SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Buletin USAMV-CN, 64/2007 (-)
ISSN 1454-2382


CONTRIBUTIONS REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF TOMATO
 CULTURE IN A MODERN PLASTIC TUNNEL SITUATED IN THE
   PEDOCLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF THE TRANSILVANIAN
                    TABLELAND

                       Singureanu V., Al. S. Apahidean, Maria Apahidean

               University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca
                                       singvalentin@yahoo.com

Key words: tomato hybrid, mulch, density, fertirigation, dosing unit, plastic tunnel

Abstract. All the experimental variants cultivated under a plant density of 41.700 plants/ha (80/30 cm) presented
a medium height higher than the experimental variants planted under the control density (80/40 cm – 31.250
plants/ha). The highest value concerning the medium number of leaves was obtained at the tomato hybrid
Shannon F1 (28.55). The blossoming and fruit link of the first 3 clusters on the tomato plants recorded the
highest percent at the Menhir F1 (80/40 cm) tomato hybrid (90.79 %). The same experimental variant has the
highest percent in blossoming and fruit link from the cluster number 4 till 8. (54.84 %) and the total one. The
early production is influenced by the plant density 80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha, with a medium yield of 2.47
kg/m2. The same plant density in interaction with the tomato hybrids obtained a significant difference (3.18
kg/m2 medium early yield – (interaction between plant density 80/30 cm and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid). The
interaction between tomato hybrids and adopted plant density lead to no statistical differences.
          The total yield was influenced by the plant density adopted with a medium yield of 19.26 kg/m2 at the
plant density of 80/30 cm. The interactions between densities and tomato hybrids lead to statistical significance
in case of Cronos F1 tomato hybrid planted at a density of 80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha (20.46 kg/m2 total yield),
and at the same density but a different tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 (19.23 kg/m2 total yield).

                                              INTRODUCTION

        The consumption of fresh vegetables is an actual and pragmatic desideratum
nowadays. Greenhouses are an important source in providing these aspects. In order to work
in profit the farmers tend to produce their vegetables in early seasons when the prices are
higher. Mulching of the soil seems to be a crucial factor in order to produce early vegetables.
In order to establish a vegetable production in early season, the environment has a lot of
importance. The trend is to produce vegetables in modern greenhouses with a minimum lost
of energy.


                                       MATERIAL AND METHOD

        The experimental field was founded in 2007 in the vegetable growing sector at the
Faculty of Horticulture. The experiment was conceived as a bifactorial one. The experimental
factors where:
        Factor 1 (biological material used) – Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (control)
                                              Menhir F1 tomato hybrid
                                                    Shannon F1 tomato hybrid
Factor 2 (plant density) – 80/40 cm (31.250 plants/ha) (control)
                                          80/30 cm (41.700 plants/ha)
               From the combination of the two factors resulted 6 experimental variants placed in 3
       repetitions.
               The experiment was founded in 3.04.2007, when the transplants where planted. Before
       the plantation the irrigation system was mounted and the soil was mulched with a black
       plastic film. Concerning the environmental conditions, the experiment was placed in a modern
       plastic tunnel double covered with Visquen UV 5 plastic film. The length of the plastic tunnel
       was 32 m, and 8 m wide. The surface of an experimental variant was established at 4.80 m2.
       The plastic tunnel was equipped with a fertirigation system, artificial fog system and an
       automatically opening and closure system for the windows.
               In the pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian Tableland the early yield was
       established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007.
               The experimental was dismounted in 3.09.2007.

                                               RESULTS AND DISCUSIONS

               The medium height of the tomato plants is higher in all experimental variants
       cultivated on the second plant density (80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha). A plausible explanation
       for this cause can be the self shading effect of the plants. As for the blossom and fruit link the
       experimental variant Menhir F1 80/40 cm recorded the highest values for the first three
       clusters and as well for the clusters between four and eight. The same experimental variant
       obtained the highest total blossom and fruit link.


