Eli 2008 Fall Focus

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    North Carolina State http://www.ncsu.edu/PER/scaleup.html

    North Carolina State http://www.ncsu.edu/PER/scaleup.html

    Columbia University Teachers College, Gottesman Libraries Peter Aaron/Esto c/o Sara Lepanto or Erica Stoller sara@esto.com t. 914-698-4060 f. 914-698-1033

    Columbia University Teachers College, Gottesman Libraries Peter Aaron/Esto c/o Sara Lepanto or Erica Stoller sara@esto.com t. 914-698-4060 f. 914-698-1033

    OLD: http://www.flickr.com/photos/janeladeimagens/170838066/ NEW: Georgetown University Law Center Eric E. Hotung International Law Building Peter Aaron/Esto c/o Sara Lepanto or Erica Stoller sara@esto.com t. 914-698-4060 f. 914-698-1033

    OLD: http://www.flickr.com/photos/janeladeimagens/170838066/ NEW: Georgetown University Law Center Eric E. Hotung International Law Building Peter Aaron/Esto c/o Sara Lepanto or Erica Stoller sara@esto.com t. 914-698-4060 f. 914-698-1033

    If we know more about innovation and the innovation process, that will help us with our own LSs work.

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/chris_anderson_of_wired_on_tech_s_long_tail.html One idea of what innovation is and how it works is that of the epiphany, the sudden emergence of a powerful idea, seemingly from nowhere. Why these epiphanies “strike” some and not others is a metaphysical question that we won’t try to address right now. Perhaps the prototype story of the epiphany is that of the apple (nothing to do with Steve Jobs) falling on Newton’s head, which caused an epiphany to erupt in his head about gravity. But if you read the history of innovation, read the case studies, you quickly come to the conclusion that this is a superficial notion of what innovation is and how it works. There is more than meets the eye with respect to innovation than the summative idea. Many innovation processes occur with no "ah ha" moment. And if there is an "ah ha" moment then it is simply the most visible component of a multifaceted process.

    Sometimes this notion changes clothes and equates innovation with having an idea. This is a bit analogous to winning the lottery, or making a living without making a living. There is indeed no life like it, there is no innovation like it period, because innovation is far more than just an idea. If you garden, the notion of "having a garden" does not mean just the moment when a flower blooms or a vegetable is ready to harvest. Or that raising a child is equivalent to the moment he or she graduates from high school. There's a bit more to it than that.

    Berkun: “Epiphany is the moment when the last piece of work fits into place. However, the last piece isn’t any more magical than the others, and has no magic without its connection to the other pieces.” p. 9 A metaphor offered by one of the authors I have read likens innovation to a jigsaw puzzle. To complete the puzzle, all the pieces must be put into place. The final one may be the moment with the highest drama, but it by itself doesn't constitute the puzzle. As the author writes: “Epiphany is the moment when the last piece of work fits into place. However, the last piece isn’t any more magical than the others, and has no magic without its connection to the other pieces.” p. 9

    This is a good way to debunk the "innovation is having an idea" notion. Once you have had a good idea, it doesn't mean that it is as yet something realized; an idea is not a product. And as we shall see, even if you get to the point of having implemented an idea, to have made it into a product, then there is the question of adoption. Even if you do build it, they still might not come.

    Iphone: 10 versions

    following Berkun, p. 133 Example of the discovery of the microwave oven. Berkun p. 133. Dr. Percy Spencer. photo: http://invention.smithsonian.org/centerpieces/iap/inventors_spe.html

    http://www.gallawa.com/microtech/history.html http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/4/2005_4_48.shtml “The oft-reported candy-bar incident may perhaps have spurred Spencer to experiment with food, but the possibilities of using microwave tubes for heating were already quite well known.”

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/chris_anderson_of_wired_on_tech_s_long_tail.html

    http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/chris_anderson_of_wired_on_tech_s_long_tail.html

    "In the grinding gears of this story, there is always an older, established entity that acts too timidly for fear of undermining its core business." NYT review

    http://www.wired.com/cars/futuretransport/magazine/16-01/ff_100mpg http://www.progressiveautoxprize.org/

    David Vise, “Google’s decade” http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/guest/22128/. “1998: Yahoo and others pass on the chance to buy new search technology developed at Stanford University for $500,000. Their rationale: "Search doesn't matter. Portals do."These rejections forced Sergey Brin and Larry Page to reluctantly take a leave of absence from Stanford (both wanted to become college professors, like their dads) to see if they could turn Google, their new search engine, into a business.”

    Apple Newton (Christensen, Dilemma, pp. 149–151. Apple I in 1976 200 units. Apple II, then Apple II+. Similar: Lisa failed, third gen Mac. Newton 140K units in 1993 and 1994. Newton perceived to be a flop; expensive, handwriting recognition software disappointing. Christensen: the “flop” was expecting big market (sustaining) sales from a disruptive market, which is inherently small. [CHECK THE IPOD HISTORY… SIMILAR?] Hydraulic story. Again entrenched firms seeing good profit Minimill steel. “Dramatically improving profit” Ice industry story.

    Apple Newton (Christensen, Dilemma, pp. 149–151. Apple I in 1976 200 units. Apple II, then Apple II+. Similar: Lisa failed, third gen Mac. Newton 140K units in 1993 and 1994. Newton perceived to be a flop; expensive, handwriting recognition software disappointing. Christensen: the “flop” was expecting big market (sustaining) sales from a disruptive market, which is inherently small. [CHECK THE IPOD HISTORY… SIMILAR?] Hydraulic story. Again entrenched firms seeing good profit Minimill steel. “Dramatically improving profit” Ice industry story.

    Examples: Kelly, filing by piling Kelly: “"We're not big fans of focus groups... We go to the source. Not the 'experts' inside a company, but the actual people who use the product or something similar to what we're hoping to create.” Jobs: "We all had cellphones. We just hated them, they were so awful to use… Everybody seemed to hate their phones.” Jobs: "We do no market research… we never hire consultants, per se. We just want to make great products.”

    Kelly, p. 41

    following Christensen, Innovator’s Solution, chapter 3

    Edison’s four hundred patents. With the help of a fourteen man team. (Kelly p70) michaelangelo + team = sistine chapel

    “ If a team has the right charge, it will energize.” Kelly 73

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Eli 2008 Fall Focus - Presentation Transcript

