Why Robins Don't Drink Milk And People Don't Share Knowledge - Judith Parker
1. People and Knowledge Management
1. Why they share & learn
2. How they share and you build
3. What they share
Is your KM plug in the
socket or have you left
it dangling?
3. apturing, distributing, and effectively using knowledge Artifacts Codifie
nowledge Skills Capabilities Apply knowledge Experiences Context
nowledge Customer Knowledge – multi-national sales teams ˆKnowledge
oducts – drugs (clinical trials) ˆKnowledge in People – PKM + PDP
nowledge in Processes – e.g. risk assessment ˆOrganizational Memory
oject knowledge ˆ Knowledge in Relationships – network analysis
nowledge Assets – Intellectual capital business intelligence, Collaboratio
ompetitive intelligence, Content management, Customer/experien
lationship management, Enterprise search and discovery, Big da
anagement, Business process management, Adaptive case managemen
maging, Workflow, Document management, Cognitive computing Tac
plicit communication Best practice Discussing Depositing Filing Readin
stening Codification Personalisation Databases, external & internal Conte
chitecture Information Service Support (training required) Data minin
est practices Lessons learned After action analysis Community & learnin
rectories, "yellow pages" (expertise locators) Findings & facilitating too
oupware, Response teams, Cultural support, Current awareness profil
nd databases, selection of items for alerting purposes / push, Data minin
4.
5.
6. Environment
•Need to build trust
•Performance Contract
•Similar motivation to share and learn
•Team spirit
•Good sportsmanship
•Trust
•Obligation
•Peer pressure
•Proof of value to BP
•Relationships
Self
•Recognition for good work / ideas
•Self gratification
•Self learning
•Feedback and evolvement of own ideas
•Excitement / enrolment
•Receiving personalised information/knowledge
•Intellectual curiosity
•Feel good
•Recognition
•Boredom
•Asking for help
•Reputation
•Learn by mistakes
•Constructive feedback
•Hard cash
•Feeling of making progress
•Desire for higher performance
•Praise
•Curiosity
•Knowing you have knowledge that other people want
•Empowerment
•Acceptance into team
What motivates us to share?
70% 30%
7. Self
•Make valuable for me to keep i.e. no cash
reward
•Ignorance
•Time
•Negative feedback
•Takes too long
•Power
•Information overload
•No money incentives
•Risk of exposure
Environment
•Insecurity
•Mistrust
•Don’t realise relevance
•Poor tools / lack of tools
•Fear of boring people
•Unsure of importance relevance
•Information overload
•Crap infrastructure
•Discomfort with person / topic
•Exclusion
•Attention of recipient
•Reliance on someone else to do it
•Not knowing who to share with (e.g. personalisation
of e-mails)
•Team interaction
What motivates us not to share?
39% 61%
8. Summary
Why:
Knowledge needs to stay attached to the person
Behaviour is difficult to change
We have to use their self interest to make them want to share
We have to provide tools and processes so they know how to share
9. What makes people want to learn?
Habit
Curiosity
Time constraints
Culture
Challenge
Control
Competition
Recognition
10. Why they wanted to learn:
‘Secrets’ – intriguing
‘my’ – the person owns the
knowledge and the success
‘Success’ – presupposition they
were successful
Why they wanted to share:
•Recognition
•Knowledge and personal exposure
leads to demand
•Senior leaders / strong profiles
Backed up with:
•Highly visual, interesting and
engaging content
•Short, catchy intros
•Metrics leading to continuous
improvement mindset for content
Secrets of my Success
11. Social network successes
• Groups with shared interest and high levels of capability –
Drillers @ BP; IT @ GSK
• Based on individual profiles
• High levels of transparency for owners of knowledge / expertise
• Immediate feedback and learning, leading to self regulation
(hopefully!)
• Short succinct nuggets of knowledge with ongoing dialogue
• Simple tool and process
12. Summary
Why:
Knowledge needs to stay attached to the person
Behaviour is difficult to change
We have to use their self interest to make them want to share
We have to provide tools and processes so they know how to share
Take a systems approach
Think about the attributes of your networks
15. Understand individuals in networks
Malcolm Gladwell – Tipping Point
Connectors, Mavens, Salesmen
Johnny M at BP – the glue in the machine
Coffee Breaks at BP – 50 of separation
16.
17.
18. If you build it, they may not come
Put content where people go anyway
-Website design
-Newsletters
-Internal meetings, events
-Posters and desk drops
-Emails and calendars
-Create a trigger to build a habit
19. Summary
Why:
Knowledge needs to stay attached to the person
Behaviour is difficult to change
We have to use their self interest to make them want to share
We have to provide tools and processes so they know how to share
Take a systems approach
Think about the attributes of your networks
How:
Create mobility
Embrace the natural enthusiasts and think about different KM roles
Focus on the end goal and use existing pathways rather than create new ones
22. NEWSROOM
Timely - weekly
Accurate – data driven
Relevant – all contributors involved
PLUS
Exposure for non-learners
Identified barriers to learning
Relevant
Accurate
Timely
23. Summary
Why:
Knowledge needs to stay attached to the person
Behaviour is difficult to change
We have to use their self interest to make them want to share
We have to provide tools and processes so they know how to share
Think about how you create your networks
How:
Create mobility
Embrace the natural enthusiasts and think about different KM roles
Create the path where users go
Take a systems approach
WHAT:
Make everything relevant, useful, timely
Investigate barriers to sharing or learning
24. ASSUME NOTHING
FIND EVIDENCE
BE OPEN AND CURIOUS
USE WHAT EMERGES
DON’T WASTE ENERGY CHANGING BEHAVIOUR
- USE EXISTING ENERGY TO POWER YOUR MACHINE
Not going to focus on technology – lots of stuff on that
I’m going to focus on a few things about behaviour with examples
You build a big KM system, with technology and processes and it’s very fancy.
