Pests of castor_Binomics_Identification_Dr.UPR.pdf
Dukat, Paulina: How does drought impact water and carbon exchange in the temperate and boreal Scots pine stands?
1. How drought impacts of water and carbon
exchange on Scots pine stands?
Paulina Dukat1,2, Marek Urbaniak1, Klaudia Ziemblińska1, Pasi Kolari2, Ivan
Mammarella2, Christian Bernhofer3, Ivan Janssens4, Matthias Mauder3,5, Matthias
Peichl6, Janusz Olejnik1, Timo Vesala2
1Meteorology Lab., Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
2Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/University of Helsinki,Finland.
3Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
4PLECO (Plants and Ecosystems), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Belgium
5Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Garmisch-
Partenkirchen, Germany
6Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå,
Sweden
2. - Studied widely and one conclusion: drought is bad for plants.
- Research question: How does drought influence pine forests across boreal and
temporal climates?
- Drought can be determined meteorologically by SPEI, based on difference of
precipitation and potential ET
- Scots pine comfort zone and drought resistance: importance of long growing season
and light availability vs soil moisture and less water stress?
- How does prolonged drought (even several summers in row), due to changing
climate, influence the carbon and water balance?
3. Brasschaat - temperate maritime 2 ha,
even-aged pine stand
Tuczno - temperate mature pine forest with
admixture (1%) of birch.
Hyytiälä – boreal, rather homogenous pine stand
Svartberget – boreal, 100 years old mixed forest with
60% pine and 40% Norway spruce
Rosinedal – boreal, pine forest
Värriö - Subarctic climate, Scots pine (Pinus
sylvestris). Trees mostly 65–70 years old
4. Tsoil ≥ 5˚C GPP ≥ 10% of max daily GPP from multi year period
7. 10 15 20 25
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Varrio April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
14 16 18 20 22 24
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Svartberget April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Rosinedal April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
10 15 20 25 30
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Hyytiala April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
4 6 8 10
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Tuczno April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
10 15 20
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
Brasschaat April − September
SWC (%)
SPEI
3
SPEI vs in-situ monthly Soil Water Content
8. -1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
NEE
(gC
m
-2
year
-1
)
Bra Tu Hyy Sva Ro Va Tu
Reduction in assimilation
rate for Tuczno in 2015
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
ET
(mm
m
-2
year
-1
)
Bra Tu Hyy Sva
Ro Va Tu
Effect of repeating drought
9.
10. Conclusions:
• Linking of long-term SPEI with in-situ flux and soil data is useful
• helps in understanding of Ecosystem response to drought
• Appearance of drought depends on the ecozone: northern sites
show meteorological drought at higher SWC
• Appearance of strong drought - for different zones and SWC range - linked to
similar WUE
• Multi-year drying tendency decreases the average carbon uptake – especially
in temperate forest