                Blossom and fruit link for the tomato plants cultivated in the plastic tunnel (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                                Table 1
                                    Medium       blossom and fruit link     blossom and fruit link      Total blossom and fruit
               Medium    Medium
Experimental                        number        between clusters 1-3       between clusters 4-8                 link
               height     nr. of
  variants                             of                           link                       link                        link
                (cm)      leafs                 Flowers Fruits             Flowers Fruits              Flowers Fruits
                                    clusters                         %                          %                           %
 Cronos F1
               177.77      22.55      6.11       58.66     52.00   88.64     66.00    33.33    50.50    124.66     85.33    68.45
 80/40 cm
 Cronos F1
               180.55      23.66      6.22       60.33     51.33   85.08     61.33    26.66    43.46    121.66     77.99    64.10
 80/30 cm
Menhir F1
               217.77      26.10      7.22       58.00     52.66   90.79     68.66    37.66    54.84    126.66     90.32    71.30
 80/40 cm
Menhir F1
               221.11      25.77      6.88       53.33     48.00   90.00     66.00    33.66    51.00    119.33     81.66    68.43
 80/30 cm
Shannon F1
               239.99      28.55      7.33       68.00     56.00   82.35     90.00    44.00    48.88    158.00     100.00   63.29
 80/40 cm
Shannon F1
               245.55      28.11      7.10       71.00     55.33   77.92     94.33    38.00    40.28    165.33     93.33    56.45
 80/30 cm

               The early yield was established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007. Regarding the
       influence of plant density upon the early yield of tomato plants, we can observe a positive
       distinct significant difference in case of plant density 80/30 (41.700 plants/ha).With a medium
       early yield of 2.47 kg/m2. (Table 2)
               The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars, in case of the early
       yield showed that the higher plant density (41.700 plants/ha) and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid
lead to the highest early yield. Compared with the control resulted a significant positive
   difference (3.18 kg/m2). Compared with the average of the experiment resulted a distinct
   significant positive difference. (Table 3)
               The influence of plant density upon the early yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                           Table 2
                                Medium yield        Medium relativ          Difference           Significance of
        Plant density
                                   (kg/m2)              yield (%)            (±kg/m2)              difference
     80/40 (31.250 pl/ha)            1.83                 100.0                0.00                 Control
     80/30 (41.700 pl/ha)            2.47                 134.9                0.64                    **
                               DL (p 5 %) + 0.38; DL (p 1%) + 0.58; DL (p 0.1 %) + 0.93


      The combined influence plant density + cultivar upon the early yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                           Table 3
                                                                               Medium
                                                                                              Difference
                                                                                relative                  Significance
                                                            Significance yield (%) in              in
                               Medium         Difference                                     comparation        of
                                                                  of        comparation
                  Medium        relative           in                                           with the    difference
  Experimental                                               difference        with the
                    yield    yield (%) in comparation                                         average of
    variants             2                                                    average of
                  (kg/m ) comparation with control                                                the
                                                                                  the
                             with control     (±kg/m2)                                      experimental    Compared
                                                                            experimental                     with the
                                                             Compared                           variants
                                                                               variants
                                                            with control                       (±kg/m2)      average
  80/40+Cronos
                        2.33       100.00         0.00             -           108.37           0.18            -
    F1(Control)
 80/30+Cronos F1        3.18       136.50          0.85            *           147.90            1.03          **
 80/40+Menhir F1        1.97        84.54         -0.36            -           91.62            -0.18           -
 80/30+Menhir F1        2.41       103.43          0.08            -           112.09            0.26           -
80/40+Shannon F1        1.19        51.07         -1.14           00            55.34           -0.96          0
80/30+Shannon F1        1.82        78.11         -0.51            -           84.65            -0.33           -
  Average of the
   experimental         2.15          -             -                          100.00             0             -
      variants
                               DL (p 5 %) + 0.66; DL (p 1%) + 1.00; DL (p 0.1 %) + 1.61

          The total yield was influenced by the plant density, with a medium yield of 19.26
   kg/m2 at the density 80/30 – 41.700 plants/ha. (Table 4)


                The influence of plant density upon the total yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                           Table 4
                                Medium yield        Medium relativ          Difference           Significance of
        Plant density
                                   (kg/m2)              yield (%)            (±kg/m2)              difference
     80/40 (31.250 pl/ha)           17.26                 100.0                0.00                 Control
     80/30 (41.700 pl/ha)           19.26                 111.6                2.00                    **
                               DL (p 5 %) + 0.96; DL (p 1%) + 1.46; DL (p 0.1 %) + 2.34

