SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59
Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112
Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57
Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55
Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56
Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57
Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47
Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65
Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102
Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72
Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47
Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92
Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119
Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53
Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140
Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70
Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation
Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only
Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50
Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98
Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109
Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82
Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65
Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100
Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108
Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55
Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133
Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71
Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11
Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19
Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14
Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18
Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9
Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9
Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18
Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10
Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10
Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4
Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18
Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17
Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21
Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13
Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5
Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18
0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y)
Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation
Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only
Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7
Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18
Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27
Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6
Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17
Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18
Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18
Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8
Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8
Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7
Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12
Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9
51% 282 47% 255 47% 202
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0
Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0
Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2
Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0
Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1
Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4
Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0
Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33
Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0
Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2
Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35
Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3
Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1
Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1
Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5
Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0
0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90
~~ No students assessed in Español for September
All Students assessed in Español
Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Source: Istation
Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only
* PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8
Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6
Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2
Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5
Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4
Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5
Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7
Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12
Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6
Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2
Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4
Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2
Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2
Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0
Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3
0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y)
Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation
Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only
Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10
Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2
Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8
Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16
Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8
Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7
Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14
Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2
Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9
Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4
Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11
Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8
22% 106 14% 113 15% 131
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober

More Related Content

More from albertrodriguez5150 (20)

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Why garden
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
 
Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
 
Iu 5 final
Iu 5 finalIu 5 final
Iu 5 final
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5
 
Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5
 
Strengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie modelStrengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie model
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsettingTac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsetting
 
How the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earthHow the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earth
 
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menuJefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
 

Recently uploaded

ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxRaymartEstabillo3
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfSpandanaRallapalli
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxEyham Joco
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayMakMakNepo
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxDr.Ibrahim Hassaan
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini  Delhi NCR
9953330565 Low Rate Call Girls In Rohini Delhi NCR
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptxEPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
EPANDING THE CONTENT OF AN OUTLINE using notes.pptx
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
How to Configure Email Server in Odoo 17
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptxTypes of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
Types of Journalistic Writing Grade 8.pptx
 
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up FridayQuarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
Quarter 4 Peace-education.pptx Catch Up Friday
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
 
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
Rapple "Scholarly Communications and the Sustainable Development Goals"
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 

Istation Report - 1 September

  • 1. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59 Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112 Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57 Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55 Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56 Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57 Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47 Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65 Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102 Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72 Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47 Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92 Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119 Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53 Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140 Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70 Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50 Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98 Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109 Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82 Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65 Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100 Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108 Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55 Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133 Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71 Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober
  • 2. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11 Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19 Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14 Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18 Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9 Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9 Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18 Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10 Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10 Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4 Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17 Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21 Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13 Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5 Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18 0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y) Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18 Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27 Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6 Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17 Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18 Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18 Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8 Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8 Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7 Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12 Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9 51% 282 47% 255 47% 202 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 3. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0 Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0 Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2 Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1 Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4 Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0 Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33 Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2 Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35 Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3 Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1 Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5 Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0 0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90 ~~ No students assessed in Español for September All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 4. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8 Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6 Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5 Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4 Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5 Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7 Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12 Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6 Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2 Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4 Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2 Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0 Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3 0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y) Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10 Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2 Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8 Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16 Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8 Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7 Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14 Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9 Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4 Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11 Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8 22% 106 14% 113 15% 131 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober