SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
ANALYZING AND USING
TEST ITEM DATA
Purposes and Elements of Item
Analysis
 To select the best available items for
the final form of the test.
 To identify structural or content
defects in the items.
 To detect learning difficulties of the
class as a whole
 To identify the areas of weaknesses of
students in need of remediation.
Three Elements in an Item
Analysis
1. Examination of the difficulty level
of the items,
2. Determination of the
discriminating power of each
item, and
3. Examination of the effectiveness
of distractors in a multiple choice
or matching items.
The difficulty level of an item is known as
index of difficulty.
Index of difficulty is the percentage of
students answering correctly each item in
the test
Index of discrimination refers to the
percentage of high-scoring individuals
responding correctly versus the number of
low-scoring individuals responding
correctly to an item.
This numeric index indicates how effectively
an item differentiates between the
students who did well and those who did
poorly on the test.
Preparing Data for Item Analysis
1. Arrange test scores from highest to
lowest.
2. Get one-third of the papers from the
highest scores and the other third
from the lowest scores.
3. Record separately the number of
times each alternative was chosen by
the students in both groups.
4. Add the number of correct answers
to each item made by the
combined upper and lower groups.
5. Compute the index of difficulty for
each item, following the formula:
IDF = (NRC
/TS)100
where IDF = index of difficulty
NRC = number of students responding
correctly to an item
TS = total number of students in the
upper and lower groups
6. Compute the index of discrimination,
based on the formula:
IDN = (CU –CL)
NSG
where IDN = index of discrimination
CU = number of correct responses of the upper group
CL = number of correct responses of the lower group
NSG = number of students per group
Using Information about Index of
Difficulty
The difficulty index of a test item
tells a teacher about the
comprehension of or performance
on material or task contained in
an item.
Item Group Answers
A B C D
Total No.
of
Correct
Answers
Difficulty
Index
H – L Discrimin
ation
Index
1
H 20
L 20
3 14 2 1
10 7 3 0
21 52.5 7 0.35
2
H 20
L 20
0 0 18 2
0 3 9 8
27 67.5 9 0.45
3
H 20
L 20
3 8 4 4
10 2 4 4
10 25.0 6 0.30
4
H 20
L 20
3 3 4 10
2 4 10 4
14 35.0 6 0.30
5
H 20
L 20
15 2 2 1
1 10 4 5
16 40.0 14 0.70
For an item to be considered a good
item, its difficulty index should be
50%. An item with 50% difficulty
index is neither easy nor difficult.
If an item has a difficulty index of 67.5%,
this means that it is 67.5% easy and
32.5% difficult.
Information on the index of difficulty of
an item can help a teacher decide
whether a test should be revised,
retained or modified.
Interpretation of the Difficulty
Index
Range Difficulty Level
20 & below
21 – 40
41 – 60
61 – 80
81 & above
Very Difficult
Difficult
Average
Easy
Very Easy
Using Information about Index of
Discrimination
The index of discrimination tells a teacher the
degree to which a test item differentiates the
high achievers from the low achievers in his
class. A test item may have positive or negative
discriminating power.
An item has a positive discriminating power when
more students from the upper group got the
right answer than those from the lower group
When more students from the lower group got the
correct answer on an item than those from the
upper group, the item has a negative
discriminating power.
There are instances when an item
has zero discriminating power –
when equal number of students
from upper and lower group got
the right answer to a test item.
In the given example, item 5 has
the highest discriminating power.
This means that it can
differentiate high and low
achievers.
Interpretation of the Index of
Discrimination
Range Verbal Description
.40 & above
.30 – .39
.20 – .29
.09 – .19
Very Good Item
Good Item
Fair Item
Poor Item
When should a test item be rejected?
Retained? Modified or revised?
A test item can be retained when its level
of difficulty is average and
discriminating power is positive.
It has to rejected when it is either
easy/very easy or difficult/very
difficult and its discriminating power is
negative or zero.
An item can be modified when its
difficulty level is average and its
discrimination index is negative.
Examining Distractor Effectiveness
An ideal item is one that all
students in the upper group
answer correctly and all students
in the lower group answer
wrongly. And the responses of
the lower group have to be evenly
distributed among the incorrect
alternatives.
Developing an Item Data File
 Encourage teachers to undertake an item
analysis as often as practical
 Allowing for accumulated data to be used to
make item analysis more reliable
 Providing for a wider choice of item format and
objectives
 Facilitating the revision of items
 Facilitating the physical construction and
reproduction of the test
 Accumulating a large pool of items as to allow
for some items to be shared with the students
for study purposes.
Limitations of Item Analysis
 It cannot be used for essay items.
 Teachers must be cautious about
what damage may be due to the
table of specifications when items
not meeting the criteria are
deleted from the test. These
items are to be rewritten or
replaced.

