1. Lord of the Flies Concept Map Graphic Organizer
Rubric and Scoring Guide
Categorie
s
4 3 2 1
Quality of
Analysis
The analysis of
the two chosen
key aspects of
each chapter is
insightful,
thorough, and
relevant to the
significance of
the novel.
The analysis of
the two chosen
key aspects of
each chapter
contains for the
most part a well-
detailed,
insightful, and
relevant analysis
of how the two
key aspects are
significant to the
novel.
There is some
insightful,
thorough, and
relevant analysis
of the chosen
two key aspects
for each chapter
contained within
the concept map.
Some of the
topics and
examples chosen
contain only
mere
summarization
or there is some
examples and
analysis missing
entirely.
Hardly any
analysis of the
two chosen key
aspects for each
chapter is
present within
the concept map.
There are hardly
any examples of
the two key
aspects from the
text or only
summarization
of the examples
from the text
chosen.
Organization The concept
map is well-
organized and
filled out
correctly
according to
the directions,
with each key
aspect for each
chapter
labelled
correctly and
branching off
into subtopics
and supporting
details.
The concept map
is well-
organized for the
most part and
filled out
correctly
according to the
directions. There
may be a few
errors of
organizing the
concept map
correctly or
missing aspects
of the concept
map.
The concept map
is mostly
disorganized and
has some parts
not filled out
correctly. There
are several errors
of organizing the
concept map
correctly and
there are several
missing aspects
of the concept
map.
The concept map
is completely
disorganized and
is not filled out
correctly. There
are many
missing aspects
of the concept
map missing and
is filled with
organization
errors such as no
title for each
category and
topic and no
punctuation
marks such as
colons to
separate
different
2. sections of the
subtopics or
examples.
Key aspects of
the text
There are two
key aspects of
the novel
chosen to be
analyzed.
These two
aspects are
important and
relevant to the
significance of
the novel. The
student focuses
on the same
two aspects for
each chapter
and is able to
present their
analysis to
their Literature
Circle groups
using their
concept maps
successfully.
There is only
one key aspect
of the novel that
is analyzed
within the
concept map.
This key aspect
is important and
relevant to the
significance of
the novel. The
student focuses
on the same key
aspect for each
chapter and is
able to present
their analysis of
it to their
Literature Circle
group
successfully.
The student
analyzes
something from
the novel that is
not an
acceptable
option to be
analyzed or that
is to surface-
level, such as a
basic summary
of each chapter.
The student
presents on this
surface-level
topic for their
Literature Circle
group but does
not have much
to add to the in-
depth discussion
the other
students provide
with their
concept maps.
There are no key
aspects that are
analyzed by the
student's concept
map. The
student hardly
fills out any of
the concept map
and hardly
contributes
anything to the
Literature Circle
group discussion
because they did
not perform their
role correctly by
choosing two
key aspects of
the novel to
focus on.
Spelling,
grammar, and
clear writing
All of the
spelling and
grammar is
correct. The
use of
sophisticated
and clear and
concise writing
is used
throughout the
concept map.
There are few
spelling and
grammatical
errors. The
student uses
some instances
of sophisticated,
clear, and
concise writing
throughout the
concept map that
showcases
excellent writing
skills.
There are some
spelling and
grammatical
errors. Writing is
unclear at times
and is at times
too simple to
demonstrate
good critical
thinking and
writing skills.
Spelling and
grammatical
errors are
present
throughout the
concept map.
Writing is
unclear
throughout the
concept map and
does not
demonstrate
good critical
thinking or
writing skills.