A 1-hour lecture to 4th-year undergraduate and/or MSc students in human genetics, focusing on exploring the role of DNA methylation in human complex disease.
Asymmetry in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-76 b
The role of DNA methylation in complex diseases
1. The
role
of
DNA
methyla0on
in
complex
diseases
Jordana
Bell
Senior
Lecturer
Department
for
Twin
Research
and
Gene8c
Epidemiology
King’s
College
London
Dec
4th,
2014
3. Epigene0c
Mechanisms
Reproduced
from
Nature
441,
143-‐145
(11
May
2006)
DNA
methyla0on
Histone
modifica0ons
Regula0on
of
chroma0n
structure
and
gene
expression
‣
DNA
methyla0on
&
histone
modifica0ons
‣
Chroma0n-‐remodeling
complexes
‣
Non-‐coding
RNA-‐mediated
gene-‐silencing
‣
Transcrip0on-‐factor
binding
‣
Mechanisms
involved
in
genera0ng
and
maintaining
heritable
chroma0n
structure
and
aTachment
to
the
nuclear
matrix.
Changes
to
the
genome
that
affect
gene
expression
without
changing
the
DNA
sequence
4. Gene
expression
Central
Dogma
A,C,T,G
A,C,U,G
Leu,
Pro,...
Transcrip0on
Start
Site
(TSS)
DNA
DNA
RNA
polymerase
pre-‐mRNA
mRNA
5’UTR 3’UTRORF
5’UTR 3’UTR
pre-‐mRNA
Transcrip0on
End
Site
(TES)
Transcrip0on
5. Epigene0c
regula0on
of
gene
expression
• Epigene0c
marks
regulate
gene
expression,
predominantly
by
changing
chroma0n
structure.
➡Euchroma0n?
➡Ac0ve
histone
marks?
➡No
promoter
DNA
methyla0on?
➡TF
promoter
binding?➡Enhancers
ac0ve?
➡No
RNA-‐mediated
silencing?
Transcript
(mRNA)
6. DNA
methyla0on
• 5-‐methylCytosine
(5mC)
• One
of
the
most
common
and
stable
epigene0c
marks
• Other
types:
5hmC,
5fC,
[4mC,
6mA
in
bacteria]
• CpG
dinucleo0des
&
CpG
islands
• Heritable
through
cell
division,
but
dynamic
or
REVERSIBLE
• Important
role
in
gene
regula0on,
XCI,
genome
stability
netic modifications. A methyl group is
n DNA is treated with bisulfite, unmethylated
thylated cytosines are protected.
Me
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
CH3
Unmethylated Methylated
C C
Bisulfite
Conversion
O
C
C
C
N
C
NO
U
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
CH3
C
R A WIDE
ne of several epigenetic modifications. A methyl group is
cytosine C . When DNA is treated with bisulfite, unmethylated
d to uracil, but methylated cytosines are protected.
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Bisulfite
Conversion
O
C
C
C
N
C
NO
U
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
CH3
C
R A WIDE
HYLATION
e of several epigenetic modifications. A methyl group is
cytosine C . When DNA is treated with bisulfite, unmethylated
d to uracil, but methylated cytosines are protected.
e
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
CH3
Unmethylated Methylated
C C
Bisulfite
Conversion
O
C
C
C
N
C
NO
U
NH2
C
C
C
N
C
NO
CH3
C
SAM SAH
Methyltransferase
7. Origin
and
dynamics
of
epigene0c
varia0on?
Gene0c
influences
Reproduced
from
Mill
&
Heijmans
2013
Nature;
Reik
&
Kelsey
2014
Nature
-‐
Guo
et
al
&
Smith
et
al
2014
Egg Sperm
Embryo
Demethyla)on
Rapid
Turnover
Direct
environmental
exposures
In
utero
effects
Ageing
8. The
importance
of
DNA
methyla0on
in
normal
development
and
throughout
life
‣ Gene
expression
regula0on
‣ Reprogramming:
cell
lineage
&
0ssue
differen0a0on
• All
cells
contain
the
same
genes
–
cell
iden00es
depend
on
which
genes
are
expressed
and
repressed.
