Political System Of The Philippines

Political System of the Philippines
Political System of the Philippines The political system of the Philippines occurs within an organized framework of a presidential, representative, and
democratic republic with the president as both the head of state and the head of government within a pluriform multi–party system. The three brunches
of government, the law–making body or the legislative branch, the law–enforcing body or the executive branch and the law–interpreting body or the
judicial branch forms political system of the Philippines. The Constitutional System The Constitution of the Philippines or the 'Saligang Batas ng
Pilipinas in Filipino' is the highest law of the land. The Constitution currently in effect was proclaimed on 2nd February, 1987 and it's popularly...show
more content...
The revolutionary movement and its mass struggles will eventually develop and transform into its sharpest form – the armed struggle – to make the
decisive action of seizing political power from the hands of the bourgeoisie. II. PROCESS The whole process of developing and strengthening the
revolutionary movement and mass struggles will be long and tedious–it is sure to undergo swerves, ebbs and flows. Maintaining and protecting the
strengths and gains it has gathered in the course of its struggle should therefore be ensured in order to make use of it in advancing the struggle. The
accumulation of strengths and gains is done with the conception of party units from the womb of organizations/associations/unions of workers and
other sectors of society. Likewise, the formation of committees among the advanced elements and the rise of organizations that are basically socialist in
orientation. III. BUILDING THE ORGANS OF POLITICAL POWER Our efforts in consolidating the strength we gather in the course of the
development of the revolutionary movement and mass struggles should naturally lead to posing a direct challenge and destabilization of the power of
the bourgeois reactionary state. This means that the strength gathered by the revolutionary movement and mass struggles will concretely be manifested
not only within the revolutionary mass movement but shall extend and reflect itself in other units/organs. It shall also manifest itself even in the
corridors of bourgeois
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The American Political System Essay
The American Political System The American political system is a federal system, which consists of division of a national government and state
governments. However, it was not always a federal system, it was not based on the Constitution, but on the Articles of Confederation. This system
divides authority between sovereign national and state government. Under the Articles of the Confederation, each state retained its ultimate governing
authority. .[1]"The power of government must be equal to its responsibilities....show more content...
The state government was protected under the Articles of Confederation and had the ultimate governing authority. 2"The government of the Articles
was a union of states rather than also of people. The result was a weak national government, since its strength depended entirely of the states'
willingness to cooperate (p 61)." If the states refused to pay the national government could not do anything to get the money. The final result of
non–payment from the states was a weaker national defense. The states wanted to retain their sovereignty and argued that the national government
would not be able serve the people as well as the union of states. Under the new governing system known as federalism the state government would
have the responsibilities of the chartering of local governments, education, public safety, registration and voting, intrastate commerce.
In 1787 a new form of government was introduced at the Philadelphia convention, which changed the power between national and state governments.
3"The Philadelphia convention thereby devised a governing system that came to be known as federalism. Federalism is the division of sovereignty, or
ultimate governing authority between a national government and regional (that is, state) governments. Each directly governs the people and derives it
powers

Republican Party Typology
The American political system is always susceptible to change. In recent decades, the United States has experienced an increase in political
polarization between the two parties. These extreme views resonate with the Americans that sit at the tips of the ideological spectrum, but the majority
of people have more moderate ideologies. Most fall in between the two extremes, holding different combinations of social and economic values that
make it difficult to place each person on the traditional linear spectrum. To further analyze voters, a political typology of the United States can be
conducted, which further sorts voters into more connected groups based on their attitudes and values. This data has proven to be crucial for political
parties when determining what policies to include in their platform, because recent general elections have revealed that the undecided vote plays a large
role in determining the winner. In order to maximize the amount of voters the Republican Party receives in the general election, the party must
incorporate values and policies in their platform that attracts the maximum amount of moderate voters, without drifting too far away from traditional
Republican values to ensure the retention of the constituency. This can be achieved by adopting new policies on abortion, alternative energy,
unauthorized immigrants, and In order to properly analyze the data collected by a typology, one must first understand how each of the different
groupings is composed.

