Symbolic interactionism views society as created and maintained through repeated interactions between individuals. It focuses on the symbols and language used in interactions that help individuals interpret experiences and form meanings. There are three core principles: 1) meaning arises through symbolic representations in interactions, 2) language and symbols allow for negotiation of meaning, and 3) individual thought influences the interpretation of symbols. George Herbert Mead established that the self develops from social interactions and Charles Cooley's "looking glass self" holds that individuals incorporate the perceived judgments of others into their self-concept.
2. Symbols & Interaction
•Symbols are context based and
products of social interaction
•Interactions are social behavior
made up of communication to
which one of the individuals reacts,
consequently causing a change in
behavior
•Could be verbal or non-verbal
•What are some examples of subtle
messages from individuals that
might alter your behavior?
3. What is symbolic interactionism?
a micro-level theoretical
framework and perspective in
sociology that addresses
how society is created and
maintained through repeated
interactions among individuals.
is the process of interaction in
the formation of meanings for
individuals(Blumer)
SIMPLER MEANING
4. Tends us focus on the language and
symbols that help us give meaning to the
experiences in our life
A theory of social behaviour
and interaction
5. Theorist
emerged in the mid-twentieth
century from a variety of
influences
George Herbert Mead (1934)
Relationship
between self
and society
6. 3 Principles
1. Meaning
Symbolic Interactionism holds the principal
of meaning to be the central aspect of human
behavior
2. Language
gives humans a means by which to
negotiate meaning through symbols. Humans
identify meaning in speech acts with others.
3. Thought
modifies each individual’s interpretation of
symbols. Thought is a mental conversation that
requires different points of view.
7. Acts and Social Acts
• In analyzing the phases of the act, Mead
meant to call attention to the interplay
between the internal processes and
external manifestations exhibited in
human behavior.
8. Phases of Acts
a. Impulse
An act starts with an impulse, which occurs when our
existing adjustment or line of activity is disturbed
b. Perception
We begin to name or designate objects and thus give our
acts direction.
c. Manipulation
At this stage, we take concrete steps to reach our goal.
d. Consummation
Finally, the act ends with consummation, when our
original adjustment or line of activity is restored.
9. Types of Acts
1. Individual (Interaction with Self)
-An act that involves only one individual. Thus, there exists
no social component, simply a human being and an object
or set of objects interacting.
2. Social act (Interaction with Others)
In Mead’s words, a social act is one that involves the
cooperation of more than one individual, and whose object
as defined by the act is a social
Object
Social acts and symbolic interaction i. In order for people
to engage in social interaction, and thus complete the
social obj ect of a social act, they must first be able to
interpret – assign meaning to one another’s acts.
According to Mead, “meaning” is
triadic.
10. Meaning is Triadic
i. When an individual acts (by
making a verbal exchange or
gesture) he or she:
1. Indicates to the other what he or
she plans to do.
2. What the other is expected to do
in return.
3. What social object they are
creating.
11. MEAD
the relationship between self and
society
that individuals use language and
significant symbols in their
communication with others
Symbolic interactionists are often
less concerned with objective
structure than with subjective
meaning – how repeated, meaningful
interactions among individuals come
to define the makeup of ‘society
12. BLUMER
individuals act based on the meanings
objects have for them;
interaction occurs within a particular social
and cultural context in which physical and
social objects (persons), as well as situations,
must be defined or categorized based on
individual meanings;
meanings emerge from interactions with
other individuals and with society; and
meanings are continuously created and
recreated through interpreting processes
during interaction with others
13. • Herbert Blumer was actually a student of Mead, and he expanded on
Mead's discussion of the self in relation to social behavior. Despite
much of the groundwork being established by Mead, Blumer is
traditionally known for being the brains behind the theory of
symbolic interactionism. In fact, it was his work Symbolic
Interactionism: Perspective and Method that synthesized his
contributions with those of Mead and Cooley and coined the term
symbolic interaction.
• Blumer argued that people's behavior is based on the meaning those
behaviors have to them. Those meanings are based on and derived
from interactions an individual has with others. It's important to note
that these meanings are subject to change based on an individual's
interpretation.
14. •Human beings respond to
things based on their subjective
meanings
•Meaning occurs through
interaction between people.
•Meaning is based on
experience, an interpretative
process.
15. Cooley: “Looking Glass Self”
•Individuals think about:
- how they appear to others
- make a judgment about what others think of
them
-incorporate those ideas into perception of self
•How do you interpret other’s reactions to you?
Most learning takes place “face to face,” especially
in primary groups
What does “face to face” mean in the digital age?
Families teach us about social expectations & how
we excel
Looking Glass Self
16. “ I am not what I think I am
and I am not what you
think I am; I am what I
think you think I am.
Editor's Notes
The inspiration for this theory came from Dewey (1981), which believed that human beings are best understood in a practical, interactive relation to their environment.
The inspiration for this theory came from Dewey (1981), which believed that human beings are best understood in a practical, interactive relation to their environment.
As we interact with the world, we change the way we behave
It is how people navigate their interactions with others and assign meanings based on their interpretation of those interaction
(social behaviour, collective behaviour of a group which is called macro level of a group of interaction)
He discusses “self” which is dynamic organism that is a being of its own. The self is breakdown into 2 processes or phases. The I, the unorganized response of the self to the attitudes of others. The ME is the oragnized set of attitudes that the individual assumes in response (those prospectives of the self that the individual interpreted from others.
Meaning states that humans act toward people and things according to the meanings that give to those people or things.
The individual’s act does not consist merely of what may be observed by others, but also entails an internal process of control in which the individual directs conduct
toward some goal or object.
In other words, we might simply suggest that an act begins with a problem to be solved, a goal to be reached, something to be overcome by the human being in the
Environment
b.
emphasized how the self emerges from an interactive process of joint action (Denzin, 1992). Blumer, like Mead, saw individuals as engaged in ‘mind action’: humans do not ponder on themselves and their relationships to others sometimes
People use ‘the looking-glass self’: they take the role of the other, imagining how we look to another person. The self is a function of language, without talk there would be no self concept. People are part of a community, where our generalized other is the sum total of responses and expectations that we pick up from the people around us. We naturally give more weight to the views of significant others
This means that we as individuals define how we perceive ourselves by how we think others perceive us. Example first day f high school