SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 77% 27 6 2 35 54% 64% 34 12 7 53 41% 54% 29 18 7 54 63% 57% 33 14 11 58
Bonham 62% 43 16 10 69 63% 77% 67 13 7 87 55% 49% 47 31 17 95 61% 65% 74 16 24 114
Bowie 52% 16 9 6 31 38% 56% 19 8 7 34 33% 46% 19 15 7 41 67% 72% 41 12 4 57
Crockett 53% 9 8 17 81% 69% 18 5 3 26 49% 48% 26 18 10 54 45% 56% 31 7 17 55
Dishman 62% 23 7 7 37 53% 71% 30 7 5 42 65% 81% 39 8 1 48 66% 72% 41 8 8 57
Houston 43% 15 12 8 35 40% 48% 30 13 19 62 46% 47% 35 22 17 74 56% 49% 28 12 17 57
Jefferson 43% 15 6 14 35 47% 58% 18 6 7 31 51% 54% 28 13 11 52 70% 68% 32 10 5 47
Lamar 30% 12 11 17 40 48% 68% 41 11 8 60 39% 42% 26 24 12 62 48% 55% 34 15 13 62
Long 65% 41 14 8 63 60% 67% 56 15 13 84 56% 55% 46 26 11 83 56% 56% 59 24 22 105
Means 57% 24 8 10 42 53% 68% 40 14 5 59 64% 65% 49 16 10 75 74% 69% 50 12 10 72
Milam N/T 0 36% 49% 23 13 11 47 35% 50% 22 14 8 44 53% 57% 28 8 13 49
Rodriguez 65% 35 10 9 54 51% 71% 61 10 15 86 40% 57% 64 27 21 112 54% 48% 46 23 27 96
Stuart 60% 39 14 12 65 63% 71% 65 15 11 91 65% 67% 71 23 12 106 71% 79% 93 11 13 117
Travis 38% 11 9 9 29 49% 66% 25 9 4 38 38% 48% 16 10 7 33 55% 55% 30 14 11 55
Treasure Hills 51% 44 17 26 87 53% 63% 64 28 10 102 62% 64% 90 27 23 140 74% 72% 100 25 13 138
Wilson 52% 17 10 6 33 65% 65% 35 14 5 54 58% 69% 41 13 5 59 76% 68% 48 15 8 71
Zavala 44% 14 12 6 32 52% 57% 31 12 11 54 45% 50% 28 16 12 56 54% 53% 27 10 14 51
Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 64% 65% 36 11 8 55 51% 53% 27 14 10 51 56% 69% 31 6 8 45 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 58% 62% 69 25 17 111 59% 60% 67 19 25 111 65% 72% 68 12 15 95 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus
Bowie 65% 79% 41 7 4 52 69% 64% 32 9 9 50 64% 69% 37 13 4 54 Source: Istation
Crockett 64% 63% 40 14 9 63 42% 46% 33 17 22 72 63% 67% 34 9 8 51 Data pulled: 10/13/17
Dishman 63% 65% 31 10 7 48 60% 51% 23 7 15 45 49% N/T 2 2 For Internal Use Only
Houston 57% 54% 38 16 16 70 52% 48% 31 20 14 65 79% 69% 37 10 7 54
Jefferson 75% 73% 27 8 2 37 69% 67% 22 8 3 33 78% 73% 41 9 6 56
Lamar 41% 40% 38 26 31 95 41% 47% 54 24 37 115 55% 54% 52 25 20 97
Long 59% 63% 58 15 19 92 70% 70% 70 15 15 100 64% 72% 79 18 12 109
Means 64% 68% 64 21 9 94 68% 74% 66 10 13 89 73% 67% 55 17 10 82
Milam 50% 53% 36 14 18 68 57% 48% 27 15 14 56 66% 66% 42 13 9 64
Rodriguez 56% 59% 61 17 25 103 50% 54% 68 29 29 126 65% 70% 73 18 14 105
Stuart 76% 78% 97 19 8 124 75% 77% 101 17 13 131 79% 79% 85 13 10 108
Travis 44% 60% 30 11 9 50 74% 79% 37 5 5 47 64% 69% 38 5 12 55
Treasure Hills 72% 78% 102 22 6 130 70% 73% 97 22 13 132 65% 62% 79 32 17 128
Wilson 60% 65% 46 16 9 71 53% 62% 58 19 17 94 75% 66% 47 14 10 71
Zavala 65% 71% 45 12 6 63 63% 72% 36 8 6 50 72% 69% 36 9 7 52
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
5TH4TH3RD
PK KG 1ST 2ND
Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 1 1 25% 42% 5 4 3 12 22% 50% 2 2 4 36% 36% 4 4 3 11
Bonham 0 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 1 2 3 26% 24% 5 3 13 21
Bowie 50% 4 2 2 8 29% 60% 3 1 1 5 25% 43% 3 4 7 43% 57% 8 4 2 14
Crockett 0 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 9 9 6 24 44% 61% 11 2 5 18
Dishman 0 100% 100% 4 4 57% 86% 6 1 7 56% 67% 6 2 1 9
Houston 0% 1 1 43% 0% 1 1 45% 100% 2 2 22% 50% 4 2 2 8
Jefferson 0% 2 2 50% 60% 3 1 1 5 13% 6% 1 6 10 17 78% 72% 13 4 1 18
Lamar 0% 1 2 3 100% 60% 3 1 1 5 18% 60% 3 2 5 30% 60% 3 2 5
Long 50% 1 1 2 25% 50% 2 1 1 4 22% 44% 4 3 2 9 50% 50% 6 1 5 12
Means 0 0 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 3 1 4
Milam N/T 0 31% 0% 2 1 3 21% 20% 2 2 6 10 39% 28% 5 5 8 18
Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 1 1 43% 580% 3 1 2 6 29% 33% 6 2 10 18
Stuart 18% 2 5 4 11 36% 42% 5 2 5 12 65% 53% 9 5 3 17 67% 76% 16 1 4 21
Travis 0% 1 1 25% 0 6% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 8 3 4 15
Treasure Hills 25% 1 1 2 4 44% 44% 4 2 3 9 23% 31% 4 4 5 13 67% 22% 2 5 2 9
Wilson 0 100% 75% 3 1 4 33% 50% 1 1 2 100% 80% 4 1 5
Zavala 0 50% 55% 6 3 2 11 29% 57% 4 2 1 7 56% 56% 10 4 4 18
AVG 27% 33 47% 53% 79 35% 77% 137 53% 53% 224
Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 71% 56% 5 2 2 9 17% 57% 4 3 7 25% 33% 1 2 3 Students with LEP Indicator (Y)
Bonham 44% 25% 2 3 3 8 30% 27% 3 1 7 11 20% 33% 2 4 6 Tier 1 % By Grade Lvl&Campus
Bowie 59% 76% 13 3 1 17 56% 50% 8 4 4 16 56% 63% 5 1 2 8 Source: Istation
Crockett 57% 65% 15 4 4 23 47% 42% 13 10 8 31 69% 33% 3 2 4 9 Data pulled: 10/13/17
Dishman 50% 75% 9 2 1 12 40% 60% 3 2 5 38% 0% 1 1 For Internal Use Only
Houston 25% 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 33% 4 3 5 12 57% 57% 4 1 2 7
Jefferson 80% 73% 11 3 1 15 67% 45% 5 4 2 11 67% 55% 11 6 3 20
Lamar 39% 36% 15 11 16 42 36% 39% 13 8 12 33 44% 43% 12 10 6 28
Long 50% 50% 5 5 10 40% 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 14% 1 4 2 7
Means 36% 39% 9 10 4 23 58% 47% 9 5 5 19 71% 57% 8 2 4 14
Milam 47% 41% 7 3 7 17 61% 36% 5 5 4 14 33% 31% 5 6 5 16
Rodriguez 36% 58% 14 5 5 24 41% 52% 11 4 6 21 33% 33% 6 6 6 18