           Regarding the combined influence between plant density and cultivars upon the total
   yield we can observe that the higher densities (41.700 plants/ha) obtained total medium yields
   larger on the Cronos F1 tomato hybrid with a medium yield of 20.46 kg/m2 and a difference
   distinct significant positive compared with the control, and at the Shannon F1 tomato hybrid
   (19.23 kg/m2) with a difference significant and positive. (Table 5)
The combined influence plant density + cultivar upon the total yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                            Table 5
                                                                                Medium
                                                                                               Difference
                                                                                 relative                   Significance
                                                             Significance yield (%) in              in
                                Medium        Difference                                      comparation        of
                                                                   of         comparation
                  Medium        relative           in                                            with the    difference
  Experimental                                                difference         with the
                    yield     yield (%) in comparation                                         average of
    variants             2                                                     average of
                   (kg/m ) comparation with control                                                the
                                                                                   the
                              with control     (±kg/m2)                                       experimental   Compared
                                                                             experimental                     with the
                                                              Compared                           variants
                                                                                 variants
                                                             with control                       (±kg/m2)      average
  80/40+Cronos
                      17.42       100.00             0.00              -              95.39           -0.84         -
    F1(Control)
 80/30+Cronos F1      20.46       117.45              3.04            **              112.04           2.20         *
 80/40+Menhir F1      16.28        93.45             -1.14             -              89.15           -1.98         0
 80/30+Menhir F1      18.09       103.84              0.67             -              99.06           -0.17         -
80/40+Shannon F1      18.09       103.84              0.67             -              99.06           -0.17         -
80/30+Shannon F1      19.23       110.39              1.81             *              105.31           0.97         -
  Average of the
   experimental       18.26          -                 -               -              100.00               0        -
      variants
                              DL (p 5 %) + 1.67; DL (p 1%) + 2.53; DL (p 0.1 %) + 4.06

          The highest percent of extra quality fruits was obtained at the Shannon F1 tomato
   hybrid cultivated at a plant density of 41.700 plants/ha with a value of 85.90 %.
          Although Cronos F1 80/30 obtained the highest total yield it seems that this yield is
   influenced by the first quality fruits plus extra quality fruits in a percent of 97.21 %. (Table 6)

                                  The quality of the tomato yield (Cluj-Napoca 2007)
                                                                                                               Table 6

                                                               Yield on qualities
                                  Total
                                               Extra quality               Extra quality + First quality
                 Experimental     yield
                   variants                                                                    % compared
                                                           % from                % from
                                         2       2                          2                    with the
                                  kg/m       kg/m           total    kg/m         total
                                                                                               experimental
                                                            yield                 yield
                                                                                                  control
                  Cronos F1
                                  17.42      14.09         80.88     16.74          96.09          100
                80/40 (control)
                  Cronos F1
                                  20.46      16.49         80.59     19.89          97.21        114.17
                    80/30
                  Menhir F1
                                  16.28      13.21         81.14     15.81          97.11         90.75
                    80/40
                  Menhir F1
                                  18.09      14.26         78.82     17.33          95.79         99.48
                    80/30
                 Shannon F1
                                  18.09      14.56         80.48     17.74          98.06        101.83
                    80/40
                 Shannon F1
                                  19.23      16.52         85.90     19.02          98.90        109.18
                    80/30
CONCLUSIONS

        1. The medium height of the tomato plants is higher in all experimental variants
cultivated on the second plant density (80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha).
        2. Regarding the blossom and fruit link, the experimental variant Menhir F1 80/40 cm
recorded the highest values for the first three clusters and as well for the clusters between four
and eight. The same experimental variant obtained the highest total blossom and fruit link.
        3. All the experimental variants panted at the control plant density 80/40 cm – 31.250
plants/ha recorded a higher value for blossom and fruit link than the variants planted at the
density 80/30 – 41.700 plants/ha.
        4. The combined influence plant density and cultivars used in case of the early yield
showed that the higher plant density (41.700 pl/ha) and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid lead to the
highest early yield.
        5. The combined influence between plant density and cultivars upon the total yield
was higher on the Cronos F1 tomato hybrid with a medium yield of 20.46 kg/m2 on the plant
density 41.700 plants/ha.
        6. Although Cronos F1 80/30 obtained the highest total yield it seems that this yield is
influenced by the first quality fruits plus extra quality fruits in a percent of 97.21 %.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