This
process
is
in
part
regulated
by
DNA
methyla0on.
‣ Imprin0ng
• Preferen0al
DNA
methyla0on
of
the
promoter
of
a
parent-‐of-‐origin
specific
copy
of
the
allele
to
silence
its
expression.
‣ X-‐chromosome
inac0va0on
‣ Genomic
stability
9. DNA
methyla0on
in
human
disease
• For
the
past
few
decades
DNA
methyla0on
changes
in
specific
genes
have
been
linked
to:
• Imprin0ng-‐related
disorders
• X-‐chromosome
abnormali0es
(eg
XO)
and
XCI
skewing
related
traits
• Cancers
10. Example
of
imprin0ng-‐related
disorders:
Prader-‐Willi
and
Angelman
syndrome
Imprinted
region
on
chromosome
15:
imprin0ng
is
not
the
cause
of
disease,
but
is
responsible
for
the
paTern
of
manifesta0on
of
the
disease
Reproduced
from
hTps://www.peds.ufl.edu
11. X-‐chromosome
inac0va0on
skewing
• Mechanism
of
dosage
compensa0on
• XCI
skewing
can
occur
(eg
preferen0al
inac0va0on
of
maternal
X)
• A
recessive
muta0on
carried
on
the
ac0ve
X
chromosome
can
have
profound
adverse
phenotypic
effects.
• XCI
skewing
has
been
associated
with
haemophilia,
Fragile-‐X
syndrome,
and
Duchenne
Muscular
Dystrophy.
• X-‐chromosome
inac0va0on
(XCI)
is
the
random
silencing
of
one
X
chromosome
in
order
for
female
development
to
proceed
X-Chromosome Inactivation
E. Heard, March 17th 2014
Xa' Xa' X' Xi'
Xist""
RNA'
One of the two X chromosomes must be silenced during e
embryogenesis in order for female development to proc
RNA'Pol'II'
Ac' H3K4'
me2'
Ac' Ac' Ac'
H3K4'
me3'
PcH3K2
me3
Ac6ve'X'chromosome' Inac6
5V
12. Epigene0cs
of
cancer
• More
recently,
genome-‐wide
scans
confirm
gross
epigene0c
abnormali0es
in
cancer
0ssue
• Cancer
is
defined
by
uncontrolled
division
of
abnormal
cells
Reproduced
from
Nephew
and
Huang
2003
Cancer
LeT
Progressive changes in promoter methylation at C
sites during cancer initiation and progression
Nephew"&,Huang,"Cancer"LeI."2003;190:125
• Progressive
epigene0c
changes
in
cancer
ini0a0on
and
progression:
13. DNA
methyla0on
in
human
disease
• For
the
past
few
decades
DNA
methyla0on
changes
in
specific
genes
have
been
linked
to:
• Imprin0ng-‐related
disorders,
eg
Angelman
syndrome
and
Prader-‐Willi
syndrome
(15q),
Beckwith-‐Wiedemann
syndrome
(11)
• X-‐chromosome
abnormali0es
(eg
XO)
and
XCI
skewing
related
traits
• Cancers
• Recent
technologies
allow
for
DNA
methyla0on
assays
throughout
genome,
and
have
the
poten0al
to
iden0fy
disease-‐related
changes
of
modest
effects
across
a
wide
range
of
traits
[EWAS].
