SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
CONTRIBUTIONS REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF
 TOMATO PLASTIC COVERED CULTURE SITUATED IN
    THE PEDOCLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF THE
         TRANSILVANIAN TABLELAND

  CONTRIBUŢII PRIVIND ÎMBUNĂTĂŢIREA SISTEMULUI DE
CULTURĂ LA TOMATELE DE SOLAR CULTIVATE ÎN CONDIŢIILE
     PEDOCLIMATICE ALE PODIŞULUI TRANSILVANIEI

                                    SINGUREANU V., APAHIDEAN AL. S.
    University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca

                Abstract. The research wants to reveal the importance of early spring
        tomato yields in modern plastic tunnel double covered, situated in the specific
        pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian tableland with direct implications
        upon the quantity and quality of yield. The experimental field was founded in
        2007 in the vegetable growing sector at the Faculty of Horticulture Cluj-
        Napoca, Romania. The experiment was conceived as a bifactorial one. The
        experimental factors where: biological material used (Cronos F1 tomato hybrid
        (control), Menhir F1 tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 tomato hybrid), plant density
        (80/40 cm - 31.250 plants/ha (control), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plants/ha) All
        experimental variants where mulched with black plastic film, and drip
        fertirigation. The highest blossom link (71.30 %) was recorded at the
        experimental variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha. The yield dynamic recorded
        the highest value for Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha variant. The best fruit quality
        was observed at the variant Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha (85.90 % extra
        quality fruits). The combined influence, plant density and used cultivars
        revealed the highest production for the variant 80/30 cm (41.700 plants/ha) and
        Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (20.46 kg/m2).

                Rezumat. Experienţa întreprinsă doreşte să sublinieze importanţa
        obţinerii producţiilor timpurii de tomate în solarii cu acoperire dublă, în
        condiţiile specifice Podişului Transilvaniei cu referiri directe la producţia
        cantitativă şi calitativă obţinută. Cultura experimentală a fost înfiinţată în anul
        2007 în cadrul câmpurilor experimentale aferente Disciplinei de
        Legumicultură, Facultatea de Horticultură, Cluj-Napoca, România. Experienţa
        a fost concepută bifactorial, factorii experimentali fiind următorii: materialul
        biologic folosit (Cronos F1 (mt.), Menhir F1, Shannon F1), desimea de plantare
        (80/40 cm - 31.250 plante/ha (mt.), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plante/ha). Toate
        variantele experimentale au fost mulcite cu folie neagră de polietilenă şi s-a
        aplicat fertirigarea prin picurare. Cel mai mare procent de legare a fost
        înregistrat la varianta experimentală Menhir F1 31.250 plante/ha. Dinamica
        recoltărilor a avut cele mai mari valori la variantele experimentale
        reprezentate de Cronos F1 41.700 plante/ha. Cea mai mare proporţie de fructe
        de calitate Extra a obţinut-o varianta Shannon F1 41.700 plante/ha (85.90 %
        fructe de calitatea Extra). Influenţa combinată dintre densitatea de plantare şi
        materialul biologic folosit arată că cele mai mari producţii se întâlnesc la
        varianta experimentală Cronos F1 cu densitatea de 41.700 plante/ha (20.46
        kg/m2).
                                       633
MATERIAL AND METHODS

         The experimental field was founded in 2007 in the vegetable growing sector at
the Faculty of Horticulture Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The experiment was conceived as
a bifactorial one. The experimental factors where: biological material used (Cronos
F1 tomato hybrid (control), Menhir F1 tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 tomato hybrid),
plant density (80/40 cm - 31.250 plants/ha (control), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plants/ha)
         From the combination of the two factors resulted 6 experimental variants
placed in 3 repetitions.
         The experiment was founded in 3.04.2007, when the transplants where
planted. Before the plantation the drip irrigation system was mounted and the soil was
mulched with a black plastic film.
         Concerning the environmental conditions, the experiment was placed in a
modern plastic tunnel double covered with Visquen UV 5 plastic film. The length of the
plastic tunnel was 32 m, and 8 m wide. The surface of an experimental variant was
established at 4.80 m2. The plastic tunnel was equipped with a fertirigation system,
artificial fog system and an automatically opening and closure system for the windows.
         In the pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian Tableland the early yield
was established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007.
         The experiment was dismounted in 3.09.2007.




