can we not believe in free will? Humans naturally have a
strong sense of freedom. Free will is true in species and there will never be an alternate. I believe people are responsible for their actions. Most
philosophers assert that the concept of free will is closely related to moral responsibility. Responsibility is "the state or fact of being accountable or
to blame for something." When a person attempts to perform an action and fails to do so, people assume there is a common response. Blame and
praise is a frequently used combination in such events. For example, one may be praised for saving a child from a house that erupted in flames, yet
one may be blamed for not using their phone to call for help. Free will becomes an important issue in the debate on whether one is responsible for
their actions, and if they are, to what degree. There are always external constraints on the options presented to a person, these outside factors are not the
person's responsibility. (Stanford 1) A common challenge to free will is determinism. "Determinism is the philosophical position that for every event,

Alternate Possibilities And Moral Responsibility By Harry...
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility talks about the principle of alternate possibilities. The principle of alternate possibilities states that
someone is morally responsible if they could have chosen to do otherwise. People who believe in free will are very supportive of the principle Free
will is the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion. The principle of alternate possibilities,
moral responsibility, and free will are all involved in this paper written by Harry Frankfurt. Frankfurt states that "its exact meaning is a subject of
controversy, particularly concerning whether someone who accepts it is thereby committed to believing that moral responsibility and determinism ...
The similarity is that all 3 of them can be coerced into doing something by a threat. There are also differences between each of these Jones'. Jones 4
had another person in the picture unlike any of the other Jones' and his name was Black. Black is a "lurker" who watches what Jones 4 does, but
Jones 4 is totally unaware that anyone is watching him. If Jones 4 decided to do what he was going to do then Black will stay away without
making any threats, but if Jones 4 decides to not do what he is going to do then Black will reveal himself to threaten and force Jones 4 into doing
what he had decided not to do. If Jones 4 decided to do what he was going to do without Black having to intervene in anyway then that makes Jones
4 morally responsible for since he had chosen to do it himself. If Jones 4 had decided to not do what he was going to do and Black intervened by
threatening and forcing Jones 4 into doing something he initially decided he didn't want to do, that would make Black morally responsible. In the
case of Jones 4, he never really had a choice on whether or not he could or could not do what he was going to do. Either way he was going to have
to do what he was going to do. Jones 4 situation proves the principle of alternate possibilities wrong in the fact that Jones 4 never had a choice so
someone can be morally responsible even without having a choice in the matter, which Jones 4 never knew he did not have. Harry Frankfurt then
presents a revision of the principle of alternate possibilities. The new principle says that someone is morally responsible for their action if they did it
only because they could not have done otherwise. This revision on the principle of alternate possibilities made it work for each of the different Jones'

What Does You Do? Essay
Introduction
"Every day we seem to make and act upon all kinds of free choices– some trivial, and others so consequential that they make change the course of our
life. But are these choices really free? Or are we compelled to act the way we do by factors beyond our control?"(Pink cover). Every day as our
eyes are opened in the mornings we are faced with various decision and consequence. One can choose to stay in bed for an extra five more minutes
sleep which will turn into thirty minutes more of sleep after their alarm goes off, or one can get up at the sound of their alarm and lose that extra
five minutes of sleep. If one stays in bed, they might run late to their meeting or miss the bus. However, if they get up on time they have a higher
probability of catching the bus and being on time for work or school. This is one of the few choices that we as human beings with this unique ability of
free will make on a daily basis. How we choose to execute our freedom of the will impact the effect it will have upon us. If one chooses stays in bed
and misses the bus which then makes them therefore late for work, who is it to be blamed? The bus driver for leaving early? The lady that walked
too slowly in front of them? Or oneself for spending an extra five minutes in bed to catch upon sleep? These are the questions of culpability, who is to
be held responsible for a particular action or event? As humans we display our freedom of will on a daily basic knowing we will be held personally

