SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 50
Assessment of
learning 1
Distracter Analysis
1.Distracter
Distracter is term used for the incorrect
option in the multiple choice type of test while the
correct answers represents the key.
Item analysis we can identify non-performing
test items, but this item seldom indicates the error
or the problem in the given item.
Factors why students failed to get the
correct answer in given question:
a. it is not taught in the class properly.
b. it is ambiguous.
c. the correct answer is not the given option.
d. it has more than one correct answer.
e. It contains grammatical clues to mislead the students.
f. The student is not aware of the correct.
g. The students were confused by the logic of the
question because it has double negatives.
h. The students failed to study the lesson.
Distracter Analysis
2.Miskeyed item
The test item is a potential miskey if there are more
students from the upper group who choose the incorrect
options than the key.
3.Guessing item
Student from the upper group have equal spread of
choices among the given alternatives.
Distracter Analysis
Students from the upper group guess their
answers because of the following reasons:
a. The content of the test is not
discussed in the class or in the text.
b. The test item is very difficult.
c. The question is trivial.
Distracter Analysis
4. Ambiguous item
This happen when more students from
the upper group choose equally an
incorrect option and the keyed answer.
Qualitative Item Analysis
Qualitative item analysis(Zurawski, R. M) is a process in which the
teacher or expert carefully proofreads the best test before is
administered, to check if there are typographical errors, to avoid
grammatical clues that may lead to giving away the correct answer,
and to ensure that the level of reading materials is appropriate.
These procedures can also include small group discussion on the
quality of the examination are its item, with examinees that have
already took the test.
Students who took the examination are asked to express verbally
their experience in answering each item in the examination. This
procedure can help the teacher in determining why they
misunderstood a certain item.
Types of Quantitative Item
Analysis
Difficulty index
Discrimination index
Response Option Analysis
Difficulty Index
Level of Difficulty of an Item
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Moderately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Difficulty Index Formula
n
N
F = __ ,where
F = Difficulty index
n = Number of students selecting the item
correctly in upper and lower group.
N= T
otal number of students who answered the test.
D
Discrimination Index
Level of Discrimination
Index Range Discrimination Level
0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated
or need to be revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but
possibly for improvement
0.40 and above Very good item
Discrimination Index
D
D
1 = __
1 = Discrimination index value
UG
Number of students selecting the
= correct answer in the upper group.
CUG CLG ,where
C
CLG = Number of students selecting then correct
answer in the lower group.
= Number of students in either the
lower group or upper group.
IMPROVING TEST
ITEMS
Consider the following examples in analyzing the test and some notes on
how to improve the item based from the result of item analysis.
Example 1. A class is composed of 40 students. Divide the group into two.
Option B is the correct answer
. Based from the given data on the table, as a
teacher, what would you do with the test item?
How to improve the test item
Options A B * C D E
Upper group 3 10 4 0 3
Lower group 4 4 8 0 4
1. Compute the difficulty index.
n = 10+4=14
N = 40
DF
n
F =
N
__ ,where
D
14
F =
40
__ ,where
D
= 0.35 OR 35%
Options A B * C D E
Upper
group
3 10 4 0 3
Lower
group
4 4 8 0 4
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
2. Compute the discrimination index.
D
1 = __
D
D = 20
UG
CUG =10
CLG = 4
C CL_G ,where
Options A B * C D E
Upper
group
3 10 4 0 3
Lower
group
4 4 8 0 4
20
_1_0 4
__6
20
=
=0.30 OR 30%
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
1
= 1
D
3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty,
discrimination and distracters.
a. Only 35% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
b. More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence,
has a positive discrimination.
c. Retain option A, C, and E because most of the students who did not
perform well in the overall examination selected it. Those option
most students from the lower group.
4. Conclusion: Retain the test item but change option D
, make it more
realistic to make it effective for the upper and lower groups. At least 5%
of the examinees choose the incorrect answer.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
Options A B * C D E
Upper
group
3 10 4 0 3
Lower
group
4 4 8 0 4
IT
IndE
exM
Rang
S
e Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
b.More students from the upper group got the
answer correctly, hence, it has a positive
discrimination.
c.Retain option A, C, and E because most of the
students who did not perform well in the overall
examination selected it. Those option attract
most students from the lower group.
4. Conclusion: Retain the test item but change option
D, make it more realistic to make it effective for the
upper and lower groups. At least 5% of the examinees
choose the incorrect answer.
Response option analysis
3. Make an analysis about the level of
difficulty, discrimination and distracters.
a.Only 35% of the examines got the
answer correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
IMPROVING TEST
Example 2. A class is composed of 50 students. Use 27% to get the upper
and the lower groups. Analyze the item given the following results. Option D
is the correct answer. What will you do with the test item?
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A B C D * E
Upper group (27%) 3 1 2 6 2
Lower group (27%) 5 0 4 4 1
1. Compute the difficulty index.
n = 6+4=10
N = 28
D
n
F
N
= __ ,where
D
10
F =
28
__ ,where
D
F = 0.36 OR 36%
Options A B C D * E
Upper
group
(27%)
3 1 2 6 2
Lower
group
(27%)
5 0 4 4 1
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
2. Compute the discrimination index.
0.14 OR 14%
1 =
D
__
D
UG = 6
= 4
UG
C
CLG
C CL_G ,where
4
__6
14
__ 2
14
=
=
Options A B C D * E
Upper
group
(27%)
3 1 2 6 2
Lower
group
(27%)
5 0 4 4 1
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
D1 = 14
D1 =
3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters.
a. Only 36% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
b. More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence, it has
positive discrimination.
c. Modify option B and E because more students from the upper group chose
