As a Collaborative Engineering Effort
By Songlin Chen, Yue Wang, Mitchell M Tseng


                                      Prepared by :
                                  12133 Chirag A. Thakur
                         12137 Dinesh Chand Devapujala
                                    12148 Manoj Sharma
                                    12156 Rheetam Mitra
                                      12166 Pappu Yadav
                                   12182 Sarthak Rohatgi
Abstract
From a collaborative engineering perspective, mass
customization can be viewed as collaborative efforts
between customers and manufacturers, who have
different sets of priorities.
Mass Customization
                               - An Introduction
 It aims to deliver product and services that best meet
  customers’ needs with near mass production efficiency
 The paradigm shift to mass customization is made an
  imperative for many companies to survive in an
  increasingly diversified, fragmented and competitive
  market place
 Currently, the focus of research in mass customization
  is shifting from its strategic viability to operational
  feasibility
                     What?
                                        How?
                     Why?
Mass Customization
                           - An Introduction (cont.)
 Despite its advances in academia and industry, mass
  customization continues to be challenged by critics
 One of the arguments against mass customization is
  that it has limited novelty and restricted applicability
 Engineering Collaboration via Negotiation (ECN)
  paradigm (Lu 2003) promises great potential to tame
  many of the challenges that are currently constraining
  many mass customization programs
Mass Customization Concept
 ‘Future Shock’ by Toffler, 1970 - “future manufacturing
  enabled by information technology would be able to
  provide customized products in a large scale with little or
  no extra cost”
 Pine et al.’s Harvard Business Review article, 1993 – the
  ability to provide individually designed products and
  services to every customer through high process agility,
  flexibility, and integration
 Hart 1995 et al. - Mass customization is a system that uses
  information technology, flexible processes, and
  organizational structures to deliver a wide range of
  products and services that meet specific needs of
  individual customers at a cost near that of mass-produced
  items
Mass Customization vs.
                Mass Production




*Mass Customization as a Collaborative Engineering Effort
Development of Mass
             Customization
 The paradigm shift to mass customization is mainly
 propelled by three forces :

       Market demand - ‘the mass market is dead and
        segmentation has progressed to the era of mass
        customization’ – Kotler(1989)
       Market competition - Product variety is exploding while
        product life cycle is shortening
       Technological revolutions - Flexible manufacturing
        systems allow manufacturers to quickly adapt to changes
        without incurring high penalty in terms of cost and lead
        time
Mass Customization Economics
 Huffman (1998) – “there’s a thin line between mass
  customization and mass confusion”
 Piller et al. (2004) – “with customers integrated into
  the value creation process, companies gain access to
  more accurate information about market demand and
  can postpone some activities” which add to cost pools
 In general, the key issue in mass customization from
  an economic perspective is how to leverage economies
  of integration to compensate potential loss of
  economies of scale
Conflicts in Mass Customization
 Conflicts in name :
    Mass – Aggregation
    Customization – one-of-a-kind
 Conflicts in operability :
  Customers’ demands are diverse and
  irregular which lead to high
  component variety, large numbers of
  suppliers, and high administrative
  complexity
Collaborative Engineering
              As a Tool for Conflict Resolution
 Monplaisir and Salhieh (2002) – “collaborative engineering can
  be viewed as a process in which people working in teams
  according to engineering methodologies and supported by
  technical tools can share resources and knowledge to achieve
  common goals”

 Lu (2003) proposes Engineering Collaboration via Negotiation
  (ECN) as a new paradigm for collaborative engineering. ECN is
  defined as “a socio-technical decision making activity where a
  team of stakeholders with different expertise and mixed motives
  engage in interactive and joint conflict resolutions to co-
  construct consensual agreements of some engineering matter”
Mass Customization
             - In Collaborative Engineering Perspective
 Conceptually, mass customization can be taken as a
 collaborative engineering activity, where customers
 and manufacturers with asymmetric information and
 different preferences engage in interactive and joint
 conflict resolutions to co-create an artefact

 How such collaboration can be carried out effectively
 and efficiently is an ideal research topic for
 collaborative engineering
Mass Customization
                                   - The Generic model*
 Spring et al. (2000) proposed a generic model of
  product customization :




*Adapted from Spring et al. 2002
Mass Customization
                      - The Generic model* (cont.)
 Problem Solving :
   The product customization
   concepts and design schemes
   are determined and agreed
   between customers and
   manufacturers

 Design Specification :
  This stage determines the
  firm’s performance on
  some of the operational
  objectives
Mass Customization
                        - The Generic model* (cont.)
 Transfer :
   Convert design specifications
   into actual products


    A limitation of this 3-stage
   generic model is that
   customer – manufacturer
   interaction is confined to
   the problem solving stage only
Application scenarios
 Scenario I : Co-Innovation