Similarities And Differences Between Uk And Us
It's impossible to learn the history and the culture of any country without knowing how these countries are governed. Since English is a global
language, it is essential to have at least some basic knowledge about the government systems in two major English–speaking countries, the United
Kingdom and the United States of America. One can get a deeper understanding of the government systems of the UK and the USA with the help of a
comparison between their structure and functions.
Firstly, the political regimes in the USA and the UK are partly the same, however in terms of types of governments and constitution these countries are
really different. The first main similarity is that the political regimes in both countries are democracies. Then, both countries have their own
constitutions, which are quite old but still actual as the highest legal documents. Moving to the differences, it should be mentioned that while the UK is
a parliamentary democracy, the USA is a representative democracy. Moreover, the forms of government are completely different as the USA is a
presidential republic and the UK is a constitutional monarchy. Also, whereas in the USA the constitution...show more content...
It's hard to say that these two systems are more alike than dissimilar as they differ to some extent in every way from names to functions. Although by
the points of the general comparison these countries have more similarities rather than differences (political regimes, the principle of separation of
powers, the functions of the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary), the UK and the USA have much more dissimilaries than resemblances (in
terms of forms of government, other principles of government such as the system of checks and balances and the principle of federalism, constitution,
serving terms and some functions as well, not to mention that political regimes differ

Here in this topic an issue arises that why we do compare and compare the political systems of the different regions, states, and countries and as well as
domestic politics.
To answer the bigger question what is politics and political systems. Politics mean the activities associated are attached with the governance of a
country or area especially the debate between parties or regimes having power. Politics is also to struggle to gain power to rule and govern
governments. On the other hand governments have access to resources and powers to rule over people and as well as empower people through the
majority winning political party who wins to rule and impose.
Some philosophers consider politics it forces for good while others take it as force for evil. In seventeenth and eighteenth century were the opinions that
if no government existed, there would be state of nature. Some philosophers conceive the idea of Social Contract on which societies come to an
existence. John Locke, Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes considered the pioneers of the...show more content...
Here comparison doesn't mean that we compare two people with their heights or compare two classrooms but it's all about comparing Political
systems of the world and how the run and are have been placed. It is also a core method to humanistic and scientific methods. Comparing our own
political systems and institutions with others provide us the opportunity to see wider range of political alternatives and increase our appreciation of
the advantages and disadvantages of our own political system, enabling us learn from other countries. Comparative analysis makes us aware of the
possibilities of politics. It also helps us to formulate theories about how to certain political systems work. Comparison as a method is very old but as s
discipline it developed very

Political Systems
Political Systems Democracy relates to a political system that equates to one person holding one single vote in the decision–making process. As a
political system, its proponents deem it as a fair and just way as the whims of the majority are preferred over the desires of the few. It becomes
necessary to comprehend how democracy works to be able to effectively understand the principles and assumptions behind it. Majority of the countries
in the world relate to a democratic system with differing variations depending on the resident country's constitution. However the basic premise is that
people in a country vote for their preferred candidate and the one with the most votes becomes the leader of the particular country. It is the same...show
more content...
It means that efficiency is high and the way in which people internalize new methods is done much faster. It becomes clearer an inclusive
educational system as well as vast pool of labor enabled China to undertake aggressive economic policies that slowly saw it rise to be the largest
economy in Asia and then the world. The effectiveness of these two factors has seen China rise to be a successful superpower despite lingering
problems. In analyzing these economic systems it becomes important to understand the way in which they may affect economic development. The
rise of China as previously stated has led to the consideration that perhaps the authoritarian rule is more liable to allow for economic development.
The communist system is more suitable in terms of how it operates on a system of meritocracy. To climb the ranks of the party one has to be
qualified and have held positions of power even at the most basic of levels. There is none of the nepotism frequented in democracy with 'political
dynasties' an abnormality in such a system. It means that the people to head the positions of leadership are qualified veterans who have the nous to
carry the country forward in terms of economic development.
In a democratic system the hope is usually that a suitable candidate comes along and that he/she convinces enough people of his/her worth. It is not
always the best candidate who wins and election rigging is a prevalent cause of concern. The way that many democratic

