Rubric for LASA 2
Grading Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Maximum Points
Identify a specific cultural group with whom you will likely work with at least one similar characteristic.
CO: 1
PO: CP: 3, 5; PCC: 1, 2, 5
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
Group is identified but is not associated with a listed diversity characteristic. The cultural group is one with whom you will not work with regularly.
Cultural group identified is appropriate, but may be one with whom you will not likely work with regularly. Cultural group shares an obvious characteristic.
Cultural group identified is appropriate and one with whom you will likely work with. Cultural group shares an obvious characteristic.
Cultural group identified is unique and appropriate, and one with whom you will likely work with. Student recognizes the possibility that the group may be associated with more than one cultural characteristic.
/36 pts.
Evaluate a professional role or function in which you will likely engage in professionally.
CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Evaluation is incomplete or inaccurate. The role or function identified is not probable, relevant, or appropriate.
Evaluation is complete and accurate. The role or function identified is relevant and appropriate.
Evaluation is complete, accurate, and specific. The role or function identified is probable, relevant, and appropriate.
Evaluation is thorough, accurate, and specific. The role or function identified is highly probable, relevant, and appropriate.
/56 pts.
Evaluate and summarize measures designed to assess multicultural competence and select one that you would use to assess your own competence.
CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Summary is incomplete or inaccurate. There is little to no description of measures included. An inappropriate measure is chosen to assess your own competence, or no measure is chosen.
Summary is complete and accurate. A brief description of measures is included. One measure is chosen to assess your own competence.
Summary is completing, accurate, and specific. A complete description of measures is included. An appropriate measure is chosen to assess your own competence.
Summary is thorough, accurate, and specific. An in depth description of measures is included. An appropriate measure is chosen to assess your own competence, along with an analysis of your competence.
/60 pts.
Summarize three recent journal articles (e.g., published since 2000) that you found to be the most helpful in understanding this group.
CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Summary is incomplete or inaccurate. Summary does not include any description of key points to help in understanding the group.
Summary is complete and accurate. Summary includes a brief description of key points to help in understanding the group.
Summary is complete, accurate, and specific. Summary includes a description of key points to help i ...
Rubric for LASA 2Grading CriteriaUnsatisfactoryEmergin.docx
1. Rubric for LASA 2
Grading Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Maximum Points
Identify a specific cultural group with whom you will likely
work with at least one similar characteristic.
CO: 1
PO: CP: 3, 5; PCC: 1, 2, 5
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
Group is identified but is not associated with a listed diversity
characteristic. The cultural group is one with whom you will not
work with regularly.
Cultural group identified is appropriate, but may be one with
whom you will not likely work with regularly. Cultural group
shares an obvious characteristic.
Cultural group identified is appropriate and one with whom you
will likely work with. Cultural group shares an obvious
characteristic.
Cultural group identified is unique and appropriate, and one
with whom you will likely work with. Student recognizes the
possibility that the group may be associated with more than one
cultural characteristic.
/36 pts.
Evaluate a professional role or function in which you will likely
engage in professionally.
2. CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Evaluation is incomplete or inaccurate. The role or function
identified is not probable, relevant, or appropriate.
Evaluation is complete and accurate. The role or function
identified is relevant and appropriate.
Evaluation is complete, accurate, and specific. The role or
function identified is probable, relevant, and appropriate.
Evaluation is thorough, accurate, and specific. The role or
function identified is highly probable, relevant, and appropriate.
/56 pts.
Evaluate and summarize measures designed to assess
multicultural competence and select one that you would use to
assess your own competence.
CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Summary is incomplete or inaccurate. There is little to no
description of measures included. An inappropriate measure is
chosen to assess your own competence, or no measure is chosen.
Summary is complete and accurate. A brief description of
measures is included. One measure is chosen to assess your own
competence.
Summary is completing, accurate, and specific. A complete
description of measures is included. An appropriate measure is
chosen to assess your own competence.