Stuart 60% 40% 4 4 2 10 25% 46% 6 2 5 13 88% 50% 4 3 1 8
Travis 40% 53% 8 4 3 15 75% 82% 9 1 1 11 13% 25% 2 2 4 8
Treasure Hills 58% 67% 6 3 9 63% 67% 4 1 1 6 43% 43% 3 1 3 7
Wilson 56% 50% 7 5 2 14 50% 67% 8 4 12 83% 56% 5 3 1 9
Zavala 57% 52% 12 8 3 23 47% 29% 2 2 3 7 67% 43% 3 2 2 7
AVG 51% 52% 279 47% 48% 234 47% 39% 176
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Istation Reading October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
5TH4TH3RD
2ND1STKGPK
Tested Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 4 4 56% 44% 4 2 3 9 25% 0% 1 5 6 100% 100% 1 1 0
Bonham 33% 2 2 2 6 67% 33% 4 2 6 12 73% 62% 8 2 3 13 0 0
Bowie 73% 8 1 2 11 50% 29% 2 1 4 7 0% 0% 1 1 0% 4 4 50% 0
Crockett 83% 10 2 12 67% 67% 8 3 1 12 0 0 0
Dishman 0 0% 17% 1 1 4 6 17% 1 5 6 0 100% 100% 1 1
Houston 63% 5 3 8 67% 44% 4 2 3 9 73% 67% 8 1 3 12 11% 1 3 5 9 75% 31% 4 9 13
Jefferson 40% 2 3 5 55% 82% 9 1 1 11 57% 43% 6 4 4 14 0 0
Lamar 60% 15 2 8 25 37% 53% 8 3 4 15 58% 58% 18 3 10 31 73% 69% 9 3 1 13 36% 44% 15 6 13 34
Long 38% 3 2 3 8 ~~ 25% 2 2 4 8 ~~ 20% 1 4 5 ~~ 0 ~~ 0
Means 38% 5 1 7 13 36% 43% 6 4 4 14 72% 72% 21 6 2 29 73% 52% 16 11 4 31 50% 0% 1 1 2
Milam 0 29% 48% 10 6 5 21 39% 42% 11 6 9 26 30% 30% 8 7 12 27 26% 28% 10 9 17 36
Rodriguez 67% 8 1 3 12 38% 69% 9 1 3 13 33% 36% 5 2 7 14 0 33% 33% 1 1 1 3
Stuart 55% 6 1 4 11 36% 36% 4 3 4 11 44% 7 4 5 16 0 0% 100% 1 1
Travis 57% 4 3 7 38% 29% 4 5 5 14 50% 31% 5 4 7 16 33% 33% 1 2 3 0% 0% 1 1
Treasure
Hills
67%
4 1 1 6 40% 50% 2 1 1 4 33% 0% 3 3 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 1 2 3
Wilson 44% 4 2 3 9 54% 57% 8 2 4 14 80% 50% 5 3 2 10 100% 6 6 80% 75% 3 1 4
Zavala 40% 4 3 3 10 8% 55% 6 2 3 11 0 67% 100% 3 3 0
AVG 57% 147 42% 46% 191 49% 36% 202 54% 50% 98 44% 44% 98
All Students assessed in Español
Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Source: Istation
Data pulled: 10/13/17
~~ No students assessed in Español
For Internal Use Only
Istation Reading Español OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND 3RD
Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 100% 1 1 25% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 0% 2 6 8
Bonham 50% 1 1 2 100% 50% 1 1 2 0 33% 33% 2 1 3 6
Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 1 1 100% 100% 2 2
Crockett 0 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 4 5
Dishman 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 1 1 2 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 1 4 5
Houston 0 0% 0% 1 1 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 0% 3 3
Jefferson 20% 1 1 3 5 0% 2 2 0% 50% 1 1 2 40% 40% 2 3 5
Lamar 0% 2 2 0 25% 0% 1 5 6 0% 0% 2 5 7
Long 0 33% 25% 1 3 4 17% 33% 2 1 3 6 17% 15% 2 2 9 13
Means 0 0 0% 0% 3 3 67% 67% 4 2 6
Milam 0 0% 0% 2 2 0% 0% 2 2 50% 50% 1 1 2
Rodriguez 0% 1 1 33% 25% 1 3 4 17% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 1 6 7
Stuart 0% 2 2 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 100% 1 1
Travis 0 0% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 1 1 2
Treasure Hills 0% 1 1 80% 50% 3 2 1 6 33% 20% 1 4 5 33% 33% 2 1 3 6
Wilson 0 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 0% 1 1
Zavala 33% 1 2 3 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 67% 67% 2 1 3
AVG 28% 19 41% 36% 37 16% 19% 54 39% 31% 82
Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 20% 1 1 3 5 0% 29% 2 2 3 7 13% 33% 2 4 6 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y)
Bonham 20% 0% 2 5 7 17% 13% 1 7 8 14% 29% 2 5 7 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus
Bowie 0% 0% 1 3 4 0% 20% 1 4 5 0% 0% 2 2 4 Source: Istation
Crockett 42% 17% 2 3 7 12 0% 0% 8 8 13% 10% 1 2 7 10 Data pulled: 10/13/17
Dishman 0% 33% 1 1 1 3 0% 0% 6 6 25% 0% 1 1 For Internal Use Only
Houston 13% 0% 1 6 7 11% 0% 4 3 7 50% 30% 3 2 5 10
Jefferson 33% 0% 2 1 3 0 0% 0% 1 1 2
Lamar 0% 0% 8 8 0% 0% 9 9 0% 0% 1 7 8
Long 7% 21% 3 1 10 14 0% 0% 2 9 11 6% 0% 7 10 17
Means 0% 0% 1 3 4 50% 33% 1 1 1 3 25% 14% 1 2 4 7
Milam 17% 0% 3 4 7 0% 0% 6 6 14% 14% 1 2 4 7
Rodriguez 25% 22% 2 7 9 25% 18% 2 1 8 11 7% 7% 1 8 6 15
Stuart 100% 100% 1 1 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 0% 50% 1 1 2
Travis 0% 25% 1 3 4 25% 0% 2 2 4 11% 11% 1 2 6 9
Treasure Hills 33% 40% 2 2 1 5 17% 13% 1 2 5 8 25% 0% 4 4
Wilson 9% 20% 2 5 3 10 10% 10% 1 4 5 10 36% 27% 3 3 5 11
Zavala 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 2 4 6 13% 25% 2 1 5 8
AVG 22% 19% 106 14% 13% 115 15% 15% 128
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
3RD 4TH 5TH
2ND1STKGPK
Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 45% 17 14 7 38 46% 71% 39 10 6 55 47% 44% 26 14 19 59 75% 80% 47 9 3 59
Bonham 60% 38 14 11 63 57% 60% 58 25 13 96 51% 57% 61 19 27 107 82% 82% 94 17 3 114
Bowie 42% 13 11 7 31 44% 33% 14 14 15 43 INC 57% 23 9 8 40 88% 86% 49 6 2 57
Crockett N/T 0 54% 53% 20 10 8 38 53% 52% 28 11 15 54 71% INC 2 2 1 5
Dishman INC 13 3 4 20 80% 81% 34 4 4 42 63% 79% 38 7 3 48 75% 87% 48 7 55
Houston 60% 24 6 10 40 49% 42% 30 19 22 71 47% 60% 52 15 19 86 71% 75% 44 12 3 59
Jefferson INC 2 1 3 58% 49% 19 7 13 39 47% 58% 30 16 6 52 72% 85% 40 6 1 47
