How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
Politics, power and resistance
1. Week 2, who rules? Theories of
power
Capital vs. labour
Do not have control= do not have
power
Power shape people’s opinion
Strong leadership keeps checking
people's power
Bellamy's functional represent who
is going to have power
Marx theory-people at the top may
create more money.
Cornwall teaching school (2014) power[Cartoon].
Retrieved from
http://www.cornwallteachingschool.org/successful-
southwest-local-leaders-pilot-project-go-ahead/
2. Cultural problem
Capitalism is bad for
us
Marx-people at the top may create
more money
Wisdom (2012) rich and poor[cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://eagleman6788.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/7-main-differences-
between-rich-and-poor-people/
3. Who has power in the
society?
Banks
media
government
employer
Police
Wealthy people
Country etc.
Marxists and Weber both
emphasized capitalist
relates to political which
considered more priorities
than democratic.
Marx: capital and the state
class based conflict between rich
and poor
Antony (2010) rich and poor[cartoonRetrieved from
http://seventhoughts.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/rich-and-poor.html
4. Conflict theory
proletariat have little control
over the distribution of power
instrumental model
Arbiter model
functionalist model
Society driven by capital
Lynn, C. (2010) Capital [photograph]. Retrieved from
http://old.textproject.org/freddysfavorites/capital
5. Max weber: pluralist elitist or
elitist pluralist?
Marx
Elitist model
Pluralist model
Foucalt :power influence on
social life.
It manipulate the different class
of the society and thus produce
control over the lower class.
Power is everywhere.
Ayubsreviews. (2013) Rich and Poor [cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://bestreviewsnarticles.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/rich-and-poor-
poem.html
6. Michel Foucault: power
and discipline is
‘everywhere’.
According to Weber’s
theory, bureaucracy is
a system based on
discipline, when
leaders hold control
over others.
Week 5 The disciplinary and punitive
state.
Benedictine College. (2013) Bureaucracy[cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://www.thegregorian.org/blog/community-and-bureaucracy
7. Week 5 The disciplinary and punitive state.
Weber + Foucault discipline power
Weber vs. Foucault establishing power
Todd Smith. (2013) Discipline
[photograph]. Retrieved from
http://inspirationaltabloid.co
m/how-to-become-a-
disciplined-person/
8. Foucault: power is dispersed and pervasive
Weber: power resides in
government/administration+centralised
Bureaucracystate apparatuseconomy
Week 5 The disciplinary and punitive state.
Ben Toh. (2012) Jail [photograph].
Retrieved from
http://www.ubfriends.org/2012/04/19/in-
jail-charged-with-sexual-assault/
9. Boss worker
Teacher student
Parents Children
Police criminals
Government control the nation
Criminals in Prison under strict rules
Upper class people under class people
Disciplinary power
The Daily Telegraph. (2013) Police and Criminals [photograph].
Retrieved from http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/police-
get-extra-powers-to-arrest-to-stop-criminals-suing/story-fni0cx12-
1226748564715
10. Examination
hierarchical observation
normalization judgment
Self-regulation: you are supposed to know what is you should do
and what you shouldn’t.
3 techniques how people regulate in society
New Zealand Cosmetic Teeth Whitening Association. (2014) Self-
regulation [cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://www.nzctwa.org.nz/nzctwa.asp?DocumentID=153
11. The relationship between capital
and inequality
People living in poverty less
able to influence social matters.
Interrelationship between
gender geography + ethnicity=
socio-economic position
(perceive differently) ‘poor’=
category of ‘other’
Week 10 Citizenship and inequality: Migration
Peter Turchin. (2012) Inequality [Cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://www.thisviewoflife.com/index.php/magazine/articles/joseph-
stiglitz.-the-price-of-inequality.-cultural-evolution.-the-evolution
12. morally evaluated
ostracised
undeserving –neo-liberal
defines citizens as
consumes. Most
controversial term used
to refer to the poor is
‘underclass’.