them compare with the lower group, hence, They are not effective
because most of the students who performed well in the overall
selected them as their answer.
4. Conclusion: Retain A and C because most of the students who did not
perform well in the overall examination selected them as the correct answers.
Hence, option A and C are effective distracters.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
IT
IndE
exM
Rang
S
e Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis b.More students from the upper group got the
answer correctly, hence, it has a positive
discrimination.
Options A B C D * E
Upper
group
(27%)
3 1 2 6 2
Lower
group
(27%)
5 0 4 4 1
c.Modify option B and E because more students
from the upper group chose them compare with
the lower group, hence, They are not effective
distracters because most of the students who
performed well in the overall examination selected
them as their answer.
Conclusion: Retain A and C because most of the students
who did not perform well in the overall examination selected
them as the correct answers. Hence, option A and C are
effective distracters.
3. Make an analysis about the level of
difficulty, discrimination and distracters.
a.Only 36% of the examines got the
answer correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
IMPROVING TEST
Example 3. A class is composed of 50 students. Use 27% to get the upper
and the lower groups. Analyze the item given the following results. Option E
is the correct answer. What will you do with the test item?
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A B C D E *
Upper group (27%) 2 3 2 2 5
Lower group (27%) 2 2 1 1 8
1. Compute the difficulty index.
OR %
n = + =
N =
D
n
F =
N
__ ,where
D
F = __ ,?
D
F =
Options A B C D E *
Upper
group
(27%)
2 3 2 2 5
Lower
group
(27%)
2 2 1 1 8
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
2. Compute the discrimination index.
OR %
1 =
D
__
D
D
UG =
=
UG
C
CLG
C CL_G ,where
__ ,?
=
= __
Options A B C D E *
Upper
group
(27%)
2 3 2 2 5
Lower
group
(27%)
2 2 1 1 8
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
1 =
D1=
3.Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and
distracters.
a. Only __ got the answer correctly, hence, the item is moderately
difficult.
b. More students from the lower group got the answer correctly, therefor, it has
. The discrimination index is -21%.
c. No need to analyze the distracters because the item discriminates
.
d. Modify all the distracters because they are not effective. Most of the students
the upper group chose the incorrect option. The options are effective if most
the students in the lower group chose the incorrect options.
4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it has a index.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
ITEMS
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis
a.Only 46% got the answer
correctly, hence, the item is
moderately difficult.
b.More students from the lower group got the
answer correctly, therefor, it has a negative
discrimination The discrimination index is -21%.
Options A B C D E *
Upper
group
(27%)
2 3 2 2 5
Lower 2
group
(27%)
2 1 1 8
c.No need to analyze the distracters because
the item discriminates negatively.
d.Modify all the distracters
because they are not effective.
Most of the students in the upper
group chose the incorrect option.
The options are effective if most
of the students in the lower
group chose the incorrect
options.
4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it has a negative
discrimination index.
3. Make an analysis about the level
of difficulty, discrimination and
distracters
IMPROVING TEST
Example 4.POTENTIAL MISKEYED ITEM. Make an item
analysis about the table below. What will you do with the
that is potential miskeyed item?
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A * B C D E
Upper group 1 2 3 10 4
Lower group 3 4 4 4 5
1. Compute the difficulty index.
n = 1+3=4
N = 40
D
n
F
N
= __ ,where
D
4
F =
40
__ ,where
D
F = 0.10 OR 10%
Options A * B C D E
Upper
group
1 2 3 10 4
Lower
group
3 4 4 4 5
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
2. Compute the discrimination index.
-0.10 OR -10%
D
1 = __
D UG
CUG =1
CLG = 3
C CL_G ,where
3
20
___
1
_-
_ 2
20
=
=
=
Options A * B C D E
Upper
group
1 2 3 10 4
Lower
group
3 4 4 4 5
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
D
D1
= 20
1
3. Make an analysis:
a. More students from the upper group choose option D that option A,
even though option A is the supposedly the correct answer.
b. Mostly likely the teacher has written the wrong answer key.
c. The teacher checks and finds out that he/she did not miskey the answer
that he/she thought is the correct answer.
d.If the teacher miskeyed it he/she must check and retally the score of the
students’ test papers before giving them back.
e. If option A is really the correct answer, revise to weaken option D,
distracters are not supposed to draw more attention than the keyed
answer.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
correctly,
3. Make an analysis:
f
. Only 10% of the students got the answer to the test item
hence, the test item is very difficult.
g. More students from the lower group got the item correctly,
therefore a negative discrimination resulted. The discrimination
ver
y
index is -10%
h. No need to analyze the distracters because the test item is
difficult and discrimination negatively.
4. Conclusion: reject the item because it is very difficult and a has
negative discrimination index.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
IT
IndE
exM
Rang
S
e Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis a.More students from the upper group
choose option D that option A, even
though option A is the supposedly the
correct answer.
Options A * B C D E
Upper
group
1 2 3 10 4
Lower
group
3 4 4 4 5
b.Mostly likely the teacher has
written the wrong answer key.
c.The teacher checks and finds out that
he/she did not miskey the answer that
he/she thought is the correct answer.
d.If the teacher miskeyed it he/she
must check and retally the score of
the students’ test papers before
giving them back.
g.More students from the lower group
got the item correctly, therefore a
negative discrimination resulted. The
discrimination index is -10%
h.No need to analyze the distracters because the test
item is very difficult and discrimination negatively.
e.If option A is really the correct answer,
revise to weaken option D, distracters are
not supposed to draw more attention than
the keyed answer.
4. Conclusion: reject the item because it is
very difficult and a has negative
discrimination index.
3. Make an analysis: potential miskeyed item
f.Only 10% of the students got the
answer to the test item correctly,
hence, the test item is very difficult.
IMPROVING TEST