16. Consequences
Genes
Complex
Phenotypes
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Causes
and
Consequences
of
DNA
methyla0on
varia0on
in
human
popula0ons
Environment
Causes
1. Prior
to
disease
onset
(causal
&
biomarker)
2. Consequence
of
disease
(disease
progression)Gene
Expression
Time
17. Consequences
Complex
Phenotypes
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Causes
and
Consequences
of
DNA
methyla0on
varia0on
in
human
popula0ons
Causes
External
Environment
Technical
covariates
Cell
heterogeneity
Internal
Environment
Age
Sex Complex
Phenotypes
Germline
Soma0c
indels
etc
Hormones
Longitudinal
stability
Genes Environment
Gene
Expression
Time
18. Consequences
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Gene0c
and
environmental
impacts
on
DNA
methyla0on
variability,
and
their
consequences
Causes
External
Environment
Germline
Genes Environment
Complex
Phenotypes
Gene
Expression
1 2
3
19. TwinsUK
Cohort
Department
for
Twin
Research,
King’s
College
London
~13,000
volunteer
adult
twins:
6,000
monozygo0c
(MZ)
twins
www.twinsuk.ac.uk
Established
in
1992 Same-‐sex
adult
(age
range:
16-‐101)
twin
pairs
20. The
EpiTwin
Project1,2
Aim:
To
iden)fy
Differen)ally
Methylated
Regions
(DMRs)
in
common
complex
disease
www.epitwin.eu
Pain
sensi2vity
Type
2
Diabetes
Depression
Heart
Disease
IVF
Breast
Cancer
Telomeres
Allergy
Asthma
Osteoporosis
Hypertension
Osteoarthri2s
Muscle
mass
Lipids
Psoriasis
Colon
cancerEczema
Obesity
Alcohol
use
10M
methyla2on
sites,
5000
individuals
Differen2ally
Methylated
Regions
(DMRs)
in
Disease
Epigenome-‐wide
Associa2on
Scan
(EWAS)
Bone
mineral
density
Autoimmune
disease
Epigene2c
profiles
of
5,000
UK
Twins
using
DNA
methyla2on
sequencing
and
Illumina
450k
profiles
in
whole
blood.
Select
disease-‐discordant
MZ
twins
1Bell
et
al.
Nat
Commun
2014;
2Davies,
Krause,
Bell
et
al.
Genome
Bio
2014;
21. The
MuTHER
Study1,2
Mul2ple
Tissue
Human
Expression
Resource
TwinsUK(Resource!
!!
Adipose((subcutaneous!fat)!!
Whole(Skin((
Lymphoblastoid(cell(lines((LCL)!
Lymphocytes,!Skeletal!Muscle!
(
850!female!
!twins!
Punch!Biopsies!&!
!blood!samples!!
Mul$%centre+collabora$on+
Kings&College&London&
Wellcome&Trust&Sanger&Ins7tute&
University&of&Oxford&
University&of&Geneva&
University&of&Cambridge&
&&
Expression
Gene0cs
Epidemiology
DNA
methyla2on
Illumina
HT12
Array
Illumina
450k
Array3
~2mln
genotyped
and
imputed
SNPs
Clinical
&
Lifestyle
longitudinal
data
1Nica
et
al.
Plos
Gene0cs
2012
2Grundberg
et
al.
Nature
Gene0cs
2013;
3Grundberg
et
al.
American
Journal
of
Human
Gene0cs
2013;
Adipose
Skin
Lymphoblastoid
cell
lines
Lymphocytes,
Skeletal
Muscle
850 female
twins
Punch
biopsies
& blood
from
P
Deloukas
22. Consequences
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Gene0c
and
environmental
impacts
on
DNA
methyla0on
variability
Causes
External
Environment
Germline
Genes Environment
Complex
Phenotypes
Gene
Expression
1
23. DNA
methyla0on
heritability
MZ DZ
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
In
twins,
heritability
es0mates
compare
the
degree
of
phenotypic
similari0es
between
groups
of
MZ
and
DZ
twins.
Heritability
(H)
=
propor0on
of
the
phenotypic
variance
that
is
aTributable
to
gene0c
effects.
Here,
the
phenotype
is
DNA
methyla0on
at
1
CpG-‐site
in
the
genome.