Lamar 52% 31 16 13 60 50% 56% 42 13 20 75 36% 41% 38 23 32 93 65% 70% 53 19 4 76
Long 75% 47 6 10 63 69% 63% 55 18 15 88 54% 53% 44 23 16 83 82% 83% 85 13 5 103
Means 84% 16 1 2 19 56% 54% 38 14 18 70 48% 55% 57 23 24 104 86% 80% 80 18 2 100
Milam N/T 0 60% 55% 35 15 14 64 60% 62% 33 9 11 53 69% 83% 39 5 3 47
Rodriguez 61% 40 11 15 66 51% 57% 55 15 27 97 46% 49% 61 32 32 125 70% 68% 65 22 9 96
Stuart 77% 33 8 2 43 73% 76% 68 12 10 90 67% 78% 83 10 13 106 89% 94% 110 7 117
Travis INC 6 1 1 8 63% 52% 26 12 12 50 33% 35% 17 13 19 49 68% 81% 46 11 57
Treasure Hills 59% 44 19 11 74 69% 66% 69 17 18 104 59% 64% 89 23 28 140 84% 88% 123 12 4 139
Wilson N/T 0 67% 67% 43 9 12 64 65% 62% 43 16 10 69 93% 91% 68 7 75
Zavala N/T 0 66% 56% 31 10 14 55 35% 55% 31 10 15 56 60% 69% 35 13 3 51
Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 88% 85% 28 4 1 33 72% 53% 25 17 5 47 39% 42% 20 14 14 48 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 90% 88% 99 8 5 112 71% 71% 79 23 10 112 46% 57% 55 17 24 96 Tier 1 Percentages By GR Level
Bowie 90% 87% 45 5 2 52 73% 69% 34 11 4 49 75% 78% 42 5 7 54 Source: Istation
Crockett 79% 84% 53 5 5 63 49% 50% 30 11 19 60 41% 50% 26 10 16 52 Data pulled: 10/13/17
Dishman 89% 85% 41 5 2 48 67% 63% 27 8 8 43 53% 65% 33 9 9 51 *PREK's 1st assessment in October
Houston INC 79% 55 9 6 70 71% 72% 48 13 6 67 48% 57% 31 14 9 54 For Internal Use Only
Jefferson 83% 84% 31 6 37 86% 85% 28 5 33 69% 63% 36 14 7 57
Lamar 75% 71% 68 9 19 96 50% 50% 59 35 23 117 49% 55% 53 21 23 97
Long 85% 87% 79 5 7 91 79% 75% 76 15 10 101 54% 73% 79 9 20 108
Means 82% 84% 77 6 9 92 89% 82% 75 13 4 92 63% 63% 52 15 15 82
Milam 76% 74% 50 8 10 68 68% 66% 37 9 10 56 56% 68% 43 10 10 63
Rodriguez 85% 85% 89 3 13 105 60% 63% 80 29 17 126 55% 60% 62 25 16 103
Stuart 96% 94% 116 5 3 124 84% 86% 113 15 3 131 66% 72% 76 14 16 106
Travis 74% 82% 41 6 3 50 81% 76% 34 8 3 45 44% 51% 28 12 15 55
Treasure Hills 91% 93% 128 5 4 137 65% 67% 95 28 18 141 46% 49% 66 35 33 134
Wilson 82% 69% 41 13 5 59 72% 74% 68 13 11 92 58% 61% 28 6 12 46
Zavala 87% 90% 57 2 4 63 77% 77% 40 10 2 52 52% 58% 30 12 10 52
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Math October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier2ND1STKGPK
3RD 4TH 5TH
1stAssessmentinOctober
Tested Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 54% 7 4 2 13 56% 40% 4 1 5 10 64% 91% 10 1 11
Bonham 33% 2 3 1 6 15% 15% 2 6 5 13 47% 63% 10 3 3 16 62% 76% 16 3 2 21
Bowie 40% 4 5 1 10 56% 44% 4 3 2 9 63% 29% 2 4 1 7 79% 86% 12 2 14
Crockett 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 57% 8 3 3 14 45% 50% 10 4 6 20 69% 0% 1 1
Dishman 0 80% 80% 4 1 5 71% 57% 4 3 7 89% 89% 8 1 9
Houston 29% 2 2 3 7 50% 30% 3 5 2 10 43% 43% 6 2 6 14 70% 70% 7 3 10
Jefferson 0 46% 62% 8 1 4 13 29% 47% 8 6 3 17 72% 78% 14 4 18
Lamar 59% 13 6 3 22 45% 40% 8 3 9 20 26% 36% 13 8 15 36 67% 83% 15 3 18
Long 50% 4 4 8 63% 63% 5 2 1 8 44% 44% 4 3 2 9 100% 92% 11 1 12
Means 0% 1 1 36% 27% 3 3 5 11 42% 52% 16 9 6 31 91% 78% 25 7 32
Milam INC 0 52% 57% 12 4 5 21 59% 37% 7 5 7 19 50% 71% 12 3 2 17
Rodriguez 20% 2 3 5 10 46% 38% 5 6 6 17 47% 47% 7 3 5 15 61% 56% 10 7 1 18
Stuart 64% 7 3 1 11 42% 42% 5 3 4 12 53% 82% 14 3 17 90% 95% 20 1 21
Travis 100% 1 1 62% 42% 5 3 4 12 13% 13% 2 4 10 16 71% 71% 12 5 17
Treasure Hills 50% 1 1 2 62% 67% 8 2 2 12 13% 19% 3 4 9 16 60% 70% 7 2 1 10
Wilson 100% 1 1 50% 54% 7 1 5 13 67% 58% 7 2 3 12 91% 91% 10 1 11
Zavala 67% 4 1 1 6 67% 58% 7 5 12 57% 43% 3 3 1 7 63% 71% 12 2 3 17
AVG 51% 101 51% 49% 215 46% 45% 269 73% 75% 257
Tested Tested Tested
Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 88% 100% 6 6 50% 43% 3 3 1 7 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y)
Bonham 78% 75% 6 2 8 42% 42% 5 6 1 12 43% 50% 3 2 1 6 Tier 1 % By Grade Lvl&Campus
Bowie 94% 82% 14 3 17 69% 63% 10 5 1 16 63% 63% 5 2 1 8 Source: Istation
Crockett 78% 87% 20 2 1 23 58% 44% 11 7 7 25 64% 56% 5 3 1 9 Data pulled: 10/16/17
Dishman 92% 85% 11 2 13 60% 40% 2 2 1 5 33% 58% 7 2 3 12 For Internal Use Only
Houston 100% 88% 7 1 8 57% 71% 10 3 1 14 29% 29% 2 4 1 7
Jefferson 87% 87% 13 2 15 83% 70% 7 3 10 55% 55% 11 7 2 20
Lamar 86% 79% 33 2 7 42 41% 39% 14 14 8 36 46% 48% 14 6 9 29
Long 70% 60% 6 4 10 40% 60% 3 2 5 29% 33% 2 1 3 6
Means 70% 79% 19 2 3 24 78% 63% 12 6 1 19 53% 67% 10 1 4 15
Milam 59% 65% 11 2 4 17 67% 86% 12 2 14 71% 59% 10 4 3 17
Rodriguez 70% 82% 23 5 28 39% 39% 9 11 3 23 26% 30% 6 4 10 20
Stuart 100% 70% 7 3 10 85% 69% 9 3 1 13 38% 63% 5 1 2 8
Travis 69% 81% 13 3 16 82% 73% 8 3 11 25% 13% 1 4 3 8
Treasure Hills 92% 83% 10 2 12 30% 30% 3 3 4 10 25% 38% 3 3 2 8
Wilson 81% 55% 6 2 3 11 64% 79% 11 3 14 67% 67% 6 3 9
Zavala 78% 87% 20 3 23 78% 56% 5 4 9 29% 43% 3 2 2 7
AVG 82% 79% 283 60% 57% 243 42% 47% 193
Istation Math October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
PK Student % by Tier KG Student % by Tier 1ST Student % by Tier 2ND Student % by Tier
Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
3RD Student % by Tier 4TH Student % by Tier 5TH

