SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Two Types of Arguments
Session 3
Basics Types of argument; deductive &
inductive
• Deductive Argument:
• In a deductive argument the conclusion follows from the premise(s)
with necessity so that, if all of the premises are true, then the
conclusion cannot be false
All men are mortal
Socrates is a man
Therefore Socrates is mortal
Basics Types of argument; deductive &
inductive
Inductive Argument:
In an Inductive argument the conclusion follows from the premise(s)
with some degree of probability. Thus even if premises are true there
are chances that the conclusion can be false
Most Greeks eat olives.
Socrates is a Greek.
Therefore, Socrates eats olives.
Inductive argument
• The conclusion in inductive argument remains acceptable
unless new evidences or facts come in observation.
• The conclusion that “Therefore, Socrates eats olives” may be
proved to be false if we come to know that Socrates was
allergic to olives.
EVALUATING ARGUMENTS: Differentiating
between good and bad argument
• Deductive arguments are evaluated as valid or invalid and
sound or unsound
• Inductive arguments are evaluated as strong or weak
Valid Deductive argument:
• A valid deductive argument is an argument in which it is
impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises
are true. In these arguments the conclusion follows with strict
necessity from the premises.
• Example:
All vehicles need energy to move
Bicycle is a vehicle
Therefore, bicycle need energy to move
• * If all premises are true then the conclusion must be true
Invalid argument
• An invalid deductive argument is a deductive argument in which it is
possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are
true. In these arguments the conclusion does not follow with strict
necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to.
• Example
• Anyone who lives in the city of Karachi, also lives in Pakistan.
• Suhail lives in Pakistan.
• Therefore, Suhail lives in the city of Karachi
Sound and unsound deductive argument
• If a deductive argument is valid and has all true premises, it is sound.
• Example
All mammals have lungs.
All whales are mammals.
Therefore all whales have lungs.
• If the argument is valid but has false premises, it is unsound.
• Example
All men are rich
All baggers are men
Therefore all baggers are rich
Inductive argument: strong & weak
• Inductive arguments are evaluated as either strong or weak and good
or bad, but never as valid and invalid
• An argument is generally strong if the probability that the conclusion
is true given the premises is greater than 50%.
• Cogent = Strong + All true premises
• Example:
• Almost all Republicans are conservative.
• John McCain is a Republican.
• Therefore, (it is likely that) McCain is conservative.
Can you evaluate the following inductive
argument?
• Every previous U.S. president was a TV debater.
Therefore, probably the next U.S. president will be a TV debater.
Weak? Strong? Cogent? Uncogent?
Thank you

More Related Content

Similar to Session 2 Two Types of Arguments.pptx

critical thinking usms bhit shah
critical thinking usms bhit shahcritical thinking usms bhit shah
critical thinking usms bhit shahAzan Ali
 
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptUnit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptkeshavpahwa3
 
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).ppt
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).pptIntro to Logic (ASP Website).ppt
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).pptManuelCastillo37310
 
Rhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentationRhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentationpvenglishteach
 
Inductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningInductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningAbir Chaaban
 
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptx
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptxW1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptx
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptxPhmTUyn57
 
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.pptmakinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.pptharvey950177
 
Types of Arguments (1).pptx
Types of Arguments (1).pptxTypes of Arguments (1).pptx
Types of Arguments (1).pptxKlodjanaSkendaj
 
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpointsagebennet
 
Lecture 3 Reasoning
Lecture 3 Reasoning Lecture 3 Reasoning
Lecture 3 Reasoning Dam Frank
 
Making inferences and drawing conclusions
Making inferences and drawing conclusionsMaking inferences and drawing conclusions
Making inferences and drawing conclusionsJesullyna Manuel
 
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptxlogical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptxherzeli
 
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...Daniel Hampikian
 
APReasoning.ppt
APReasoning.pptAPReasoning.ppt
APReasoning.pptBQ43
 

Similar to Session 2 Two Types of Arguments.pptx (20)

critical thinking usms bhit shah
critical thinking usms bhit shahcritical thinking usms bhit shah
critical thinking usms bhit shah
 
Chapter 3
Chapter 3Chapter 3
Chapter 3
 
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptUnit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
 
