Event Sourcing, Stream Processing and Serverless (Benjamin Stopford, Confluent) Kafka Summit London 2019
•
8 likes•2,323 views
In this talk we’ll look at the relationship between three of the most disruptive software engineering paradigms: event sourcing, stream processing and serverless. We’ll debunk some of the myths around event sourcing. We’ll look at the inevitability of event-driven programming in the serverless space and we’ll see how stream processing links these two concepts together with a single ‘database for events’. As the story unfolds we’ll dive into some use cases, examine the practicalities of each approach-particularly the stateful elements-and finally extrapolate how their future relationship is likely to unfold. Key takeaways include: The different flavors of event sourcing and where their value lies. The difference between stream processing at application- and infrastructure-levels. The relationship between stream processors and serverless functions. The practical limits of storing data in Kafka and stream processors like KSQL."
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Event Sourcing, Stream Processing and Serverless (Benjamin Stopford, Confluent) Kafka Summit London 2019
Similar to Event Sourcing, Stream Processing and Serverless (Benjamin Stopford, Confluent) Kafka Summit London 2019 (20)
More from confluent
More from confluent (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Event Sourcing, Stream Processing and Serverless (Benjamin Stopford, Confluent) Kafka Summit London 2019
- 1. Event Sourcing, Stream Processing & Serverless Ben Stopford Office of the CTO, Confluent
- 2. What we’re going to talk about • Event Sourcing • What it is and how does it relate to Event Streaming? • Stream Processing as a kind of “Database” • What does this mean? • Serverless Functions • How do this relate?
- 3. Can you do event sourcing with Kafka?
- 5. Popular example: Shopping Cart DB Apps Search Apps Apps Database Table matches what the user sees.
- 6. 12.42 12.44 12.49 12.50 12.59 Event Sourcing stores events, then derives the ‘current state view’ Apps Apps DERIVE Chronological Reduce Event Timeseries of user activity
- 7. Traditional Event Sourcing (Store immutable events in a database in time order) Apps Search NoSQL Monitoring Security Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R MTable of events Persist events Apps Apps
- 8. Traditional Event Sourcing (Read) Apps Search NoSQL Monitoring Security Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M Apps Search Monitoring Apps Apps Chronological Reduce on read (done inside the app) Query by customer Id (+session?) - No schema migration - Similar to ’schema on read’
- 9. 3 Benefits
- 10. Evidentiary Accountants don’t use erasers (e.g. audit, ledger, git)
- 11. Replayability Recover corrupted data after a programmatic bug
- 12. Analytics Keep the data needed to extract trends and behaviors i.e. non-lossy (e.g. insight, metrics, ML)
- 13. Traditional Event Sourcing • Use a database (any one will do) • Create a table and insert events as they occur • Query all the events associated with your problem* • Reduce them chronologically to get the current state *Aggregate ID in DDD parlance
- 14. Traditional Event Sourcing with Kafka • Use a database Kafka • Create a table topic insert events as they occur • Query all the events associated with your problem* • Reduce them chronologically to get the current state *Aggregate ID in DDD parlance
- 15. Confusion: You can’t query Kafka by say Customer Id* *Aggregate ID in DDD parlance
- 16. Events are a good write model, but make a tricky read model
- 17. CQRS is a tonic: Cache the projection in a ‘View’ Apps Search Monitoring Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M Query by customer Id Apps Search NoSQL Apps Apps DWH Hadoop S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M View Events/Command Events accumulate in the log Stream Processor Cache/DB/Ktable etc.
- 18. Even with CQRS, Event Sourcing is Hard CQRS helps, but it’s still quite hard if you’re a CRUD app
- 19. What’s the problem? Harder: • Eventually Consistent • Multi-model (Complexity ∝ #Schemas in the log) • More moving parts Apps Search NoSQL Monitoring Security Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L A T F O R M CRUD System CQRS
- 20. Eventual Consistency is often good for serving layers Source of Truth Every article since 1851 https://www.confluent.io/blog/publishing-apache-kafka-new-york-times/ Normalized assets (images, articles, bylines, tags all separate messages) Denormalized into “Content View”
- 21. If your system is both simple and transactional: stick with CRUD and an audit/history table Trigger Evidentiary Yes Replayable N/A to web app Analytics Yes CDC
- 22. More advanced: Use a Bi-Temporal Database
- 23. Use Traditional Event Sourcing judiciously, where it makes sense
- 24. CQRS comes into its own when the events move data
- 25. Online Transaction Processing: e.g. a Flight Booking System - Flight price served 10,000 x #bookings - Consistency required only at booking time
- 26. CQRS with event movement Apps Search Monitoring Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M Apps Search NoSQL Apps Apps DWH Hadoop S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M View Book Flight Events accumulate in the log Apps Search Apps S T R E A M I N G P L A View Apps Search NoSQL Apps DWH S T R E A M I N G P L A View Get Flights Get Flights Get Flights Global Read Central Write
- 27. The exact same logic applies to microservices
- 28. Microservices Orders Service Fraud Service Billing Service Email Service Orders
- 29. Fraud service doesn’t have to be consistent with the Orders service because it just creates new data (new events) Orders Service Fraud Service Billing Service Email Service Orders Consistent?