More Related Content

Similar to Istation Report - 2 October

日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演youthcommissionjapan
 
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog Isaacklilop
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932tuan_azuan
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932tuan_azuan
 
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdfEstimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdfkarimshaikh24
 
Ejercicios con referencias, filtros
Ejercicios con referencias, filtrosEjercicios con referencias, filtros
Ejercicios con referencias, filtrosDAYCIQUISHPE
 
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveAnalytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveCasey Iannone
 
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdfQuinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdfAnderson Bladimir
 
Konversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_eptKonversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_eptqwlasting
 
Vote PS sections Haute-Garonne
Vote PS sections Haute-GaronneVote PS sections Haute-Garonne
Vote PS sections Haute-Garonnelaurent dubois
 
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdf
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdfhealthcare healthcare statistics.pdf
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdfsdfghj21
 
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%diariodocentrodomundo
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)20slab(대학내일20대연구소)
 
Math final
Math finalMath final
Math finalJy Chong
 
Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Jy Chong
 
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557ยุทธกิจ สัตยาวุธ
 

Similar to Istation Report - 2 October (20)

日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
日本若者協議会_代表理事室橋_講演
 
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
Daniel coloma (2) (1) blog
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
 
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
Tuan mohd azuan bin tuan yusoff a139932
 
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdfEstimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
Estimated Annual Life Insurance Premium Rates per $1-000 of Face Value.pdf
 
Ejercicios con referencias, filtros
Ejercicios con referencias, filtrosEjercicios con referencias, filtros
Ejercicios con referencias, filtros
 
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to PredictiveAnalytics: From Reflective to Predictive
Analytics: From Reflective to Predictive
 
Sample Summaries 3-6-16
Sample Summaries 3-6-16Sample Summaries 3-6-16
Sample Summaries 3-6-16
 
Dr. azad hama sharif
Dr. azad hama sharifDr. azad hama sharif
Dr. azad hama sharif
 
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdfQuinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
Quinche a. referencias y filtros pdf
 
Konversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_eptKonversi toefl ac_ept
Konversi toefl ac_ept
 