                    Fig.1. Plant densities used in the experiment




                                        634
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS


       The medium height of the tomato plants is larger an all experimental
variants cultivated under the density of 41.700 plants/ha, where the self
shading effect is more pregnant. Blossom and fruit link between clusters 1-3 is
higher for the experimental variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha (90.79 % fruit
link). The same experimental variant had the highest fruit link between
clusters 4-8 (54.84 % fruit link) and a medium fruit link/plant of 71.30 %.
(Table 1)
       The highest yield dynamic was observed at the Cronos F1 41.700
plants/ha experimental variant with a value of 3.24 kg/m2 in June; 11.7 kg/m2
in July and 6.53 kg/m2 in August for the experimental variant Shannon F1
80/40. The highest total yield was recorded at the Cronos F1 80/30
experimental variant, with a value of 20.5 kg/m2. (Fig. 1)
        Overall, all the experimental variants planted at the larger plant
density recorded higher total yields. (Fig. 1)
                                                                            Table 1
  Blossom and fruit link for the cultivated tomatoes (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007)

                                                         Fruit       Fruit
                   Medium
                                Medium      Medium        link        link       Total
  Experimental     height of
                                 no. of      no. of    between     between       fruit
    variant         plants
                                leaves      clusters   (clusters   (clusters   link (%)
                     (cm)
                                                        1-3) (%)    4-8) (%)
       V1            177.77      22.55        6.11       88.64       50.50      68.45
       V2            180.55      23.66        6.22       85.08       43.46      64.10
       V3            217.77      26.10        7.22       90.79       54.84      71.30
       V4            221.11      25.77        6.88       90.00       51.00      68.43
       V5            239.99      28.55        7.33       82.35       48.88      63.29
       V6            245.55      28.11        7.10       77.92       40.28      56.45



V1 = Cronos F1 31.250 plants/ha (control)
V2 = Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha
V3 = Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha
V4 = Menhir F1 41.700 plants/ha
V5 = Shannon F1 31.250 plants/ha
V6 = Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha




                                            635
25




                                                                      20.5
                             20                                                                                                                               19.56

                                                                                                                     18.05                18.08
                                                17.41
                                                                                           16.24


                             15

                                                                                                                                                                      June
                     kg/m2




                                                               11.7                                                                                   11.41           July
                                                                                                          10.58                   10.35
                                        10.1                                      9.96                                                                                August
                             10
                                                                                                                                                                      TOTAL PRODUCTION

                                                                                                                                      6.53                 6.3
                                                                  5.56
                                             4.95                                                                 5.07
                              5                                                        4.31
                                                           3.24
                                    2.36                                                               2.4
                                                                               1.97                                                                1.85
                                                                                                                               1.2

                              0
                                    Cronos F1 31.250       Cronos F1 41.700   Menhir F1 31.250        Menhir F1 41.700        Shannon F1 31.250   Shannon F1 41.700
                                    plants/ha (control)       plants/ha          plants/ha               plants/ha                plants/ha           plants/ha
                                                                                         Experim ental variants




   Fig.1 - Yield dynamic for the cultivated tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007)

        The highest percent of extra quality fruits from the total yield was obtained
at the Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha experimental variant (85.90 %). The same
experimental variant had the highest percent of extra quality fruits + first quality
fruits (98.90 %). (Fig.2)
        Even if the highest total yield was obtained at the Cronos F1 41.700
plants/ha experimental variant (20.5 kg/m2), the qualitative variant seems to be
Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha with a total yield of 19.23 kg/m2. (Table 2 and Fig.
2)

           120.00%


                                      96.09%                 97.21%                   97.11%                                         98.06%               98.90%
                                                                                                             95.79%
           100.00%

                                                                                                                                                  85.90%
                             80.88%                 80.59%               81.14%                                              80.48%
                                                                                                 78.82%
            80.00%


                                                                                                                                                                       Extra quality fruits
     (%)




            60.00%
                                                                                                                                                                       Extra + First quality fruits