Utilitarianism And Moral Responsibility : Utilitarianism
The welfarist component of utilitarianism denies the intrinsic value of any moral elements other than wellbeing. This assumption makes the utilitarian
moral theory susceptible to the criticism that it undermines the moral significance of justice and law–something that many people assume to possess
an absolute nature. However, in the following analysis, I'll try to demonstrate that even in morally sophisticated cases, utilitarianism comes to the
conclusion that may well explain our commonsense about law. Its real weaknesses lie in the consequentialist assumption, which may be potentially
incompatible with a plausible theory on moral responsibility.
It might be helpful to begin our evaluation about utilitarianism by considering a moral dilemma. I'll then propose an answer under the utilitarian
framework and respond to some of our moral concerns by offering alternative explanations. Then I'll try to identify the weaknesses of utilitarianism by
showing its confusion on moral responsibility.
Suppose that four white policemen were taped beating a black suspect while arresting him, and the videotape was uploaded online. The video aroused
widespread public anger and the four policemen were put on trial, yet the available evidences argue against conviction. However, an acquittal is likely
to trigger public fury and cause riots, which may ultimately result in deaths and injuries. A jury member is thus facing a decision either to vote for
acquittal, allowing the riot to happen, or to

Moral Responsibility Of The Army As A Profession
A TRADOC approved white paper present the Army as a profession, referring to it as the Profession of Arms and comparing it to the medical,
theological and legal professions. Moral responsibility towards society bestows professionals with ample discretions for their social service, and
expects that all professionals will acts as custodians of the public trust. The continued engagement of the Armed Forces in recent years has enabled the
Army to develop a proficiency that makes it unique, using operational guidance to pursue an outcome that is not guaranteed, much like medical and
legal practices. Society has a vested interest in the ability of the Army to be proactive and successful, to stand between the American people and the
enemies of

Reflective Paper On Moral Responsibility
Reflective Paper Regarding Moral Responsibility of Rehabilitating Criminals
Dalia M Al–Rubaye
Parkdale High School
Abstract
This paper is generally about the correlation between moral responsibility and rehabilitation. Moral responsibility was examined in the context of
criminals and ordinary people. What brings about a crime, and what impels an individuals to commit an action that he realizes is wrong. Also, the
concept of rehabilitation and the way in which it is applied were examined to deliver a better understanding of issues regarding criminals. Examining
these concepts was the key used to depict the moral responsibility, that's innate in people, and how it should be considered in rehabilitating criminals.
Key words: Morality, self respect, conscience, rehabilitation
Moral Responsibility of Rehabilitating Criminals I am a person with very little knowledge regarding criminology. Luckily, I've acquired some
knowledge from being a girl who loves to read about philosophy. Linking between the morals I've learned as a religious person and the theories about
the innate format of a human being presented by philosophers, I was able to initiate my thinking process and organize my ideas. My ultimate goal was
to get to the point where I'm able to decide whether the society and I are morally responsible of rehabilitating criminals or not. Based on my trivial
knowledge, I think that we, as individuals habitating the same community, are morally responsible

Moral Responsibility Of Homelessness In The United States
Responsibility
"I think you have a moral responsibility when you've been given far more than you need, to do wise things with it and give intelligently"– J.K
Rowling. Furthermore, when one is so fortunate, it is up to us to aid and support the less fortunate. Humans across the globe are desperate and
societies more fortunate, like the U.S, must respond in these times of crisis. In addition, moral responsibility imposes that we, as humans, ethically and
morally must act to drastically transform and better this world. We know and see all our problem, how we hurt the environment, animals, the land, and
ourselves all because we want to be better. Individuals of our society have a moral responsibility to right the wrongs in the world caused by indifference.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After all, many people see our country, the United States, as a great country of hopes and dreams, we are a role model, a beacon of hope. Elie Wiesel
mentions that "in America, the great country, the greatest democracy, the most generous of all new nations in modern history" (Wiesel 13). For
example, a donation can give someone in need their food for the day or the medical attention, so they can see the next day. Also, "Our capacity to
affect what is happening, anywhere in the world, is one way in which we are living in an era of global responsibility" (Singer 3). When one of the
U.S.'s ships had an oil spill off the coast of France in 1978 we corrected this wrong immediately. When any of us makes a mistake we fix it and when
we can not we have help. Helping each other is the only way we can coexist