En2013 s i m u l a r e evaluarea nationala la matematica ilfov
En2013  s i m u l a r e  evaluarea nationala la matematica   ilfovEn2013  s i m u l a r e  evaluarea nationala la matematica   ilfov
En2013 s i m u l a r e evaluarea nationala la matematica ilfov
Gherghescu Gabriel
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Cresterea iepurilor de casa
Cresterea iepurilor de casaCresterea iepurilor de casa
Cresterea iepurilor de casa
 
Off Season Cultivation of Cucurbits under Low Tunnel - A Cost Effective Techn...
Off Season Cultivation of Cucurbits under Low Tunnel - A Cost Effective Techn...Off Season Cultivation of Cucurbits under Low Tunnel - A Cost Effective Techn...
Off Season Cultivation of Cucurbits under Low Tunnel - A Cost Effective Techn...
 
En2013 s i m u l a r e evaluarea nationala la matematica ilfov
En2013  s i m u l a r e  evaluarea nationala la matematica   ilfovEn2013  s i m u l a r e  evaluarea nationala la matematica   ilfov
En2013 s i m u l a r e evaluarea nationala la matematica ilfov
 
Caracteristici tehnice sere
Caracteristici tehnice sereCaracteristici tehnice sere
Caracteristici tehnice sere
 
Off season vegetables ,tunnel technology By Allah Dad Khan
Off season vegetables ,tunnel technology By Allah Dad KhanOff season vegetables ,tunnel technology By Allah Dad Khan
Off season vegetables ,tunnel technology By Allah Dad Khan
 
Altoire pepene verde
Altoire pepene verdeAltoire pepene verde
Altoire pepene verde
 
Immersed tunnels Proposal Mumbai, India
Immersed tunnels Proposal Mumbai, IndiaImmersed tunnels Proposal Mumbai, India
Immersed tunnels Proposal Mumbai, India
 
Tunnel technology for Off season Vegetables by Allah Dad Khan
Tunnel technology for Off season Vegetables by Allah Dad Khan Tunnel technology for Off season Vegetables by Allah Dad Khan
Tunnel technology for Off season Vegetables by Allah Dad Khan
 
AUDI A4 B5 1.8L 1996 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 96 12 interior lights avant
AUDI A4 B5 1.8L 1996 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 96 12 interior lights avantAUDI A4 B5 1.8L 1996 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 96 12 interior lights avant
AUDI A4 B5 1.8L 1996 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 96 12 interior lights avant
 
Status of Protected Cultivation in India and Abroad
Status of Protected Cultivation in India and AbroadStatus of Protected Cultivation in India and Abroad
Status of Protected Cultivation in India and Abroad
 

Similar to The improvement of tomato transilvania

Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing TechnologyBenefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
Christina Valadez
 
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
Innspub Net
 
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
Innspub Net
 
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkUSotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
Diego Sotomayor
 
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
Premier Publishers
 
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
IOSR Journals
 

Similar to The improvement of tomato transilvania (20)

Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing TechnologyBenefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
Benefits Over Traditional Wired Sensing Technology
 
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar ...
 
International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR)
 
On-farm trials report 2022-2023.docx
On-farm trials report 2022-2023.docxOn-farm trials report 2022-2023.docx
On-farm trials report 2022-2023.docx
 
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
Line × tester analysis for yield contributing morphological traits in Triticu...
 
INFLUENCE OF SEED PELLETING ON GROWTH, SEED YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAI...
INFLUENCE OF SEED PELLETING ON GROWTH, SEED YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAI...INFLUENCE OF SEED PELLETING ON GROWTH, SEED YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAI...
INFLUENCE OF SEED PELLETING ON GROWTH, SEED YIELD AND YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAI...
 
The Effects of Coconut Milk on the Rooting Of Two Types of Cutting of Termina...
The Effects of Coconut Milk on the Rooting Of Two Types of Cutting of Termina...The Effects of Coconut Milk on the Rooting Of Two Types of Cutting of Termina...
The Effects of Coconut Milk on the Rooting Of Two Types of Cutting of Termina...
 
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
GGEBiplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in Agropyron interme...
 