Twin-‐based
studies
can
es0mate
the
narrow-‐sense
heritability
(h2),
which
measures
the
propor0on
of
trait
variance
that
is
due
to
addi0ve
gene0c
effects.
h2
=
2(rMZ
-‐
rDZ)
24. DNA
methyla0on
heritability
across
0ssues
1Grundberg
et
al.
American
Journal
of
Human
Gene0cs
2013;
2
Gordon
et
al.
2012Genome
Research;
3
Bell
et
al.
2012
PLoS
Gene0cs;
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
‣
Blood
samples
from
240
female
twins
‣
377,000
methyla0on
sites
‣
Assess
DNA
methyla0on
heritability
‣
Adipose
0ssue
from
518
female
twins1
‣
424,000
methyla0on
sites
‣
Assess
DNA
methyla0on
heritability
_
__
_
MZ DZ Singleton
0.980
0.985
0.990
0.995
Whole Blood Illumina 450k Adipose Tissue Illumina 450k
➡
Mean
CpG-‐site
heritability
is
0.183
(blood)
and
0.191
(adipose).
10%
CpGs
with
>50%
heritability.
➡
Overlap
of
heritable
probes,
consistent
with
previous
blood(-‐related)
es0mates
in
newborns2.
Correla0on
Zygosity Zygosity
Correla0on
25. DNA
methyla0on
QTLs
(meQTLs)
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
‣
Blood
samples
from
188
female
twins
‣
370,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
‣
Adipose
0ssue
from
649
female
twins1
‣
424,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
0 1
Methyla0on
Unmethylated Methylated
DNA
methyla2on
level
met-‐QTLs
Individuals
AA
AG
GG
Genotype
1
Grundberg
et
al.
AJHG
2013;
26. DNA
methyla0on
QTLs
(meQTLs)
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
‣
Blood
samples
from
188
female
twins
‣
370,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
Distance from the CpG site (kb)
ProportionofmeQTL(1kbbins)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.12
−100 −50 0 50 100
Distance
to
CpG
(kb)
ProbabilitythatSNPismeQTL
Genome-wide meQTLs
(FDR = 5%)
cis-meQTL (7e-5) 14,206
trans-meQTL (8e-10) 460
➡Cis
meQTLs
are
<5kb
away
from
CpGs
~3.9%
of
probes
‣
Adipose
0ssue
from
649
female
twins1
‣
424,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
Genome-wide meQTLs1
cis-meQTL 36,139
~10%
of
probes
from th
jects an
of metQ
was sign
restricte
or metQ
TVS me
and 52%
whole b
have be
among
metQTL
the rep
those e
sites and
is show
Distance from the probe (kb)
Frequency
−100 −80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80 100
02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000
Figure 4. Distribution of Top SNPs Associated with the Probe
We performed metQTL analysis by associating methylation levels
with common sequence variants (MAF > 0.05) located close to the
Distance
to
CpG
(kb)
ProbabilitythatSNPismeQTL
➡Cis
meQTLs
are
<5kb
away
from
CpGs
1
Grundberg
et
al.
AJHG
2013;
27. DNA
methyla0on
QTLs
(meQTLs)
across
0ssues
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
‣
Blood
samples
from
188
female
twins
‣
370,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
Distance from the CpG site (kb)
ProportionofmeQTL(1kbbins)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.12
−100 −50 0 50 100
Distance
to
CpG
(kb)
ProbabilitythatSNPismeQTL
Genome-wide meQTLs
(FDR = 5%)
cis-meQTL (7e-5) 14,206
trans-meQTL (8e-10) 460
➡Cis
meQTLs
are
<5kb
away
from
CpGs
~3.9%
of
probes
‣
Adipose
0ssue
from
649
female
twins
‣
424,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
Genome-wide meQTLs1
cis-meQTL 36,139
~10%
of
probes
from th
jects an
of metQ
was sign
restricte
or metQ
TVS me
and 52%
whole b
have be
among
metQTL
the rep
those e
sites and
is show
Distance from the probe (kb)
Frequency
−100 −80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80 100
02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000
Figure 4. Distribution of Top SNPs Associated with the Probe
We performed metQTL analysis by associating methylation levels
with common sequence variants (MAF > 0.05) located close to the
Distance
to
CpG
(kb)
ProbabilitythatSNPismeQTL
➡Cis
meQTLs
are
<5kb
away
from
CpGs
1
Grundberg
et
al.