Summary is thorough, accurate, and specific. An in depth
description of measures is included. An appropriate measure is
chosen to assess your own competence, along with an analysis
of your competence.
3. /60 pts.
Summarize three recent journal articles (e.g., published since
2000) that you found to be the most helpful in understanding
this group.
CO: 3
PO: CP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; PCC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ILO: 1, 3, 5, 6
Summary is incomplete or inaccurate. Summary does not
include any description of key points to help in understanding
the group.
Summary is complete and accurate. Summary includes a brief
description of key points to help in understanding the group.
Summary is complete, accurate, and specific. Summary includes
a description of key points to help in understanding the group.
Summary is thorough, accurate, and specific. Summary includes
a full description of obvious and subtle key points to help in
understanding the group.
/60 pts.
Select and evaluate three methods for skill development that
you could employ in your current setting with your identified
cultural group and your selected professional role or function.
CO: 5
PO: CP: 1, 4, 5 PCC: 1, 2, 3, 4
Methods evaluated are inappropriate. They could not be
employed with the identified cultural group and selected role or
function. Methods would not increase skill development.
Methods evaluated are appropriate. With accommodations, they
could be employed with the identified cultural group and
selected role or function. Methods may eventually increase skill
development.
Methods evaluated are appropriate and could be immediately
4. employed with the identified cultural group and selected role or
function. Methods would likely increase skill development.
Methods evaluated are advanced and could be immediately
employed with the identified cultural group and selected role or
function. Methods would be extremely likely to increase skill
development.
/60 pts.
Writing Standards
Write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate
ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of
sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and
punctuation.
Include citations in text and at the end of the document in the
correct APA format.
Writing is unclear and disorganized and rereading to solidify
understanding is frequently necessary. Although an attempt at
ethical scholarship is attempted, it is sloppy or incomplete
throughout. Spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors severely
interfere with readers’ comprehension.
Citations in text and at the end of the document are not in the
correct APA format.
Writing is somewhat clear and is somewhat organized, although
rereading to solidify understanding is occasionally necessary. It
demonstrates an attempt at ethical scholarship in accurate
representation and attribution of sources, but errors are
occasional or minor. Writing has good spelling, grammar, and
punctuation, but errors somewhat interfere with readers’
6. Critique of image/critique.docx
I want critique for each image. No Plagiarism plzz
This paper must be no less than 500 and not much more than
1000 words. Here are some question you can use.
What is the name of the artist?
- What kind of an artwork is it?
- What is the name of the artwork?
- Where and when was the artwork created?
- List the literal objects in the painting (trees, people, animals,
mountains, rivers, etc.).
- What do you notice first when you look at the work(s)? Why?
- What kinds of colors do you see? How would you describe
them?
- What shapes can we see? What kind of edges do the shapes
have?
- Are there lines in the work(s)? If so, what kinds of lines are
they?
- What sort of textures do you see? How would you describe
them/
- What time of day/night is it? How can we tell?
- What is the overall visual effect or mood of the work(s)?
Suggested questions to help with analysis:
- How has the artist used colors in the work(s)?
- What sort of effect do the colors have on the artwork?
- How as the artist used shapes within the work of art?
- How have lines been used in the work(s)? Has the artist used
them as an
important or dominant part of the work, or do they play a
different roll?
- What role does texture play in the work(s)? Has the artist used
the illusion of texture or has the artist used actual texture? How
has texture been used within the work(s).
- How has the artist used light in the work(s)? Is there the
7. illusion of a scene with lights and shadows, or does the artist
use light and dark values in a more abstracted way?
- How has the overall visual effect or mood of the work(s)?
been achieved by the use of elements of art and principles of
design.
- How were the artists design tools used to achieve a particular
look or focus?
Critique of image/golden retriever 1 5x7.jpg
Critique of image/marilyn.jpg
Critique of image/Thumbs.db