2. Agenda
GLP BOK.
History of Standard Development
GLP Essentials
-resources
-characterization
-Rules
-results
-QA
Summary
3. Good Laboratory Practice - BOK
1) Fundamentals of GLP
2) Resources
2.1 Personnel
2.2 Facility “building & Equipment”
3) Rules
3.1 Protocols / Study plan
3.2 Procedures / SOPs
4) Characterization
4.1 test item
4.2 test system
4. GLP – BOK (II)
5) Documentation /Results
5.1 raw data & data collection
5.2 final reports
5.3 archives
5.4 indexing
6) Quality Assurance
6. GLP is a formal regulation that was created by
the FDA (United states food and drug
administration) in 1978.
Although GLP originated in the United States , it
had a world wide impact.
Non-US companies that wanted to do business
with the United states or register their
pharmacies in the United States had to comply
with the United States GLP regulations.
They eventually started making GLP regulations
in their home countries.
In 1981 an organization named OECD
(organization for economic co-operation and
development ) produced GLP principles that are
international standard.
7. Purpose for creating GLP standard
In the early 70‟s FDA became aware of cases
of poor laboratory practice all over the United
States.
FDA decided to do an in-depth investigation
on 40 toxicology labs.
They discovered a lot fraudulent activities and
a lot of poor lab practices.
Examples of some of these poor lab practices
found were
1. Equipment not been calibrated to standard
form , therefore giving wrong measurements.
2. Incorrect/inaccurate accounts of the actual
lab study
3. Inadequate test systems
8. One of the labs that went
under such an investigation
made headline news.
The name of the Lab was
Industrial Bio Test. This was a
big lab that ran tests for big
companies such as Procter
and Gamble.
It was discovered that mice
that they had used to test
cosmetics such as lotion and
deodorants had developed
cancer and died.
Industrial Bio Test lab threw
the dead mice and covered
results deeming the products
good for human
consumption.
Those involved in production,
distribution and sales for the
lab eventually served jail
time.
9. FDA investigation findings
• Poorly-trained Study Directors and study
personnel
• Poorly-designed protocols
• Protocols not followed - procedures not
conducted as prescribed
• Raw data badly collected - not correctly
identified - without traceability - not verified
or approved by responsible persons
• Lack of standardized procedures
• Poor animal husbandry
10. • Inadequate characterization of test items
and test systems.
• Inadequate resources.
• Equipment not properly calibrated or
otherwise qualified.
• Reports not sufficiently verified, inaccurate
account of study or raw data
• Inadequate archives and retrieval processes
FDA investigation findings (II)
11. Objectives of GLP
GLP makes sure that the data submitted are a
true reflection of the results that are obtained
during the study.
GLP also makes sure that data is traceable.
Promotes international acceptance of tests.
12. Aim of GLP
to make the
incidence of
False Negative
More obvious
to make the
incidence of
False Positive
More obvious
13. MISSION OF GLP
Test systems
Archiving of records and materials.
Apparatus, material and reagent
facilities.
Quality assurance programs.
Performance of the study.
Reporting of study results.
Standard operating procedures (SOP)
Personnel and test facility organization
14. GLP , WHO approach
Part (1) Management &
Infrastructure
1. Organization &
Management
2. QMS
3. Control of docs.
4. Records
5. Data processing
equipments
6. Personnel
7. Premises
8. Equipments, instruments
and other devices
9. contracts
Part (3) working procedure
14. Incoming samples
15. Analytical worksheet
16. Validation of analytical procedures
17. Testing
18. Evaluation of test results
19. Certificate of analysis
20. Retained samples
Part (2) materials & Equipments
10. Reagents
11. Reference substance & RM
12.Calibration and verification of
performance
13. Traceability
Part (4) safety
21. General rules
16. Cleanliness
Control laboratories & equipment should
be kept clean., in accordance with
written cleaning schedules.
All laboratory personnel should wear
clean protective clothing appropriate to
the duties being performed.
The disposal of waste material should be
done carefully & responsibly in
accordance with procedures which
should be documented.
Keep the work place clean &
uncluttered& do not get distracted at
work by other people.
17. Premises
Located, designed, constructed or
adapted 7 maintained to suit the
performance of all quality control tests &
analysis required before, during & after
manufacture.
Away from external & internal traffic.
18. Premises (II)
Design & construction should prevent
entry of rodents & insects
Interior surfaces of walls, floors& ceilings
should be smooth& free from cracks
Temp. & relative humidity should be
appropriate for desired functions
Bio-burden will be routinely maintained.
19. Premises (III)
Separate facility for
Instrumentation
Chemical analysis/wet chemistry
Micro lab/sterility/ pyrogen testing lab
Hot room: fuming hood
Stability room
Reference sample/control samples room
20. Premises – animal facility
To minimize the effects of environmental
variables on the animal, the facility should be
designed and operated to prevent the animal
coming into contact with disease, or with a test
item other than the one under investigation.