Political Systems of France and Britain Essay
COMPARITIVE POLITICS
SEMINAR II В– A DESCRIPTION OF TWO WESTERN EUROPEAN POLITICAL SYSTEMS
FRANCE AND GREAT BRITAIN
INTRODUCTION
I chose these two systems, which interest me for different reasons. The British system is one that has evolved over many centuries, with both small
and large adjustments along the way to keep in on course. In contrast to this, the French model has changed dramatically on several occasions, and
can rarely have been described as stable. However, in 1958 Charles de Gaulle made some brave changes to the constitution, which after being
approved by the French public, set the scene for the classic semi–presidential system that we see today.
Despite these opposing histories, there are many similarities between...show more content...
The House of Commons, on the other hand, is a democratically elected chamber. The House of Lords and the House of Commons meet in separate
chambers in the Palace of Westminster (the Houses of Parliament), in central London.
The British Parliament is often called the "Mother of Parliaments," as the legislative bodies of many nationsВ—most notably, those of the members of
the CommonwealthВ—are modelled on it. However, it is a misquotation of John Bright, who had actually remarked on 18 January 1865 that "England
is the Mother of Parliaments", in the context of supporting demands for expanded voting rights in a country which had pioneered Parliamentary
government.
The differences between the constituent members of the UK are interesting, England, despite being the most developed, populous and richest member,
is the only one without its own devolved government.
House of Commons
The UK is divided into parliamentary constituencies of broadly equal population (decided by the Boundaries Commission), each of which elects a
Member of Parliament to the House of Commons. The leader of the party with the largest number of MPs is invited by the monarch to form a
government, and becomes the Prime Minister. The leader of the second largest party becomes the Leader of the Opposition.

There is usually a majority in Parliament, thanks to the First Past the Post electoral system so coalitions are rare. The monarch normally asks a person
commissioned to form a government

Every country differs in their preference of political system to govern their countries. For democratic countries, two possible choices of governing are
the presidential system and the parliamentary system. Since both the presidential and the parliamentary systems have their own strengths and
weaknesses, many scholars have examined these two forms of government, and debate on which political system is more successful in governance. In
this paper, I will first provide a detailed analysis of both the parliamentary and the presidential system. I will also evaluate each system's strengths and
weaknesses, addressing any differences as well as any commonalities. Finally, I will conclude by using historical examples to analyze and support the
...show more content...
Advocates of the parliamentary form of government suggested a few competitive strengths of this system of government. Since it has gained a stable
parliamentary majority, the government is able to smoothly process its legislative project. In addition, the government is adequately furnished that it
could still choose to adopt measures designed to support the national interests while many strong sectional groups oppose such measures (Dyck,
2012). The prime minister is the leader of this type of government, who is obliged to be responsive to all its people's demands. Also, the people have
the right to vote and replace the prime minister due to any incompetency of governance that does not address and fulfill their desires. This is known as
the non–confidence vote; the government may be removed when it has lost confidence in the parliament, and cause the head of state to resign a new
government (Dyck, 2012). An example of such measure occurred in Britain on March 28th, 1979. When James Callaghan's labour government was
defeated in the House of Commons just by one vote, it was forced into an early election that was won by the opposition leader Margaret Thatcher
(Dyck, 2012). In this case, it can avoid or at least reduce the period of legislative gridlock, because of its flexibility in elections and the power is
centered in the country's prime

The United States Political System
The United States political system is dominated by an intense battle for power. Those who have control, have the ability to influence the way our
nation is operated. While every citizen has the opportunity to impact politics, some citizens and groups are at a disadvantage. In America, we struggle
to ensure that every individual has a chance to equally participate in the political process.
Although anyone can run for political office in the United States, the cost of a campaign is expensive. Throughout their campaign, candidates spend
money on research, ads, speaking engagements, and other activities to promote their name and policy to the public. The average amount of money
spent in 2012 on a candidate elected to the House of Representatives was just under 1.6 million dollars (The Center for Responsive Politics (CRP),
Row 1). In the senate, the candidate who won the 2012 election spent on average 11.5 million dollars (CRP, Row 1). Even being elected to a position
in a state legislature comes at a cost. In the 2010 election, the average candidate running for a seat in a state's House of Representatives spent 56,142
dollars (Casey et al., 2001). The cost of a political campaign jeopardizes the ability of candidates with limited funding to competitively contend in
elections. The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2010 that the annual median income in America was 52,646 dollars (DeNavas–Walt & Proctor, 23).
Without financial assistance, over 50% of Americans could not match the