Moral Responsibility and Harry Frankfurt
The incompatibilists argue that one is morally responsible for what she has done given that she could have done otherwise. Further, they think that if
determinism is true then one could not have done otherwise, so if determinism is true, one is not morally responsible for things she has done. In
debates surrounding the issue of free will, philosophers have focused on discussing whether determinism is true or false. Harry Frankfurt thinks
even though the requirement of alternative possibilities in order to be held morally responsible for our actions seems intuitively plausible, it is a
questionable premise in the argument provided by incompatibilists. Frankfurt calls the premise that "a person is morally responsible for what he
has done only if he could have done otherwise" the principle of alternative possibilities or PAP (Frankfurt, 829). He argues that PAP is false and a
person can be held morally responsible even if she could not have done otherwise. Frankfurt presents counterexamples to PAP to prove its falsity. He
tells us to assume that there is a universal controller that wants to ensure certain outcomes. The controller makes it impossible for an agent to act
otherwise, which causes her to act exactly as the controller wishes. Frankfurt argues that in such a case it is true that agent is not responsible for her
action and that she could not have done otherwise, but he thinks that the agent's lack of responsibility does not follow from her inability to do otherwise.

Free Will And Moral Responsibility Essay
The concept of free will is a source of constant debate and has been a major focus of philosophic and religious discourse for more than two millennia;
the concepts of determinism and free will are among the oldest known philosophies. In the modern age, compatibilists like Laura Ekstrom have argued
that the possibility to have chosen a different action – even if the action itself is predetermined – renders moral responsibility possible in a wholly
determined universe (Ekstrom). Conversely, incompatibilists have argued that moral culpability is incompatible with determinism; arguing that it is
fundamentally impossible to be held responsible for an action one has no control over. In this paper, I will demonstrate that bothfree will and moral
responsibility are issues of semantics and are therefore unrelated to the philosophic and religious study of free will and moral responsibility.
The problem of free will is a problem faced only by those who freely choose to do something wrong, not those who freely choose to do what is
right. Specifically, one is only held morally responsible for acts the other has deemed inappropriate; those acts which are a willful denial of the social
norms or laws a society has constructed to ensure its smooth operation. This link between free will and acts of willfulness – acts against the ideological
binary construct of right versus wrong – is where I will begin my examination.
What exactly does it mean to have a free will? To answer simply, a free

Analysis Of Ayer's Moral Responsibility
Ayer's problem with holding one morally responsible for their actions when caused deterministically is based on the fact the determinists believe
that all decisions are based on casual laws which say that one's destiny is already formed and one can not change the outcome. This gives people
the illusion of free will. The believe they can decide between say two cars, A or B, but in fact based on casual laws they were determined, even
before birth, to choose car A. Ayres states that with situations like this we can not hold them morally responsible for their choosing of car A as it was
not their choice to begin with. According to Ayer the problem with holding someone responsible for accidental errors is that they simply could not
control the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I agree with Ayer that his first solution lead to a dead end when trying to disprove determinism. It only made sense that going back to ones past and
using previous choices made only gave the same results to the choice being made at that present moment. Ayer did an excellent job with his
second solution and eliminating causation as an argument against free will and instead replacing it with constraints. Once the term constraint was
implemented it all began to make sense. Of course your free will is revoked once somebody puts you into a situation where you are forced to do
an action that you normally would not have done. When he finishes by implementing his new solution of the three conditions for what must
happen in order for you to have free will he describes everything we consider when describing free will. His only mistake is to allow somebody
with a mental disorder such as kleptomania to be excused from free will. While they may not be able to stop them selves from stealing they are
surely not making the choice to seek out help for their disorder. This is why I do not feel that mental disorders should fall under the absences of free
will. In all we do have free will and one choice does determine other choices we must make throughout our lives. Those choices are not determined by
the universe because the events that happen in our lives are spontaneous and as I stated before