Example 5. AMBIGUOUS ITEM. Below is the result of item analysis of
a test with an ambiguous test item. What can you say about the
item? Are you going to retain, revise or reject?
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A B C D E *
Upper group 7 1 1 2 8
Lower group 6 2 3 3 6
1. Compute the difficulty index.
n = 8+6=14
N = 39
D
n
F = __ ,where
D
N1
4
F
39
= __ ,where
D
F = 0.36 OR 36%
Options A B C D E *
Upper
group
7 1 1 2 8
Lower
group
6 2 3 3 6
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
2. Compute the discrimination index.
0.10 OR 10%
D
1 = __
D
D = 20
C = 6
UG
CUG =8
LG
C CL_G ,where
6
20
__8
__2
20
=
Options A B C D E *
Upper
group
7 1 1 2 8
Lower
group
6 2 3 3 6
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
1
=
D1 =
3. Make an analysis:
a. Only 36% of the students got the answer to test item correctly,
hence, the test item is difficult.
b.More students from the upper group got the item correctly, hence,
it discriminates positively. The discrimination index is 10%
c. About equal numbers of top students went for option A and
option E, this implies that they could not tell which is the correct
answer. The students do not know the content of the test, thus, a
reteach is needed.
4. Conclusion: Revise the test item because it is ambiguous.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
ITEMS
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis
Upper
group
7 1 1 2 8
Lower
group
6 2 3 3 6
3. Make an analysis: ambiguous item
a.Only 36% of the students
got the answer to test item
correctly, hence, the test item
is difficult.
b.More students from the upper group got the
item correctly, hence, it discriminates positively. The
discrimination index is 10%
Options A B C D E *
c.About equal numbers of top students went for option
A and option E, this implies that they could not tell
which is the correct answer. The students do not know
the content of the test, thus, a reteach is needed.
4.Conclusion: Revise the test
item because it is
ambiguous.
IMPROVING TEST
Example 6.GUESSING ITEM. Below is the result of item
analysis of a test with students’ answers mostly based on a
guess. Are you going to retain, revise or reject?
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A B C * D E
Upper group 4 3 4 3 6
Lower group 3 4 3 4 5
1. Compute the difficulty index.
n = 4+3=7
N = 39
D
n
F =
N
__ ,where
D
7
39
F = __ ,where
D
F = 0.18 OR 18%
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Options A B C * D E
Upper
group
4 3 4 3 6
Lower
group
3 4 3 4 5
2. Compute the discrimination index.
0.05 OR 5%
D
1 = __
D
C = 3
UG
CUG =4
LG
C CL_G ,where
3
20
__4
__1
20
=
=
=
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Options A B C * D E
Upper
group
4 3 4 3 6
Lower
group
3 4 3 4 5
D1
D1 = 20
3. Make an analysis:
a. Only18% of the students got the answer to the test item correctly.
b. More students from the upper group got the correct answer to the test item;
therefore, the test item is positive discrimination. The discrimination index is 5%.
c. Students responds about equally to all alternatives, an indication that they are
guessing.
Three possibilities why student guesses the answer on a test item:
The content of the test item has not yet been discussed in the class
because the test is designed in advance;
T
est item were badly written that students have no idea what the question
is really all about: and
T
est item were very difficult as shown from the difficulty index and low
discrimination index.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
3. Make an analysis:
d.If the test is well-written but too difficult, reteach
material to the class.
4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it is very
difficult and the discrimination index is very poor, and
option A and B are not effective distracters.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
IT
IndE
exM
Rang
S
e Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis
3. Make an analysis: guessing item
Upper 4
group
3 4 3 6
Lower 3
group
4 3 4 5
a.Only18% of the students got the
answer to the test item correctly.
b.More students from the upper group got the correct
answer to the test item; therefore, the test item is
positive discrimination. The discrimination index is 5%.
Options A B C * D E
c.Students responds about equally to all
alternatives, an indication that they are
guessing.
d.If the test is well-written but too
difficult, reteach the material to
the class.
4. Conclusion: Reject the item
because it is very difficult and the
discrimination index is very poor
, and
option A and B are not effective
distracters.
IMPROVING TEST
Example 7.Reject the item because it is very difficult and the
discrimination index is very poor, and options A and B are
not effective distracters.
ITEM
Ho
S
w to improve the test item
Options A B C * D E
Upper group 5 3 9 0 3
Lower group 6 4 6 0 4
1. Compute the difficulty index.
OR %
n = + =
N =
D
n
F =
N
__ ,where
D
F = __ ,?
D
F =
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Options A B C * D E
Upper
group
5 3 9 0 3
Lower
group
6 4 6 0 4
2. Compute the discrimination index.
OR %
D
1 = __
D UG
CUG =
CLG =
C CL_G ,where
__ ,?
=
= __
=
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Options A B C * D E
Upper
group
5 3 9 0 3
Lower
group
6 4 6 0 4
D1 =
1
D
3.Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and
distracters.
a. Only got the answer correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
b.More students from the upper group answer the test item correctly,
a result, the test got a . The discrimination
index is 15%
c. Option A,B, and E are attractive and effective distracters.
d.Option D is in effective; therefore, changing it with more realistic
one.
4. Conclusion: Revise the item by changing option D.
IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
IMPROVING TEST
ITEMS
Index Range Difficulty Level
0.00-0.20 Very Difficult
0.21-0.40 Difficult
0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode
rately Difficult
0.61- 0.80 Easy
0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
Index Range Discrimination
Level
0.19 and below Poor item,
should be
eliminated or
need to be
revised
0.20-0.29 Marginal item,
needs some
revision
0.30- 0.39 Reasonably
good item but
possibly for
improvement
0.40 and
above
Very good
item
Response option analysis
3. Make an analysis:
a.Only 38% got the answer
correctly, hence, the item is
difficult.
group
Upper 5 3 9 0 3
Lower
group
6 4 6 0 4
b.More students from the upper group answer
the test item correctly, as a result, the test got
a positive discrimination. The discrimination
index is 15%
Options A B C * D E
c.Option A,B, and E are attractive and
effective distracters.
d.Option D is in effective; therefore, changing
it with more realistic one.
4. Conclusion: Revise the item by
changing option D.
The End