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkUSotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
Sotomayor PhD presentation Apr19 YorkU
 
Study of Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation among 20 Accessions of Nigerian...
Study of Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation among 20 Accessions of Nigerian...Study of Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation among 20 Accessions of Nigerian...
Study of Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation among 20 Accessions of Nigerian...
 
Determination of Optimum Rates of N and P Fertilizer for Tomato at Mereb-lekh...
Determination of Optimum Rates of N and P Fertilizer for Tomato at Mereb-lekh...Determination of Optimum Rates of N and P Fertilizer for Tomato at Mereb-lekh...
Determination of Optimum Rates of N and P Fertilizer for Tomato at Mereb-lekh...
 
Seed yield components of onion (allium cepa var. cepa) as
Seed yield components of onion (allium cepa var. cepa) asSeed yield components of onion (allium cepa var. cepa) as
Seed yield components of onion (allium cepa var. cepa) as
 
No 18. effect of organic fertilizers on the performance of seed potato 2
No 18. effect of organic fertilizers on the performance of seed potato 2No 18. effect of organic fertilizers on the performance of seed potato 2
No 18. effect of organic fertilizers on the performance of seed potato 2
 
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
Genotype x Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Maize (Zea ma...
 
Linseed
LinseedLinseed
Linseed
 
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
Combining Ability for Yield and Yield Components through Diallel Analysis in ...
 
Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Perlite and its Mixture with Organic ...
Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Perlite and its Mixture with Organic ...Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Perlite and its Mixture with Organic ...
Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Perlite and its Mixture with Organic ...
 
Correlations and pass coefficient analyses of yield and yield related traits ...
Correlations and pass coefficient analyses of yield and yield related traits ...Correlations and pass coefficient analyses of yield and yield related traits ...
Correlations and pass coefficient analyses of yield and yield related traits ...
 
Synopsis Seminar (Satyendra Verma).pptx
Synopsis Seminar (Satyendra Verma).pptxSynopsis Seminar (Satyendra Verma).pptx
Synopsis Seminar (Satyendra Verma).pptx
 
Row spacing and fertilizer rate on yield and yield components of tef eragrost...
Row spacing and fertilizer rate on yield and yield components of tef eragrost...Row spacing and fertilizer rate on yield and yield components of tef eragrost...
Row spacing and fertilizer rate on yield and yield components of tef eragrost...
 

More from Gherghescu Gabriel

Modele si variante bac matematica m1 2010 (model oficial)
Modele si variante bac matematica m1   2010 (model oficial)Modele si variante bac matematica m1   2010 (model oficial)
Modele si variante bac matematica m1 2010 (model oficial)
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Gherghescu Gabriel
 

More from Gherghescu Gabriel (20)

Modele si variante bac matematica m1 2010 (model oficial)
Modele si variante bac matematica m1   2010 (model oficial)Modele si variante bac matematica m1   2010 (model oficial)
Modele si variante bac matematica m1 2010 (model oficial)
 
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
 
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
 
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
 
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
 
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
 
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
 
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
 
Cutie sigurante audi
Cutie sigurante audiCutie sigurante audi
Cutie sigurante audi
 
A3 1997 AUDI maintenance
A3 1997 AUDI maintenanceA3 1997 AUDI maintenance
A3 1997 AUDI maintenance
 
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRA3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRSiguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDISiguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
 
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRMotor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGeneral AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRCompart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Audi a6 adr
Audi a6 adrAudi a6 adr
Audi a6 adr
 
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRAir flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 

Recently uploaded

Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
Design and Development of a Provenance Capture Platform for Data Science
Design and Development of a Provenance Capture Platform for Data ScienceDesign and Development of a Provenance Capture Platform for Data Science
Design and Development of a Provenance Capture Platform for Data Science
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Simplifying Mobile A11y Presentation.pptx
Simplifying Mobile A11y Presentation.pptxSimplifying Mobile A11y Presentation.pptx
Simplifying Mobile A11y Presentation.pptx
 
TEST BANK For Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 16th Edition by Gerard J....
TEST BANK For Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 16th Edition by Gerard J....TEST BANK For Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 16th Edition by Gerard J....
TEST BANK For Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, 16th Edition by Gerard J....
 