An Organization As A Political System
The metaphor of an organization as a political system is a good way to dispel the myth of organizations' rationality (Morgan 2006). The organization as
a complex political system involves many levels of interactions, interpersonal relationships and diverse integrated processes meant to help achieve the
goals and objectives of the organization.
What the organization is about and how successful and effective it is depends on many factors. First of all – the distribution of power and authority. In
addition, for a better understanding of organizational processes, it is important to take into account the fact that the power comes from a variety of
sources, not just from formal power. Besides the formal authority power comes from the control of scarce resources, control of decision process,
control of knowledge and information etc. (Morgan 2006). Thus every organization has powerful people on different level that influence the way of the
organization's development.
Distribution of power is significant part of organizational management. The way of its arrangement influences efficiency of the organization and
employees' loyalty. When all authority is concentrated on the top, like it often happens in the organizations with classic machine like type of
management, it leaves lack of freedom and choice to the line level employees.
I have an experience of work in the organization with matrix structure. The power distribution was set up the way, that nobody had an absolute authority.

Political Systems Thematic Essay
History and culture of many nations and societies have been affected by political systems. In the 1600s–1700s two political systems, absolute
monarchy of France and the constitutional monarchy of England, have affected Europe. Absolute monarchy is when a ruler rules with absolute, or
total, power. Aconstitutional monarchy is when laws limit the power of the monarch so they cannot rule absolutely. These two political systems
affected not only their own country, but the whole of Europe as well. Mainly under the influences of the two leaders Louis XIV, Charles II, James II,
Prince William, and Queen Mary.
One of the most known rulers that ruled with absolute power in France was Louis XIV. Louis ruled for many years and was considered...show more
content...
Jean Baptiste Colbert, the minister of finance, helped Louis the most in achieving these goals. He expanded manufacturing, placed high tariffs on
imported goods, encouraged people to move to colonies, and supported mercantilism. After Colbert's death, Louis created a policy which slowed
down France's economic progress. He also cancelled the Edict of Nantes, which protected the religious freedom of Huguenots. When Louis got rid
of the Edict of Nantes, it caused many Huguenot artisans and business people to flee the country, leaving France without many skilled
workers.Another thing that Louis did was build the palace of Versailles, a huge palace that stretched for 500 yards. Louis also forced his country to
fight several wars, considering France had an army other countries could not even match. The other countries were eventually able to join forces and
match France's strength, in which Louis began to impose more taxes to pay for army finances. When Louis eventually died, he left behind a legacy
yet he also left behind many debts and a ruined France. Although France was now a power to be reckoned with, the debts and bad harvests had an
affect on the people and they had resentment because of the royal abuse they took.
One could define a constitutional (limited) monarchy as a rule when the King or Queen's power was limited by law, document, and legislature. One
could also characterize a limited monarchy as when the King or Queen have

Political and Economic System
World Geography and Culture
Spain
Analysis of the Political and Economic Systems
Table of Contents I. Introduction (abstract) II. Political System a. Type of Political System b. Structure of the Government c. Identify a current law
/policy law d. Impact on society III. Economic System a. Type of economic system b. Identify a current economic issue c. Government role in address
the issue d. Impact on society IV. Compare Contract a. Economic issue country of origin V. Conclusion
Abstract
In this essay, I had to assume the role of a politician and an economist. The country ofSpain has many different political issues that can impact the
society based on the structure of the...show more content...
Economic System
Spain's economy is a well–based way to equally spread money to all of the people. Some of Spain's natural resources include coal, lignite, iron ore,
uranium, mercury, pyrites, fluorspar, gypsum, zinc, lead, tungsten, copper, kaolin; hydroelectric power. Spain's currency is theEuropean Union euro.
Spain's imports include machinery and equipment, fuels, chemicals, semi–finished goods, foodstuffs, consumer goods, measuring and medical control
instruments. In 2011, the amount of money that Spain received for imports was $364.9 billion. Some of Spain's exports include machinery, motor
vehicles; foodstuffs, pharmaceuticals, medicines, other consumer goods. In 2011, the amount of money that Spain received for exports was $309.6
billion.
The gross domestic per capita is thirty three thousand six hundred euros a year. In labor force 2.4 percent goes to agriculture, 24 percent to industry,
and 71.1 percent to services. Spain came out in the number one position because it is a sunny country, because its citizens enjoy shorter working
hours and more days holiday, because energy and lifestyle costs are lower, because the government invests into education and healthcare, because the
average age at which people die is higher than in most of Europe and because overall, living in Spain ensures you have a better quality of life.
Spain has many economic issues. One economic issue is

