1. Boost ELL Student Achievement
with Innovative Supplemental
Programs
Laura Lukens
Lezlie Paden
North Kansas City Schools
2. Agenda
Purpose and Rationale for Tutoring Program
Program Overview
Funding, Sites, Staffing, Timing, Student Selection and
Enrollment, Technology, Transportation
Lessons Learned
Student Results-ACCESS Data
3. Allowable Uses of Title III Funds
The key is to “supplement, not supplant” what district is
mandated to provide
E.g., core instructional program (materials, and personnel) for
language instructional program for LEP students
4. Allowable Uses of Title III Funds
Examples of allowable uses of Title III funds:
Supplemental instructional services (e.g., summer
school, tutoring)
Programs to intensify instruction
Technology
Currricular materials for supplemental programs
Community programs and services
Parent involvement and outreach
Family literacy programs
Mentoring, academic, or career counseling
5. Purpose and Rationale
Extend language and literacy opportunities for
elementary ELLs at lowest levels of language proficiency
in selected schools
Provide dedicated time to focus on four-domain
language development as district adopted push-in
service model for elementary ELLs
Component of Title III Improvement Plan
6. Funding
Funded by Title III
Licenses and headphones
Tutor teacher stipends
ELL Instructional Coach
Funded by District
Transportation
Hardware
ELL Administrative and IT Support
Interpreters
7. Sites
Nine Elementary Schools
Participated
High numbers of ELLs
All but one are Title I schools
Four AM, four PM
Numbers of students ranged from 22-64 Average
number served was 42
Total number of students served: 336
Location-Computer lab and/or library
8. Staffing
Most schools had at least two tutor teachers
ELL teacher or other certified teacher(s)
Number of tutor teachers ranged from one to four
Tutor teachers received four hours of IL training at the
beginning of the year and an optional refresher session
second semester
9. Timing
Title III tutoring ran from mid-October through the end
of May
Four schools ran tutoring in the AM before school
Four schools conducted tutoring after school in the PM
Total tutoring time frames ranged from 35 minutes to
one hour
Session length was from 20-40 minutes
10. Student Selection and Enrollment
Students were recommended based on ACCESS composite score
2.5 and below
Teachers could recommend others
ELL Coordinator approves final recommendations
ELL interpreters call parents for verbal permission to participate in
tutoring
ELL Administrative Assistant sets up transportation, interpreters call
families with information
ELL Instructional Coach assigns license to student
11. Technology
Good relationship with district IT Dept. is critical
A point person within IT to troubleshoot and serve as an
IT liaison with IL is important
Tutor teachers must learn how to troubleshoot issues
with hardware and sound as well as know how to call
the IL support line for issues with software
Toni is very responsive!
12. Transportation
It all starts with Transportation!
Meet with Transportation first to ensure the program is
feasible
Ongoing, clear communication with Transportation
about student attendance, adds, drops, etc. ensures a
smooth-running program
13. Lessons Learned
PM is best for Title III Tutoring
Better attendance (less chance of missing the bus), longer sessions possible
Allow at least one hour total time for tutoring session
Time to get settled, log on, do session, and pack up. Some PM sessions
offered snacks beforehand.
Tutor teachers must be diligent about taking attendance and
communicating attendance issues to the ELL Office
Offer attendance incentives to students and tutor teachers to encourage
consistent attendance
Encourage tutor teachers to communicate drops to ELL Office in a timely
manner in order to allocate licenses to other students
Communicate consistently with principals and Transportation about
tutoring schedule throughout the year
District program, not building-based
14. Summary of Student
Growth Analysis
This analysis examined matched scores from the Spring, 2012 and
Spring, 2013 ACCESS assessments for students who received Imagine
Learning tutoring and those who did not.
The entry level skills of students receiving Imagine Learning tutoring
were, on average, 18% lower than those students who did not receiving
tutoring
Students with lower ACCESS scores were purposefully selected for tutoring as a strategic
language and literacy intervention
Unfortunately, K students were not included in this analysis because their
pre-test (W-APT) and post-test (ACCESS) scores are not reported in the
same way.
18. Accelerate Elementary ELLs’
Language and Literacy Gains with
Summer Learning
Kent Yocum
Teaching and Learning Coach, North Kansas City Schools
Laura Lukens
ELL Program Coordinator, North Kansas City Schools
19. I.
Agenda
Welcome and Introductions
II. Why Summer Learning?
III. Program Planning and
Implementation ProcessWho, What, When, Where,
How Fund?