AI+A11Y 11MAY2024 HYDERBAD GAAD 2024 - HelloA11Y (11 May 2024)
AI+A11Y 11MAY2024 HYDERBAD GAAD 2024 - HelloA11Y (11 May 2024)AI+A11Y 11MAY2024 HYDERBAD GAAD 2024 - HelloA11Y (11 May 2024)
AI+A11Y 11MAY2024 HYDERBAD GAAD 2024 - HelloA11Y (11 May 2024)
 
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational PerformanceDecarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
Decarbonising Commercial Real Estate: The Role of Operational Performance
 
AI in Action: Real World Use Cases by Anitaraj
AI in Action: Real World Use Cases by AnitarajAI in Action: Real World Use Cases by Anitaraj
AI in Action: Real World Use Cases by Anitaraj
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
 
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
 
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptxJohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
JohnPollard-hybrid-app-RailsConf2024.pptx
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
TrustArc Webinar - Unified Trust Center for Privacy, Security, Compliance, an...
 
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering DevelopersWSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
WSO2's API Vision: Unifying Control, Empowering Developers
 
Choreo: Empowering the Future of Enterprise Software Engineering
Choreo: Empowering the Future of Enterprise Software EngineeringChoreo: Empowering the Future of Enterprise Software Engineering
Choreo: Empowering the Future of Enterprise Software Engineering
 
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
Understanding the FAA Part 107 License ..
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern EnterpriseNavigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
Navigating Identity and Access Management in the Modern Enterprise
 
Modernizing Legacy Systems Using Ballerina
Modernizing Legacy Systems Using BallerinaModernizing Legacy Systems Using Ballerina
Modernizing Legacy Systems Using Ballerina
 