The Moral And Legal Responsibility In King Lear
CHAPTER TWO
The Moral and Legal Responsibility In King Lear
2.1 Introduction.
Chapter Two presents The Moral and Legal Responsibility In King Lear , King Lear as one of Shakespeare's main tragedies, King Lear was first
printed in 1608. This initial printing is now referred to as the First Quarto. Another Quarto version was printed in 1619, and King Lear appeared again in
a 1623 Folio edition. "King Lear would be an excellent choice for the most virtuosic play Shakespeare ever wrote. It has great verbal brilliance–but so
too do Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Twelfth Night, and indeed others of his plays as well".( Raffel, 2007: xvii).Shakespeare's drama is ever connected
with the point of presenting a moral idea which Man endeavours to have, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Goneril and Regan swiftly begin to undermine the little authority that Lear still holds. Unable to believe that his beloved daughters are betraying
him, Lear slowly goes insane. He flees his daughters' houses to wander on a heath during a great thunderstorm, accompanied by his Fool and by
Kent, a loyal nobleman in disguise. Meanwhile, an elderly nobleman named Gloucester also experiences family problems. His illegitimate son,
Edmund, tricks him into believing that his legitimate son, Edgar, is trying to kill him. Fleeing the manhunt that his father has set for him, Edgar
disguises himself as a crazy beggar and calls himself "Poor Tom." Like Lear, he heads out onto the heath. When the loyal Gloucester realizes that
Lear's daughters have turned against their father, he decides to help Lear in spite of the danger. Regan and her husband, Cornwall, discover him
helping Lear, accuse him of treason, blind him, and turn him out to wander the countryside. He ends up being led by his disguised son, Edgar, toward
the city of Dover, where Lear has also been

The Moral Responsibility Of Free Will Essay
There is little doubt that free will is seen as hugely important to western philosophy. In particular, it has been suggested that it's absence may have
ramifications for the existence of moral responsibility, henceforth 'MR'. I will be arguing that ultimate responsibility is the only sufficient condition
forMR and that Baker's reflective endorsement argument fails to encapsulate all scenarios in which we have MR. In addition, I will argue that belief
in moral responsibility isn't necessary to treat people as moral beings. Unless specified otherwise, when I say 'free will', I will be referring to libertarian
free will. By moral responsibility, I mean the ubiquitous phenomena whereby someone's evaluative judgements and actions make them answerable for
an event or outcome and liable for certain consequences. Included in this definition is the idea that an agent can be absolved of responsibility if they
have a morally relevant justification
I will be focusing on two accounts of sufficient conditions. The first being Pereboom's account of MR as ultimate responsibility and the second being
Baker's reflective endorsement view. Pereboom suggests that an agent is morally responsible for an outcome if and only if that agent was the ultimate
cause of that outcome. I would word this condition in the following way: to be responsible, the agent must have willingly causally contributed to an
occurrence where the agent is personally responsible for both the event and their own mental state

Aristotle Moral Responsibility Essay
According to Aristotle, we are morally responsible for our actions. Through the analysis of notions and concepts such as responsibility in terms of
voluntary/involuntary actions, incontinence, and intemperance, we can further understand Aristotle's stance, which is that we are morally responsible
for our actions, and character. I will not only be exploring Aristotle's views, but also the views of Dr. Dian Hsieh, and Jonathan Barnes, who both
reconstruct an argument for moral responsibility from Aristotle's work. In addition, I will also contrast aspects of Aristotle's view on moral
responsibility, with Jean–Paul Sartre's views on the matter as portrayed in Existentialism Is A Humanism, in an attempt to improve upon and reveal
potential problems... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If this needs further proof, consider the practice of rewarding and punishing: if men weren't in control of their behaviour, there would be no point in
rewarding and punishing them. But here's a possible objection: if I am a thoughtless or careless sort of man, then I can't effectively control my
behaviour. That is no excuse, says Aristotle, because you are responsible for having turned into that man. We influence the development of all
aspects of our personalities by how we choose to spend our time, and what we choose to do; it is obvious that gambling produces gamblers, and
military exercises produces bravery. Although I cannot be a different sort of man just by deciding to, I remain responsible for encouraging myself to
become the sort of man I have become, just as I cannot stop the stone that I threw at you, although I remain responsible for having thrown it. Aristotle
is confident in holding bad men responsible for their wickedness, and believes that any argument that could absolve them of their badness would also
deprive good men of their goodness.

Internet Crime and Moral Responsibility
Internet Crime and Moral Responsibility
Internet Crime and Moral Responsibility3
Introduction3
What is Internet Crime?3
Types of Crimes3
Phishing3
Child Pornography4
Cyber Stalking5
Computer Intrusion5
Denial of Service Attacks and Cyber War5
Identity Theft6
Whose responsibility is it to report these crimes?7
Reporting agencies8
Conclusion8
References9 Internet Crime and Moral Responsibility
Introduction
The Internet is the technological genius of the computer age. Although the Internet is a phenomenal tool, providing access to the world, it has also
become a Shangri–La for criminals. The Internet because of the ability to remain anonymous is the perfect playground for this type of mayhem. This ...
Users need to be informed that if they receive an email that appears to be from the institution or business, they need to contact the company in regards
to the validity of the email. This should be reiterated to users monthly to help insure the reduction of personal information being gathered unlawfully.
Child Pornography
Child Pornography is the abuse of innocent children that has been put on display and oftentimes sold for a profit. It is used largely by pedophiles to
help lure other children into illicit relationship situations that no child should ever have to endure. Because the Internet provides global access, the
number of sex offenders using this avenue has dramatically increased, allowing them greater access to innocent victims.