   The manufacturer-centric view holds that innovations result
    from intentional research while the user-centric (or
    customer-centric) view contents that many innovations
    actually come from users
   Problem solving in mass customization is collaborative in
    nature and designated as collaborative innovation (co-
    innovation)*
   Family Architecture (PFA) - As a framework for co-innovation
    PFA allows customers, product engineers, and process
    engineers can work under a unified framework with their
    interdependent relationships explicitly mapped out
    * Songlin Chen, Yue Wang, Mitchell M. Tseng
Application scenarios (contd.)
 Scenario II : Co-Configuration

   The stage where customers and manufacturers come to agree
    upon the specifications of a specific product offering or
    customization type
   In a typical organization setting, co-configuration often
    involves customers and sales engineers (sometimes design
    engineers)
   Besides    product    configuration   systems,    personal
    recommendation systems (Stolze and Strobel 2004) are
    proposed to facilitate customers in product configuration
    enabled by techniques like data mining, recommendation
    system
Application scenarios (contd.)
 Scenario III : Co-Production

   Co-production corresponds to the transfer stage (Spring
    et al. 2000) by including material conversion, material
    transportation, shop floor control, procurement,
    inventory management etc.

   By sharing demand and supply information, supply
    chain partners can better utilize production resources in
    response to volatile market demand
Conclusion
 Mass customization defies the contradiction between
  mass and customization and aims to deliver products
  and services that best meet individual customers’
  needs with near mass production efficiency
 It is important that all parties concerned can engage in
  collaboration with sufficient trust and only then
  collaborative engineering can play a significant role
 The Economist: “Mass Customization a Result of the
  Third Industrial Revolution”
Application of Mass Customization
Application of Mass Customization
Application of Mass Customization
Application of Mass Customization
Application of Mass Customization
References :

     http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/182/1/Brabazon_thesis.pdf
     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_customization
     http://www.build-to-order-consulting.com/mc.htm
     http://mass-customization.info/
     http://www.ft.com/cms/s/dd9634d0-affd-11e1-ad0b-
      00144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2
      F0%2Fdd9634d0-affd-11e1-ad0b-00144feabdc0.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmass-
      customization.info%2Fpost%2F25572611981%2Fthe-financial-times-mentions-personalized-
      production-as#axzz1yQucDfcG
     http://mass-customization.info/post/3466529920/definition-of-the-term-mass-customization
     http://nikeid.nike.com/nikeid/index.jsp?promoID=ONHOME#home
     http://images.google.com/
     http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/
Thank you!

