2. Dave Sobel
Director of Partner Community
• Joined GFI in 2013, putting the GFI community into the
executive team of MAX
• 2 years prior leading partner and community growth in
vendor channel
• 10 years experience as CEO of MSP, focused on Washington
DC metro
• 20 years experience in IT channel and consulting
• Microsoft MVP for Virtualization
• Author, Virtualization: Defined
• CompTIA Community Chair and Executive Council
• MSP Mentor 250 member, SMB 150
• Contributing writer: Channel Insider, CRN, Tech Target, MSP
Mentor
• Former HTG facilitator, member
@djdaveet
www.davesobel.com
11. Community & Events
Kelly O’Bray
Community Manager
Carissa Johnston
Marketing Coordinator
Nadia Karatsoreos
Community Manager
Jessica Schroder
Vendor Alliance
Manager
Canden Hicks
Marketing Associate
Gis Johannsson
Rockstar
Debbie Lister
Marketing and Events
Executive
Sarah Hill
Marketing and Events
Assistant
20. "2014 will be marked by a relative revival
of the global PC market” - Gartner.
Worldwide combined shipments of
devices (PCs, tablets, ultramobiles and
mobile phones) are projected to reach 2.4
billion units in 2014
A 4.2% increase from 2013
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26. When it came to protecting
company data, respondents were
most concerned about these:
74% : Business data
69%: Customer/employee data
66%: Documents
27. 79% have “not fully
implemented” BYOD policies,
processes, and infrastructure”
24%did not even have a
mobile device policy.
28. Most common security measures for
mobile devices were:
67% : Passcode protection
52% : Remote wiping of data
43% : MDM
43% : Encryption
39% : Endpoint security tools
38% : Network access controls
29. 70% of Baby Boomer respondents
never use “outside” apps to support their work,
only 31% of the Millennials said the same
60% of Millennials
“aren’t concerned about corporate security when they use
personal apps instead of corporate-approved apps”
because those apps aren’t up to the job
35% of the Millennial respondents say they use their own
apps because corporate-approved apps can’t be used
across different devices
44. 2014 and GFI MAX
Changing Role of the MSP
Value
Added
Reseller
Network
Engineer/
Consultant
1st Generation
Managed
Service
Provider
Managed
Service
Provider
2.0
46. 2014 and GFI MAX
Changing Role of the MSP
MSP 1.0 skills MSP 2.0 skills
Technical expertise Service management
IT-focused Business-focused
Network design, configuration,
installation
Service and vendor research and
selection
Business development Business development
Operations excellence Consulting and advisory skills
Product sourcing Vendor management
Infrastructure skills Application skills
Hardware integration Service integration
Recommender and implementer Trusted adviser, service aggregator
56. Customer
Scheduled, proactive
management of IT resources to
maintain up-time and peak
performance
MSP
Predictable resource
requirements that allow accurate
planning and investments
57. Customer
Consistent, reliable budget
planning based on a clearly
defined contract commitment.
MSP
Consistent reliable revenue
based on long term
commitments and regular
payments.
58. Customer
Access to a team of experts in
real-time to quickly resolve a
broad range of technical
challenges.
MSP
Enhanced control of customer
accounts that comes from
ongoing planned engagements.
59. Customer
Leverage of advanced skills and
training to optimize the value
and performance of IT systems.
MSP
Insights into future customer
needs for IT systems and
services.
60. Customer
Comprehensive services to
maintain systems at peak
performance to prolong the
lifecycle of IT investments
MSP
Ability to leverage tools and
automation to scale capacity
significantly beyond the direct
limits of staff, which yields
higher margins
92. Core improvements
17 releases to production (approx 1 every 2 weeks)
75 new features and feature updates
30+ IdeaFactory requests added
150 bugs fixed
96. Educational Webinars
» Making Money on Cloud
Management
» Selling Security and
Compliance solutions
» Adding Mobile Management
to your MSP offering
» Using Managed Security
Services to grow your
portfolio
» Building a Complete
Managed Services offering
Editor's Notes
Change this to be your own bio.
Technology areas where there is growth – mobile and cloud leading the way, but MSP also a growing area.
Things they need that you have.
We have crossed the inflection point – there are now more smartphones and tablets than there are desktops and notebooks.
The death of the PC is in consumer – but there is little expected growth anywhere.
- Point out that this includes projections, so looking to the future shows MSPs as the growth areas.
Three questions to answer
what are the meaningful advantages of a Managed Services business model that you need to take advantage of in order to optimize your performance today?
which elements of a Managed Services business model are most likely to need a significant change in the next few years & how will the MSP value proposition need to evolve to stay relevant?
how can a Managed Services Provider manage their business today, keep track of shifting market conditions and prepare to adapt, & manage the business through multiple change cycles without losing control of the business?
What are the meaningful advantages of a Managed Services business model that you need to take advantage of in order to optimize your performance today?
Which elements of a Managed Services Business model are most likely to need a significant change in the next few years, and how will the value proposition need to evolve to stay relevant?