AJHG
2013;
3
Shi
et
al.
2014
Nat
Commun
➡
30%
of
CpGs
with
me-‐QTLs
overlap
across
0ssues
Blood
(14,206)
Adipose2 Lung3
1,722
5,7226,758
8,45171,116
4,255
20,131
28. DNA
methyla0on
QTLs
(meQTLs)
1
UK10K
project.
2
Grundberg
et
al.
2013
AJHG;
3
Shi
et
al.
2014
Nat
Commun
Genes
DNA
methyla0on
‣
Whole
blood
samples
from
188
female
twins
‣
370,000
methyla0on
sites
&
>3M
genotypes
‣
Genotype-‐methyla0on
associa0ons
Distance from the CpG site (kb)
ProportionofmeQTL(1kbbins)
0.000.020.040.060.080.100.12
−100 −50 0 50 100
Distance
to
CpG
ProbabilitythatSNPismeQTL
Genome-wide meQTLs
(FDR = 5%)
cis-meQTL (7e-5) 14,206
trans-meQTL (8e-10) 460
➡Cis
meQTLs
are
located
near
CpGs
~3.9%
of
probes
➡
CpGs
with
me-‐QTLs
overlap
across
0ssues
Blood
14,206
Adipose2 Lung3
1,722
5,7226,758
8,45171,116
4,255
20,131
A
propor0on
(4%-‐10%)
of
CpG-‐sites
exhibit
strongly
heritable
effects
with
evidence
for
meQTLs,
predominantly
in
cis.
At
many
of
these
regions
gene0c
effects
are
shared
across
0ssues
(30%
of
regions).
5-‐25%
of
meQTLs
are
also
eQTLs,
depending
on
study.
29. Consequences
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Gene0c
and
environmental
impacts
on
DNA
methyla0on
variability
Causes
External
Environment
Germline
Genes Environment
Complex
Phenotypes
Gene
Expression
2
30. Environmental
Epigene0cs
in
Humans
Tobacco
smoking
Snuff
Diet
Stress
Alcohol
consump0on
Exercise
Pathogen
infec0on
UV
radia0on
Sunlight
Genome-‐wide
studies Candidate-‐gene
studies
Air
pollu0on
Lead
&
arsenic
Pes0cides
Benzene
PAHs
Organic
chemicals
Season
of
concep0on
…
1
Nat
Rev
Genet
13:97
2011;
Nat
Rev
Genet
8:
253
(2007);
Many
recent
references
(2014)
32. • Tobacco
Smoking
is
a
major
risk
factor
in
disease
• Mul0ple
EWAS
for
smoking
in
whole
blood:
>25
smoking
differen0ally
methylated
regions
(s-‐DMRs)
iden0fied
and
replicated,
with
top
hits
in
AHRR,
F2RL3,
GFI1,
2q37
• S-‐DMRs
also
observed
in
newborns
from
mothers
who
smoked
during
pregnancy
• Few
studies
in
samples
other
than
blood,
or
on
gene
expression
Environment
DNA
methyla0onSmoking
impacts
the
epigenome
➡Systemic
impacts
of
smoking
on
DNA
methyla0on
and
expression?
33. Environment
DNA
methyla0onSmoking
impacts
the
epigenome
Smoking influences DNA methylation and gene expression in
adipose tissue, and effects are conserved across tissues.