Child pornography is illegal in the United States regardless of whether it is being sold, viewed, saved on a computer or copied. Other countries have
varying laws regarding child pornography where it is illegal to produce it but not to have it stored on a computer that you own. Although laws may be
in place to protect against child pornography across the global community, those laws are not always enforced. Some countries have no laws at all
against child pornography, making those countries a haven for distribution.
The two agencies responsible for handling reports

The Philosophical Debate On Moral Responsibility
Philosophical debate on moral responsibility has a long history. Thousands of years, many philosophers have debated on whether human beings are
morally responsible for their actions. To answer this question, philosophers use terms like free will, determinism, compatibility and deservingness to
help it. The question is still a major issue addressed today. To be morally responsible means to accept praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act
or omission in accordance with one 's moral obligations. People could argue that they have free will or not. According to general knowledge of free
will, free will can be defined as the ability to do things on ones own discretion. Thus, in this paper I will argue that humans are morally responsible for
their actions. I will prove this by using the concepts of Free will and determinism. Free will in the sense that for humans to be morally responsible for
an action, one has to be free and conscious of his or her decision. In the case of Determinism, the presence of causation and external forces has minimal
effect or no effect on moral responsibility.
Free will
Human beings are morally responsible for their actions because they posess free will. Free will is a choice or a desire to do something of ones
accord. According to Paul Edward, a philosopher, when we call an action "free" we mean that the agent is not compelled or constrained to perform it.
(Edward). One might argue that people act in certain ways because they have been drugged or

Galen Strawson On Moral Responsibility
Galen Strawson refutes the idea that we have free will and claims that we cannot be morally responsible for our actions. According to his basic
argument nothing can be the cause of itself or causa sui, and in order for one to be morally responsible for their actions they have to be the cause of
one self. Therefore, since we are not causa sui we are not morally responsible for our actions. He claims that we do not have free will because we do
actions that have a reason behind them and if a person acts for a reason they act that way because of how they are mentally. Thus, if no one
responsible for their mental state they are not responsible for the actions that occur. A person has to be responsible for their self–makeup to be morally
responsible and since no one is responsible for this they are not morally responsible for their actions.
Moral responsibility from my view is for someone to do something and later is held accountable for their actions. To be morally responsible one must
have the power or right to act or think as one wants without restraint. Whether they use ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For example, a person goes to a supermarket and wants to buy fruit, there are a variety of fruit at the supermarket. The person has plenty of options
and because these options are presented to him he has the free will to choose which fruit he wants to buy. Meaning that having options and having
the ability to choose one thing over indicates that we do have free will and therefore are morally responsible for our actions. Adding on we also
have the ability to resist or engage in certain actions meaning we can say yes or no to certain things and that we aren't forced into choosing whether
yes or no. Just like having options we have the right to resist certain options and engage in certain options. The person in the supermarket can say yes
to apples and no to

Montresor's Moral Responsibility
In this character analysis of Montresor, the narrator in "the Cask of Amontillado" by edgar Allen Poe I provide references as to how he fits a
description of a sociopath. A sociopath is defined as: a person with psychopathic personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal and who
lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. We see throughout the story a grandiose sense of self, lack of remorse, glibness,
manipulative behavior, shallow emotion, unreliability, the creation of a willing victim, and lack of empathy. All of which are listed as classic actions
of a sociopath. Montresor feels that he has been insulted by Fortunato. Even though he has had " a Thousand injuries..." (1) done to him by Fortunato
he vowed revenge once insulted. Montressor appears to be a vindictive man, another classic sign of a sociopath, and plots his revenge with a meticulous
nature. He formulated his plans so that no only does he avoid discipline, he comes up with a punishment that will sufficiently put and end to possible
further insults from Fortunato. "I must not only punish but punish with impunity: (5–6). It would also appear that perhaps Montresor is not a very
confrontational man, and picks his battles, continuing to be injured be Fortunato until he could no longer take anymore, the final straw being an actual
insult.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He does this by putting on as Fortunato's friend, all the while still plotting his death. Montressor, if truly a sociopath, would be unlikely to be able to
be a real friend to anyone. Even when he does begin to unfold his plot of revenge he does so without confrontation and rather he he treats Fortunato
as a "friend" up until the last brick was laid. He even feigned interest for Fortunato's health "we will go back; your health is precious..." (82) when he
begins coughing due to the nitre in the