How can a MSP manage their business today, keep track of shifting market conditions and prepare to adapt, and manage the business through multiple change cycles without losing control of the business?
Based on research
Our premise
Sustainable success is possible in the MSP business model
Achieved by balance between two competing forces.
Force 1 is the ability to establish stable, consistent service offerings and operating processes that produce predictable results for customers and manageable operating conditions for the MSP … and then continuously drive efficiency and productivity through optimization strategies
Force 2 is the ability to monitor and adapt to changing market conditions, adding new offerings and supporting new technologies to stay current with customer demands and outpace competitors, and manage the changes to the business without disrupting ongoing operations
Icebergs – commodity below the surface, high value above the surface.
MSP Model emerged and became established because
It provides a unique value and alignment to both customers and solution providers
If the general value provided by an IT channel company is to enable business customers to use technology to improve business performance
the unique value of an MSP is consistency and predictability in technology operations.
Let’s review the 5 core advantages again
Theme is predictablity
Customer gets predicable
MSP gets predictable
Theme is budget reliability for both
Remember how peaks and valleys of break/fix
Compare to consistency of MSP
Theme is control for both sides
Customer gets control over access to multiple resources
MSP gets control of accounts and ability to drive consistency / standardization
Theme is insight
Customer gets advanced skills & training to optimize systems
MSP gets insights into future customer needs
Theme is tools and systems
Customer gets selection of services that keep things running well
MSP can use tools that scale beyond people
The common goal is profitability based on uptime, not on time.
Not everyone can be a MSP
It has advantages, but not everyone can do it.
Some companies want to be MSPs and others don’t
For all that want to be MSP, not all are successful
So what are the three traits of MSPs that are most likely to be successful, so we can get those traits.
:
Trait 1: Operating Process Discipline
The most successful MSPs
are built on a foundation of repeatable process
and the commitment to address and resolve big or small customer IT challenges
in a continuous flow of daily operations.
The ability to design processes that can effectively address customer technology challenges is one thing …
but the desire to actually operate those processes is apparently a rare commodity among IT companies
Trait two: Understanding of Customers Requirements
Beyond the ability to understand and operate technology,
the most successful MSPs must also have
a detailed understanding of how customers use technology,
what meaningful business outcomes they are trying to accomplish with technology,
and how their operations can be improved.
Again, tech expertise is reasonably widespread in the IT channel,
but deep knowledge of customer environments and priorities is significantly more rare.
Insights into Market Developments & Technology Progress
In addition to established knowledge of today’s technologies
and best practices for effective operations,
the most successful MSPs also have the ability to stay in touch with new releases,
developing trends,
and products that actually do what they say they will.
Even more,
they have to know which technologies their customers will bet their businesses on
and hedge their bets accordingly.
The objective is to determine whether the current offerings,
pricing, messages,
and other elements of an MSP’s value proposition are sufficient to win and retain a customer’s business …
or if changes need to be made to create a more favorable position.
According to our research,
MSPs must have the ability and discipline to track the status and implications of factors that fall into three categories
Economy: How do changes in the national / regional / local economy
affect customers’ ability and willingness to spend on IT solutions and services?
Competitors: Are there new competitive offerings available to customers
that provide better value and would require changes to services, prices, etc.?
Industry: How do conditions in your target customer’s market segment
affect their priorities for buying and using specific technology solutions?
Resources / Capabilities: What changes to your internal resources
could affect your ability to deliver current solutions or adopt new solutions?
Capacity / Financial Position: How does your current financial health affect your
ability to acquire resources, make investments, and appear healthy to customers?
Strategy / Objectives: What is your attitude about investment, growth, and change,
and how open are you to changes based on your short-term and long-term goals?
Internal Resources: What changes to your customer’s internal IT
and business resources might affect your relationship and their willingness to spend on your services?
Financial Position: How does the customer’s financial health affect their behavior
with regard to IT solutions and services,
and what would cause those changes to occur?
IT / Business Strategy: Do your customers see IT solutions as a strategic investment for advantage,
as a normal element of current business operations, or as a necessary but unpleasant expense?
All of these factors affect your ability to engage with customers and deliver value,
but none of these factors is inherently positive or negative.
your goal is to determine the current conditions regarding each of these factors and track changes
for the better or for the worse –
and determine whether you need to adjust your business strategy.
For example, the economy could improve … which may allow you to introduce new offerings or increase prices;
or the economy could decline … which may require you to streamline operations or reduce prices.
There is no “ideal” set of conditions that are required for an MSP to succeed – your goal is simply to adapt your strategy according to these conditions and present the most appropriate offering to your customers.
Business Agility = Present Fitness + Future Vision x Agile Development
Present Fitness: Optimize performance in current operations to generate investment resources and the flexibility to pursue alternatives
Future Vision: See and understand new opportunities that will provide value for your business and for your customers, and plan a roadmap for when to adopt relevant options
Agile Development: Assess the impact of market drivers and take fast, deliberate action to incorporate new offerings, retire offerings that are no longer valuable, and maintain predictable results
Future of MSP theme
Let’s discuss 10 best practices now that these MSPs embrace
Instead of conducting big, slow, complex annual planning processes,
companies should adopt a more responsive quarterly planning cycle in which long-term forecasts
are adjusted according to real-time feedback and experiences
and updates are planned in to numbers several times within a year.
