This is my assignment done during my master's degree in Management of Bioeconomy Innovation and Governance to produce a poster on recent debates and issues in Bioeconomy sector.
Introducing Blue Carbon Deck seeking for actionable partnerships
Don't knock GM crops just yet EU!
1. Innogen Institute
The University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH1 1LZ
www.innogen.ac.uk
1) Background
Since its commercialization (1996), GM
crops :controversial issue that has
impact the world.
World progression- astounding
Europe ambition of Horizon 2020- to
ensure Europe produce world class
science, remove innovation barriers, and
make it easy for public and private to
deliver innovation.
Recent news: EU member states to
restrict/ban GMO
4) A halt in GM crops - Similar to the
pharmaceutical industry dilemma?
3)Pros and Cons to new legislation2) EU progression with GM Crops
SCIENCE
-food safety research
(£260 million)
-lack funding for
applied plant
research
SOCIETY
-Public opinion (hard
to measure)
-Activist (Vocal)
AVAILABILITY
- GM crops cultivated
MON 810
-Imported products
Major importer for
agriculture goods.
Assessments: EFSA
POLICY MAKERS
- Placed moratorium on
approvals of GMO in
2001
-2001-Allows for GM
cultivation under tight
regulations
- June 2014- allowing
EU member states to
restrict/ban GMO
5) Suggestions
Rebranding
Knowledge transfer
(academia- producers
and consumers)
Allowing
transparency
Observe GM Crop
individually instead as
a whole
Realize the potential
References
1. Rt Hon Owen Paterson MP speech to Rothamsted Research 20 June
2012
2. MEPs vote to allow countries to ban GM crop cultivation-retrieved
11/11/2014.
3. Nightingale, P and Martin P. (2004) The myth of the biotech
revolution
4. Munos, B. (2009) Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation
DON’T KNOCK GM CROPS JUST YET EU
Not a matter of being left behind in economics,
but more on the science potential.
Unrealistic ideas
could kill- over
estimating the
potential or
under estimating
a certain
technology will
not end well.
A constant
graph for
output is
not
satisfactory
.
High
failure
rates
Pros Cons
The best in both
worlds
Further ruin GMOs
image
Addressing fear in
certain groups
Eliminating any chance
for funded applied
plant research