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Jr guzman-item-analysis
Jr guzman-item-analysisJr guzman-item-analysis
Jr guzman-item-analysis
 
Qualitative item analysis
Qualitative item analysisQualitative item analysis
Qualitative item analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Analyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item dataAnalyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item data
 
Item
ItemItem
Item
 
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
tryout test, item analysis (difficulty, discrimination)
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Assessment of learning1
Assessment of learning1Assessment of learning1
Assessment of learning1
 
Item analysis
Item analysis Item analysis
Item analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Item Analysis
Item AnalysisItem Analysis
Item Analysis
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
New item analysis
New item analysisNew item analysis
New item analysis
 
Item analysis.pptx du
Item analysis.pptx duItem analysis.pptx du
Item analysis.pptx du
 
MCQ test item analysis
MCQ test item analysisMCQ test item analysis
MCQ test item analysis
 
Item analysis and validation
Item analysis and validationItem analysis and validation
Item analysis and validation
 
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessmentAdministering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
Administering, analyzing, and improving the test or assessment
 
Test appraisal
Test appraisalTest appraisal
Test appraisal
 

Viewers also liked

value based healthcare
value based healthcarevalue based healthcare
value based healthcaremuirgray
 
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB Stick
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB StickHow to Recover Deleted Files From USB Stick
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB StickKaneSpack
 
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)_ce
 
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)_ce
 

Viewers also liked (8)

value based healthcare
value based healthcarevalue based healthcare
value based healthcare
 
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB Stick
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB StickHow to Recover Deleted Files From USB Stick
How to Recover Deleted Files From USB Stick
 
Mi9 Manifesto
Mi9 ManifestoMi9 Manifesto
Mi9 Manifesto
 
Diapo ihh
Diapo ihhDiapo ihh
Diapo ihh
 
АРХИВ - New book 2007
АРХИВ - New book 2007АРХИВ - New book 2007
АРХИВ - New book 2007
 
tabac
tabactabac
tabac
 
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)
영화 예매 프로그램 (DB 설계, 프로그램 연동)
 
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)
서비스중인 게임 DB 설계 (쿠키런 편)
 

Similar to Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02

Similar to Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02 (20)

Analyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item dataAnalyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item data
 
Analyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item dataAnalyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item data
 
Analyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item dataAnalyzing and using test item data
Analyzing and using test item data
 
Item analysis2
Item analysis2Item analysis2
Item analysis2
 
Topic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item AnalysisTopic 8b Item Analysis
Topic 8b Item Analysis
 
tools of research
tools of researchtools of research
tools of research
 
6.tools of research
6.tools of research6.tools of research
6.tools of research
 
Achievement test
Achievement testAchievement test
Achievement test
 
Item analysis ppt
Item analysis pptItem analysis ppt
Item analysis ppt
 
Item analysis
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysis
 
Item analysis report
Item analysis report Item analysis report
Item analysis report
 
Item analysis ppt
Item analysis pptItem analysis ppt
Item analysis ppt
 
Item analysis in education
Item analysis  in educationItem analysis  in education
Item analysis in education
 
Analysis of item test
Analysis of item testAnalysis of item test
Analysis of item test
 
Analysis of item test
Analysis of item testAnalysis of item test
Analysis of item test
 
Development of pyschologica test construction
Development of pyschologica test constructionDevelopment of pyschologica test construction
Development of pyschologica test construction
 
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptxITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
ITEM ANALYSIS.pptx
 
MODULE 7.pptx
MODULE 7.pptxMODULE 7.pptx
MODULE 7.pptx
 
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
CHAPTER 6 Assessment of Learning 1
 
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking StrategiesTest Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
Test Administration, Test administration, Test-taking Strategies
 