IV. Student Learning Outcomes
V. Lessons Learned
VI. Your turn!
VII. Wrap-Up
20. Research Base
Summer language and literacy loss disproportionately
affects economically disadvantaged children and those
who are not proficient in English, which causes the
achievement gap to widen
These students can lose up to three to five months of
learning over the summer months (Cooper, et. al., 2000)
Lack of reading materials and exposure to English over
the summer puts ELLs at additional risk for summer
learning loss (Guryan and Kim, 2010)
21. Why Seven Weeks of
Summer Learning for ELLs?
Goals:
Combat summer language and literacy loss among our
most at-risk elementary ELLs
Increase acculturation by exposing students to the arts
and community resources
Year 1: Outgrowth of the Superintendent’s Leadership
Institute
Year 2: “Fed Ex” Project
24. 2012 Model
Recommended: Elementary
ELLs with composite ACCESS
scores of 2.5 and below
Grades Pre-K through 5
Bussed to Crestview
Elementary for continuous
seven-week session
Dates/Times:
Monday-Thursday: 8:15AM2:15PM
June 4-July 26; BREAK;
July 2-6
Challenge: Ran “regular”
summer school and ELL
program concurrently in June
26. Program
Planning, Implementation, and
Evaluation
1.
2.
Funding
Staffing
3.
4.
5.
6.
Administrative, Teachers, IAs, Interpreter, Nurse
Student Identification and Enrollment
Transportation
Food Services
Administrative Support: Building and District
7.
8.
9.
Custodial Support
Curriculum and Materials
Technology
Field Trips/Learning Experiences
10.
11.
Mid-Continent Public Library Programs
Scheduling
Evaluations/Debriefing
Student Data; Stakeholder Surveys; Administrators Meeting
27. Funding Sources
Title III Funded:
Program
Leader, Teachers, IAs, Nurse, materials, technology, field
trips, learning experiences
District Funded:
Transportation, Administrative Assistant/ELL
Coordinator,
interpreters
Federal Summer Seamless program funded school
breakfast and lunch
Back Snack weekend program funded by Harvesters and
local churches
30. Student Identification
Recommendation Criteria
Composite ACCESS score of 2.5 or below
Teachers able to recommend other students
Intensive recruitment effort with parents
31. Enrollment
Enrollment was handled centrally through ELL
Department
Paper enrollment form and a health questionnaire
Communication and coordination between ELL
Department and schools crucial
Interpreters followed up with calls to parents who
did not return forms
We provided interpreters scripts to obtain verbal
permission
32. • Planning starts with transportation
• Crucial to the success of the program
33. Food Service
• Seamless Summer
program served all
students breakfast and
lunch every day
• Harvester’s weekend
Back Snack program
provides healthy
weekend snacks for
students
34. Scheduling
AM Arrival Duties-Bus, Car Rider, Cafeteria
Breakfast
“Brain Break”
Lunch
Computer Lab with Imagine Learning
30 minutes per day
Learning Experiences
Once a week, in-house or field trip related to instructional theme
for the week
Public Library “Story Times”
Twice a week
PM Dismissal Duties-Bus, Car Riders, Walkers
35. July 2012 ELL XLT Summer School Program
Kent/Laura Morning Info
8:15 AM
8:15 AM - 8:30
AM
Students have breakfast
8:30 AM
Grade
Building Open for Students
Students move to classrooms
Teacher
Rm #
Transportation Responsiblities
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM
IAs-8:15 AM - 8:35 AM
K2K
Dismissal Duty
Rivera
131
Café Supervision
Route 479
Tortorilla
129
Café Supervision
Rout 475
Knipp
132
Café Supervision
Route 478
Crabtree
136
Car Drop-Off - Front Horseshoe
Rout 478
1-2
Markie
133
North Side of Bus Drop-Off
Route 477
1- 2
Heitmeier
134
North Side of Bus Drop-Off
Walkers
4
Satorius
127
Car Drop-Off - Front Horseshoe
Car Riders
4-5
Greason
135
North Side of Bus Drop-Off
Route 476
K2K - 0
0
1 -2
K Yaw Paw
Car Drop-Off - Front Horseshoe
Route 477
Lynn
Car Drop-Off - Front Horseshoe
Car Riders
Sandlin
North Side of Bus Drop-Off
Route 478
Lappin
North Side of Bus Drop-Off
Car Riders
Café Supervision
Route 479
Clark
Kent/Laura Afternoon Duties
1:25 PM
Announce Move to Dismissal Location
1:30 PM
Announce Release of Car Riders
Announce Busses as they arrive
Announce to release walkers after all busses have left
36. Curriculum and Themes
Materials:
Oxford Picture Dictionary Content Areas for Kids-PreK-2nd
Oxford Picture Dictionary for the Content Areas 2nd Edition3rd-5th
Themes for each week:
Week 1: Friends, Family, Home, School
Week 2: The Community
Week 3: The United States
Week 4: Health
Week 5: Life Science
Week 6: Physical Science
Week 7: Earth and Space
42. Learning Experiences
Week 1: Friends, Family
Music Around the World
Week 2: The
Community
KC Fire Department
Week 3: The US
Week 4: Health
Public Library Field Trip
Hy-Vee Nutritionist
Zoo to You
Week 5: Life Science
Science City Field Trip
Week 6: Physical Science
Mad Science
Week 7: Earth and Space
60. Questions? Comments?
Thank you for attending our session!