More Related Content

Similar to Assesment of Learning 1.pptx

Item and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter AnalysisItem and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter AnalysisSue Quirante
 
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dd
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by ddFdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dd
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dddettmore
 
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptx
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptxTest Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptx
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptxShad847167
 
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02cezz gonzaga
 
Topic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item AnalysisTopic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item AnalysisYee Bee Choo
 
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking StrategiesTest Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking StrategiesSarah Cruz
 
Item analysis in education
Item analysis  in educationItem analysis  in education
Item analysis in educationmunsif123
 
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty IndexItem Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty IndexMr. Ronald Quileste, PhD
 
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.pptTEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.pptJennilynDescargar
 
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)April Gealene Alera
 
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptxSultanRitoAnthony
 
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptxassessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptxAnthony Bacalzo
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationItem analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationKEnkenken Tan
 

Similar to Assesment of Learning 1.pptx (20)

Item and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter AnalysisItem and Distracter Analysis
Item and Distracter Analysis
 
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dd
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by ddFdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dd
Fdu item analysis (1).ppt revised by dd
 
Item analysis2
Item analysis2Item analysis2
Item analysis2
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptx
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptxTest Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptx
Test Items Based on their Discrimination Power.pptx
 
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02
Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02
 
Topic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item AnalysisTopic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item Analysis
 
Item Analysis.pptx
Item Analysis.pptxItem Analysis.pptx
Item Analysis.pptx
 
Item analysis report
Item analysis report Item analysis report
Item analysis report
 
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking StrategiesTest Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
 
Item analysis in education
Item analysis  in educationItem analysis  in education
Item analysis in education
 
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty IndexItem Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
 
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.pptTEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
TEST ITEM ANALYSIS PRESENTATION 2022.ppt
 
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
 
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
430660906-Item-Analysis.pptx
 
ITEM DIFFICULTY.pptx
ITEM DIFFICULTY.pptxITEM DIFFICULTY.pptx
ITEM DIFFICULTY.pptx
 