Free Will : The Concept Of Moral Responsibility
Part One, The Thesis:
Free–will can be defined as the ability an individual has to act without the limitation of necessity or fate. It the power a person has to act at one's
discretion. Do we really have the freedom to experience what we want, when we choose? Some would say yes while some others will say no,
philosophers have argued about this topic and there hasn't been any particular conclusion yet. It is the ability a person or animal has to choose his or
her course of actions. Although most philosophers suppose that the concept of free–will is very closely connected to the concept of moral
responsibility. However, there are two various views onfree will, the ones that agree that everyone has freewill and the other that disagrees that
everyone has free will. These types of views are determinism and libertarianism. Determinism is a theory that everything that occurs happens in
accordance with some regular structure or order; it assumes that human actions are determined by previous events. Determinists believe that our actions
are pre–determined by fate, by logical necessity, by arbitrary gods, or by a natural cause while libertarianism explains that people are free to choose to
act other than they do; it means that humans are with respect to some actions, free to choose and act otherwise. It upholds freedom as its principal
objective. Libertarians seek to maximize independence, freedom of choice and also emphasizing constitutional freedom. In order for humans to make

Who Knew That Consciousness And Moral Responsibility
Who Knew that Consciousness and Moral Responsibility was Simple? In this paper, I will explicate the views of George Sher and Neil Levy on
moral responsibility. These philosophers present different arguments on determining how and whether an individual can be held morally responsible
for their actions and omissions. To begin this paper, I will address the view of Sher, following with Levy's view, and then concluding the paper with
a contrast of the two views. George Sher develops his argument in his book, Who Knew?. His main thesis is laid out in the Full Epistemic Condition,
also known as the FEC. Sher's FEC proposes three distinct conditions under which a person is morally responsible, with the second condition having
two subsets. To be held morally responsible, an individual must fulfill only one of the three conditions. The first two conditions are distinct conditions
under which a person can be held morally blameworthy, while the third condition specifies conditions under which a person can be held morally
praiseworthy. To explain Sher's view, consider a woman who owns acat, is married, and has a child. Every evening during dinner, this woman opens
the window while she cooks and gives most of her attention to her husband and child as they talk to her about their days. The family's cat remains in
the kitchen with them as they prepare for dinner. Whenever the cat approaches the window, the woman normally yells at the cat to get away from it, in
order to keep it safe

Social Responsibilities And Moral Character Of Business
Social Responsibilities and Moral Character of Business
Milton Friedman was a 20th century American economist who advocated free–market capitalism. In 1970 he submitted an editorial article entitled
"The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits" to the New York Times. In the article, Friedman argues that in free market systems it
is nonsensical to make corporate entities adhere to "social responsibilities of business" pushed by activists, as corporations are artificial in nature, and
thus do not have any social responsibilities other than to make money for the shareholders of the company. I will argue against this paper and support
the claim corporations do in–fact have moral and ethical obligations to more than just their shareholders, and that many individuals have their stakes
and livelihoods embedded within the acts of corporations. As well, the idea in the article that corporations are not moral agents has led to unsavory
violations of human rights across the world, failing Kant's second formulation of the Categorical Imperative, as well as not satisfying Act
Utilitarianism. Thus, corporations, and individuals within those corporations, possess considerable ability to make ethical decisions that have great
impact to many people, culminating in the truth that corporations have moral status. Friedman often surrounds ideas that he feels are nonsensical with
quotation marks in order to make the ideas seem out of touch with any sort of economic

