***Please read the assignment and what is required first***Price of $15.00 is firm, so please do not consider the assignment if you are not willing to accept this price.  Thank you. Project  2 Bart worked for Bill as a computer engineer in Florida.  Bart had been working for Bill for 15 years and had made a lot of money for Bill in Florida.  Bill had many companies all over the United States. Bart owned a home in Vero Beach Florida.   Bill called Bart from his office in Indianapolis and wanted Bart to come work for him there and offered him a Supervisor position in the company .  Bill said If Bart would move there he would have employment for the rest of his life. Bart had a son who was 17 named Albart.   Bart told him to put up the house for sale and to take care of everything as he needed to move right away. Bart moved to Indianapolis and bought a house from Ruby for $300,000. Bart liked the house because it had a one acre lot.  Two weeks before settlement someone began to build a Seven Eleven on the land which the house was on by mistake. Albart put the house up for sale in Vero for $175,000 and the house was sold in one week.  Albart had signed all of the document as agent for Bart.  Bart had instructed Albart not to sell the house for less than $225,000 as that was the amount owed on the house.  The house was sold to Barney.  At settlement Barney was informed that he would have to pay off the loan for $225,000 or $50,000 in addition to the contract price. Ruby lives in Baltimore, Maryland and employed Steve to sell the house in Indianapolis.  Ruby talked to Steve on the phone and he said he would take care of everything. Bart went to settlement and signed the documents in New York where he was staying for a week due to the birth of his grandson. After he got back to Indianapolis and went to move into his house, there was a Seven Eleven operating next to his house with drunks standing in the parking lot owned by Pepsi. Bart worked  for Bill for six weeks, and because of the economy Bill let Bart go.  Bill said because of his great job he had done over the years he would pay Bart's house payments.  After one month Bill changed his mind and stopped the payments. Discuss who can sue whom, under what cause of action, and for what type of damages.   Where can suit be brought and under what grounds? Which state law applies? Case Analysis Research Project Write an extensive, comprehensive analysis of applicable court cases related to this area of law and how it applies to the set of facts. The case analysis must be between 8-10 pages in length (excluding title page, Bibliography, tables, appendices). The 8-10 page length is a suggested length; the paper may be longer than 10 pages, but not less than 8 full pages. A paper less than 8 pages is unlikely to comprehensively cover any case analysis approved for this project and points will be deducted. There must not be large gaps between the paragraphs. Case Analysis Content Format: The case analysi.

1. ***Please read the assignment and what is required
first***Price of $15.00 is firm, so please do not consider the
assignment if you are not willing to accept this price. Thank
you.
Project 2
Bart worked for Bill as a computer engineer in Florida. Bart
had been working for Bill for 15 years and had made a lot of
money for Bill in Florida. Bill had many companies all over the
United States.
Bart owned a home in Vero Beach Florida.
Bill called Bart from his office in Indianapolis and wanted Bart
to come work for him there and offered him a Supervisor
position in the company . Bill said If Bart would move there he
would have employment for the rest of his life.
Bart had a son who was 17 named Albart. Bart told him to put
up the house for sale and to take care of everything as he
needed to move right away.
Bart moved to Indianapolis and bought a house from Ruby for
$300,000. Bart liked the house because it had a one acre lot.
Two weeks before settlement someone began to build a Seven
Eleven on the land which the house was on by mistake.
Albart put the house up for sale in Vero for $175,000 and the
house was sold in one week. Albart had signed all of the
document as agent for Bart. Bart had instructed Albart not to
sell the house for less than $225,000 as that was the amount
owed on the house. The house was sold to Barney. At
settlement Barney was informed that he would have to pay off
the loan for $225,000 or $50,000 in addition to the contract
price.
Ruby lives in Baltimore, Maryland and employed Steve to sell
the house in Indianapolis. Ruby talked to Steve on the phone
and he said he would take care of everything.
Bart went to settlement and signed the documents in New York
where he was staying for a week due to the birth of his

2. grandson.
After he got back to Indianapolis and went to move into his
house, there was a Seven Eleven operating next to his house
with drunks standing in the parking lot owned by Pepsi.
Bart worked for Bill for six weeks, and because of the economy
Bill let Bart go. Bill said because of his great job he had done
over the years he would pay Bart's house payments. After one
month Bill changed his mind and stopped the payments.
Discuss who can sue whom, under what cause of action, and for
what type of damages. Where can suit be brought and under
what grounds? Which state law applies?
Case Analysis Research Project
Write an extensive, comprehensive analysis of applicable court
cases related to this area of law and how it applies to the set of
facts.
The case analysis must be between 8-10 pages in length
(excluding title page, Bibliography, tables, appendices). The 8-
10 page length is a suggested length; the paper may be longer
than 10 pages, but not less than 8 full pages. A paper less than 8
pages is unlikely to comprehensively cover any case analysis
approved for this project and points will be deducted. There
must not be large gaps between the paragraphs.
Case Analysis Content Format:
The case analysis must include the following content:
Introduction: 1-2 paragraph introduction of the case analysis.
Case Brief: A complete case brief of the case to be analyzed,
using the Case Brief format described in conference area,
listing the issues to be answered.
Case Background: Discussion of background of case, including
discussion of previously decided related cases using the actual
court opinions of other legal cases, law review journal articles,
and other legal publication, articles as resources.
Analysis of Current Implications of Case: Discussion of how
case decision is likely to affect current events and business law,
using the actual court opinions of other legal cases, law review
journal articles and legal publications as resources.