Logical fallacies powerpoint
Logical fallacies powerpointLogical fallacies powerpoint
Logical fallacies powerpoint
 
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).ppt
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).pptIntro to Logic (ASP Website).ppt
Intro to Logic (ASP Website).ppt
 
Rhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentationRhetoric and logic and argumentation
Rhetoric and logic and argumentation
 
Inductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningInductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoning
 
Fallacies
FallaciesFallacies
Fallacies
 
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptx
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptxW1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptx
W1 Introduction to Logical Argumentation.pptx
 
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.pptmakinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
makinginferencesanddrawingconclusions.ppt
 
Types of Arguments (1).pptx
Types of Arguments (1).pptxTypes of Arguments (1).pptx
Types of Arguments (1).pptx
 
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
 
Session 7.pptx
Session 7.pptxSession 7.pptx
Session 7.pptx
 
Lecture 3 Reasoning
Lecture 3 Reasoning Lecture 3 Reasoning
Lecture 3 Reasoning
 
Making inferences and drawing conclusions
Making inferences and drawing conclusionsMaking inferences and drawing conclusions
Making inferences and drawing conclusions
 
Logic guide 1
Logic guide 1Logic guide 1
Logic guide 1
 
Logic ppt
Logic pptLogic ppt
Logic ppt
 
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptxlogical-fallacies3765.pptx
logical-fallacies3765.pptx
 
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...
Daniel Hampikian's Power point on arguments and moral skepticism - danielhamp...
 
APReasoning.ppt
APReasoning.pptAPReasoning.ppt
APReasoning.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDThiyagu K
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfchloefrazer622
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajanpragatimahajan3
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3JemimahLaneBuaron
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 

Session 2 Two Types of Arguments.pptx

  • 1. Two Types of Arguments Session 3
  • 2. Basics Types of argument; deductive & inductive • Deductive Argument: • In a deductive argument the conclusion follows from the premise(s) with necessity so that, if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false All men are mortal Socrates is a man Therefore Socrates is mortal
  • 3. Basics Types of argument; deductive & inductive Inductive Argument: In an Inductive argument the conclusion follows from the premise(s) with some degree of probability. Thus even if premises are true there are chances that the conclusion can be false Most Greeks eat olives. Socrates is a Greek. Therefore, Socrates eats olives.
  • 4. Inductive argument • The conclusion in inductive argument remains acceptable unless new evidences or facts come in observation. • The conclusion that “Therefore, Socrates eats olives” may be proved to be false if we come to know that Socrates was allergic to olives.
  • 5. EVALUATING ARGUMENTS: Differentiating between good and bad argument • Deductive arguments are evaluated as valid or invalid and sound or unsound • Inductive arguments are evaluated as strong or weak
  • 6. Valid Deductive argument: • A valid deductive argument is an argument in which it is impossible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. In these arguments the conclusion follows with strict necessity from the premises. • Example: All vehicles need energy to move Bicycle is a vehicle Therefore, bicycle need energy to move • * If all premises are true then the conclusion must be true
  • 7. Invalid argument • An invalid deductive argument is a deductive argument in which it is possible for the conclusion to be false given that the premises are true. In these arguments the conclusion does not follow with strict necessity from the premises, even though it is claimed to. • Example • Anyone who lives in the city of Karachi, also lives in Pakistan. • Suhail lives in Pakistan. • Therefore, Suhail lives in the city of Karachi
  • 8. Sound and unsound deductive argument • If a deductive argument is valid and has all true premises, it is sound. • Example All mammals have lungs. All whales are mammals. Therefore all whales have lungs. • If the argument is valid but has false premises, it is unsound. • Example All men are rich All baggers are men Therefore all baggers are rich
  • 9. Inductive argument: strong & weak • Inductive arguments are evaluated as either strong or weak and good or bad, but never as valid and invalid • An argument is generally strong if the probability that the conclusion is true given the premises is greater than 50%. • Cogent = Strong + All true premises • Example: • Almost all Republicans are conservative. • John McCain is a Republican. • Therefore, (it is likely that) McCain is conservative.
  • 10. Can you evaluate the following inductive argument? • Every previous U.S. president was a TV debater. Therefore, probably the next U.S. president will be a TV debater. Weak? Strong? Cogent? Uncogent?