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptxassessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
assessment and evaluation in math8(finals).pptx
 
Item Analysis and Validation
Item Analysis and ValidationItem Analysis and Validation
Item Analysis and Validation
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationItem analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation
 
item analysics
item analysicsitem analysics
item analysics
 

More from RayLorenzOrtega

Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptx
Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptxEducation Assessment in Learnings 1.pptx
Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptx
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptxChemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptx
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).ppt
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).pptReport in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).ppt
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).pptRayLorenzOrtega
 
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptx
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptxFinal-report-in-educ-4.pptx
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptxEstablishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptx
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptxEstabllishing Reliability-Validity.pptx
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptx
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptxMODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptx
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Validity and Reliabilty.ppt
Validity and Reliabilty.pptValidity and Reliabilty.ppt
Validity and Reliabilty.pptRayLorenzOrtega
 
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptx
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptxAUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptx
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxFOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxRayLorenzOrtega
 
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdf
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdfShrimp grow-out culture.pdf
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdfRayLorenzOrtega
 

More from RayLorenzOrtega (14)

Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptx
Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptxEducation Assessment in Learnings 1.pptx
Education Assessment in Learnings 1.pptx
 
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptx
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptxChemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptx
Chemical-reactions-stoichiometry-unit-objectives-solve.pptx
 
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).ppt
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).pptReport in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).ppt
Report in Physical Science (Stoichiometry).ppt
 
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptx
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptxFinal-report-in-educ-4.pptx
Final-report-in-educ-4.pptx
 
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptxEstablishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
 
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptx
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptxEstabllishing Reliability-Validity.pptx
Establlishing Reliability-Validity.pptx
 
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptx
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptxMODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptx
MODEL-OF-COMMUNICATION.pptx
 
Validity and Reliabilty.ppt
Validity and Reliabilty.pptValidity and Reliabilty.ppt
Validity and Reliabilty.ppt
 
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptx
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptxAUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptx
AUSUBELS-MEANINGFUL-VERBAL-THEORY.pptx
 
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptxFOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
FOOD-SAFETY-ACT-2022-PRESENTATION.pptx
 
13. Migration.ppt
13. Migration.ppt13. Migration.ppt
13. Migration.ppt
 
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdf
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdfShrimp grow-out culture.pdf
Shrimp grow-out culture.pdf
 
Siganids.pdf
Siganids.pdfSiganids.pdf
Siganids.pdf
 
Fish Morphology.pptx
Fish Morphology.pptxFish Morphology.pptx
Fish Morphology.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Sapana Sha
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsKarinaGenton
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersChitralekhaTherkar
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesFatimaKhan178732
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfUmakantAnnand
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application ) Sakshi Ghasle
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its CharacteristicsScience 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
Science 7 - LAND and SEA BREEZE and its Characteristics
 
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri  Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Bikash Puri Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of PowdersMicromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
Micromeritics - Fundamental and Derived Properties of Powders
 
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and ActinidesSeparation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
Separation of Lanthanides/ Lanthanides and Actinides
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 