            40.00%



            20.00%



             0.00%
                                  Cronos F1               Cronos F1           Menhir F1               Menhir F1               Shannon F1           Shannon F1
                                    31.250                 41.700              31.250                  41.700                   31.250               41.700
                                  plants/ha               plants/ha           plants/ha               plants/ha                plants/ha            plants/ha
                                   (control)
                                                                               Experimental variants


   Fig.2 - Quality of the tomato yield obtained in a modern plastic tunnel (Cluj-Napoca,
                                       Romania 2007)




                                                                                                      636
Table 2
  The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars upon the total
          medium yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007)

                               Relative       Difference           Relative       Difference
                  Total                               2                                   2
Plant density                total yield in    (±kg/m )          total yield in    (±kg/m )
                 medium
   + Used                    comparation      compared           comparation      compared
                  yield
   cultivar            2       with the        with the            with the        with the
                 (kg/m )
                                control         control            average         average
      V1           17.42        100.00                    −          95.39                 −
                                                  0.00                             -0.84
      V2           20.46        117.45                   **          112.04                *
                                                  3.04                              2.20
      V3           16.28         93.45                    −          89.15                 0
                                                  -1.14                            -1.98
      V4           18.09        103.84                    −          99.06                 −
                                                  0.67                             -0.17
      V5           18.09        103.84                    −          99.06                 −
                                                  0.67                             -0.17
     V6            19.23        110.39                    *          105.31                −
                                                  1.81                              0.97
   Average         18.26                                             100.00          0.00

                            DL (p 5 %)                        1.67
                            DL (p 1%)                         2.53
                            DL (p 0.1 %)                      4.06

V1 = Cronos F1 31.250 plants/ha (control)
V2 = Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha
V3 = Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha
V4 = Menhir F1 41.700 plants/ha
V5 = Shannon F1 31.250 plants/ha
V6 = Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha



       The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars reveal a
distinct positive significance for the experimental variant Cronos F1 41.700
plants/ha (V2) compared with the experimental control, and a significant positive
difference for the V6 experimental variant (Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha)
compared with the average of the experiment. (Table 2)
       The increase of production was 17.45 % at V2 experimental variant,
compared with the experimental control, and 12.04 % compared with the average
of the experiment. (Table 2)
       The V2 experimental variant compared with the average of the experiment
has a significant positive difference.
       The lowest total yield was obtained at the V3 experimental variant (16.28
kg/m2) (Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha)




                                            637
CONCLUSIONS

       1. All the experimental variants planted at the larger plant density 41.700
plants/ha recorded higher medium heights of plants, where the self shading effect
is more pregnant.
       2. The highest values for fruit link where obtained at the experimental
variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha, conducting to the idea that this plant density
assures a better fruit link.
       3. Overall, all experimental variants plated at the density 41.700 plants/ha
obtained the highest percent of Extra quality fruits and highest total yields, with
the recommendation for adopting this plant density, mulching of the soil with
black plastic film and drip fertirigation.

                                  REFERENCES

1. Apahidean Al. S., Maria Apahidean, 2000 - Legumicultură specială. Ed. Risoprint,
       Cluj-Napoca.
2. Hochmuth G. J., 2001 - Production of Greenhouse Tomatoes, University of Florida,
       Greenhouse Vegetable Production Handbook. Vol. 3, Agricultural Extension
       Service.
3. Jidavu M. G., Sonia Nechifor - The influence of photooselective mulches on crop
       production to long pepper (Capsicum annum). Buletinul USAMV-CN 63, Editura
       AcademicPres, Cluj-Napoca.
4. Munteanu N., T. Stan, 2004 - Folosirea textilelor neţesute în horticultură. Revista
       Hortinform 6-142, pg. 7-8




                                        638

More Related Content

More from Gherghescu Gabriel

9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)Gherghescu Gabriel
 
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)Gherghescu Gabriel
 
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliuGherghescu Gabriel
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliuGherghescu Gabriel
 
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi Gherghescu Gabriel
 
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5Gherghescu Gabriel
 
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRA3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRSiguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDISiguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDIGherghescu Gabriel
 
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRMotor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGeneral AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRCompart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRAir flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRAer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGherghescu Gabriel
 
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2Gherghescu Gabriel
 

More from Gherghescu Gabriel (20)