Moral Responsibility In King Henry's War
Morally Responsible Character Development Responsibility in war isn't always abundantly clear and Shakespeare uses King Henry's dynamic
character to highlight that issue. Shakespeare uses this heavily metaphysical discussion of moral responsibility in war to symbolize a permanence
in Henry's maturity by critically analyzing the position as seen by the king himself and his soldiers. The discussion between King Henry and his
soldiers ultimately discusses one deep question: who is responsible for who in war? The soldiers themselves, especially Captain Bates, deem
themselves responsible for their physical allegiance to the king and "if his cause be wrong, [their] obedience to the King wipes the crime of it out of
them" (145). According to the Captain, if Henry's cause for war is an unjust one, any ill–becoming end that befalls them is on the conscience of the king.
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
. . Besides, there is no king, be his cause never so spotless . . . can try it out with all unspotted soldiers. Now, if these men have defeated the law
and outrun native punishment, they have no wings to fly from God . . . Then, if they die unprovided, no more is the King guilty of their damnation
than he was guilty of those impieties for the which they are now visited. Every subject's duty is the King's, but every subject's soul is his own (147).
Henry knows that every soldier in his army is guilty to some degree of some transgression, however minor; proof of this lies in his soldiers Scroop,
Grey and Cambridge who were guilty of treason against the king. But to claim that Henry himself is responsible for their judgement in death is a
ludicrous proposition: his only responsibility is to ensure that his soldiers fight like soldiers. Any end that befalls them is through only their own

Essay on Oedipus Rex's Moral Responsibility
Conscience, in modern usage, term denoting various factors in moral experience. Thus, the recognition and acceptance of a principle of conduct as
binding is called conscience. In theology and ethics, the term refers to the inner sense of right and wrong in moral choices, as well as to the
satisfaction that follows action regarded as right and the dissatisfaction and remorse resulting from conduct that is considered wrong. In earlier ethical
theories, conscience was regarded as a separate faculty of the mind having moral jurisdiction, either absolute or as a representative of God in the human
soul.
Various syntheses of traditional theology with the existential view that knowledge is more emotional than scientific have been developed in... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Lonely and homeless, Oedipus arrived at Thebes, which was beset by a dreadful monster called the Sphinx. The frightful creature frequented the
roads to the city, killing and devouring all travelers who could not answer the riddle that she put to them: What walks on four legs in the morning,
on two legs at noon, and on three legs in the evening? The answer was a human being, who in infancy crawls on all fours, in adulthood walks
upright on two legs, and in old age uses a cane. When Oedipus solved her riddle, the Sphinx killed herself. Believing that King Laius had been slain
by unknown robbers, and grateful to Oedipus for ridding them of the Sphinx, the Thebans rewarded Oedipus by making him their king and giving him
Queen Jocasta as his wife. For many years the couple lived in happiness, not knowing that they were really mother and son.
Then a terrible plague descended on the land, and the oracle proclaimed that Laius's murderer must be punished. After he made king, Oedipus takes it
upon himself to rid Thebes of the plague by finding Laius' murder.(p311/ln.104) Oedipus soon discovered that he had unknowingly killed his father. In
grief and despair at her incestuous life, Jocasta killed herself, and when Oedipus realized that she was dead and that their children were accursed, he
put out his eyes and relinquished the throne. He lived in Thebes for

Free Will : Moral Responsibility
15Free will is the ability of a representative to make individual choices and/or act upon them in their own desired way. People make choices every
day in their lives, maybe with a little incentive here and there, yet in the end, it's the people's choice. Free will has been a commonly debated
subject throughout history. Not just if it's true, but ultimately the real meaning of it. How can we not believe in free will? Humans naturally have
a strong sense of freedom. Free will is true in species and there will never be an alternate. I believe people are responsible for their actions. Most
philosophers assert that the concept of free will is closely related to moral responsibility. Responsibility is "the state or fact of being accountable or
to blame for something." When a person attempts to perform an action and fails to do so, people assume there is a common response. Blame and
praise is a frequently used combination in such events. For example, one may be praised for saving a child from a house that erupted in flames, yet
one may be blamed for not using their phone to call for help. Free will becomes an important issue in the debate on whether one is responsible for
their actions, and if they are, to what degree. There are always external constraints on the options presented to a person, these outside factors are not the
person's responsibility. (Stanford 1) A common challenge to free will is determinism. "Determinism is the philosophical position that for every event,