Vote PS sections Haute-Garonne
Vote PS sections Haute-GaronneVote PS sections Haute-Garonne
Vote PS sections Haute-Garonne
 
Basis file
Basis fileBasis file
Basis file
 
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdf
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdfhealthcare healthcare statistics.pdf
healthcare healthcare statistics.pdf
 
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%
Pesquisa XP/Ipespe que mostra Bolsonaro com 28% e Haddad com 21%
 
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
[대학내일20대연구소] 2017 20대 전시회/페스티벌 문화 향유 실태 및 트렌드 조사 (연구리포트 2017-12)
 
Math final
Math finalMath final
Math final
 
Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)Math final project (fnbe0814)
Math final project (fnbe0814)
 
Calendarios 2021
Calendarios 2021Calendarios 2021
Calendarios 2021
 
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
รายงานระดับบุคคล 1085460018-โรงเรียนอนุบาลระนอง ป.3/2557
 

More from albertrodriguez5150 (20)

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Why garden
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
 
Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
 
Iu 5 final
Iu 5 finalIu 5 final
Iu 5 final
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5
 
Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5
 
Strengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie modelStrengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie model
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsettingTac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsetting
 
How the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earthHow the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earth
 
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menuJefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
 

Recently uploaded

Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Mark Reed
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.arsicmarija21
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayMakMakNepo
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptx
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptxPlanning a health career 4th Quarter.pptx
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptxLigayaBacuel1
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationAadityaSharma884161
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
Influencing policy (training slides from Fast Track Impact)
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
 
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
AmericanHighSchoolsprezentacijaoskolama.
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptx
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptxPlanning a health career 4th Quarter.pptx
Planning a health career 4th Quarter.pptx
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint PresentationROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS PowerPoint Presentation
 