9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (prima sesiune)
9 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (prima sesiune)
 
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
 
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1   2010 (sesiune august)
6 barem varianta oficiala bac matematica m1 2010 (sesiune august)
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a teorie cu teste si nrezolvari in detaliu
 
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliuAlgebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si  teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
Algebra clasa a 9a si a 10 a cu teorie si teste cu rezolvari in detaliu
 
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
AUDI Siguranţe fuzibile incepand cu an 1996
 
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
Pionier deh 2000 mp ownersmanual1019 audi
 
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
Montare carlig remorcare audi a4 b5
 
Cutie sigurante audi
Cutie sigurante audiCutie sigurante audi
Cutie sigurante audi
 
A3 1997 AUDI maintenance
A3 1997 AUDI maintenanceA3 1997 AUDI maintenance
A3 1997 AUDI maintenance
 
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRA3 electrical AUDI A3  1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
A3 electrical AUDI A3 1997 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRSiguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Siguranţe fuzibile şi relee AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDISiguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
Siguranţe fuzibile pana in anul 1996 AUDI
 
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRMotor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Motor AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRGeneral AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
General AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRCompart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Compart 3 AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Audi a6 adr
Audi a6 adrAudi a6 adr
Audi a6 adr
 
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRAir flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Air flow sensors AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADRAer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
Aer condiţionat AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR
 
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2
AUDI A4 B5 1996 2000 1.8 20V 4ADR Adr 2
 

Recently uploaded

08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Patryk Bandurski
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersThousandEyes
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024Rafal Los
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions
 
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxFactors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxKatpro Technologies
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsEnterprise Knowledge
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?XfilesPro
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationSafe Software
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Allon Mureinik
 

Recently uploaded (20)

08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
Integration and Automation in Practice: CI/CD in Mule Integration and Automat...
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
 
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
 
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxFactors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
How to Remove Document Management Hurdles with X-Docs?
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
Injustice - Developers Among Us (SciFiDevCon 2024)
 

Contribuţii privind îmbunătăţirea sistemului de cultură la tomatele de solar cultivate în condiţiile pedoclimatice ale podişului transilvaniei