In addition to seeking and reviewing customer feedback on technical offerings and services,
companies need to engage non-technical leaders and users in conversations that are deliberately not about technology
… but instead, about what the customer is trying to accomplish.
Creative responses to business challenges often take the form of technical solutions,
but they must not be initially conceived within the boundaries of current technical capabilities.
No matter how many good ideas a company can come up with,
the only way to accurately test whether an idea is viable is to approach them one at a time.
Too many new ideas being tested at once can lead to a chaotic lack of focus,
as well as false indicators (a problem with one test can contaminate the results of another test).
This approach requires companies to adopt two vital agile behaviors:
first, prioritize new opportunities based on the combined values of customer relevance + adjacent skills + potential value;
and second, deliver fast prototypes and capture real-time feedback targeted to short-term, incremental milestones.
Agile behavior is critical … and it can be measured in real financial metrics.
Four key data points can be used to keep score of the ultimate effectiveness of this approach to business development:
Percentage of revenue from new products / offerings: Share of total revenue generated by things that were not in your portfolio 2 years ago.
Percentage of revenue from modified products / offerings: Share of total revenue generate by things that were already in your portfolio but have undergone a significant change within the past 2 years.
Growth percentage: YOY change in total revenue for the organization from all revenue sources.
Profit growth percentage: YOY change in total profit production from all revenue sources and accommodating all investments / expenses.
New products / services are, by definition, less capable and less predictable than established offerings.
Companies need to adopt a mindset that new offerings do not need to be perfect,
but are tested in limited rollouts when they have achieved “minimum viable functionality” for initial customer adoption.
In other words: this is the opposite of “paralysis by analysis;”
do not insist on perfection for new offerings …
improve them incrementally over time based on lessons learned.
A concept borrowed from the legal profession:
inside your private development meetings,
adopt the position of your competitors and
argue why your customers should not continue to buy from you
or why new prospects should choose someone else to provide their services.
Too often companies get “tunnel vision” when they only argue their own position and promote their own value.
To find weak spots or vulnerability, companies need to actively challenge their assumptions and attack their positions.
Do this reasonably frequently (i.e. quarterly or monthly) at regularly scheduled times to get your whole team to buy in.
When people are paid only to sell / deliver existing offerings,
they will actively avoid any effort towards new initiatives.
In order to convince your team to try new things,
they need more than just the direction …
they need a reward.
Companies need to reconfigure compensation plans to require the right participation from the right resources.
Pay attention to balance:
you can’t afford to take too much emphasis away from the current business,
but you need enough emphasis on new offerings.
It is much more difficult to build new capabilities by using a portion of time / energy from a larger team
than it is to use the full effort of a small portion of a team.
Instead of asking all members of a team to spend a little effort trying to do a new thing,
companies need to identify willing participants who can jump in,
give full effort,
show early results,
and then spread the lessons learned to more members of the team incrementally.
Based on experience and best practices,
companies need to establish a scripted, repeatable approach to finding, developing, testing, and launching new offerings.
If a company only launches something new very infrequently,
it’s easy to miss big and small details;
the more frequently a company launches new things,
the easier it is to develop a “muscle memory” for doing the right things.
But you can’t afford to wait for the successful completion of several new launches before you get good at it;
so leverage peer resources to identify best practices
and build a script to minimize uncertainty and maximize efficiency for launching new products.
As a mirror to the concept of a Launch Methodology,
it is equally critical that companies develop a systematic approach to ending activities that no longer produce value.
Without such an approach, companies tend to unnecessarily drag out the ending process,
clinging to things that used to work,
resting on past successes,
and missing out on future opportunities.
Plus, when your De-Commission Methodology includes a scripted approach to re-allocating resources (i.e. staff)
to new activities once the old ones have been ended,
your team is much more likely to participate willingly without sabotaging the process to protect their own job security.
Welcome Alistair to talk about the platform and what we’re doing to support their business
Remember to mention the two way integrations we have with the PSAs and how we continue to invest.
App control for office 365
Waiting on Eric Harless – could be a problem though as he can’t get screen shots for this – something to do with the platform he is running??
Waiting on Eric Harless
New products / services are, by definition, less capable and less predictable than established offerings. Companies need to adopt a mindset that new offerings do not need to be perfect, but are tested in limited rollouts when they have achieved “minimum viable functionality” for initial customer adoption. In other words: this is the opposite of “paralysis by analysis;” do not insist on perfection for new offerings … improve them incrementally over time based on lessons learned.
App control for office 365
These are the new features coming out
MAX Mail Integration
Talk about what the community group is doing
Four Sales playbooks coming out
Basic Managed Services
Advanced Managed Services
Managed Security Services
Backup / DR services
Launched five new webinars.
Do you subscribe to the YouTube channel?
White paper content, and how it’s being presented and broken up