But many people don’t plug it in to the socket of human behaviour and that’s where the energy is that will make it happen. So they have this fancy machine and nothing happens – literally nothing.
Take a much smaller machine and plug it in, and it will work.
What I can tell you is that by applying simple behavioural principles that I apply in every job that I do, and those things are always, always successful. People are mystified as to why things work
When you implement a new system or process you always need to get people to do something differently
You have to create the connection between what you do and the behaviours that you want from them
I will give you nuggets that are relevant to KM – hope at least one is useful. The how and the why and what are very interlinked in the examples
I hope its interesting, I hope its relevant and I really hope no one falls asleep.
Knowledge management is a huge space
Everyone was defining it, creating language, from very hard financially driven KM like managing intellectual property to softer side – learning and collaborating
But as a I learnt more I heard one message loud and clear….
Talked to lots of people
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER
How do we get people to give up their knowledge?
It soon became evident that trying to overcome this was like banging your head against a brick wall!
So, one day showering, ironing or something mundane when my internal dialogue was on screen saver – my subconscious got the chance to offer a solution.
The logic is that people need knowledge for security so taking it away is crazy….
The solution was quite simple “flip the problem on its head”
Same mystical voice as field of dreams
Instead of fighting the knowledge is power behaviour – why not embrace it? Its reality
And say “that’s ok”
Instead of taking away knowledge, what if we made people more powerful
the more knowledge they had.
Instead of the centre of the world being the knowledge, the centre is the person
That was pretty radical – that was pre-facebook!!!!
Of course there are other factors – culture, environment, family, etc.
The controlled interest view of sharing
There are three types of users of KM systems
Suckers – Quite happy to continue sharing and giving selflessly
Cheaters – Want to take continuously and don’t make any effort to give
Grudgers – controlled self interest. Will give once, if there is no reciprocation, they won’t give again
Grudgers are the ones that should be encouraged, but they should be encouraged to give twice before they do not volunteer again.
To share successfully the self interest of the individuals should be addressed before the organisational benefits.
People need
Exceptionally successful – people engage with them – metrics prove that
Change the name
by promoting the individual, you are giving them exposure and recognition
Demand driven – they want to be included in the group of successful people
Start of with A listers in the organisation
Not dumbed down but it should be clear and engaging and easy to read and understand
What are the similar attributes of people?
Firstly – not a homegenous group of people
Proud of what they did
More credibility for showing off their knowledge
First connection was critical
Barriers to entry of using it are very low
Evolution of a species is not linear, but determined by a series of genetic ticks (think clock face).
The more genetic ticks, the more evolved the species.
Species with highest number of genetic ticks is man
Next, at equal second are chimpanzees and songbirds.
A study was made of why Blue Tits but not Robins (i.e. songbirds) had adapted to exploit milk bottles as a food source
Back in the day, milk came in bottles on doorsteps with an open top
Then birds started drinking it and that’s when they added foil
The following conditions were noted to prevail within the Blue Tit society:
Mobile individuals – each flock consists of 8 birds which change with no discernable pattern
Innovative individuals
They learn from the innovators and then change their habits and the innovation spreads to other flocks
Its like little atoms which crash into each other – you need to create the environment for that to happen… which is….
For epidemics:
Connectors – make introductions
Mavens – are information specialists
Salesman – are persuasive negotiators
They may not appear to do any significant work in the organisation – or be that visible
If you have an advocate – enthusiast around this – do every thing you can to keep them
Research – why they were so successful when not every one attended
When you are thinking about how knowledge flows – its quite lumpy and disorganised and chaotic
So what – invest in the glue of the organisation
Create systems that allow for individual traits – back to connecting
Be careful not to lump people in together
Johnny Martin at BP – social glue for a huge network and he was the key – he went, it failed
University Christopher Alexander (1977)
Air traffic control example
Do the exercise
This is how change works in the west, we push and resist
There is a different way and I’m going to talk about somethings that will reduce that resistance
How – path of least resistanceuser defined paths
Put content into the path of where people go anyway
Websites at GSK – paths to get content, knowledge
KM is normally somewhere new that you have to go to learn, put it where people go anyway
GMS shared lessons on leader calls – one each session (with a resouce attached)
James Clear – how to build habits – first thing is a trigger, reminder.
Tell the story of the speech – open with this
Imagine I’m sitting with you and having a coffee
And I say to you I can’t boil an egg
And you say – I make the best boiled eggs
And then this is how it goes
Kitchen
Cupboards
Family
Activities
When they eat the egg
What they eat it off
How they feel about the egg
I just think – tell me how to boil the damn egg…
Then they explain the heston blumenthal method
However, we are having a coffee in the alps at 1800m … and so I need to adjust for altitude
But I make a fantastic boiled egg
What have I learnt?
The most valuable attribute of knowledge is relevance (e.g. personalisation of e-mails research)
The next most important attributes are accuracy and timeliness
Situation
Communications - people collected metrics on content to drive improvement and lessons learned, things didn’t improve
Relevant
Right people in the room – people who done the writing
Accurate
Data on each item which was discussed
Timely
Weekly
We discussed the results, then what we were going to do differently
Applied lessons learned immediately
What else?
Behavioural factors
- Everyone created the improvement including the person who did the initial work and the person who follow on
- Exposure for person who didn’t learn from the past – they would have to come back and explain why