Istation Report - 2 October

  • 1. Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 77% 27 6 2 35 54% 64% 34 12 7 53 41% 54% 29 18 7 54 63% 57% 33 14 11 58 Bonham 62% 43 16 10 69 63% 77% 67 13 7 87 55% 49% 47 31 17 95 61% 65% 74 16 24 114 Bowie 52% 16 9 6 31 38% 56% 19 8 7 34 33% 46% 19 15 7 41 67% 72% 41 12 4 57 Crockett 53% 9 8 17 81% 69% 18 5 3 26 49% 48% 26 18 10 54 45% 56% 31 7 17 55 Dishman 62% 23 7 7 37 53% 71% 30 7 5 42 65% 81% 39 8 1 48 66% 72% 41 8 8 57 Houston 43% 15 12 8 35 40% 48% 30 13 19 62 46% 47% 35 22 17 74 56% 49% 28 12 17 57 Jefferson 43% 15 6 14 35 47% 58% 18 6 7 31 51% 54% 28 13 11 52 70% 68% 32 10 5 47 Lamar 30% 12 11 17 40 48% 68% 41 11 8 60 39% 42% 26 24 12 62 48% 55% 34 15 13 62 Long 65% 41 14 8 63 60% 67% 56 15 13 84 56% 55% 46 26 11 83 56% 56% 59 24 22 105 Means 57% 24 8 10 42 53% 68% 40 14 5 59 64% 65% 49 16 10 75 74% 69% 50 12 10 72 Milam N/T 0 36% 49% 23 13 11 47 35% 50% 22 14 8 44 53% 57% 28 8 13 49 Rodriguez 65% 35 10 9 54 51% 71% 61 10 15 86 40% 57% 64 27 21 112 54% 48% 46 23 27 96 Stuart 60% 39 14 12 65 63% 71% 65 15 11 91 65% 67% 71 23 12 106 71% 79% 93 11 13 117 Travis 38% 11 9 9 29 49% 66% 25 9 4 38 38% 48% 16 10 7 33 55% 55% 30 14 11 55 Treasure Hills 51% 44 17 26 87 53% 63% 64 28 10 102 62% 64% 90 27 23 140 74% 72% 100 25 13 138 Wilson 52% 17 10 6 33 65% 65% 35 14 5 54 58% 69% 41 13 5 59 76% 68% 48 15 8 71 Zavala 44% 14 12 6 32 52% 57% 31 12 11 54 45% 50% 28 16 12 56 54% 53% 27 10 14 51 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 65% 36 11 8 55 51% 53% 27 14 10 51 56% 69% 31 6 8 45 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 62% 69 25 17 111 59% 60% 67 19 25 111 65% 72% 68 12 15 95 Tier 1 % By GRD LVL&Campus Bowie 65% 79% 41 7 4 52 69% 64% 32 9 9 50 64% 69% 37 13 4 54 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 63% 40 14 9 63 42% 46% 33 17 22 72 63% 67% 34 9 8 51 Data pulled: 10/13/17 Dishman 63% 65% 31 10 7 48 60% 51% 23 7 15 45 49% N/T 2 2 For Internal Use Only Houston 57% 54% 38 16 16 70 52% 48% 31 20 14 65 79% 69% 37 10 7 54 Jefferson 75% 73% 27 8 2 37 69% 67% 22 8 3 33 78% 73% 41 9 6 56 Lamar 41% 40% 38 26 31 95 41% 47% 54 24 37 115 55% 54% 52 25 20 97 Long 59% 63% 58 15 19 92 70% 70% 70 15 15 100 64% 72% 79 18 12 109 Means 64% 68% 64 21 9 94 68% 74% 66 10 13 89 73% 67% 55 17 10 82 Milam 50% 53% 36 14 18 68 57% 48% 27 15 14 56 66% 66% 42 13 9 64 Rodriguez 56% 59% 61 17 25 103 50% 54% 68 29 29 126 65% 70% 73 18 14 105 Stuart 76% 78% 97 19 8 124 75% 77% 101 17 13 131 79% 79% 85 13 10 108 Travis 44% 60% 30 11 9 50 74% 79% 37 5 5 47 64% 69% 38 5 12 55 Treasure Hills 72% 78% 102 22 6 130 70% 73% 97 22 13 132 65% 62% 79 32 17 128 Wilson 60% 65% 46 16 9 71 53% 62% 58 19 17 94 75% 66% 47 14 10 71 Zavala 65% 71% 45 12 6 63 63% 72% 36 8 6 50 72% 69% 36 9 7 52 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 5TH4TH3RD PK KG 1ST 2ND
  • 2. Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 1 1 25% 42% 5 4 3 12 22% 50% 2 2 4 36% 36% 4 4 3 11 Bonham 0 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 1 2 3 26% 24% 5 3 13 21 Bowie 50% 4 2 2 8 29% 60% 3 1 1 5 25% 43% 3 4 7 43% 57% 8 4 2 14 Crockett 0 100% 100% 2 2 25% 25% 9 9 6 24 44% 61% 11 2 5 18 Dishman 0 100% 100% 4 4 57% 86% 6 1 7 56% 67% 6 2 1 9 Houston 0% 1 1 43% 0% 1 1 45% 100% 2 2 22% 50% 4 2 2 8 Jefferson 0% 2 2 50% 60% 3 1 1 5 13% 6% 1 6 10 17 78% 72% 13 4 1 18 Lamar 0% 1 2 3 100% 60% 3 1 1 5 18% 60% 3 2 5 30% 60% 3 2 5 Long 50% 1 1 2 25% 50% 2 1 1 4 22% 44% 4 3 2 9 50% 50% 6 1 5 12 Means 0 0 100% 100% 3 3 100% 75% 3 1 4 Milam N/T 0 31% 0% 2 1 3 21% 20% 2 2 6 10 39% 28% 5 5 8 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 100% 1 1 43% 580% 3 1 2 6 29% 33% 6 2 10 18 Stuart 18% 2 5 4 11 36% 42% 5 2 5 12 65% 53% 9 5 3 17 67% 76% 16 1 4 21 Travis 0% 1 1 25% 0 6% 0% 1 1 62% 53% 8 3 4 15 Treasure Hills 25% 1 1 2 4 44% 44% 4 2 3 9 23% 31% 4 4 5 13 67% 22% 2 5 2 9 Wilson 0 100% 75% 3 1 4 33% 50% 1 1 2 100% 80% 4 1 5 Zavala 0 50% 55% 6 3 2 11 29% 57% 4 2 1 7 56% 56% 10 4 4 18 AVG 27% 33 47% 53% 79 35% 77% 137 53% 53% 224 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 56% 5 2 2 9 17% 57% 4 3 7 25% 33% 1 2 3 Students with LEP Indicator (Y) Bonham 44% 25% 2 3 3 8 30% 27% 3 1 7 11 20% 33% 2 4 6 Tier 1 % By Grade Lvl&Campus Bowie 59% 76% 13 3 1 17 56% 50% 8 4 4 16 56% 63% 5 1 2 8 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 65% 15 4 4 23 47% 42% 13 10 8 31 69% 33% 3 2 4 9 Data pulled: 10/13/17 Dishman 50% 75% 9 2 1 12 40% 60% 3 2 5 38% 0% 1 1 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 33% 4 3 5 12 57% 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 73% 11 3 1 15 67% 45% 5 4 2 11 67% 55% 11 6 3 20 Lamar 39% 36% 15 11 16 42 36% 39% 13 8 12 33 44% 43% 12 10 6 28 Long 50% 50% 5 5 10 40% 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 14% 1 4 2 7 Means 36% 39% 9 10 4 23 58% 47% 9 5 5 19 71% 57% 8 2 4 14 Milam 47% 41% 7 3 7 17 61% 36% 5 5 4 14 33% 31% 5 6 5 16 Rodriguez 36% 58% 14 5 5 24 41% 52% 11 4 6 21 33% 33% 6 6 6 18 Stuart 60% 40% 4 4 2 10 25% 46% 6 2 5 13 88% 50% 4 3 1 8 Travis 40% 53% 8 4 3 15 75% 82% 9 1 1 11 13% 25% 2 2 4 8 Treasure Hills 58% 67% 6 3 9 63% 67% 4 1 1 6 43% 43% 3 1 3 7 Wilson 56% 50% 7 5 2 14 50% 67% 8 4 12 83% 56% 5 3 1 9 Zavala 57% 52% 12 8 3 23 47% 29% 2 2 3 7 67% 43% 3 2 2 7 AVG 51% 52% 279 47% 48% 234 47% 39% 176 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Istation Reading October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier 5TH4TH3RD 2ND1STKGPK