‣
Blood
samples
from
306
female
twins2
‣
26
current-‐
,
94
ex-‐,
186
non-‐smokers
‣
377,000
methyla0on
sites
‣
smoking-‐EWAS
‣117,000
exons
RNA-‐seq
‣
smoking-‐TWAS
(Transcriptome-‐WAS)
‣
Analyses
account
for:
‣Methyla0on:
chip,
posi0on
on
chip,
BS
conversion
‣RNAseq:
mean
GC,
primer
index
‣age,
BMI,
family,
zygosity
‣no
probes
with
SNPs
&
mul0ple
alignments
1
Grundberg
et
al.
2013
AJHG;
2
Tsaprouni
et
al.
Epigene0cs,
in
press;
‣
Analyses
account
for:
‣Methyla0on:
chip,
posi0on
on
chip,
BS
conversion,
blood
cell
subtypes
(FACS)
‣RNAseq:
mean
GC,
primer
index
‣age,
BMI,
family,
zygosity
‣no
probes
with
SNPs
&
mul0ple
alignments
‣
Adipose
0ssue
from
349
female
twins1
‣
35
current-‐,
128
ex-‐,
186
non-‐smokers
‣
396,000
methyla0on
sites
‣
smoking-‐EWAS
‣119,000
exons
RNA-‐seq
‣
smoking-‐TWAS
(Transcriptome-‐WAS)
39. F2RL3
1
Tsaprouni
et
al.
Epigene0cs,
in
press;
Environment
DNA
methyla0on
GFI1
2q37.1
AHRR
4 regions overlap: tissue shared effects
Adipose
Blood1
Robust
markers
of
smoking
in
blood
and
fat
40. Methyla2on
markers
of
smoking
in
3
previously
iden2fied2
genes.
Current
smoker
Never
smoked
12 MZ pairs
‣
Illumina
450k
profiles
(1.7%
CpGs)
‣
Blood
(correc0on1
for
cell
heterogeneity)
Chromosome
ATAD3B
2q37.1 AHRR
GNG12 KLHL29
PCGF3
AHRR INTS1
KCNQ1 ETS2
1""""""""""""""""""""""""""""2"""""""""""""""""""""""""3"""""""""""""""""""""4"""""""""""""""""""""5"""""""""""""""""""6""""""""""""""""""7"""""""""""""""""8""""""""""""""""9""""""""""""""10"""""""""""""11""""""""""""12"""""""""""13""""""""""14"""""""""15""""""""16""""""17"""""18"""""19""""20""""21"""22"
-‐log(P-‐value)
FDR
25%
P=2e-‐6
FDR
90%
P=1e-‐4
1
Houseman
et
al.
BMC
Bioinforma0cs
2012;
2
Shenker
et
al.
HMG
2012;
Besingi&Johansson
HMG
2013;
Philibert
et
al.
Clin
Epigenet
2013;
Sun
et
al.
Hum
Genet
2013;
Zeilinger
et
al.
PLoS
One
2013;
EllioT
et
al.
Clin
Epigenet
2014;
(ALPPL2)
Markers
iden0fied
in
12
smoking-‐discordant
MZ
pairs
Environment
DNA
methyla0on
41. Methyla2on
markers
of
smoking
in
3
previously
iden2fied2
genes.
Current
smoker
Never
smoked
12 MZ pairs
‣
Illumina
450k
profiles
(1.7%
CpGs)
‣
Blood
(correc0on1
for
cell
heterogeneity)
Chromosome
ATAD3B
2q37.1 AHRR
GNG12 KLHL29
PCGF3
AHRR INTS1
KCNQ1 ETS2
1""""""""""""""""""""""""""""2"""""""""""""""""""""""""3"""""""""""""""""""""4"""""""""""""""""""""5"""""""""""""""""""6""""""""""""""""""7"""""""""""""""""8""""""""""""""""9""""""""""""""10"""""""""""""11""""""""""""12"""""""""""13""""""""""14"""""""""15""""""""16""""""17"""""18"""""19""""20""""21"""22"
-‐log(P-‐value)
FDR
50%
P=2e-‐6
FDR
90%
P=1e-‐4
1
Houseman
et
al.