Political Systems : Political System
Political Systems: Political systems reflect a culture's distribution of power, power that is established and maintained with or without a formal
government. As such, anthropologists use "political" to include all human activities involving power (MindEdge, 2017). The political system that is
prevalent throughout this movie is power.
Alfred Ludlow, decided to move to the modern city of Helena to find opportunity and work. Alfred was known in the city for his honesty and fair
dealing reputation and, because of these, influential citizens befriended him. The O'Banion brothers, James and John, were part of an Irish–American
gang and were bootleggers who operated during prohibition in the city of Helena, Montana. The O'Banion's influenced...show more content...
To frighten him, a police officer fired his gun into the mountains, but tragically, a bullet hit Isabel Two in the chest and she died instantly. Tristan in
turn beats the officer with his own gun until he is practically dead, then carries his wife away from the rest of the family. Tristan is going to cut her
heart out to set her soul free, as he was taught by One Stab as a young child.
Application:
The person I would interview would be Colonel William Ludlow, the patriarch of the family. I think deep down he feels responsible and guilty for the
demise of many Native Americans in the war and I think he is trying to make amends with himself by the decisions he makes for himself and for his
family. I would like to ask him the following questions:
1.Colonel William Ludlow, why did you move your family away from the town? Do you really think that moving will protect your family from war
and the government? Or was the move an excuse for you to get away from the reminder of what you did to the Native American Indians?
I would ask these questions because I really want to get insight on his thoughts about how he feels about what he (and his soldiers) did to the Native
American Indians and how that has affected his view points of them as a people and as a culture. Colonel Ludlow is asserting his power by

The political systems in the United States of America, and the United Kingdom are fairly different due to several policies. The most predominant
difference that could be deducted from their policies is the difference in selecting their government. The United States base their elections off of
what is known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a process that was created by the founding fathers, written in the Constitution.
Not only is it a compromise made between the election of the President by a vote in Congress, but also the election of the President due to popular
vote of eligible citizens. In total, there are 538 electors that make up the Electoral College. However, for the President to be elected there is a
required majority of 270 electoral votes that need to be won. If you obtain the most votes within a state, then you will win the seats of that state that
help the potential President to get 270 electoral votes. The way in which the number of seats in each state is decided is through Congressional
delegation; there is one for each member of the House of Representatives, and two others for the Senators. The Electoral College is particularly
interesting due to the reason that even if you win the popular vote, you may not necessarily be elected as President. The most recent example of this is
the 2016 presidential election between democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, and republican Donald Trump. Clinton did in fact receive more votes than
Trump; however,

The American Two Party Political System Essay
The American Two Party Political System
Since the administration of George Washington two political parties have dominated the United States political system, but they have not always been
the same two parties. The first two parties were the Federalists and Anti–Federalists. Federalists were those who supported a strong federal government
and the Anti–Federalists were those who did not. The leaders of the Federalists were Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. Both were from the
Northeast where the Federalist line of thinking was strongest. Thomas Jefferson became the leader of the Anti–Federalists. These two groups really did
not considered themselves parties. The founders feared parties because they thought of them as factions....show more content...
The party of Jackson is today's Democratic Party. By the election of 1836 the National Republicans and other anti–Jacksonians had merged to form a
new party, the Whigs. They lost to the Democrats that year, but in 1840 they succeeded in getting William Henry Harrison elected President. In 1844
the Whig candidate, Henry Clay, lost to James Polk, but in the next election Zachary Taylor won for the Whigs. This seemed to be a time of uncertainty
in political direction.
While this uncertainty was taking place, a social force greater than party loyalty was beginning to reshape American politics. The slavery issue, with
the passions it aroused in the North and the South, gradually compelled a realignment of parties. The Whigs party began to split in 1852. This was a
result of the deep split in opinion over slavery. During the next few years most Southern Whigs joined the Democrats. Northern Whigs joined northern
antislavery Democrats. In 1854 groups of northern men against slavery urged the creation of a new political party opposed to the continuation of
slavery. This party has become today's Republicans. During 1854 to1860, the slavery issue became such a hot topic that even Democrats were
becoming divided among themselves. In 1860 four candidates ran for the presidency. Brekenridge was the Southern Democrats candidate, Douglas was
the Northern Democrats candidate,

