4. 4
Introduction
Coverage of Presentation
• Why Strengthening?
• Conventional Strengthening Techniques
• MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
– Features & Benefits
– Areas and Ways of application
– Installation Procedure
– Basic Design Understanding
– Research and Testing
– Some Completed Projects
5. 5
Introduction
Why Strengthening?
ERRORS IN DESIGN STAGE
• Design Errors
– Loading Specification
– Material Specification
– Change of Code
• Drafting Errors
• Assumption Errors
SERVICE STAGE
• Overloading
• Change of use
• Upgrading
• Environmental factors
• Earthquake/Seismic forces
• Lack of regular
maintenance
• Concrete deterioration
• Bomb blast
CONSTRUCTION ERRORS
• Poor Construction Practices
– Insufficient compaction
– Inadequate curing time
• Poor Workmanship
• Lack of proper supervision
7. 7
Introduction
Some of the Traditional Strengthening Techniques
STEEL PLATE BONDINGSTEEL PLATE BONDING
JACKETING/ENLARGEMENTJACKETING/ENLARGEMENT
EXTERNAL POST-TENSIONINGEXTERNAL POST-TENSIONING
11. 11
STEEL PLATE BONDING
• Disadvantages
– Bulky set-up
– Labour and Time intensive
– Difficult to align and install
– Design needs to cater for weight of
steel plates
– Requires heavy equipment
– Steel plates need to be tailor made
– Drilling and bolting cause further
distress
Some of the Traditional Strengthening Techniques
12. 12
Some of the Traditional Strengthening Techniques
JACKETING
• Disadvantages
– Bulky set-up with massive formwork
– Labour and Time intensive
– Fairly destructive
– Improper bond between new and
existing concrete
– Different shrinkage rate of old and new
concrete
– Offset from original alignment
Existing profile
Enlarged profile
16. 16
Some of the Traditional Strengthening Techniques
EXTERNAL POST-TENSIONING
• Disadvantages
– Labour and Time intensive
– Requires special equipment
– Requires specialised skills
– Requires easy access to work area
– Fairly destructive
– Uneven surface finish
– Offset from original alignment
– May not be aesthetically acceptable
19. 19
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
History of Composite Strengthening
• Used in the aerospace and
manufacturing industry for 25 years
• Used in structural strengthening for
more than 10 years.
32. 32
Constructio
n
Chemicals
07 / 2006
– Klaus
Kamhub
er
1. Roll MBrace Primer1. Roll MBrace Primer
2. Level Surfaces with2. Level Surfaces with
MBrace PuttyMBrace Putty
3. Apply First Coat of3. Apply First Coat of
MBrace SaturantMBrace Saturant
Easy InstallationEasy Installation
33. 33
Constructio
n
Chemicals
07 / 2006
– Klaus
Kamhub
er
4. Apply MBrace Fiber4. Apply MBrace Fiber
ReinforcementReinforcement
6. Apply Optional6. Apply Optional
MBrace TopcoatMBrace Topcoat
5. Apply Second Coat5. Apply Second Coat
of MBrace Saturantof MBrace Saturant
Easy InstallationEasy Installation
34. 34
Constructio
n
Chemicals
07 / 2006
– Klaus
Kamhub
er
Design Thickness 0.0065 in.
Tensile Strength 3.3 K/in.
Tensile Strength
for Design
505 Ksi
Tensile Modulus
for Design
33 Msi
Ultimate Elongation 1.5%
Physical Properties
of CF Sheet
35. 35
Constructio
n
Chemicals
07 / 2006
– Klaus
Kamhub
er
MBrace vs. Conventional Upgrade
Bonded Steel Plate
0.5 cm bolted plate
110 kg dead load
Placed by lift truck
Member Enlargement
2 #20 rebar, 10 cm grout
1,125 kg dead load
Formed and cured
FRP Sheet
1 layer resin bonded
2.7 kg dead load
Placed by hand
Simply supported beam; 35% upgrade in live load
36. 36
Constructio
n
Chemicals
07 / 2006
– Klaus
Kamhub
er
FRP Repair Strategies
Ductile behavior
Deflection
Load Beam with Composite
Original beam
B
C
A D
SL
SL
UL
42. 42
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Strengthening Philosophy in MBraceTM
#2 Compatible MBraceTM
Primer and MBraceTM
Saturant to form effective polymer matrix
Fully integrated
Proper load transfer to fibres Concrete Failure
43. 43
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Strengthening Philosophy in MBraceTM
#3 Coloured MBraceTM
Saturant to indicate complete
impregnation of fibres with the saturant
Fully impregnated
Proper protection to fibres
Proper distribution of loads
Carbon Fibre
E-Glass Fibre
45. 45
Buildings
• RC Beams, Columns and Slabs
• RC and Masonry Walls
Bridges
• Beams, Pier and Deck Slabs
Silos, Chimneys and Tanks
Pipes and Tunnels
Marine Structures
• Jetties and Wharves
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Areas of Application with MBraceTM
51. 51
Increases flexural capacity of flexural elements
Increases shear capacity of beams, columns and walls
Increases vertical load-bearing capacity of columns
Increases ductility under cyclic loadings
Increases seismic resistance
Resistance against corrosion
Resistance to crack propagation
Resistance to bomb blast
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Characteristics of MBraceTM
52. 52
High Strength-to-Weight Ratio
Easy to install and non-destructive
Low labour and less downtime
Does not require heavy and special equipment
Can be used in space-constrained areas
Flexible and able to adapt to various shapes
No off-setting from original alignment
Durable, non-corrosive and able to resist corrosion
No maintenance
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Advantages of MBraceTM
E-Glass Fibre
Carbon Fibre
53. 53
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Composite Performance of MBraceTM
Properties
Type of Fibre
Tensile Strength
(min. ASTM D3039)
Tensile Modulus
(min. ASTM D3039)
Ultimate Strain
(min. ASTM D3039)
Thickness/Layer
MBraceTM
EG900
E-Glass
480 N/mm2
28 000 N/mm2
2.0
1.10 mm
MBraceTM
CF130
Carbon
30000 N/mm2
2300 G N/mm2
1.5
0.165 mm
58. 58
Surface Preparation
• Remove existing
finishes to expose
bare concrete surface
• Concrete surface to be
smoothen to give an
even surface with no
voids or potholes
• Chamfer edges and
corners to a radius of
approximately 20mm
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
59. 59
Application of Primer
• Mix MBraceTM
Primer
Part A and Part B
using a mechanical
mixer for between 1-
2 minutes
• Apply MBraceTM
Primer to prepared
concrete surface
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
61. 61
Material Preparation
• Fibre sheets are pre-
cut according to the
requirement as per
structural drawings.
• Mix MBraceTM
Saturant Part A and
Part B using a
mechanical mixer for
between 1-2 minutes
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
62. 62
Saturation of Fibre
• Saturate MBraceTM
Fibre
Sheets with MBraceTM
Saturant using a roller or
saturator
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
63. 63
Installation of MBraceTM
• Install pre-saturated MBraceTM
Fibre Sheets onto primed
concrete surface
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
65. 65
Broadcast sand
• Broadcasting sand onto
strengthened column to
form keys for application of
finishes
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
66. 66
Finishes
• Apply desired finishes to
the strengthened column
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Installation Procedure of MBraceTM
87. 87
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Slab Testing
Cantilever end-span of RC bridge deck slab was tested to
failure
Failed deck slab was repaired and strengthened using
MBraceTM
Strengthened deck slab was loaded and no sign of failure
was shown when the unstrengthened failure load was
reached
88. 106
Tensile Strength Test FRP Carbon CF 130 at
Material & Structure Lab. Civil Eng. Institut
Technology Bandung West Java
91. 110
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Silo, USA
Silo was strengthened with MBraceTM
to increase its load-bearing capacity
and enhance against hoop stresses
Strengthening work was conducted
with no disruption to the daily
operation of the silo
92. 111
MBraceTM
Composite Strengthening System
Silo, USA
Grooves were formed on
concrete substrate for the
installation of MBarTM
Workers cutting grooves
on concrete substrate
View of Silo with prepared
concrete substrate
95. 114
Hong Kong LCC206 (Cont’d)
Fitting GFRP reinforcement cage to
steel frame to be lifted to vertical
position
Stiffening frame
96. 115
Hong Kong LCC206 (Cont’d)
GFRP cage lifted by crane and lowered into
excavated hole for construction of D-wall
16m long GFRP
Reinforcement Cage
97. 116
MBarTM
FRP Reinforcements
Delhi Metro, India
GFRP was used as
reinforcement to replace
conventional steel for the
soft-eye.
GFRP is ideal for TBM to cut
through easily without
damaging it.
⇒Less labour
⇒Less downtime
⇒Less work constraints
⇒Lower overall project cost
Delhi Metro
98. 117
MBarTM
FRP Reinforcements
C822 Circleline Project, Singapore
MBarTM
GFRP rods used
as temporary
reinforcement at soft-eye
region of diaphragm wall
for link sewer tunnelling
interface
MBarTM
GFRP rods
chosen due to:
⇒Easy to cut by TBM
⇒Light-weight
⇒Easy to handle
⇒Less construction time
⇒High tensile strength
Soft-eye region to be
reinforced with MBarTM
GFRP
rods
99. 118
Install of MBarTM
GFRP rods to
replace conventional steel
reinforcements at soft-eye region
Steel tie
used to
secure
MBarTM
MBarTM
FRP Reinforcements
C822 Circleline Project, Singapore
100. 119
Sutherland Metro
CFRP rods used as soil nails to create steep-
sided cuttings for new railway in an urban area.
CFRP rods chosen due to:
⇒High resistant to wide variety of
aggressive environments.
⇒Light-weight; 3.5% of the weight
of an equivalent strength steel
rods
⇒Easy to handle
⇒Reduced construction time
⇒Reduced costs of about 10%
⇒High tensile strength
102. 121
114mm Drilled Hole
200mm thk
Vegetation Layer
Sutherland Metro (Cont’d)
Cementitious Grout (W/C:0.45)
Min. Strength 35N/mm2
at 28 Days
1 layer of Geogrid
laid on soil surfaceRC Face Plate
400x400x70mm thk
bedded on 2:1 Mortar
Voids & Empty Hole
packed with 2:1 Mortar
16mm Dia.
CFRP Rod
Wedge Grip
Mechanism
103. 122
Sutherland Metro (Cont’d)
Using drilling rigs to drill 114mm dia.
hole.
CFRP was inserted into
the drilled holes. Length of
between 3.0 and 10.7 m.
Holes filled under gravity
with grout.
109. 128
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure & Shear Strengthening for Beam
Compass Rose Restaurant in
Raffles City S. C., Singapore
Strengthening using MBraceTM
due to change in use.
New RC slabs added to close up
void after removal of existing
RC staircase linking two floors.
110. 129
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure & Shear Strengthening for Beam
Compass Rose Restaurant in
Raffles City S. C., Singapore
Casting of new RC slab after
strengthening of RC beam with
MBraceTM
Installing MBraceTM
onto RC beam to
increase flexural capacity
111. 130
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure & Shear Strengthening for Beam
Compass Rose Restaurant in
Raffles City S. C., Singapore
Strengthening for shear using
MBraceTM
Bolting of steel plate to strengthened
RC beam
112. 131
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Beam
Convention Center in Oklahoma City, USA
Strengthening
using
MBraceTM
to
increase
flexural capacity
Change in use
due to addition
loads from
exhibition events
on trucks and
heavy machines
113. 132
Installing of MBraceTM
to main beam
Installing MBraceTM
to
joist beams
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Beam
Convention Center in Oklahoma City, USA
115. 134
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Beam
North Vista Secondary School, Singapore
Applying MBraceTM
Primer onto
prepared RC beam surface
Installing MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre
onto RC beam to increase flexural
capacity
116. 135
MBraceTM
Project: Shear Strengthening for Beam
Carpark Structure in South Florida, USA
Strengthening of beams
to increase shear
capacity using
MBraceTM
Steel-plate bonding and
enlargement proposed
initially
But due to space-
constraining and
aesthetic reasons,
MBraceTM
accepted
117. 136
MBraceTM
Project: Shear Strengthening for Beam
Carpark Structure in South Florida, USA
MBraceTM
applied to beam
at direction perpendicular to
shear cracks
MBraceTM
installed
unto RC beam
Project completed with
no disruption and at a
reduced cost to owner
119. 138
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Upgrading of Marsiling Drive Precinct MUP10, Singapore
Strengthening of RC
columns at first-storey
of HDB flats using
MBraceTM
.
RC columns
strengthening under
HDB’s upgrading and
maintenance to existing
HDB flats.
124. 143
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Column
Stadio De Cesena 98, Italy
Crack repair to reinstate
column
Column primed with
MBraceTM
Primer
Column strengthened
with MBraceTM
126. 145
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Column
Stadio De Cesena 98, Italy
Strain gauges installed
onto strengthened column
Insitu load testing on column
strengthened with MBraceTM
127. 146
FRP Project: Column Strengthening
Evangel Family Church, Singapore
RC Columns to be strengthened
128. 147
FRP Project: Column Strengthening
Evangel Family Church, Singapore
Priming of concrete substrate
prior to installation
Installation of FRP to RC Column
129. 148
Shear deficiency of
RC columns due to
additional loading
from new roof truss.
Architectural features
of columns must be
preserved
MBraceTM
proposed and
adopted
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Conservation of Majestic Theatre, Singapore
130. 149
Shear capacity of
RC columns
enhanced with
MBraceTM
Architectural
features
preserved
Total of 20 RC
columns
strengthened
within a short
period of 10 days
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Conservation of Majestic Theatre, Singapore
133. 152
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Slab
JTC Summit, Singapore
Saturating MBraceTM
E-Glass Fibre
using roller
Installing MBraceTM
onto RC slab to
increase negative moment capacity
134. 153
MBraceTM
Project: Flexure Strengthening for Pier Deck
Port Canaveral Pier, USA
Strengthening
using
MBraceTM
to
increase flexural
capacity of RC
Slabs due to
increase in
crane loads
Coastal/Marine
Structures
137. 156
MBraceTM
Project: Strengthening for Wall
Residential Apartment, Singapore
Surface preparation prior to the
installation of MBraceTM
Priming of prepared concrete
substrate with MBraceTM
Primer for
installing MBraceTM
138. 157
Applying MBraceTM
EG900 E-Glass
Fibre saturated with MBraceTM
Saturant to the primed concrete
substrate
MBraceTM
Project: Strengthening for Wall
Residential Apartment, Singapore
140. 159
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Viadotto Calafuria 98, Italy
Bridge pier
strengthened using
MBraceTM
to increase its
load-bearing capacity
Strengthening work was
conducted with no
disruption to traffic flow
of the bridge
141. 160
Column primed with
MBraceTM
Primer and
Saturant
Laying dry MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre vertically to
column
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Viadotto Calafuria 98, Italy
142. 161
Apply MBraceTM
Saturant onto
MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre to
impregnate the carbon fibre
Remove protective sheet
from MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Viadotto Calafuria 98, Italy
144. 163
Final adjustment and
alignment of carbon fibre
Apply MBraceTM
Saturant onto
MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre to
impregnate the carbon fibre
MBraceTM
Project: Column Strengthening
Viadotto Calafuria 98, Italy
145. 164
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Arch Railway Prakanong Bridge, Thailand
Award-Winning Project
50 year old Arch
Railway Bridge
strengthened with
MBraceTM
due to
increase in traffic
volume
8th Annual Projects Awards
ICRI 2000 Project Awards Program
Award of Excellence
Transportation Category
146. 165
Restoration in progress with
no disruption to
transportation of oil
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Arch Railway Prakanong Bridge, Thailand
Installation of MBraceTM
to bridge
Bridge strengthened
and the architectural
beauty of the bridge is
also preserved.