BMC
Bioinforma0cs
2012;
2
Shenker
et
al.
HMG
2012;
Besingi&Johansson
HMG
2013;
Philibert
et
al.
Clin
Epigenet
2013;
Sun
et
al.
Hum
Genet
2013;
Zeilinger
et
al.
PLoS
One
2013;
EllioT
et
al.
Clin
Epigenet
2014;
(ALPPL2)
Markers
iden0fied
in
12
smoking-‐discordant
MZ
pairs
Environment
DNA
methyla0on
Smoking-‐DMRs
in
adipose
0ssue:
adipose-‐specific
and
0ssue-‐shared
effects
Smoking
influences
not
only
methyla0on,
but
also
gene
expression
Smoking
should
be
included
as
a
covariate
in
EWAS
Use
of
methyla0on
markers
as
a
proxy
of
smoking
in
large-‐scale
epidemiological
studies
43. Consequences
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Epigenome-‐wide
Associa0on
Scans
(EWAS)
Considera0ons
Causes
External
Environment
Germline
Genes Environment
Complex
Phenotypes
Gene
Expression
Functional annotation
EWAS study design
& power
Methylation assay:
coverage vs sensitivity
Time
Cause or Consequence?
Validation & ReplicationCell and Tissue
specificity
44. Consequences
DNA
methyla2on
varia2on
Epigenome-‐wide
Associa0on
Scans
(EWAS)
Considera0ons:
Study
design
Causes
External
Environment
Germline
Genes Environment
Complex
Phenotypes
Gene
Expression
vs
vs
Case-‐control
T0 T1 T2
Discordant
MZ
twins
Longitudinal
samples
45. EWAS
Methods
and
considera0ons
• EWAS
Study
designs:
tailored
to
research
ques0on
• Tissue
specificity:
disease
relevance/cell
heterogeneity
• Bias
and
covariates:
approaches
to
correct
for
artefacts
• Sta0s0cal
analysis:
test
sta0s0c/signal
distribu0on
• Mul0ple
tes0ng
correc0on
• Valida0on
using
independent
assay
• Replica0on
in
an
independent
sample
• Longitudinal
follow
up
to
establish
reversibility
• Func0onal
follow
up
to
establish
func0onal
relevance
46. EWAS
Examples
• Type
1
Diabetes,
SLE
• Type
2
Diabetes
• Obesity
• Alzheimer’s
disease
• Bipolar
disorder
• Depression
• Au0sm
• Pain
sensi0vity
See
further
reading
list
47. Conclusions
• Epigene0cs
represents
a
set
of
regulatory
mechanisms
that
can
be
stable,
heritable,
yet
also
reversible
• Epigene0c
changes
can
be
under
gene0c
control,
but
also
influenced
by
environmental
factors
• Epigene0c
changes
have
been
linked
to
complex
disease
• Epigene0cs
can
complement
and
extend
previous
genome-‐wide
gene0c
studies
to
help
us
understand
molecular
mechanisms
in
complex
disease.
48. Further
Reading
• DNA
methyla0on
assays
• Laird
Nat
Rev
Genet.
2010
Mar;11(3):191-‐203.
doi:
10.1038/nrg2732
• Heritability
• Visscher
et
al
Nature
Reviews
Gene0cs
12,
529-‐541
doi:10.1038/nrg3000
• EWAS
overviews
• Rakyan
et
al
Nature
Reviews
Gene0cs
12,
529-‐541
doi:10.1038/nrg3000
• Tsai
et
al.
Epigenomics.
2012
Oct;4(5):511-‐26.
doi:
10.2217/epi.12.45.
• Some
EWAS
examples:
• Bell
et
al.
Nature
Commun
2014;
Liu
et
al.
Nature
Biotech
2013;
Rakyan
et
al.
PLoS
Gene0cs
2011;
Bell
et
al.
PLoS
Gene0cs
2012;
Dempster
et
al.
Hum
Molec
Genet
2011;