🏙️ Cities are at the forefront of AI governance, acting as laboratories of governance innovation. 🤝 Proximity fosters a unique environment for experimentation due to cities' close relationship with citizens. 🌍 Different cities, different insights – a rich tapestry of AI governance approaches is emerging. 🛠 Yet, we now have to start crafting the Normative Framework: What Does “Good” Look Like? This requires us to think about how ESTABLISHING LEGITIMACY & EFFECTIVENESS at the same time? This will require us to evaluate AI localism along 7 lines: 👥 PARTICIPATION: Inclusive decision-making with diverse stakeholders. Example: Citizen Assemblies 🔊 REPRESENTATION: Ensuring diverse voices shape AI policies. Example: Dedicated Committees 🔍 TRANSPARENCY: Clear about AI applications & decision-making processes. Example: AI Registries ⚖️ ACCOUNTABILITY: Stakeholders held responsible for ethical AI governance. Example: New Positions 🌀 AGILITY: Adapting to AI advancements for relevant governance. Example: Regulatory Sandboxes 📚 EVIDENCE-BASED: Rational decision-making through experiments. Example: Collaboration with Research Institutes 💰 COST-EFFECTIVENESS: Adaptive resource allocation. Example: AI Procurement Processes