Kent Yocum ryocum@nkcschools.org
Laura Lukens llukens@nkcschools.org
61. Thank you!
Dr. Todd White
Chad Sutton
Allison Clemens
Diana Thornburg
Deyrle Wallace
Curt Fowler
Amy Sieverin
Shirley Patrick
Lon Waterman
Cindy Butts
Carol Kidd
Rob Winter
Cathy Long
Tim Dooley
Eve Mulqueen
Tammy Bissell
Toni Lombardo
Maria Perdomo
Martha Medina Maldonado
Perla Weaver
Paw Wah Tamla
Editor's Notes
HAND OUT REPORTS
DESE sets growth for AMAO 1 calculation for Cohort 1 at .5 CPL per year and for Cohort 2 at .3 CLP per year.
KentIntro selves
LAURA
KENT/LAURASuperintendent asked Laura to develop year-round programming for most at-risk elementary ELLsYear 1: Outgrowth of the Superintendent’s Leadership InstituteAdditional three weeks of summer school for selected studentsYear 2: “Fed Ex” ProjectSeven weeks of summer programming for all recommended elementary students at one site
LAURADistrict demographics-biggerHow it’s changed over the yearsWho attended summer school program-countries and languages
LAURADistrict demographics-biggerHow it’s changed over the yearsWho attended summer school program-countries and languages
LAURAFor summer program:Recommended: Elementary ELLs with composite ACCESS scores of 2.5 and belowRecommended: 194 studentsAttended June session: 108Attended July session: 90Bussed to one elementary site for seven weeksIncluded 20 Pre-K students Dates/Times: Monday-Thursday: 8:15AM-2:15PMJune 4-July 26; BREAK July 2-6Considerations-running “regular” XLT and ELL program concurrently in JuneCooperation from building principal and custodial staff crucial
KENTHow/why chose Crestview as the siteDemographics on Crestview: Languages, % of school ELL, F & R, etc.Philosophy of Whatever it TakesFlags representing the students’ countries decorate front hall-welcomingWrap-around services for families
KENTComponentsFundingStaffingAdministrative, Teachers, IAs, Interpreter, NurseStudent Identification and EnrollmentTransportationFood ServicesAdministrative Support: Building and DistrictCustodial SupportCurriculum and MaterialsTechnologyField Trips/Learning ExperiencesMid-Continent Public Library ProgramsSchedulingEvaluations Student Data; Stakeholder Surveys/Administrators’ debriefing meeting
LAURA
KENTHR process for application and hiringSummer Handbook and training Teachers-District ELL teachers or Project EXCELL endorsedSome split contracts (Complicated!)Administrators: Program Leader (Kent) and ELL Coordinator (Laura); building principal and asst. principal on site in June Admin asst: School-June/ELL-July
LAURAConflict with summer Bible campPlanned around itInterpreters often called several times to explain program and obtain parent permission to attendInterpreters also called with bussing information and if students were absent
LAURAELL Department handled enrollment for summer learning program centrallyParents had to return a paper enrollment form and a health questionnaireInterpreters followed up with calls to parents who did not return paper formsWe provided interpreters scripts to obtain verbal permissionInterpreters, system between dept. and schoolShow enrollment form? Handout?Overlapped regular summer school
LAURA
KENTSeamless Summer: Community members under the age of 18 able to eat free breakfast and lunchAdults pay nominal fee
KENTTalk about what day looked like.
KENT
LAURA
LAURA
KENT
KENT/LAURA
LAURA
KENTTitle I EC teacher recommended
LAURACorrelated to the week’s themeMost were at the school due to high summer temperaturesSelected field trips (Public Library/Science City)Parents invitedExamples: KC Young Audiences, visit from the fire truck, local nutritionist, Zoo to You, Science City trip, Mad Science.
LAURA/KENT
KENT
LAURA
KENT
LAURATied to the theme of the weekOne visit per week featured multicultural literature aligned to theme
LAURA
Kent
KENT
KENT
Laura
Laura
Laura
Laura
LAURAThink Write Pair ShareTHINK about the Guiding QuestionsWRITE your answers on the Guiding Questions sheet in your packetSHARE your answers with your shoulder partner
KENTReference the Planning Template and the Checklist in the packet