Assesment of Learning 1.pptx

  • 2. Distracter Analysis 1.Distracter Distracter is term used for the incorrect option in the multiple choice type of test while the correct answers represents the key. Item analysis we can identify non-performing test items, but this item seldom indicates the error or the problem in the given item.
  • 3. Factors why students failed to get the correct answer in given question: a. it is not taught in the class properly. b. it is ambiguous. c. the correct answer is not the given option. d. it has more than one correct answer. e. It contains grammatical clues to mislead the students. f. The student is not aware of the correct. g. The students were confused by the logic of the question because it has double negatives. h. The students failed to study the lesson.
  • 4. Distracter Analysis 2.Miskeyed item The test item is a potential miskey if there are more students from the upper group who choose the incorrect options than the key. 3.Guessing item Student from the upper group have equal spread of choices among the given alternatives.
  • 5. Distracter Analysis Students from the upper group guess their answers because of the following reasons: a. The content of the test is not discussed in the class or in the text. b. The test item is very difficult. c. The question is trivial.
  • 6. Distracter Analysis 4. Ambiguous item This happen when more students from the upper group choose equally an incorrect option and the keyed answer.
  • 7. Qualitative Item Analysis Qualitative item analysis(Zurawski, R. M) is a process in which the teacher or expert carefully proofreads the best test before is administered, to check if there are typographical errors, to avoid grammatical clues that may lead to giving away the correct answer, and to ensure that the level of reading materials is appropriate. These procedures can also include small group discussion on the quality of the examination are its item, with examinees that have already took the test. Students who took the examination are asked to express verbally their experience in answering each item in the examination. This procedure can help the teacher in determining why they misunderstood a certain item.
  • 8. Types of Quantitative Item Analysis Difficulty index Discrimination index Response Option Analysis
  • 9. Difficulty Index Level of Difficulty of an Item Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Moderately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy
  • 10. Difficulty Index Formula n N F = __ ,where F = Difficulty index n = Number of students selecting the item correctly in upper and lower group. N= T otal number of students who answered the test. D
  • 11. Discrimination Index Level of Discrimination Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 12. Discrimination Index D D 1 = __ 1 = Discrimination index value UG Number of students selecting the = correct answer in the upper group. CUG CLG ,where C CLG = Number of students selecting then correct answer in the lower group. = Number of students in either the lower group or upper group.
  • 13. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS Consider the following examples in analyzing the test and some notes on how to improve the item based from the result of item analysis. Example 1. A class is composed of 40 students. Divide the group into two. Option B is the correct answer . Based from the given data on the table, as a teacher, what would you do with the test item? How to improve the test item Options A B * C D E Upper group 3 10 4 0 3 Lower group 4 4 8 0 4
  • 14. 1. Compute the difficulty index. n = 10+4=14 N = 40 DF n F = N __ ,where D 14 F = 40 __ ,where D = 0.35 OR 35% Options A B * C D E Upper group 3 10 4 0 3 Lower group 4 4 8 0 4 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 15. 2. Compute the discrimination index. D 1 = __ D D = 20 UG CUG =10 CLG = 4 C CL_G ,where Options A B * C D E Upper group 3 10 4 0 3 Lower group 4 4 8 0 4 20 _1_0 4 __6 20 = =0.30 OR 30% Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item 1 = 1 D
  • 16. 3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a. Only 35% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult. b. More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence, has a positive discrimination. c. Retain option A, C, and E because most of the students who did not perform well in the overall examination selected it. Those option most students from the lower group. 4. Conclusion: Retain the test item but change option D , make it more realistic to make it effective for the upper and lower groups. At least 5% of the examinees choose the incorrect answer. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 17. IMPROVING TEST Options A B * C D E Upper group 3 10 4 0 3 Lower group 4 4 8 0 4 IT IndE exM Rang S e Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item b.More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence, it has a positive discrimination. c.Retain option A, C, and E because most of the students who did not perform well in the overall examination selected it. Those option attract most students from the lower group. 4. Conclusion: Retain the test item but change option D, make it more realistic to make it effective for the upper and lower groups. At least 5% of the examinees choose the incorrect answer. Response option analysis 3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a.Only 35% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult.
  • 18. IMPROVING TEST Example 2. A class is composed of 50 students. Use 27% to get the upper and the lower groups. Analyze the item given the following results. Option D is the correct answer. What will you do with the test item? ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A B C D * E Upper group (27%) 3 1 2 6 2 Lower group (27%) 5 0 4 4 1
  • 19. 1. Compute the difficulty index. n = 6+4=10 N = 28 D n F N = __ ,where D 10 F = 28 __ ,where D F = 0.36 OR 36% Options A B C D * E Upper group (27%) 3 1 2 6 2 Lower group (27%) 5 0 4 4 1 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 20. 2. Compute the discrimination index. 0.14 OR 14% 1 = D __ D UG = 6 = 4 UG C CLG C CL_G ,where 4 __6 14 __ 2 14 = = Options A B C D * E Upper group (27%) 3 1 2 6 2 Lower group (27%) 5 0 4 4 1 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item D1 = 14 D1 =