The British Political System
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United
Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the
head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom's political system is a
parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like
that?
The present monarch of the Great Britain is the Queen Elizabeth the Second, who came into power after the death of her father the King...show more
content...
The Royal Assent turns a Bill into an Act of Parliament, allowing it to become law in the UK. Although, the Queen has right to encourage and warn his
ministers in regular meetings with the Prime Minister, her role in adopting legislation is purely formal.
Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Queen would refuse to accept the bills supported and adopted within the European Union. However, it is possible in
case of occurrence of a constitutional crisis. If we think about the example, that the Lords would reject the European Union treaty due to remarkable
reasons and the government would push it through regardless, then the Queen might refuse to consent. In this particular moment, the Queen due to her
position in Parliament could intervene and refuse to give royal assent.
Convention defines the Constitutional Position of the Crown. The monarch as the formal head of Government has the significant powers, which are
called the "Royal Prerogative." Firstly, she assents to Bills passed by Parliament, on the advice of Ministers. Secondly, giving audiences to Ministers,
at which Her Majesty may be consulted, encourage and warn. Thirdly, opening each new session of Parliament. Lastly, proroguing or dissolving
Parliament before a general election. The Opening of Parliament takes place on the first day of the new session of parliament shortly after the

Democratic Political Systems
Democracy is typically known as a type of government that is ruled by the people. Active public participation in political matters, free and fair elections,
equality, and protection of basic human rights are at the core of democratic political systems. Individual citizens, organized groups and institutions,
elected officials and governmental bureaucracies all contribute to the democratic nature of these political systems, but the main power resides with the
people. There are generally two types of democracies: direct and representative. Both types of democratic systems have their own unique strengths and
weaknesses but the intended purpose for both is to protect the public and their interests. In addition to protecting public interest, democracies help
prevent the monopoly of authority, but the overall strength of a democratic political system lies with politically and socially educated citizens.
Protecting Public Interests The underlying principle of a democratic political system is that it is governed by the people. In that context, the strength of
democratic political system lies in protecting the public's interests regarding political, social, and economic issues. Three ways this protection can be
accomplished by public participation through voting, civil societies, and elected representation.
Voting
Public participation in the voting is one of the pillars of democracy. Citizens in democratic societies vote on important issues to

The Political System Of Democracy Essay
We the people. The three words that make up the political system of Democracy that has existed since the days of ancient Greece. When applied to the
United States of America, two forms of Democracy are presented that clash together in their principles. This is of course, Elite Democracy and Popular
Democracy. Through the analysis of the process of the Electoral College, the actions of politically charged people, and various reforms throughout
history, we can see how Popular Democracy pales in comparison to the superior philosophy of Elite Democracy. Before we start looking at these
subjects, we will build an extended definition around both systems to lay a foundation of each one's beliefs.
Defining Popular and Elite Democracy
The debate surrounding both Popular Democracy and Elite Democracy is interesting because they are essentially two sides of the same coin. Popular
Democracy is centered around the ideology of "The People's Rule". This ideology refers to the belief that citizens should be involved as much as
possible when the government makes decisions that affect their lives. On the other hand, Elite Democracy's viewpoint is based around the idea of people
voting for elected officials that rule as they see fit (Miroff 12). These two different outlooks displayed by both Popular and Elite Democracy were
formed through six primary debates in which they differ. Elite and Popular Democracy can be condensed into six central points: Trust in the people,
Human nature,

Political System Of The Philippines

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Political System Of The Philippines