  • 3. Tested Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 4 4 56% 44% 4 2 3 9 25% 0% 1 5 6 100% 100% 1 1 0 Bonham 33% 2 2 2 6 67% 33% 4 2 6 12 73% 62% 8 2 3 13 0 0 Bowie 73% 8 1 2 11 50% 29% 2 1 4 7 0% 0% 1 1 0% 4 4 50% 0 Crockett 83% 10 2 12 67% 67% 8 3 1 12 0 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 17% 1 1 4 6 17% 1 5 6 0 100% 100% 1 1 Houston 63% 5 3 8 67% 44% 4 2 3 9 73% 67% 8 1 3 12 11% 1 3 5 9 75% 31% 4 9 13 Jefferson 40% 2 3 5 55% 82% 9 1 1 11 57% 43% 6 4 4 14 0 0 Lamar 60% 15 2 8 25 37% 53% 8 3 4 15 58% 58% 18 3 10 31 73% 69% 9 3 1 13 36% 44% 15 6 13 34 Long 38% 3 2 3 8 ~~ 25% 2 2 4 8 ~~ 20% 1 4 5 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 38% 5 1 7 13 36% 43% 6 4 4 14 72% 72% 21 6 2 29 73% 52% 16 11 4 31 50% 0% 1 1 2 Milam 0 29% 48% 10 6 5 21 39% 42% 11 6 9 26 30% 30% 8 7 12 27 26% 28% 10 9 17 36 Rodriguez 67% 8 1 3 12 38% 69% 9 1 3 13 33% 36% 5 2 7 14 0 33% 33% 1 1 1 3 Stuart 55% 6 1 4 11 36% 36% 4 3 4 11 44% 7 4 5 16 0 0% 100% 1 1 Travis 57% 4 3 7 38% 29% 4 5 5 14 50% 31% 5 4 7 16 33% 33% 1 2 3 0% 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 67% 4 1 1 6 40% 50% 2 1 1 4 33% 0% 3 3 0% 0% 1 1 33% 33% 1 2 3 Wilson 44% 4 2 3 9 54% 57% 8 2 4 14 80% 50% 5 3 2 10 100% 6 6 80% 75% 3 1 4 Zavala 40% 4 3 3 10 8% 55% 6 2 3 11 0 67% 100% 3 3 0 AVG 57% 147 42% 46% 191 49% 36% 202 54% 50% 98 44% 44% 98 All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 10/13/17 ~~ No students assessed in Español For Internal Use Only Istation Reading Español OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by TierPK KG 1ST 2ND 3RD
  • 4. Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 100% 1 1 25% 50% 1 1 2 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 0% 2 6 8 Bonham 50% 1 1 2 100% 50% 1 1 2 0 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 Bowie 0 0 0% 0% 1 1 100% 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 0% 0% 1 4 5 Dishman 50% 1 1 2 50% 50% 1 1 2 100% 100% 1 1 33% 20% 1 4 5 Houston 0 0% 0% 1 1 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 0% 0% 3 3 Jefferson 20% 1 1 3 5 0% 2 2 0% 50% 1 1 2 40% 40% 2 3 5 Lamar 0% 2 2 0 25% 0% 1 5 6 0% 0% 2 5 7 Long 0 33% 25% 1 3 4 17% 33% 2 1 3 6 17% 15% 2 2 9 13 Means 0 0 0% 0% 3 3 67% 67% 4 2 6 Milam 0 0% 0% 2 2 0% 0% 2 2 50% 50% 1 1 2 Rodriguez 0% 1 1 33% 25% 1 3 4 17% 14% 1 1 5 7 25% 0% 1 6 7 Stuart 0% 2 2 67% 67% 2 1 3 20% 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 100% 1 1 Travis 0 0% 50% 1 1 2 0% 0% 1 1 50% 0% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0% 1 1 80% 50% 3 2 1 6 33% 20% 1 4 5 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 Wilson 0 100% 100% 1 1 0% 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 Zavala 33% 1 2 3 40% 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 20% 1 1 3 5 67% 67% 2 1 3 AVG 28% 19 41% 36% 37 16% 19% 54 39% 31% 82 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 20% 1 1 3 5 0% 29% 2 2 3 7 13% 33% 2 4 6 All Students w/SPED Indicator(Y) Bonham 20% 0% 2 5 7 17% 13% 1 7 8 14% 29% 2 5 7 Tier 1 % By Grd Lvl & Campus Bowie 0% 0% 1 3 4 0% 20% 1 4 5 0% 0% 2 2 4 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 17% 2 3 7 12 0% 0% 8 8 13% 10% 1 2 7 10 Data pulled: 10/13/17 Dishman 0% 33% 1 1 1 3 0% 0% 6 6 25% 0% 1 1 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 0% 1 6 7 11% 0% 4 3 7 50% 30% 3 2 5 10 Jefferson 33% 0% 2 1 3 0 0% 0% 1 1 2 Lamar 0% 0% 8 8 0% 0% 9 9 0% 0% 1 7 8 Long 7% 21% 3 1 10 14 0% 0% 2 9 11 6% 0% 7 10 17 Means 0% 0% 1 3 4 50% 33% 1 1 1 3 25% 14% 1 2 4 7 Milam 17% 0% 3 4 7 0% 0% 6 6 14% 14% 1 2 4 7 Rodriguez 25% 22% 2 7 9 25% 18% 2 1 8 11 7% 7% 1 8 6 15 Stuart 100% 100% 1 1 33% 33% 2 1 3 6 0% 50% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 25% 1 3 4 25% 0% 2 2 4 11% 11% 1 2 6 9 Treasure Hills 33% 40% 2 2 1 5 17% 13% 1 2 5 8 25% 0% 4 4 Wilson 9% 20% 2 5 3 10 10% 10% 1 4 5 10 36% 27% 3 3 5 11 Zavala 33% 33% 1 2 3 33% 33% 2 4 6 13% 25% 2 1 5 8 AVG 22% 19% 106 14% 13% 115 15% 15% 128 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading OCTOBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 3RD 4TH 5TH 2ND1STKGPK