  • 1. CONTRIBUTIONS REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF TOMATO PLASTIC COVERED CULTURE SITUATED IN THE PEDOCLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF THE TRANSILVANIAN TABLELAND CONTRIBUŢII PRIVIND ÎMBUNĂTĂŢIREA SISTEMULUI DE CULTURĂ LA TOMATELE DE SOLAR CULTIVATE ÎN CONDIŢIILE PEDOCLIMATICE ALE PODIŞULUI TRANSILVANIEI SINGUREANU V., APAHIDEAN AL. S. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Abstract. The research wants to reveal the importance of early spring tomato yields in modern plastic tunnel double covered, situated in the specific pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian tableland with direct implications upon the quantity and quality of yield. The experimental field was founded in 2007 in the vegetable growing sector at the Faculty of Horticulture Cluj- Napoca, Romania. The experiment was conceived as a bifactorial one. The experimental factors where: biological material used (Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (control), Menhir F1 tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 tomato hybrid), plant density (80/40 cm - 31.250 plants/ha (control), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plants/ha) All experimental variants where mulched with black plastic film, and drip fertirigation. The highest blossom link (71.30 %) was recorded at the experimental variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha. The yield dynamic recorded the highest value for Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha variant. The best fruit quality was observed at the variant Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha (85.90 % extra quality fruits). The combined influence, plant density and used cultivars revealed the highest production for the variant 80/30 cm (41.700 plants/ha) and Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (20.46 kg/m2). Rezumat. Experienţa întreprinsă doreşte să sublinieze importanţa obţinerii producţiilor timpurii de tomate în solarii cu acoperire dublă, în condiţiile specifice Podişului Transilvaniei cu referiri directe la producţia cantitativă şi calitativă obţinută. Cultura experimentală a fost înfiinţată în anul 2007 în cadrul câmpurilor experimentale aferente Disciplinei de Legumicultură, Facultatea de Horticultură, Cluj-Napoca, România. Experienţa a fost concepută bifactorial, factorii experimentali fiind următorii: materialul biologic folosit (Cronos F1 (mt.), Menhir F1, Shannon F1), desimea de plantare (80/40 cm - 31.250 plante/ha (mt.), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plante/ha). Toate variantele experimentale au fost mulcite cu folie neagră de polietilenă şi s-a aplicat fertirigarea prin picurare. Cel mai mare procent de legare a fost înregistrat la varianta experimentală Menhir F1 31.250 plante/ha. Dinamica recoltărilor a avut cele mai mari valori la variantele experimentale reprezentate de Cronos F1 41.700 plante/ha. Cea mai mare proporţie de fructe de calitate Extra a obţinut-o varianta Shannon F1 41.700 plante/ha (85.90 % fructe de calitatea Extra). Influenţa combinată dintre densitatea de plantare şi materialul biologic folosit arată că cele mai mari producţii se întâlnesc la varianta experimentală Cronos F1 cu densitatea de 41.700 plante/ha (20.46 kg/m2). 633
  • 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS The experimental field was founded in 2007 in the vegetable growing sector at the Faculty of Horticulture Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The experiment was conceived as a bifactorial one. The experimental factors where: biological material used (Cronos F1 tomato hybrid (control), Menhir F1 tomato hybrid, Shannon F1 tomato hybrid), plant density (80/40 cm - 31.250 plants/ha (control), 80/30 cm - 41.700 plants/ha) From the combination of the two factors resulted 6 experimental variants placed in 3 repetitions. The experiment was founded in 3.04.2007, when the transplants where planted. Before the plantation the drip irrigation system was mounted and the soil was mulched with a black plastic film. Concerning the environmental conditions, the experiment was placed in a modern plastic tunnel double covered with Visquen UV 5 plastic film. The length of the plastic tunnel was 32 m, and 8 m wide. The surface of an experimental variant was established at 4.80 m2. The plastic tunnel was equipped with a fertirigation system, artificial fog system and an automatically opening and closure system for the windows. In the pedoclimatic conditions of the Transilvanian Tableland the early yield was established between 15.06.2007 – 28.06.2007. The experiment was dismounted in 3.09.2007. Fig.1. Plant densities used in the experiment 634
  • 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The medium height of the tomato plants is larger an all experimental variants cultivated under the density of 41.700 plants/ha, where the self shading effect is more pregnant. Blossom and fruit link between clusters 1-3 is higher for the experimental variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha (90.79 % fruit link). The same experimental variant had the highest fruit link between clusters 4-8 (54.84 % fruit link) and a medium fruit link/plant of 71.30 %. (Table 1) The highest yield dynamic was observed at the Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha experimental variant with a value of 3.24 kg/m2 in June; 11.7 kg/m2 in July and 6.53 kg/m2 in August for the experimental variant Shannon F1 80/40. The highest total yield was recorded at the Cronos F1 80/30 experimental variant, with a value of 20.5 kg/m2. (Fig. 