Requirements will be different depending upon
the nature and duration of the studies being
performed in the facilities.
21. A typical animal house would have separation maintained
by provision of areas for :
– species
– studies
– quarantine
– changing rooms
– receipt of materials
– storage
- bedding and diet
- test doses
- cages
– cleaning equipment
– necropsy
– laboratory procedures
– utilities
– waste disposal.
Premises – animal facility – (II)
24. Personnel
Adequate education, training &
experience
keeping of OC, CVs, JDs, and training
records is essential
Head of laboratory shall be responsible
for
1. Maintenance of SOPs, Protocol &
documentation
2. Organizing audits & follow up of
Corrective action
3. Investigation of technical complaints
26. Reagents
The reagents should be dated upon receipt or
preparation & labeled for identification.
Reagents made up in the laboratory should be
prepared by competent persons according to
laid-down procedures.
The labels on the reagent bottles should indicate
the concentration, standardization factor, shelf life
& storage conditions , date of preparation, date
of re-standardisation & signature of the chemist
who has prepared it.
Reference standards & working standards should
be dated & stored at proper conditions. They
should be handled & used carefully in consultation
with senior chemist.
MSDS of hazardous & poisonous chemicals
Distilled /DM water- analysis
28. Equipments
Laboratory instruments & equipments
should be serviced & calibrated at
suitable intervals according to written
procedures by persons or a service
agency & validated. (SOP for
operation & calibration)
Readily available records must be
maintained for each one of them.
Next servicing or calibration due date
should also be mentioned on them.
Separate room under control temp. &
humidity
29. Equipments (II)
Written operating instructions should be readily
available or preferably be displayed for each
instrument.
Records shall have Name of eqip., Mfg.‟s name &
instruction manual, model no., list of spares
&accessories, etc.
Defective instrument should be withdrawn from
use until the fault has been rectified.
31. Sampling
Sample should be a proper representative
of bulk product.
A trained & authorized sampler should
sample out using appropriate , clean
Sampling equipments , following safety
precautions & sampling norms.
32. Sampling (II)
Written Sampling SOP should include
Method of sampling
Equipment to be used
The amount of sample to be taken
Instructions for any required sub division
of sample
The type & condition of sample
container to be used
Any special precaution to be observed
Cleaning & storage of sampling
equipment.
33. Sampling (III)
The Sample container should have
labels bearing details about Name
of material, Batch no., Mfg. Date,
expiry date , Name of
manufacturer,& quantity sampled.
Those containers from which samples
are drawn, are marked with
„sampled‟ stamp with date &
signature of the chemist so that they
are identifiable from bulk containers.
Sampling equipments should be
cleaned after each use & stored
separately from other laboratory
equipments.
35. Documents
All the departmental systems &
procedures , specifications for all input
materials, intermediates & finished
products & all tests and methods of
analysis should be documented.
All raw data, formats of analytical
reports , under test, approved &
rejected labels , various in-process
checks , calibration check records
should be documented & available.
Archives for storage,& retrieval of
records. Retention time should be
maintained.
36. Procedure & documentation
Method of analysis & specifications
SOP for systems, instruments
Reports- Analytical reports of batch,
stability report, working standards,
validation reports, Monitoring quality of
water, effluents discharged, RM, In-
process, FP.
37. Standard Operating Procedures (II)
To store data in paper format, humidity
conditions shall be maintained.
Data in the form of disc & tape should be
stored with care.
For storage on optical disc, its life shall be
longer than storage time.
Keep a photocopy of data on thermal
paper.
38. Documents
Documents shall specify the title, nature &
purpose.
They shall be laid out in an orderly fashion
& easy to check.
Documents shall be approved, signed,
regularly reviewed, and dated by
appropriate & authorized person.
39. Records
Raw data refers to records of
original observations.
Make detailed records of the results
of the tests & analyses of all
materials, intermediates & finished
products & in process tests done,
environmental monitoring,
calibrations etc.
Changes or corrections in the entry
should be single line strike.
Authorized persons will have access
to data to maintain its integrity &
security.
40. Records
Records should have following details.
Analytical report no.
Name of the sample
Date of receipt of sample
Batch/lot no.
Protocols of tests applied
Signature of the analyst
Opinion & sign of approved analyst
Any other relevant & extra information e.g.
date of expiry , date of release & in case of
drugs, requirements complying schedule U
Records should also contain the basic data &
calculations from which test results were
derived.(e.g. weighings, readings, recorder
charts, instrument printouts etc.)
42. Testing
Samples should be tested in
accordance with the written methods
& referred to in relevant specifications.