  • 21. 3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a. Only 36% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult. b. More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence, it has positive discrimination. c. Modify option B and E because more students from the upper group chose them compare with the lower group, hence, They are not effective because most of the students who performed well in the overall selected them as their answer. 4. Conclusion: Retain A and C because most of the students who did not perform well in the overall examination selected them as the correct answers. Hence, option A and C are effective distracters. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 22. IMPROVING TEST IT IndE exM Rang S e Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis b.More students from the upper group got the answer correctly, hence, it has a positive discrimination. Options A B C D * E Upper group (27%) 3 1 2 6 2 Lower group (27%) 5 0 4 4 1 c.Modify option B and E because more students from the upper group chose them compare with the lower group, hence, They are not effective distracters because most of the students who performed well in the overall examination selected them as their answer. Conclusion: Retain A and C because most of the students who did not perform well in the overall examination selected them as the correct answers. Hence, option A and C are effective distracters. 3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a.Only 36% of the examines got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult.
  • 23. IMPROVING TEST Example 3. A class is composed of 50 students. Use 27% to get the upper and the lower groups. Analyze the item given the following results. Option E is the correct answer. What will you do with the test item? ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A B C D E * Upper group (27%) 2 3 2 2 5 Lower group (27%) 2 2 1 1 8
  • 24. 1. Compute the difficulty index. OR % n = + = N = D n F = N __ ,where D F = __ ,? D F = Options A B C D E * Upper group (27%) 2 3 2 2 5 Lower group (27%) 2 2 1 1 8 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 25. 2. Compute the discrimination index. OR % 1 = D __ D D UG = = UG C CLG C CL_G ,where __ ,? = = __ Options A B C D E * Upper group (27%) 2 3 2 2 5 Lower group (27%) 2 2 1 1 8 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item 1 = D1=
  • 26. 3.Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a. Only __ got the answer correctly, hence, the item is moderately difficult. b. More students from the lower group got the answer correctly, therefor, it has . The discrimination index is -21%. c. No need to analyze the distracters because the item discriminates . d. Modify all the distracters because they are not effective. Most of the students the upper group chose the incorrect option. The options are effective if most the students in the lower group chose the incorrect options. 4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it has a index. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 27. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis a.Only 46% got the answer correctly, hence, the item is moderately difficult. b.More students from the lower group got the answer correctly, therefor, it has a negative discrimination The discrimination index is -21%. Options A B C D E * Upper group (27%) 2 3 2 2 5 Lower 2 group (27%) 2 1 1 8 c.No need to analyze the distracters because the item discriminates negatively. d.Modify all the distracters because they are not effective. Most of the students in the upper group chose the incorrect option. The options are effective if most of the students in the lower group chose the incorrect options. 4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it has a negative discrimination index. 3. Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters
  • 28. IMPROVING TEST Example 4.POTENTIAL MISKEYED ITEM. Make an item analysis about the table below. What will you do with the that is potential miskeyed item? ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A * B C D E Upper group 1 2 3 10 4 Lower group 3 4 4 4 5
  • 29. 1. Compute the difficulty index. n = 1+3=4 N = 40 D n F N = __ ,where D 4 F = 40 __ ,where D F = 0.10 OR 10% Options A * B C D E Upper group 1 2 3 10 4 Lower group 3 4 4 4 5 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 30. 2. Compute the discrimination index. -0.10 OR -10% D 1 = __ D UG CUG =1 CLG = 3 C CL_G ,where 3 20 ___ 1 _- _ 2 20 = = = Options A * B C D E Upper group 1 2 3 10 4 Lower group 3 4 4 4 5 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item D D1 = 20 1
  • 31. 3. Make an analysis: a. More students from the upper group choose option D that option A, even though option A is the supposedly the correct answer. b. Mostly likely the teacher has written the wrong answer key. c. The teacher checks and finds out that he/she did not miskey the answer that he/she thought is the correct answer. d.If the teacher miskeyed it he/she must check and retally the score of the students’ test papers before giving them back. e. If option A is really the correct answer, revise to weaken option D, distracters are not supposed to draw more attention than the keyed answer. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 32. correctly, 3. Make an analysis: f . Only 10% of the students got the answer to the test item hence, the test item is very difficult. g. More students from the lower group got the item correctly, therefore a negative discrimination resulted. The discrimination ver y index is -10% h. No need to analyze the distracters because the test item is difficult and discrimination negatively. 4. Conclusion: reject the item because it is very difficult and a has negative discrimination index. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 33. IMPROVING TEST IT IndE exM Rang S e Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis a.More students from the upper group choose option D that option A, even though option A is the supposedly the correct answer. Options A * B C D E Upper group 1 2 3 10 4 Lower group 3 4 4 4 5 b.Mostly likely the teacher has written the wrong answer key. c.The teacher checks and finds out that he/she did not miskey the answer that he/she thought is the correct answer. d.If the teacher miskeyed it he/she must check and retally the score of the students’ test papers before giving them back. g.More students from the lower group got the item correctly, therefore a negative discrimination resulted. The discrimination index is -10% h.No need to analyze the distracters because the test item is very difficult and discrimination negatively. e.If option A is really the correct answer, revise to weaken option D, distracters are not supposed to draw more attention than the keyed answer. 4. Conclusion: reject the item because it is very difficult and a has negative discrimination index. 3. Make an analysis: potential miskeyed item f.Only 10% of the students got the answer to the test item correctly, hence, the test item is very difficult.