Mass customization

  • 1.
    As a CollaborativeEngineering Effort By Songlin Chen, Yue Wang, Mitchell M Tseng Prepared by : 12133 Chirag A. Thakur 12137 Dinesh Chand Devapujala 12148 Manoj Sharma 12156 Rheetam Mitra 12166 Pappu Yadav 12182 Sarthak Rohatgi
  • 2.
    Abstract From a collaborativeengineering perspective, mass customization can be viewed as collaborative efforts between customers and manufacturers, who have different sets of priorities.
  • 3.
    Mass Customization - An Introduction  It aims to deliver product and services that best meet customers’ needs with near mass production efficiency  The paradigm shift to mass customization is made an imperative for many companies to survive in an increasingly diversified, fragmented and competitive market place  Currently, the focus of research in mass customization is shifting from its strategic viability to operational feasibility What? How? Why?
  • 4.
    Mass Customization - An Introduction (cont.)  Despite its advances in academia and industry, mass customization continues to be challenged by critics  One of the arguments against mass customization is that it has limited novelty and restricted applicability  Engineering Collaboration via Negotiation (ECN) paradigm (Lu 2003) promises great potential to tame many of the challenges that are currently constraining many mass customization programs
  • 5.
    Mass Customization Concept ‘Future Shock’ by Toffler, 1970 - “future manufacturing enabled by information technology would be able to provide customized products in a large scale with little or no extra cost”  Pine et al.’s Harvard Business Review article, 1993 – the ability to provide individually designed products and services to every customer through high process agility, flexibility, and integration  Hart 1995 et al. - Mass customization is a system that uses information technology, flexible processes, and organizational structures to deliver a wide range of products and services that meet specific needs of individual customers at a cost near that of mass-produced items
  • 6.
    Mass Customization vs. Mass Production *Mass Customization as a Collaborative Engineering Effort
  • 7.
    Development of Mass Customization  The paradigm shift to mass customization is mainly propelled by three forces :  Market demand - ‘the mass market is dead and segmentation has progressed to the era of mass customization’ – Kotler(1989)  Market competition - Product variety is exploding while product life cycle is shortening  Technological revolutions - Flexible manufacturing systems allow manufacturers to quickly adapt to changes without incurring high penalty in terms of cost and lead time
  • 8.
    Mass Customization Economics Huffman (1998) – “there’s a thin line between mass customization and mass confusion”  Piller et al. (2004) – “with customers integrated into the value creation process, companies gain access to more accurate information about market demand and can postpone some activities” which add to cost pools  In general, the key issue in mass customization from an economic perspective is how to leverage economies of integration to compensate potential loss of economies of scale
  • 9.
    Conflicts in MassCustomization  Conflicts in name :  Mass – Aggregation  Customization – one-of-a-kind  Conflicts in operability : Customers’ demands are diverse and irregular which lead to high component variety, large numbers of suppliers, and high administrative complexity
  • 10.
    Collaborative Engineering As a Tool for Conflict Resolution  Monplaisir and Salhieh (2002) – “collaborative engineering can be viewed as a process in which people working in teams according to engineering methodologies and supported by technical tools can share resources and knowledge to achieve common goals”  Lu (2003) proposes Engineering Collaboration via Negotiation (ECN) as a new paradigm for collaborative engineering. ECN is defined as “a socio-technical decision making activity where a team of stakeholders with different expertise and mixed motives engage in interactive and joint conflict resolutions to co- construct consensual agreements of some engineering matter”
  • 11.
    Mass Customization - In Collaborative Engineering Perspective  Conceptually, mass customization can be taken as a collaborative engineering activity, where customers and manufacturers with asymmetric information and different preferences engage in interactive and joint conflict resolutions to co-create an artefact  How such collaboration can be carried out effectively and efficiently is an ideal research topic for collaborative engineering
  • 12.
    Mass Customization - The Generic model*  Spring et al. (2000) proposed a generic model of product customization : *Adapted from Spring et al. 2002
  • 13.
    Mass Customization - The Generic model* (cont.)  Problem Solving : The product customization concepts and design schemes are determined and agreed between customers and manufacturers  Design Specification : This stage determines the firm’s performance on some of the operational objectives
  • 14.
    Mass Customization - The Generic model* (cont.)  Transfer : Convert design specifications into actual products  A limitation of this 3-stage generic model is that customer – manufacturer interaction is confined to the problem solving stage only
  • 15.
    Application scenarios  ScenarioI : Co-Innovation  The manufacturer-centric view holds that innovations result from intentional research while the user-centric (or customer-centric) view contents that many innovations actually come from users  Problem solving in mass customization is collaborative in nature and designated as collaborative innovation (co- innovation)*  Family Architecture (PFA) - As a framework for co-innovation PFA allows customers, product engineers, and process engineers can work under a unified framework with their interdependent relationships explicitly mapped out * Songlin Chen, Yue Wang, Mitchell M. Tseng
  • 16.
    Application scenarios (contd.) Scenario II : Co-Configuration  The stage where customers and manufacturers come to agree upon the specifications of a specific product offering or customization type  In a typical organization setting, co-configuration often involves customers and sales engineers (sometimes design engineers)  Besides product configuration systems, personal recommendation systems (Stolze and Strobel 2004) are proposed to facilitate customers in product configuration enabled by techniques like data mining, recommendation system
  • 17.
    Application scenarios (contd.) Scenario III : Co-Production  Co-production corresponds to the transfer stage (Spring et al. 2000) by including material conversion, material transportation, shop floor control, procurement, inventory management etc.  By sharing demand and supply information, supply chain partners can better utilize production resources in response to volatile market demand
  • 18.
    Conclusion  Mass customizationdefies the contradiction between mass and customization and aims to deliver products and services that best meet individual customers’ needs with near mass production efficiency  It is important that all parties concerned can engage in collaboration with sufficient trust and only then collaborative engineering can play a significant role  The Economist: “Mass Customization a Result of the Third Industrial Revolution”
  • 19.
    Application of MassCustomization
  • 20.
    Application of MassCustomization
  • 21.
    Application of MassCustomization
  • 22.
    Application of MassCustomization
  • 23.
    Application of MassCustomization
  • 24.
    References :  http://etheses.nottingham.ac.uk/182/1/Brabazon_thesis.pdf  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_customization  http://www.build-to-order-consulting.com/mc.htm  http://mass-customization.info/  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/dd9634d0-affd-11e1-ad0b- 00144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2 F0%2Fdd9634d0-affd-11e1-ad0b-00144feabdc0.html&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmass- customization.info%2Fpost%2F25572611981%2Fthe-financial-times-mentions-personalized- production-as#axzz1yQucDfcG  http://mass-customization.info/post/3466529920/definition-of-the-term-mass-customization  http://nikeid.nike.com/nikeid/index.jsp?promoID=ONHOME#home  http://images.google.com/  http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/
  • 25.