Analyzingandusingtestitemdata 101012035435-phpapp02

  • 2. Purposes and Elements of Item Analysis  To select the best available items for the final form of the test.  To identify structural or content defects in the items.  To detect learning difficulties of the class as a whole  To identify the areas of weaknesses of students in need of remediation.
  • 3. Three Elements in an Item Analysis 1. Examination of the difficulty level of the items, 2. Determination of the discriminating power of each item, and 3. Examination of the effectiveness of distractors in a multiple choice or matching items.
  • 4. The difficulty level of an item is known as index of difficulty. Index of difficulty is the percentage of students answering correctly each item in the test Index of discrimination refers to the percentage of high-scoring individuals responding correctly versus the number of low-scoring individuals responding correctly to an item. This numeric index indicates how effectively an item differentiates between the students who did well and those who did poorly on the test.
  • 5. Preparing Data for Item Analysis 1. Arrange test scores from highest to lowest. 2. Get one-third of the papers from the highest scores and the other third from the lowest scores. 3. Record separately the number of times each alternative was chosen by the students in both groups.
  • 6. 4. Add the number of correct answers to each item made by the combined upper and lower groups. 5. Compute the index of difficulty for each item, following the formula: IDF = (NRC /TS)100 where IDF = index of difficulty NRC = number of students responding correctly to an item TS = total number of students in the upper and lower groups
  • 7. 6. Compute the index of discrimination, based on the formula: IDN = (CU –CL) NSG where IDN = index of discrimination CU = number of correct responses of the upper group CL = number of correct responses of the lower group NSG = number of students per group
  • 8. Using Information about Index of Difficulty The difficulty index of a test item tells a teacher about the comprehension of or performance on material or task contained in an item.
  • 9. Item Group Answers A B C D Total No. of Correct Answers Difficulty Index H – L Discrimin ation Index 1 H 20 L 20 3 14 2 1 10 7 3 0 21 52.5 7 0.35 2 H 20 L 20 0 0 18 2 0 3 9 8 27 67.5 9 0.45 3 H 20 L 20 3 8 4 4 10 2 4 4 10 25.0 6 0.30 4 H 20 L 20 3 3 4 10 2 4 10 4 14 35.0 6 0.30 5 H 20 L 20 15 2 2 1 1 10 4 5 16 40.0 14 0.70
  • 10. For an item to be considered a good item, its difficulty index should be 50%. An item with 50% difficulty index is neither easy nor difficult. If an item has a difficulty index of 67.5%, this means that it is 67.5% easy and 32.5% difficult. Information on the index of difficulty of an item can help a teacher decide whether a test should be revised, retained or modified.
  • 11. Interpretation of the Difficulty Index Range Difficulty Level 20 & below 21 – 40 41 – 60 61 – 80 81 & above Very Difficult Difficult Average Easy Very Easy
  • 12. Using Information about Index of Discrimination The index of discrimination tells a teacher the degree to which a test item differentiates the high achievers from the low achievers in his class. A test item may have positive or negative discriminating power. An item has a positive discriminating power when more students from the upper group got the right answer than those from the lower group When more students from the lower group got the correct answer on an item than those from the upper group, the item has a negative discriminating power.
  • 13. There are instances when an item has zero discriminating power – when equal number of students from upper and lower group got the right answer to a test item. In the given example, item 5 has the highest discriminating power. This means that it can differentiate high and low achievers.
  • 14. Interpretation of the Index of Discrimination Range Verbal Description .40 & above .30 – .39 .20 – .29 .09 – .19 Very Good Item Good Item Fair Item Poor Item
  • 15. When should a test item be rejected? Retained? Modified or revised? A test item can be retained when its level of difficulty is average and discriminating power is positive. It has to rejected when it is either easy/very easy or difficult/very difficult and its discriminating power is negative or zero. An item can be modified when its difficulty level is average and its discrimination index is negative.
  • 16. Examining Distractor Effectiveness An ideal item is one that all students in the upper group answer correctly and all students in the lower group answer wrongly. And the responses of the lower group have to be evenly distributed among the incorrect alternatives.
  • 17. Developing an Item Data File  Encourage teachers to undertake an item analysis as often as practical  Allowing for accumulated data to be used to make item analysis more reliable  Providing for a wider choice of item format and objectives  Facilitating the revision of items  Facilitating the physical construction and reproduction of the test  Accumulating a large pool of items as to allow for some items to be shared with the students for study purposes.
  • 18. Limitations of Item Analysis  It cannot be used for essay items.  Teachers must be cautious about what damage may be due to the table of specifications when items not meeting the criteria are deleted from the test. These items are to be rewritten or replaced.