Tiffany Williams' (TCDD Policy Fellow housed at the Coalition of Texans with Disabilities) presented on the history of inclusion in Texas and where we are now.
2. DEFINITION OF INCLUSION:
• Inclusion is the preferred
method for educating
students with disabilities
alongside their peers
without disabilities with
the necessary aids and
supports
• Inclusion is NOT
Mainstreaming.
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
2
3. WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY?
• Under section 612(a)(b) IDEA “to the
maximum extent appropriate, children with
disabilities, are educated with children who
are not disabled… Removal from the
regular education environment occurs only
when the nature or severity of the
disability is such that education in regular
classes with the use of supplementary
aides and services cannot be achieved
satisfactorily”
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities
2018
3
4. WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH SAY?
• Academic Outcomes of Inclusion:
• Higher grades, achieved higher or comparable scores on
standardized tests, and attended more days of school than
students served in the pullout program. (Rea et. al, 2002)
• Improvement in reading and math scores when compared to
segregated setting. (Cole, Waldron, & Majd, 2004)
• Increased mastery of IEP goals. (Salend and Duhany, 1999).
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
4
5. WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH SAY?
(CONT)
• Affects of inclusion on the social development
• Improved attendance (Rea et. al, 2002)
• Reduction in discipline referrals (Wagner, M., Newman,
L., Cameto, R., Levine, P. and Garza, N. 2006).
• Social competence and communication skills
improve when students with disabilities are
educated in inclusive settings. (McGregor and
Vogelsberg 1998)
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
5
6. KEY STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL
IMPLEMENTATION OF INCLUSION
• Strong Leadership
• A Collaborative Approach
• Professional Development
• Universal Design Learning (UDL)
• Funding
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
6
7. HOW DOES TEXAS MEASURE UP?
• 68% of students with
disabilities are spending 80%
or more of their day in the
general classroom. (USDE, 2017)
• Only 14% of students with
IDD get to experience the
majority of their school day
with their peers. (USDE, 2017)
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
7
8. BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION:
• Texas’ public school finance system
has consistently underfunded public
education (Center for Public Policy
Priorities, 2017).
• The funding weights that are assigned
to special education in Texas, are
placement based, incentivizing self-
contained settings over inclusive ones.
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
8
Center for Public Policy Priorities, 2017
10. POLICY SOLUTIONS
• Adjust Special Education Funding weights Texas has not
updated the special education allotment since 1993.
• Provide professional development for teachers for an
inclusive classroom - Texas teachers are being asked to
teach students with disabilities without the necessary
supports which can negatively impact their efficacy and limit
the benefits of inclusion.
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
10
11. SUMMARY: WHY SUPPORT INCLUSION?
• Federal Law (IDEA) support the inclusion of students
with disabilities in general education settings.
• Over 30 years of research supports the positive impact
of inclusion on students with disabilities and all
students in both behavioral and academic areas.
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
11
12. THE END
Coalition of Texans with Disabilities 2018
12
Email any questions to
Twilliams@txdisabilities.org
Tiffany Williams, Policy Fellow
Financial Support for the CTD Developmental Disabilities Policy Fellowship is provided by the Texas
Council for Developmental Disabilities, with Federal funds* made available by the United States
Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Intellectual and Developmental
Disabilities. *$67,500 (79%) DD funds; $17,947 (21%) non-federal resources
Editor's Notes
The definition of Inclusion has evolved over the years and unfortunately many schools may think they are offering inclusion but are not. Various interpretations of what an inclusive education is can lead to mixed reviews of its effectiveness.
So the definition I am operating off of today is :
The goal of inclusionary schools seek to establish communities of learners by educating all students together in a general education classrooms in their neighborhood schools. Although the inclusive movement has focused on individuals with disabilities, it can be viewed as a philosophy for educating all students
Inclusion is not mainstreaming: Integrating students with disabilities in the general education classroom without the necessary resources is not what I am referring to
So what are schools actually required to do by law as it pertains to the setting type for SWD? If you read IDEA you will not find the term Inclusion, just a near description of it.
So the law states that the full range of supplementary aids and services would need to be considered before a student with disabilities is removed from the gen ed classroom . You will see in my report that I focus on students who spend 80% or more of the day in the gen ed classroom which is based off this language in the IDEA- basically says that students should not be removed from the gen ed classroom unless aids and services in the classroom are not adequate
So why does the law say that this is the best way to educate students with disabilities? Research supports it!
Students served in inclusive classrooms earned : first bullet
Students with IDD who are included: second bullet
Once research established that inclusion lead to improved academic research, studies focused on the social development factors they noticed students had:
There is also research included in my report that shows how students without disabilities also improve from inclusion, and their learning is not hindered or interfered with.
According to the most recent congressional report on the implementation of IDEA Texas is including…
Reiterate why we shoot for 80%
even though these are texas’ numbers- doesn’t mean that 68% is correct implementation
So what is keeping Texas from including more students? My report goes into more detail about how nationally- funding is one of the most common barriers to proper implementation however Texas specifically has made cuts that are hurting the population already and this is at a 68% rate.
First bullet : , causing schools to cut services for the most vulnerable populations, particularly English language learners, low income schools, and students with disabilities.
More specifically to Texas’s special education funding mechanisms the …. Second bullet
When the actual school finance structure in Texas is examined- you will see that funding per student is determined by placement rather than service so there is a weight or multiplier if you will of the basic allotment that is assigned to self contained settings and the mainstream setting. If our school finance system all the resources that were necessary to do inclusion properly, this would be a higher weight than 1.1.
So based on Texas’ low inclusion rates we are proposing some policy solutions for this upcoming session and now as we speak actually as the Commission on School finance is meeting.
Weights have not been updated since 1993, with the passage of sb 7. so the same time inclusion research was starting to currently schools are financially incentive.
Studies have shown that all students benefit from a teacher who is well-trained in best-practices such as differentiated learning and are supported by co-teachers.
In Summary: the Law supports it, and research proves it