  • 5. Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 45% 17 14 7 38 46% 71% 39 10 6 55 47% 44% 26 14 19 59 75% 80% 47 9 3 59 Bonham 60% 38 14 11 63 57% 60% 58 25 13 96 51% 57% 61 19 27 107 82% 82% 94 17 3 114 Bowie 42% 13 11 7 31 44% 33% 14 14 15 43 INC 57% 23 9 8 40 88% 86% 49 6 2 57 Crockett N/T 0 54% 53% 20 10 8 38 53% 52% 28 11 15 54 71% INC 2 2 1 5 Dishman INC 13 3 4 20 80% 81% 34 4 4 42 63% 79% 38 7 3 48 75% 87% 48 7 55 Houston 60% 24 6 10 40 49% 42% 30 19 22 71 47% 60% 52 15 19 86 71% 75% 44 12 3 59 Jefferson INC 2 1 3 58% 49% 19 7 13 39 47% 58% 30 16 6 52 72% 85% 40 6 1 47 Lamar 52% 31 16 13 60 50% 56% 42 13 20 75 36% 41% 38 23 32 93 65% 70% 53 19 4 76 Long 75% 47 6 10 63 69% 63% 55 18 15 88 54% 53% 44 23 16 83 82% 83% 85 13 5 103 Means 84% 16 1 2 19 56% 54% 38 14 18 70 48% 55% 57 23 24 104 86% 80% 80 18 2 100 Milam N/T 0 60% 55% 35 15 14 64 60% 62% 33 9 11 53 69% 83% 39 5 3 47 Rodriguez 61% 40 11 15 66 51% 57% 55 15 27 97 46% 49% 61 32 32 125 70% 68% 65 22 9 96 Stuart 77% 33 8 2 43 73% 76% 68 12 10 90 67% 78% 83 10 13 106 89% 94% 110 7 117 Travis INC 6 1 1 8 63% 52% 26 12 12 50 33% 35% 17 13 19 49 68% 81% 46 11 57 Treasure Hills 59% 44 19 11 74 69% 66% 69 17 18 104 59% 64% 89 23 28 140 84% 88% 123 12 4 139 Wilson N/T 0 67% 67% 43 9 12 64 65% 62% 43 16 10 69 93% 91% 68 7 75 Zavala N/T 0 66% 56% 31 10 14 55 35% 55% 31 10 15 56 60% 69% 35 13 3 51 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 88% 85% 28 4 1 33 72% 53% 25 17 5 47 39% 42% 20 14 14 48 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 90% 88% 99 8 5 112 71% 71% 79 23 10 112 46% 57% 55 17 24 96 Tier 1 Percentages By GR Level Bowie 90% 87% 45 5 2 52 73% 69% 34 11 4 49 75% 78% 42 5 7 54 Source: Istation Crockett 79% 84% 53 5 5 63 49% 50% 30 11 19 60 41% 50% 26 10 16 52 Data pulled: 10/13/17 Dishman 89% 85% 41 5 2 48 67% 63% 27 8 8 43 53% 65% 33 9 9 51 *PREK's 1st assessment in October Houston INC 79% 55 9 6 70 71% 72% 48 13 6 67 48% 57% 31 14 9 54 For Internal Use Only Jefferson 83% 84% 31 6 37 86% 85% 28 5 33 69% 63% 36 14 7 57 Lamar 75% 71% 68 9 19 96 50% 50% 59 35 23 117 49% 55% 53 21 23 97 Long 85% 87% 79 5 7 91 79% 75% 76 15 10 101 54% 73% 79 9 20 108 Means 82% 84% 77 6 9 92 89% 82% 75 13 4 92 63% 63% 52 15 15 82 Milam 76% 74% 50 8 10 68 68% 66% 37 9 10 56 56% 68% 43 10 10 63 Rodriguez 85% 85% 89 3 13 105 60% 63% 80 29 17 126 55% 60% 62 25 16 103 Stuart 96% 94% 116 5 3 124 84% 86% 113 15 3 131 66% 72% 76 14 16 106 Travis 74% 82% 41 6 3 50 81% 76% 34 8 3 45 44% 51% 28 12 15 55 Treasure Hills 91% 93% 128 5 4 137 65% 67% 95 28 18 141 46% 49% 66 35 33 134 Wilson 82% 69% 41 13 5 59 72% 74% 68 13 11 92 58% 61% 28 6 12 46 Zavala 87% 90% 57 2 4 63 77% 77% 40 10 2 52 52% 58% 30 12 10 52 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Math October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier2ND1STKGPK 3RD 4TH 5TH 1stAssessmentinOctober
  • 6. Tested Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 54% 7 4 2 13 56% 40% 4 1 5 10 64% 91% 10 1 11 Bonham 33% 2 3 1 6 15% 15% 2 6 5 13 47% 63% 10 3 3 16 62% 76% 16 3 2 21 Bowie 40% 4 5 1 10 56% 44% 4 3 2 9 63% 29% 2 4 1 7 79% 86% 12 2 14 Crockett 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 57% 8 3 3 14 45% 50% 10 4 6 20 69% 0% 1 1 Dishman 0 80% 80% 4 1 5 71% 57% 4 3 7 89% 89% 8 1 9 Houston 29% 2 2 3 7 50% 30% 3 5 2 10 43% 43% 6 2 6 14 70% 70% 7 3 10 Jefferson 0 46% 62% 8 1 4 13 29% 47% 8 6 3 17 72% 78% 14 4 18 Lamar 59% 13 6 3 22 45% 40% 8 3 9 20 26% 36% 13 8 15 36 67% 83% 15 3 18 Long 50% 4 4 8 63% 63% 5 2 1 8 44% 44% 4 3 2 9 100% 92% 11 1 12 Means 0% 1 1 36% 27% 3 3 5 11 42% 52% 16 9 6 31 91% 78% 25 7 32 Milam INC 0 52% 57% 12 4 5 21 59% 37% 7 5 7 19 50% 71% 12 3 2 17 Rodriguez 20% 2 3 5 10 46% 38% 5 6 6 17 47% 47% 7 3 5 15 61% 56% 10 7 1 18 Stuart 64% 7 3 1 11 42% 42% 5 3 4 12 53% 82% 14 3 17 90% 95% 20 1 21 Travis 100% 1 1 62% 42% 5 3 4 12 13% 13% 2 4 10 16 71% 71% 12 5 17 Treasure Hills 50% 1 1 2 62% 67% 8 2 2 12 13% 19% 3 4 9 16 60% 70% 7 2 1 10 Wilson 100% 1 1 50% 54% 7 1 5 13 67% 58% 7 2 3 12 91% 91% 10 1 11 Zavala 67% 4 1 1 6 67% 58% 7 5 12 57% 43% 3 3 1 7 63% 71% 12 2 3 17 AVG 51% 101 51% 49% 215 46% 45% 269 73% 75% 257 Tested Tested Tested Campus SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT OCT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 88% 100% 6 6 50% 43% 3 3 1 7 25% 25% 1 1 2 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y) Bonham 78% 75% 6 2 8 42% 42% 5 6 1 12 43% 50% 3 2 1 6 Tier 1 % By Grade Lvl&Campus Bowie 94% 82% 14 3 17 69% 63% 10 5 1 16 63% 63% 5 2 1 8 Source: Istation Crockett 78% 87% 20 2 1 23 58% 44% 11 7 7 25 64% 56% 5 3 1 9 Data pulled: 10/16/17 Dishman 92% 85% 11 2 13 60% 40% 2 2 1 5 33% 58% 7 2 3 12 For Internal Use Only Houston 100% 88% 7 1 8 57% 71% 10 3 1 14 29% 29% 2 4 1 7 Jefferson 87% 87% 13 2 15 83% 70% 7 3 10 55% 55% 11 7 2 20 Lamar 86% 79% 33 2 7 42 41% 39% 14 14 8 36 46% 48% 14 6 9 29 Long 70% 60% 6 4 10 40% 60% 3 2 5 29% 33% 2 1 3 6 Means 70% 79% 19 2 3 24 78% 63% 12 6 1 19 53% 67% 10 1 4 15 Milam 59% 65% 11 2 4 17 67% 86% 12 2 14 71% 59% 10 4 3 17 Rodriguez 70% 82% 23 5 28 39% 39% 9 11 3 23 26% 30% 6 4 10 20 Stuart 100% 70% 7 3 10 85% 69% 9 3 1 13 38% 63% 5 1 2 8 Travis 69% 81% 13 3 16 82% 73% 8 3 11 25% 13% 1 4 3 8 Treasure Hills 92% 83% 10 2 12 30% 30% 3 3 4 10 25% 38% 3 3 2 8 Wilson 81% 55% 6 2 3 11 64% 79% 11 3 14 67% 67% 6 3 9 Zavala 78% 87% 20 3 23 78% 56% 5 4 9 29% 43% 3 2 2 7 AVG 82% 79% 283 60% 57% 243 42% 47% 193 Istation Math October 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP PK Student % by Tier KG Student % by Tier 1ST Student % by Tier 2ND Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober 3RD Student % by Tier 4TH Student % by Tier 5TH