  • 34. IMPROVING TEST Example 5. AMBIGUOUS ITEM. Below is the result of item analysis of a test with an ambiguous test item. What can you say about the item? Are you going to retain, revise or reject? ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A B C D E * Upper group 7 1 1 2 8 Lower group 6 2 3 3 6
  • 35. 1. Compute the difficulty index. n = 8+6=14 N = 39 D n F = __ ,where D N1 4 F 39 = __ ,where D F = 0.36 OR 36% Options A B C D E * Upper group 7 1 1 2 8 Lower group 6 2 3 3 6 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item
  • 36. 2. Compute the discrimination index. 0.10 OR 10% D 1 = __ D D = 20 C = 6 UG CUG =8 LG C CL_G ,where 6 20 __8 __2 20 = Options A B C D E * Upper group 7 1 1 2 8 Lower group 6 2 3 3 6 Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item 1 = D1 =
  • 37. 3. Make an analysis: a. Only 36% of the students got the answer to test item correctly, hence, the test item is difficult. b.More students from the upper group got the item correctly, hence, it discriminates positively. The discrimination index is 10% c. About equal numbers of top students went for option A and option E, this implies that they could not tell which is the correct answer. The students do not know the content of the test, thus, a reteach is needed. 4. Conclusion: Revise the test item because it is ambiguous. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 38. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis Upper group 7 1 1 2 8 Lower group 6 2 3 3 6 3. Make an analysis: ambiguous item a.Only 36% of the students got the answer to test item correctly, hence, the test item is difficult. b.More students from the upper group got the item correctly, hence, it discriminates positively. The discrimination index is 10% Options A B C D E * c.About equal numbers of top students went for option A and option E, this implies that they could not tell which is the correct answer. The students do not know the content of the test, thus, a reteach is needed. 4.Conclusion: Revise the test item because it is ambiguous.
  • 39. IMPROVING TEST Example 6.GUESSING ITEM. Below is the result of item analysis of a test with students’ answers mostly based on a guess. Are you going to retain, revise or reject? ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A B C * D E Upper group 4 3 4 3 6 Lower group 3 4 3 4 5
  • 40. 1. Compute the difficulty index. n = 4+3=7 N = 39 D n F = N __ ,where D 7 39 F = __ ,where D F = 0.18 OR 18% Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Options A B C * D E Upper group 4 3 4 3 6 Lower group 3 4 3 4 5
  • 41. 2. Compute the discrimination index. 0.05 OR 5% D 1 = __ D C = 3 UG CUG =4 LG C CL_G ,where 3 20 __4 __1 20 = = = Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Options A B C * D E Upper group 4 3 4 3 6 Lower group 3 4 3 4 5 D1 D1 = 20
  • 42. 3. Make an analysis: a. Only18% of the students got the answer to the test item correctly. b. More students from the upper group got the correct answer to the test item; therefore, the test item is positive discrimination. The discrimination index is 5%. c. Students responds about equally to all alternatives, an indication that they are guessing. Three possibilities why student guesses the answer on a test item: The content of the test item has not yet been discussed in the class because the test is designed in advance; T est item were badly written that students have no idea what the question is really all about: and T est item were very difficult as shown from the difficulty index and low discrimination index. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 43. 3. Make an analysis: d.If the test is well-written but too difficult, reteach material to the class. 4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it is very difficult and the discrimination index is very poor, and option A and B are not effective distracters. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 44. IMPROVING TEST IT IndE exM Rang S e Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis 3. Make an analysis: guessing item Upper 4 group 3 4 3 6 Lower 3 group 4 3 4 5 a.Only18% of the students got the answer to the test item correctly. b.More students from the upper group got the correct answer to the test item; therefore, the test item is positive discrimination. The discrimination index is 5%. Options A B C * D E c.Students responds about equally to all alternatives, an indication that they are guessing. d.If the test is well-written but too difficult, reteach the material to the class. 4. Conclusion: Reject the item because it is very difficult and the discrimination index is very poor , and option A and B are not effective distracters.
  • 45. IMPROVING TEST Example 7.Reject the item because it is very difficult and the discrimination index is very poor, and options A and B are not effective distracters. ITEM Ho S w to improve the test item Options A B C * D E Upper group 5 3 9 0 3 Lower group 6 4 6 0 4
  • 46. 1. Compute the difficulty index. OR % n = + = N = D n F = N __ ,where D F = __ ,? D F = Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Options A B C * D E Upper group 5 3 9 0 3 Lower group 6 4 6 0 4
  • 47. 2. Compute the discrimination index. OR % D 1 = __ D UG CUG = CLG = C CL_G ,where __ ,? = = __ = Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Options A B C * D E Upper group 5 3 9 0 3 Lower group 6 4 6 0 4 D1 = 1 D
  • 48. 3.Make an analysis about the level of difficulty, discrimination and distracters. a. Only got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult. b.More students from the upper group answer the test item correctly, a result, the test got a . The discrimination index is 15% c. Option A,B, and E are attractive and effective distracters. d.Option D is in effective; therefore, changing it with more realistic one. 4. Conclusion: Revise the item by changing option D. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS
  • 49. IMPROVING TEST ITEMS Index Range Difficulty Level 0.00-0.20 Very Difficult 0.21-0.40 Difficult 0.41- 0.60 Average/Mode rately Difficult 0.61- 0.80 Easy 0.81 – 1.00 Very Easy Index Range Discrimination Level 0.19 and below Poor item, should be eliminated or need to be revised 0.20-0.29 Marginal item, needs some revision 0.30- 0.39 Reasonably good item but possibly for improvement 0.40 and above Very good item Response option analysis 3. Make an analysis: a.Only 38% got the answer correctly, hence, the item is difficult. group Upper 5 3 9 0 3 Lower group 6 4 6 0 4 b.More students from the upper group answer the test item correctly, as a result, the test got a positive discrimination. The discrimination index is 15% Options A B C * D E c.Option A,B, and E are attractive and effective distracters. d.Option D is in effective; therefore, changing it with more realistic one. 4. Conclusion: Revise the item by changing option D.