The improvement of tomato transilvania

  • 1. Buletin USAMV-CN, 64/2007 (-) ISSN 1454-2382 CONTRIBUTIONS REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF TOMATO CULTURE IN A MODERN PLASTIC TUNNEL SITUATED IN THE PEDOCLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF THE TRANSILVANIAN TABLELAND Singureanu V., Al. S. Apahidean, Maria Apahidean University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca singvalentin@yahoo.com Key words: tomato hybrid, mulch, density, fertirigation, dosing unit, plastic tunnel Abstract. All the experimental variants cultivated under a plant density of 41.700 plants/ha (80/30 cm) presented a medium height higher than the experimental variants planted under the control density (80/40 cm – 31.250 plants/ha). The highest value concerning the medium number of leaves was obtained at the tomato hybrid Shannon F1 (28.55). The blossoming and fruit link of the first 3 clusters on the tomato plants recorded the highest percent at the Menhir F1 (80/40 cm) tomato hybrid (90.79 %). The same experimental variant has the highest percent in blossoming and fruit link from the cluster number 4 till 8. (54.84 %) and the total one. The early production is influenced by the plant density 80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha, with a medium yield of 2.47 kg/m2. The same plant density in interaction with the tomato hybrids obtained a significant difference (3.18 kg/m2 medium early yield – (interaction between plant density 80/30 cm and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid). The interaction between tomato hybrids and adopted plant density lead to no statistical differences. The total yield was influenced by the plant density adopted with a medium yield of 19.26 kg/m2 at the plant density of 80/30 cm. The interactions between densities and tomato hybrids lead to statistical significance in case of Cronos F1 tomato hybrid planted at a density of 80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha (20.46 kg/m2 total yield), and at the same density but a different tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 (19.23 kg/m2 total yield). INTRODUCTION The consumption of fresh vegetables is an actual and pragmatic desideratum nowadays. Greenhouses are an important source in providing these aspects. In order to work in profit the farmers tend to produce their vegetables in early seasons when the prices are higher. Mulching of the soil seems to be a crucial factor in order to produce early vegetables. In order to establish a vegetable production in early season, the environment has a lot of importance. The trend is to produce vegetables in modern greenhouses with a minimum lost of energy. MATERIAL AND METHOD The experimental field was founded in 2007 in the vegetable growing sector at the Faculty of Horticulture. The experiment was conceived as a bifactorial one. The experimental factors where: Factor 1 (biological material used) – Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (control) Menhir F1 tomato hybrid Shannon F1 tomato hybrid
  • 2. Factor 2 (plant density) – 80/40 cm (31.250 plants/ha) (control) 80/30 cm (41.700 plants/ha) From the combination of the two factors resulted 6 experimental variants placed in 3 repetitions. The experiment was founded in 3.04.2007, when the transplants where planted. Before the plantation the irrigation system was mounted and the soil was mulched with a black plastic film. Concerning the environmental conditions, the experiment was placed in a modern plastic tunnel double covered with Visquen UV 5 plastic film. The length of the plastic tunnel was 32 m, and 8 m wide. The surface of an experimental variant was established at 4.80 m2. The plastic tunnel was equipped with a fertirigation system, artificial fog system and an automatically opening and closure system for the windows. In the pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian Tableland the early yield was established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007. The experimental was dismounted in 3.09.2007. RESULTS AND DISCUSIONS The medium height of the tomato plants is higher in all experimental variants cultivated on the second plant density (80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha). A plausible explanation for this cause can be the self shading effect of the plants. As for the blossom and fruit link the experimental variant Menhir F1 80/40 cm recorded the highest values for the first three clusters and as well for the clusters between four and eight. The same experimental variant obtained the highest total blossom and fruit link. Blossom and fruit link for the tomato plants cultivated in the plastic tunnel (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 1 Medium blossom and fruit link blossom and fruit link Total blossom and fruit Medium Medium Experimental number between clusters 1-3 between clusters 4-8 link height nr. of variants of link link link (cm) leafs Flowers Fruits Flowers Fruits Flowers Fruits clusters % % % Cronos F1 177.77 22.55 6.11 58.66 52.00 88.64 66.00 33.33 50.50 124.66 85.33 68.45 80/40 cm Cronos F1 180.55 23.66 6.22 60.33 51.33 85.08 61.33 26.66 43.46 121.66 77.99 64.10 80/30 cm Menhir F1 217.77 26.10 7.22 58.00 52.66 90.79 68.66 37.66 54.84 126.66 90.32 71.30 80/40 cm Menhir F1 221.11 25.77 6.88 53.33 48.00 90.00 66.00 33.66 51.00 119.33 81.66 68.43 80/30 cm Shannon F1 239.99 28.55 7.33 68.00 56.00 82.35 90.00 44.00 48.88 158.00 100.00 63.29 80/40 cm Shannon F1 245.55 28.11 7.10 71.00 55.33 77.92 94.33 38.00 40.28 165.33 93.33 56.45 80/30 cm The early yield was established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007. Regarding the influence of plant density upon the early yield of tomato plants, we can observe a positive distinct significant difference in case of plant density 80/30 (41.700 plants/ha).With a medium early yield of 2.47 kg/m2. (Table 2) The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars, in case of the early yield showed that the higher plant density (41.700 plants/ha) and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid
  • 3. lead to the highest early yield. Compared with the control resulted a significant positive difference (3.18 kg/m2). Compared with the average of the experiment resulted a distinct significant positive difference. (Table 3) The influence of plant density upon the early yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 2 Medium yield Medium relativ Difference Significance of Plant density (kg/m2) yield (%) (±kg/m2) difference 80/40 (31.250 pl/ha) 1.83 100.0 0.00 Control 80/30 (41.700 pl/ha) 2.47 134.9 0.64 ** DL (p 5 %) + 0.38; DL (p 1%) + 0.58; DL (p 0.1 %) + 0.93 The combined influence plant density + cultivar upon the early yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 3 Medium Difference relative Significance Significance yield (%) in in Medium Difference comparation of of comparation Medium relative in with the difference Experimental difference with the yield yield (%) in comparation average of variants 2 average of (kg/m ) comparation with control the the with control (±kg/m2) experimental Compared experimental with the Compared variants variants with control (±kg/m2) average 80/40+Cronos 2.33 100.00 0.00 - 108.37 0.18 - F1(Control) 80/30+Cronos F1 3.18 136.50 0.85 * 147.90 1.03 ** 80/40+Menhir F1 1.97 84.54 -0.36 - 91.62 -0.18 - 80/30+Menhir F1 2.41 103.43 0.08 - 112.09 0.26 - 80/40+Shannon F1 1.19 51.07 -1.14 00 55.34 -0.96 0 80/30+Shannon F1 1.82 78.11 -0.51 - 84.65 -0.33 - Average of the experimental 2.15 - - 100.00 0 - variants DL (p 5 %) + 0.66; DL (p 1%) + 1.00; DL (p 0.1 %) + 1.61 The total yield was influenced by the plant density, with a medium yield of 19.26 kg/m2 at the density 80/30 – 41.700 plants/ha. (Table 4) The influence of plant density upon the total yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 4 Medium yield Medium relativ Difference Significance of Plant density (kg/m2) yield (%) (±kg/m2) difference 80/40 (31.250 pl/ha) 17.26 100.0 0.00 Control 80/30 (41.700 pl/ha) 19.26 111.6 2.00 ** DL (p 5 %) + 0.96; DL (p 1%) + 1.46; DL (p 0.1 %) + 2.34 Regarding the combined influence between plant density and cultivars upon the total yield we can observe that the higher densities (41.700 plants/ha) obtained total medium yields larger on the Cronos F1 tomato hybrid with a medium yield of 20.46 kg/m2 and a difference distinct significant positive compared with the control, and at the Shannon F1 tomato hybrid (19.23 kg/m2) with a difference significant and positive. (Table 5)
  • 4. The combined influence plant density + cultivar upon the total yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 5 Medium Difference relative Significance Significance yield (%) in in Medium Difference comparation of of comparation Medium relative in with the difference Experimental difference with the yield yield (%) in comparation average of variants 2 average of (kg/m ) comparation with control the the with control (±kg/m2) experimental Compared experimental with the Compared variants variants with control (±kg/m2) average 80/40+Cronos 17.42 100.00 0.00 - 95.39 -0.84 - F1(Control) 80/30+Cronos F1 20.46 117.45 3.04 ** 112.04 2.20 * 80/40+Menhir F1 16.28 93.45 -1.14 - 89.15 -1.98 0 80/30+Menhir F1 18.09 103.84 0.67 - 99.06 -0.17 - 80/40+Shannon F1 18.09 103.84 0.67 - 99.06 -0.17 - 80/30+Shannon F1 19.23 110.39 1.81 * 105.31 0.97 - Average of the experimental 18.26 - - - 100.00 0 - variants DL (p 5 %) + 1.67; DL (p 1%) + 2.53; DL (p 0.1 %) + 4.06 The highest percent of extra quality fruits was obtained at the Shannon F1 tomato hybrid cultivated at a plant density of 41.700 plants/ha with a value of 85.90 %. Although Cronos F1 80/30 obtained the highest total yield it seems that this yield is influenced by the first quality fruits plus extra quality fruits in a percent of 97.21 %. (Table 6) The quality of the tomato yield (Cluj-Napoca 2007) Table 6 Yield on qualities Total Extra quality Extra quality + First quality Experimental yield variants % compared % from % from 2 2 2 with the kg/m kg/m total kg/m total experimental yield yield control Cronos F1 17.42 14.09 80.88 16.74 96.09 100 80/40 (control) Cronos F1 20.46 16.49 80.59 19.89 97.21 114.17 80/30 Menhir F1 16.28 13.21 81.14 15.81 97.11 90.75 80/40 Menhir F1 18.09 14.26 78.82 17.33 95.79 99.48 80/30 Shannon F1 18.09 14.56 80.48 17.74 98.06 101.83 80/40 Shannon F1 19.23 16.52 85.90 19.02 98.90 109.18 80/30
  • 5. CONCLUSIONS 1. The medium height of the tomato plants is higher in all experimental variants cultivated on the second plant density (80/30 cm – 41.700 plants/ha). 2. Regarding the blossom and fruit link, the experimental variant Menhir F1 80/40 cm recorded the highest values for the first three clusters and as well for the clusters between four and eight. The same experimental variant obtained the highest total blossom and fruit link. 3. All the experimental variants panted at the control plant density 80/40 cm – 31.250 plants/ha recorded a higher value for blossom and fruit link than the variants planted at the density 80/30 – 41.700 plants/ha. 4. The combined influence plant density and cultivars used in case of the early yield showed that the higher plant density (41.700 pl/ha) and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid lead to the highest early yield. 5. The combined influence between plant density and cultivars upon the total yield was higher on the Cronos F1 tomato hybrid with a medium yield of 20.46 kg/m2 on the plant density 41.700 plants/ha. 6. Although Cronos F1 80/30 obtained the highest total yield it seems that this yield is influenced by the first quality fruits plus extra quality fruits in a percent of 97.21 %.