147. 166
Restoration in progress with no
disruption to transportation of oil
Applying MBraceTM
Saturant to
MBraceTM
Carbon Fibre
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Arch Railway Prakanong Bridge, Thailand
148. 167
Installation of MBraceTM
to bridge
Bridge
strengthened to
withstand a 40%
increase in live
load and the
architectural
beauty of the
bridge is also
preserved.
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Arch Railway Prakanong Bridge, Thailand
149. 168
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Little River Bridge, Australia
80 year old bridge built in
1920 was strengthened
with MBraceTM
to
increase its load-bearing
capacity due to new code
requirement
MBraceTM
was proposed
against steel-plate
bonding and approved!!!
Strengthening completed
within three weeks
150. 169
Level substrate with
MBraceTM
Putty
Prime substrate with
MBraceTM
Primer
Installing MBraceTM
to soffit of beam
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Little River Bridge, Australia
151. 170
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Bridge G270, Phelps County MO USA
Pilot Project with the
Missouri Department
of Transportation
(MoDOT) to study
the effective of
strengthening bridge
with FRP
Bridge strengthened
to allow removal of
load posting
152. 171
Installing MBraceTM
to soffit of deck
slab
Bridge deck slab strengthened with
MBraceTM
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Bridge G270, Phelps County MO USA
153. 172
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Santa Theresa Viaduct, Brazil
Important viaduct
serving heavy traffic
daily
Viaduct needed to be
strengthened to
cater to increase in
traffic load
Required Upgrade
for 45-ton Vehicles
154. 173
MBraceTM
Project: Bridge Strengthening
Santa Theresa Viaduct, Brazil
MBraceTM
installed to soffit of deck
slabs and beams for flexural
strengthening
Viaduct strengthened and
completed with finishes
162. 181
MBraceTM
Project: Crack Repair for Tank
Water Tank in USA
Cracks caused by
insufficient steel
due to design
error
Cracks injected
with epoxy and
MBraceTM
installed
across crack
Cracks
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
An example of passive strengthening would be one in which a steel plate is bonded to the bottom of a beam. That beam must deflect before any loads are transferred into the plate.
An example of an active strengthening technique would be external post tensioning. In this situation, an externally post-tension rod not only compresses the member but also is put into a condition in which instantaneous loads will be picked up by the post-tensioning rod.
The key difference is that the strengthening element is prestressed for active techniques.
The final step in the repair strategy defines a technique. Typical strengthening techniques include enlargement and overlays, composite construction (similar to the MBrace System), external or internal post-tensioning, stress reduction, and internal or external grouting.
The following slides will show some examples of “conventional” strengthening techniques.
This slide shows the technique of enlargement for flexural upgrade of a beam. New reinforcing steel is doweled into the existing beam and encased in concrete.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Continuing through the strengthening process, two questions must be asked during the development of the repair strategy.
1.Do we need to strengthen or stabilize the condition?
Strengthening would describe a situation in which additional loads beyond original design must be carried. Stabilization would describe a situation in which the structure needs to be brought back to its original or intended load-carrying condition.
2.What is the load-carrying type?
This question deals with the issue of -- How will the loads be picked up by the additional strengthening member? In active strengthening techniques loads will be instantaneously engaged into the additional strengthening member. In passive strengthening techniques loads will not engage into the additional strengthening member until deflection occurs.
Properties of the MBrace Carbon Fiber Sheet of note:
Tensile Strength -- 3300 lbs. per lineal inch tensile capacity
Tensile Strength for Design -- 505,000 psi (505 ksi vs. 60 ksi for steel=10x)
Tensile Modulus -- 3.3 x 106 (33 msi vs. 29 msi for steel)
Design Thickness -- .0065”
Ultimate Elongation -- 1.5% to failure
As a general comparison between the MBrace System and Conventional Upgrades, three conditions are noted in which a beam requires a 35% upgrade in live load. In order to equal one sheet (1 ply) of CF-130, you would have to install:
1.A 3/16” steel bonded plate
or
2.An enlarged member utilizing 2 #8 bars encased in 4” of concrete.