3. Analysis of Future Implications of Case: Discussion of how
case decision is likely to affect/influence future business law
and future court cases, using actual court opinions of other legal
cases, law review journal articles and legal publications as
resources. This is not to be your personal opinion.
Personal Opinion of Case: 1-5 paragraph discussion or your
personal opinion of the case. Your opinions must be largely
supported with legal rationale and legal principles, legal
resources and other cases; it may not be only an emotional
reaction.
Summary/Conclusion of Case: Discussion of summary,
conclusions of case, excluding your personal opinion.
Bibliography: Properly formatted bibliography of at least 5
resources used in case analysis, in addition to the case citation.
In other words, you are required to use a minimum of 5 legal
resources + the case resource for a total of 6+ resources which
must be cited in the Bibliography and body of the analysis.
Case Analysis Research Resources: The case analysis research
project must include a minimum of 6 legal resources. Resources
may be obtained through the Index to Legal Periodicals,
LEXIS/NEXIS, and other UMUC Library databases, the
Internet, the classroom Webliography websites and other
methodologies for accessing information. Resources should be
taken largely from law review journal articles, other legal
publication articles relevant to the case topic, business journal
articles relevant to the case subject, and case opinions. This is a
legal case analysis so the resources need to be largely legal
resources and very relevant, on-point business resources.
Newspapers (except The Wall Street Journal),
textbooks, the class textbook and Wikipedia sites may not be
used as resources in any section of the case analysis research
project.
Refer to the UMUC Effective Writing Center and UMUC
Library tutorials and examples regarding plagiarism and
citations. You may access these resources via the Course
Content conference in the classroom.

4. Case Analysis Evaluation Criteria: The case analysis will be
evaluated according to the following standards:
An accurate and complete case brief; Logical integration of
information to support the case analysis discussion;
Comprehensiveness/depth of research and analysis;
Comprehensive, thorough analysis of case; Organizational
consistency, orderly flow, relevancy, and effectiveness of
sequential ideas and paragraphs to the case analysis;
Clarity of expression and presentation of ideas;
Grammatically correct construction and correct spelling and
punctuation;
Timely submission of analysis on the designated due date;
Caliber, quality, and depth of research, judged in part according
to the nature of the case subject matter and the bibliographic
documentation
including, particularly, the use of articles from the Index to
Legal Periodicals and its equivalents; Overall quality of
resources used;
Adherence to the standards of formatting and documentation,
including proper in-text citations and references using only
APA (American Psychological Association) documentation
style, or Kate Turabian documentation style(as assigned by
instructor);
Proper court case citation format; Accuracy and
comprehensiveness of citations;
Use of required minimum quantity of resources; Conformance
with presentation format requirements; Overall quality of
research and analysis.
Case Analysis Format: The paper must conform to the following
presentation format:
Typed;
Not single or double spaced but 1.5 spacing, in 12-point Times
New Roman or ariel fonts;
Margins not to exceed 1 in width at top/bottom/left and right
margins;

5. Cover page to include paper title, your name, class title/section
number, date;
Pagination on each page, beginning with the first page of text;
APA in-text citation style, or Kate Turabian documentation
(style as assigned); Bibliography of sources used/cited in
analysis.
GRADING CRITERIA
Criteria
Outstanding
Superior
Good
Substandard
Failure
Identification of relevant issues and legal doctrine
5.25 points
accurately identifies all relevant issues, identifies all relevant
legal doctrines, explains in depth how legal doctrines apply to
relevant issues
4.46 points
accurately identifies some relevant issues, and identifies some
relevant legal /conclusion(s)doctrines, explains some points
regarding how legal doctrines apply to relevant issues
3.94 points
inaccurately identifies some/all relevant issues, inaccurately
identifies some/all relevant legal /conclusion(s)doctrines,
partially explains one or more points regarding how legal

6. doctrines apply to relevant issues
3.41 points
inaccurately identifies some/all relevant issues or does not
identify any relevant issues, inaccurately identifies some/all
relevant legal /conclusion(s)doctrines, partially explains one or
more points regarding how legal doctrines apply to relevant
issues
2.89 points
fails to identify relevant issues; does not explain applicability
of legal doctrines
Application of Concepts/Development
5.25 points
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from
the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material
and recognize implication and extensions of the material and
concepts
4.46 points
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from
the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate
student’s understanding of the material and concepts
3.94 points
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views
than on position grounded in the readings of material or
external sources of material
3.41 points

7. arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student
may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of
making meaningful application of the material
2.89 points
a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist
Attention to instructions
2.25 points
demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to
each aspect of assignment
1.91 points
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor
aspect of assignment
1.69 points
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key
element or two minor aspects of assignment
1.46 points
failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two
key elements or several minor aspects of assignment
1.24 points
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements
Clarity, including grammar
1.5 points

8. writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all
correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to
readability
1.28 points
most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or
grammar issues
1.13 points
wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more
than an occasional spelling and/or grammar
0.98 points
unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and
grammar issues
0.83 points
largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of
mechanics and structure
Adherence to APA Style (6th ed)
0.75 points
no APA style errors
0.64 points
attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style
errors are present
0.56 points

9. attempts in-text citation and reference listing; APA style errors
are present: inconsistencies in citation usage can be found
throughout the document
0.49 points
attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the
other
0.41 points
no attempt at APA style
Overall Score
Outstanding
13.5 or more
Superior
12 or more
Good
10.5 or more
Substandard
9 or more
Failure
0 or more