- 30. Microservices Orders Service Fraud Service Billing Service Email Service Orders Start to build things “Event Driven”
- 31. Event Streaming
- 32. Event Streaming is a more general form of Event Sourcing/CQRS Event Streaming • Events as shared data model • Many microservices • Polyglot persistence • Data-in-flight Traditional Event Sourcing • Events as a storage model • Single microservice • Single DB • data-at-rest
- 33. Benefits of Event Streaming stand out where there are multiple data sources.
- 34. Join, Filter, Transform and Summarize Events from Different Sources Fraud Service Orders Service Payment Service Customer Service Event Log Projection created in Kafka Streams API
- 35. KStreams & KSQL have different positioning •KStreams is a library for Dataflow programming: • App logic lives in stream processor and can use state stores • Statefulness limited by operational constraints. •KSQL is a ‘database’ for event preparation: • App logic is a separate process (can’t use state stores) • Statefulness unlimited, like a DB. • App uses consumer in any language
- 36. This difference makes most sense if we we look to the future.
- 38. Thesis • Serverless provides real-time, event-driven infrastructure and compute. • A stream processor provides the corollary: a database-equivalent for real-time, event-driven data.
- 39. Using FaaS • Write a function • Upload • Configure a trigger (HTTP, Event, Object Store, Database, Timer etc.)
- 40. FaaS in a Nutshell • Fully managed (Runs in a container pool) • Cold start’s can be (very) slow: 100ms – 45s (AWS 250ms-7s) • Pay for execution time (not resources used) • Auto-scales with load • 0-1000+ concurrent functions • Event driven • Stateless • Short lived (limit 5-15 mins) • Weak ordering guarantees
- 41. Where is FaaS useful? • Spikey workloads • Use cases that don’t typically warrant massive parallelism e.g. CI systems. • General purpose programming paradigm?
- 42. But there are open questions
- 43. Serverless Developer Ecosystem • Runtime diagnostics • Monitoring • Deploy loop • Testing • IDE integration Currently quite poor
- 44. Harder than current approaches Easier than current approaches Amazon Google Microsoft Serverless programming will likely become prevalent
- 45. In the future it seems unlikely we’ll manage our own infrastructure.
- 47. Event-Streaming approaches this from a different angle
- 48. FaaS is event-driven But it isn’t streaming
- 49. Complex, Timing issues, Scaling limits Customers Event Source Orders Event Source Payments Event Source Serverless functions handle only one event source FaaS/μS FaaS/μS FaaS/μS
- 50. Send SQL Process boundary Orders Payments KSQL Customers Table Customers KSQL simplifies these issues by pre-preparing events from different sources into one event stream App Logic CREATE STREAM order- payments AS SELECT * FROM orders, payments, customers LEFT JOIN… Order Payment Customer
- 51. KSQL prepares data so, when a function is called, a single event has all the data that function needs.
- 52. KSQL also separates stateful operations from event-driven application logic
- 53. FaaSFaaSFaaSKSQL Customers Table KSQL as a “Data Layer” for Serverless Functions FaaSFaaS STATELESS Fully elastic STATEFUL Orders Payments Customers Autoscale with load Filter, transform, join, summarizations
- 54. Familiar Apps Search Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M Apps Search Monitorin Apps Apps S T R E A M I N G P L AT F O R M Apps Search AppsApps Search Monitor Apps Apps Stateful Stateless
- 55. FaaS Traditional Application Event-Driven Application Application Database KSQL Stateful Data Layer FaaS FaaS FaaS FaaS FaaS Streaming Stateless Stateless Stateless Compute Layer Massive linear scalability with elasticity
- 57. Use stream processors to make the consumption of events both simple and scalable Think Event- Driven
- 58. Summary • Events underpin the storage models of truthful/factful architectures. • Event sourcing is most useful when it embraces events as data-in-flight • A stream processor provides a database-like equivalent for real-time, event-driven data • Serverless provides the corollary: real-time, event-driven infrastructure and compute
- 59. Things I didn’t tell you 1/2 • Tools like KSQL provide data provisioning, not state mutation. • Good for offline services & data pipelines • Not good for CRUD (but it’s ok to mix and match) • Kafka’s serverless integration is in it’s early stages. • Existing connector for Kafka (Limited functionality). • Confluent connector coming. • Can KSQL handle large state? • Unintended rebalance can stall processing • Static membership (KIP-345) – name the list of stream processors • Increase the timeout for rebalance after node removal (group.max.session.timeout.ms) • Worst case reload: RocksDB ~GbE speed
- 60. Things I didn’t tell you 2/2 • Can Kafka be used for long term storage? • Log files are immutable once they roll (unless compacted) • Jun spent a decade working on DB2 • Careful: • Historical reads can stall real-time requests (cached) • ZFS has several page cache optimizations • Tiered storage will help
- 61. Find out More • Peeking Behind the Curtains of Serverless Platforms, Wang et al. • Cloud Programming Simplified: A Berkeley View on Serverless Compute • Neil Avery’s Journey to Event Driven Part 3. The Affinity Between Events, Streams and Serverless. • Designing Event Driven Systems, Ben Stopford
- 62. Thank you @benstopford Book: https://www.confluent.io/designing-event-driven-systems Github: http://bit.ly/kafka-microservice-examples Example ecosystem built with streams. Includes KSQL, Control Centre, Elastic etc.