In- process checks done by QC
personnel on the batches in
production should also be attached to
the analytical reports for the batch.
Test methods should be validated.
Where the results of testing appear
doubtful, repeat the test/s but do not
fabricate the results to cover up
mistakes or to avoid work.
43. Good house keeping & Safety
People working in the laboratory should
look after safety aspects of their work for
themselves, their colleagues &the
organization.
They should wear appropriate safety
gadgets while working with hazardous ,
corrosive chemicals & inflammable
solvents.
Persons in the department should be
trained to operate fire fighting apparatus.
Persons in the department should be
familiar to first-aid techniques in case of
emergency till medical help is available.
44. Good house keeping & Safety (II)
Government of specifies SOPs as
Circulation of safety data sheet
Eating, drinking, smoking and keeping
food items in the lab is prohibited.
Adequate facilities for storage & disposal
of animal waste
Protective clothing to be provided.
46. Safety
Waste materials awaiting disposal should
be safely stored. Flammable &
halogenated solvents & other
contaminated waste liquids should not be
poured into the drains carrying the
factory effluent. They should be collected
separately & disposed off suitably . There
should be separate waste containers for
broken glass.
48. Training
Persons in the department should be
adequately qualified & provided suitable
training to carry out their responsibilities in
a competent & reliable manner.
Records of training should be maintained.
49. Reference materials
Traceable to Government body Or
international agency.
Working std. shall be prepared using ref.
std. & records of same will be maintained
Maintain a register for ref. material
including source of supply, code no. ID
no., storage conditions, mfg. & expiry
date.
Handled & stored properly.
51. Quality System
Documented quality policy
Compliance with GLP
Non conformities noted by internal &
external audits should be corrected & CA
documented.
The head of laboratory is responsible for
schedule & conduct of the audit.
52. Internal system quality audits
The head of laboratory is responsible
for schedule & conduct of audit.
Manager will be responsible to
maintain all records & protocols of the
analysis which are being checked by
audit team.
Should be carried out by competent
personnel to meet regulatory
requirements.
Any non compliance reported in the
audit should be analyzed & CA should
be documented.
53. Management Review
At least once in 12 months to cover
Internal & external audit report
Complaints & customer feedback
received from laboratory customers
Training records of the staff.
Other laboratory requirements.
54. Standard Operating
Procedures
Sops required for
Analysis of drugs
Sample handling & accountability
Receipt, identification, storage &
sampling of test & control articles.
Cleaning, maintenance and
calibration of equipments
Responsibilities of audit team
personnel.
55. Standard Operating
Procedures
Healthy & safety precaution
Storage & maintenance of microbial
cultures.
Maintenance of animal rooms.
Use & storage of reference standards
Training programs & their frequency
House Keeping
Document control
56. Standard Operating
Procedures
Retention & disposal of control samples
SOPs should be reviewed periodically
SOPs should include designation of the
person responsible for intended activity.
Complaints & Product recall procedures
57. What happens if a workplace
does not comply with federal
Good Laboratory Practice
standards?
58. Disqualification of a Facility
Before a workplace can experience the
consequences of noncompliance, an
explanation of disqualification is needed
The FDA states the purpose of disqualification
as the exclusion of a testing facility from
completing laboratory studies or starting any
new studies due to not following the standards
of compliance set by the Good Laboratory
Practice manual
59. Possible Violations
Falsifying information for permit, registration
or any required records
Falsifying information related to testing~
protocols, ingredients, observations, data
equipment, ect.
Failure to prepare, retain, or submit written
records required by law
60. Grounds for Disqualification
The testing facility failed to comply with one or
more regulations implemented by the GLP
manual
The failure to comply led to adverse outcomes
in the data; in other words, it affected the
validity of the study
Warnings or rejection of previous studies have
not been adequate to improve the facility‟s
compliance
61. Consequences of Noncompliance
The FDA states the following consequences of
noncompliance:
The commissioner will send a written proposal of
disqualification to the testing facility
A regulatory hearing on the disqualification will be
scheduled
If the commissioner finds that after the hearing, the
facility has complied, then a written statement with an
explanation of termination of disqualification will be
sent to the facility
Thus, if it can be shown that such disqualifications did
not affect the integrity and outcome of the study itself,
or did not occur at all, then the study may be
reinstated at the will of the commissioner
62. Upon Disqualification…
If the commissioner finds that the facility was
noncompliant on any of the grounds after the
hearing, then a final order of noncompliance will be
sent to the facility with explanations
If a testing facility has been disqualified, any studies
done before of after the disqualification will need to be
determined as essential to a decision (acceptable or
not)
If the study is determined unacceptable, then the facility
itself may need to show that the study was not affected
by the noncompliance that led to the disqualification
Once finally disqualified, the facility may not receive or
be considered for a research or marketing permit and
the study is rejected.