The Moral Responsibilities Within A Corporation
Corporations can be large or small but they all have some sort of ethical impact on their employees, shareholders, customers, community, and
surrounding environments. Richard DeGeorge writes, "We can speak of corporations having moral responsibilities to act in certain ways, and they are
morally responsible for the consequences of their actions on people." (p. 200). Large corporations are comprised of the board of directors, management,
and their workers. They also deal with suppliers, customers, and have competitors. This essay will examine the moral responsibilities within a
corporation.
In large corporations the success or failure of the company is the responsibility of the board of directors. According to Richard DeGeorge, "The
members of the board are responsible to the shareholders for the selection of honest, effective managers, and especially for the selection for the CEO
and of the president of the corporation." (p. 202). The board members have a moral responsibility to ensure the corporation is run honestly, in respect
to its major policies, and to ensure the interests of the shareholders are satisfied. The next responsibility within a corporation is the responsibility
management has to its board of directors. DeGeorge writes, "It must inform the board of its actions, the decisions it makes or the decisions to be made,
the financial condition of the firm, its successes and failures, and the like." (p. 202). The management of the corporation is morally obligated to

Aristotle Theory Of Moral Responsibility
Moral Responsibility The theory of moral responsibility by Aristotle will be used as a foundation to analysis the moral responsibility on dream. The
theory is used because Aristotle is the earliest philosopher who discuss about moral responsibility in Nicomachean Ethic. Aristotle concept of moral
responsibility is focus on "the role of knowledge in taking the proper course of action" (Hsieh). According to Aristotle, moral responsibility is the
notion that "it is sometimes appropriate to respond to an agent with praise or blame on the basis of her actions and/or dispositional traits of
character" (Eshleman). This concept similar to Plato's ideas that "the issue of moral responsibility primarily arises as a result of the investigations into
the connection between knowledge, desire, and right action; his discussions generally center around whether those who desire evil do so knowingly
or due to ignorance or error" (Hsieh). However, the notion of moral responsibility by Aristotle is more complex and details.... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
A person who dreams mainly does not aware what he or she is doing. A dream person does not have control over her or his dream but they only
follow the scenario in their dreams. However, this idea has not answer the notion of people who experience lucid dream. For a lucid dreamer, he
or she does not hold moral responsibility because the dream that happen in their life does not impact on the real life. For example, if a lucid
dreamer kills his friend in his dream, the friend does not die in the real life. This case is similar when a person play video game and kills his or her
mate, he or she does not hold any moral responsibility because it does not impact the awaking life. This idea of the consequent of an action in a dream
will be discussed in details in the next

Moral Responsibility In Susan Wolf's Analysis
In an attempt to explain moral responsibility, Susan Wolf puts forth a modified version of what she calls the Deep Self View (DSV) first expounded
on by Harry Frankfurt, Gary Watson and Charles Taylor (Perry et al. 460
–462). The key to her argument the condition of sanity; a deep self must be
sane in order to be considered morally responsible. However, I will argue that her attempt fails for the following two reasons:
1.Wolf's definition of sanity is too vague and to be useful and relies on the collective view of lay persons.
2.Wolf raises the bar of moral responsibility so high as to make it nearly impossible to reach and in the process seems to defeat her own argument.
Wolf's attempt to make sense of DSV by creating her own definition of sanity (CITATION) does not add clarity to DSV but instead creates more
confusion. Her definition seems to rely too heavily on the views of the general population for determining what is and is not sane (CITATION). What
is sane then ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"...the minimally sufficient ability cognitively and normatively to recognize and appreciate the world for what it is" (Perry et al. 465).
In other words, society at large is the yardstick for judging what is and is not to be considered sane and acceptable behavior. While few would object to
the role sanity plays in a person's moral responsibility, Wolf's definition of the sane DSV is far too vague and subjective to be of any real value.
So, if we accept Wolf's vague definition of the sane DSV and assume our view of the world is the correct one, we may create even bigger problems.
All too often the tyranny of the righteous majority has violated the rights of the weak and savage minority. Therefore, it is my argument that Wolf's
definition of the sane DSV has the very real potential of creating even more Jo Jo's on an even larger scale. Wolf acknowledges the difficulty of this
objection and admits there are no satisfactory answers (Perry et al.

Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Alicia Brooks

More from Alicia Brooks (17)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Impossibility Of Moral Responsibility Analysis