Week 10 Citizenship and inequality: Migration
Laura Mazurak. (2013) Right or Wrong[Cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://oldgoldandblack.com/?p=28224
13. Inequality
Rich people becomes
more richer, poor people
becomes more poorer. It
is a social phenomenon.
Social expectations
shaped our life. We have
to become the one that
our parents, teacher, boss
expected.
Robert Kiyosaki (2013) Rich and poor [Cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://www.successezine.com/2012/12/confidence-of-rich-and-
successful-people.html
14. The relationship between ethnicity
(race) and inequality?
Inequality changes but still
exist
-ethnic- minority groups more
likely to be discriminated
-assumptions/ prejudices
result in less opportunities
Race skin color/nationality
Ethnicity more cultural
features
Alani (2013) Ethnicity [Cartoon]. Retrieved from
http://nailpro.com/book/export/html/4151
15. The relationship between ethnicity
(race) and inequality?
• Environmet
• Religion
• Freedom of
speech
Poverty
Ethnicity
Race
Sexuality
Gender
* cultural difference are problem
The Articulate. (2011) Culture difference [photography]. Retrieved
from http://thearticulateceo.typepad.com/my-blog/2011/09/cultural-
differences-the-power-distance-relationship.html
The daily telegraph. (2012) Twins[photography]. Retrieved from
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/lifestyle/dream-twins-part-of-
new-baby-formula/story-e6frf00i-1226504235563
16. Reference
Miller, R. W. (1984). Analyzing Marx: Morality, power, and history. Princeton University
Press.
Huntington, S. P. (2006). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Random House LLC.
Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Routledge.
Downs, A., & Rand Corporation. (1967). Inside bureaucracy (p. 264). Boston: Little, Brown.
Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber-organization-ethics. Sage.
O’neill, J. (1986). The disciplinary society: from Weber to Foucault. British Journal of
Sociology, 37(1), 42-60.
Heiskala, R. (2001). Theorizing power: Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism.
Social Science Information, 40(2), 241-264.
Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2005). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Yale
University Press.
Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (2006). Black wealth, white wealth: A new perspective on
racial inequality. Taylor & Francis.
Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (Eds.). (1992). Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and
the making of inequality. University of Chicago Press.
Ball, H. L., & Hill, C. M. (1996). Reevaluating" Twin Infanticide". Current anthropology, 856-
863.
Editor's Notes
Race associate social features to different skin colors affect us. It has less opportunity for large sections of the population in much of the country. According to Marxist and Weberian of class, Weberian very concerned with people’s occupations (Seekings, 2005). The works that they do will reflect their social status and the class that they are in. The inequality also can focus on the income of private wealth. It displayed strong differences in ability to make wealth between black and white. Black people lack access to quality education, job training opportunities, jobs and other work-related factors (Oliver, 2006). It is discrimination between black and white if only judge them by the appearance difference.
Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2005). Class, race, and inequality in South Africa. Yale University Press.
Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (2006). Black wealth, white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. Taylor & Francis.
Cultural difference boundaries and making of inequality, it shaped social fabric (Lamont, 1992). Like, the language difference is one of the common different between two countries. If you go to overseas (which the language they speak is not your mother language) to looking for a job, you may have less opportunity to find a job than local people. Then it will effect on your ability to make money, even the social status and class. Also the cultural difference can makes misunderstands. There is another example to explain the cultural difference is ‘Twin Infanticide’ (Ball, 1996). Wide varieties of cultural response to twins are very auspicious, which can bring good fortune to the family; however some society cannot let twins exist. The mother has to disposal the weaker twin. ‘The first born or the healthier one of twins was allowed to live, but the other was killed.’
Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (Eds.). (1992). Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality. University of Chicago Press.
Ball, H. L., & Hill, C. M. (1996). Reevaluating" Twin Infanticide". Current anthropology, 856-863.