1) Overall, all the experimental variants planted at the larger plant density recorded higher total yields. (Fig. 1) Table 1 Blossom and fruit link for the cultivated tomatoes (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007) Fruit Fruit Medium Medium Medium link link Total Experimental height of no. of no. of between between fruit variant plants leaves clusters (clusters (clusters link (%) (cm) 1-3) (%) 4-8) (%) V1 177.77 22.55 6.11 88.64 50.50 68.45 V2 180.55 23.66 6.22 85.08 43.46 64.10 V3 217.77 26.10 7.22 90.79 54.84 71.30 V4 221.11 25.77 6.88 90.00 51.00 68.43 V5 239.99 28.55 7.33 82.35 48.88 63.29 V6 245.55 28.11 7.10 77.92 40.28 56.45 V1 = Cronos F1 31.250 plants/ha (control) V2 = Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha V3 = Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha V4 = Menhir F1 41.700 plants/ha V5 = Shannon F1 31.250 plants/ha V6 = Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha 635
  • 4. 25 20.5 20 19.56 18.05 18.08 17.41 16.24 15 June kg/m2 11.7 11.41 July 10.58 10.35 10.1 9.96 August 10 TOTAL PRODUCTION 6.53 6.3 5.56 4.95 5.07 5 4.31 3.24 2.36 2.4 1.97 1.85 1.2 0 Cronos F1 31.250 Cronos F1 41.700 Menhir F1 31.250 Menhir F1 41.700 Shannon F1 31.250 Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha (control) plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha Experim ental variants Fig.1 - Yield dynamic for the cultivated tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007) The highest percent of extra quality fruits from the total yield was obtained at the Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha experimental variant (85.90 %). The same experimental variant had the highest percent of extra quality fruits + first quality fruits (98.90 %). (Fig.2) Even if the highest total yield was obtained at the Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha experimental variant (20.5 kg/m2), the qualitative variant seems to be Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha with a total yield of 19.23 kg/m2. (Table 2 and Fig. 2) 120.00% 96.09% 97.21% 97.11% 98.06% 98.90% 95.79% 100.00% 85.90% 80.88% 80.59% 81.14% 80.48% 78.82% 80.00% Extra quality fruits (%) 60.00% Extra + First quality fruits 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Cronos F1 Cronos F1 Menhir F1 Menhir F1 Shannon F1 Shannon F1 31.250 41.700 31.250 41.700 31.250 41.700 plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha plants/ha (control) Experimental variants Fig.2 - Quality of the tomato yield obtained in a modern plastic tunnel (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007) 636
  • 5. Table 2 The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars upon the total medium yield of tomato plants (Cluj-Napoca, Romania 2007) Relative Difference Relative Difference Total 2 2 Plant density total yield in (±kg/m ) total yield in (±kg/m ) medium + Used comparation compared comparation compared yield cultivar 2 with the with the with the with the (kg/m ) control control average average V1 17.42 100.00 − 95.39 − 0.00 -0.84 V2 20.46 117.45 ** 112.04 * 3.04 2.20 V3 16.28 93.45 − 89.15 0 -1.14 -1.98 V4 18.09 103.84 − 99.06 − 0.67 -0.17 V5 18.09 103.84 − 99.06 − 0.67 -0.17 V6 19.23 110.39 * 105.31 − 1.81 0.97 Average 18.26 100.00 0.00 DL (p 5 %) 1.67 DL (p 1%) 2.53 DL (p 0.1 %) 4.06 V1 = Cronos F1 31.250 plants/ha (control) V2 = Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha V3 = Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha V4 = Menhir F1 41.700 plants/ha V5 = Shannon F1 31.250 plants/ha V6 = Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha The combined influence between plant density and used cultivars reveal a distinct positive significance for the experimental variant Cronos F1 41.700 plants/ha (V2) compared with the experimental control, and a significant positive difference for the V6 experimental variant (Shannon F1 41.700 plants/ha) compared with the average of the experiment. (Table 2) The increase of production was 17.45 % at V2 experimental variant, compared with the experimental control, and 12.04 % compared with the average of the experiment. (Table 2) The V2 experimental variant compared with the average of the experiment has a significant positive difference. The lowest total yield was obtained at the V3 experimental variant (16.28 kg/m2) (Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha) 637
  • 6. CONCLUSIONS 1. All the experimental variants planted at the larger plant density 41.700 plants/ha recorded higher medium heights of plants, where the self shading effect is more pregnant. 2. The highest values for fruit link where obtained at the experimental variant Menhir F1 31.250 plants/ha, conducting to the idea that this plant density assures a better fruit link. 3. Overall, all experimental variants plated at the density 41.700 plants/ha obtained the highest percent of Extra quality fruits and highest total yields, with the recommendation for adopting this plant density, mulching of the soil with black plastic film and drip fertirigation. REFERENCES 1. Apahidean Al. S., Maria Apahidean, 2000 - Legumicultură specială. Ed. Risoprint, Cluj-Napoca. 2. Hochmuth G. J., 2001 - Production of Greenhouse Tomatoes, University of Florida, Greenhouse Vegetable Production Handbook. Vol. 3, Agricultural Extension Service. 3. Jidavu M. G., Sonia Nechifor - The influence of photooselective mulches on crop production to long pepper (Capsicum annum). Buletinul USAMV-CN 63, Editura AcademicPres, Cluj-Napoca. 4. Munteanu N., T. Stan, 2004 - Folosirea textilelor neţesute în horticultură. Revista Hortinform 6-142, pg. 7-8 638