    1. Spaces to Learn Spaces to Innovate ELI Fall Focus Session 2008 Malcolm Brown Educause Learning Initiative [email_address]
    2. “ If I’d have asked my customers what they wanted, they would have told me ‘A faster horse.’ ” attributed to Henry Ford
    3. “ Well… how did I get here?”
    4. “ Well… how did I get here?” North Carolina State http://www.ncsu.edu/PER/scaleup.html
    5. “ Well… how did I get here?”
    6. “Well… how did I get here?” Columbia University Teachers College, Gottesman Libraries
    7. “ Well… how did I get here?”
    8. “Well… how did I get here?” Georgetown University Law Center Eric E. Hotung International Law Building
    9. Steps Educause Quarterly , No. 1, 2003, pp. 14–15
    10. Steps
      • Educause Quarterly op-ed piece: 2003
      • ELI LS focus sessions
        • Classrooms Fall 2004
        • Informal Spaces Fall 2005
        • Mobile Learning Spring 2006
      • LS eBook: 2006
      • Educause LS constituent group: late 2006
    11. Technology Learning theory (how people learn) we are here social web NetGens: students and young faculty
    12. How did we get here? We’ve innovated
    13. But what is innovation?
      • What does it “look” like? Feel like?
      • How does it work?
      • How can we be better at it?
      • What are all the moving parts?
    14. It seems to be everywhere
    15. Innovation seems cool it seems to be about ideas BMW ad here about BMW being all about ideas
    16. Innovation seems empowering
    17. Our LS works seems to be innovative
    18. Apollo 13 Excerpt from the movie Apollo 13 here
    19. a square peg in a round hole… rapidly
    20. It feels like innovation
      • No formula
      • Adoption to rapidly changing circumstances
      • Working with teams
      • Often handed odds & ends
      • Funding can be uncertain
      • New ideas not always received well
    21. but is innovation?
    22. 10
    23. 1 Innovation = Epiphany or does it???
    24. Version 2: Innovation = Idea
    25. Berkun, p. 9
    26. “ The best way to get a good idea is to get a lot of ideas.” Linus Pauling
    27. Implementation “ The elaboration of idea into function… [is] ‘ the one that takes up the most time and involves the hardest work.’ ” Berkun, Myths of Innovation , p. 13
    28. 1 research thinking work more work 2 “ missing link” idea 3 implementation thinking work trial & error
    29. Also… Innovation ≠ Serenpidity Percy Spencer (1896–1970)
    30. The microwave
    31. Innovation Epiphany = ≠ + lots of hard work, trial and error, research, etc.
    32. Thought “ Every innovation is difficult.” Christensen, Innovator’s Dilemma , p. 154
    33. 2 Understand the diffusion process
    34. What influences diffusion
      • Relative advantage
      • Compatibility
      • Ease of use
      • Trialability
      • Observability
      following Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations
    35. Analyzing diffusion’s prospects Example 1 relative advantage very high compatibility somewhat low
    36. Analyzing diffusion’s prospects Example 2 relative advantage modest ease of use very low
    37. Analyzing diffusion’s prospects Example 3 compatibility very high relative advantage very high ease of use OK
    38. Analyzing diffusion’s prospects Example 4 relative advantage moderate/high compatibility somewhat low trialability low
    39. TED talk: Technology’s Long Tail
    40. 3 Do better brainstorming
    41. Towards better brainstorming
      • Sharpen the focus
      • Number your ideas
      • Build and jump
      • Write it out: “space remembers”
      • Get physical: draw a diagram, make a model
      • Mental yoga & warm-up exercises
      following Kelly, The Art of Innovation
    42. Towards “badder” brainstorming
      • The boss speaks first
      • Everybody gets a turn
      • Experts only
      • Gotta do it off-site
      • Write everything down
      • No silly stuff; “we’re professionals ”
      following Kelly, The Art of Innovation
    43. 4 Understand the challenges of disruption
    44. Thought “ If, at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.” Albert Einstein
    45. “ I can’t waste my time on this stuff.” Disney exec on Pixar, c. 1987 (NYT review)
    46. “… we just cannot divert ourselves from the business at hand.” — GM vice chair www.wired.com/cars/futuretransport/magazine/16-01/ff_100mpg
    47. “ Search doesn’t matter. Portals do.” Yahoo execs, 1998
    48. Disruption is hard
      • Limited market capacity for disruption
      • Disruptive tech won’t fit
      • Our orgs our less flexible than we want to believe
      • Failure and iterative learning are keys
      • Reluctance to invest in disruption: not something you “can bank on”
      following Christensen, Innovator’s Dilemma
    49. Managing for disruption
      • Align disruptive tech with the right customers so there’s tangible demand
      • Align to small, independent units for small growth
      • Fail early and inexpensively
      • Search for markets not technological breakthroughs
      following Christensen, Innovator’s Dilemma, p. 113–114
    50. 5 Learn to see and observe
    51. “ You can observe a lot by just watching.” Yogi Berra
    52. Learning to see
      • Don’t rely on surveys and focus groups
      • Focus on what they do not on what they say
      • Experts may know too much
      • Customers may lack the vocabulary to say what is wrong or missing
    53. 6 Be left-handed
    54. “ It’s not that we build such bad cars; it’s that they are such lousy customers.” Auto executive, 1930’s
    55. Being left handed
      • Customers have “jobs”
      • They “hire” products and services to do them
      • Target circumstances, not customers
      • Carefully observe what people are trying to achieve
      • Danger in asking people to “change jobs”
      following Christensen, Innovator’s Solution
    56. 7 Fear not failure
    57. Thought “ If I have a thousand ideas and only one turns out to be good, I am satisfied.” Alfred Bernhard Nobel
    58. http://www.wd40.com/about-us/history/
    59. 8 Look for blisters and rule-breakers
    60. “… your customers may lack the vocabulary or the palate to explain what’s wrong and especially what’s missing .” Kelly, Art of Innovation , p. 27
    61. “ We all had cell phones. We just hated them, they were so awful to use. Everybody seemed to hate their phones.” Steve Jobs on the idea of the iPhone
    62. 9 Who’s on your LS team?
    63. Team building
      • Lone genius most often a myth
      • Team’s charge and frame
      • Not about defending status quo
      • Sense of something is at stake
      • Flatter the better
      • Select for ability not seniority
      • Create energy: fun
    64. Team motivation “ A specific performance challenge that is clear and compelling to all team members is the greatest motivator.” Wisdom of Teams , p. 269
    65. 10 Aim for the wet napkin interface
    66. What is it? “ Open and use.”
    67. Getting there
      • More is less
      • Rigorous limits on user options
      • One click is better than two
      • Give users feedback
      • Don’t trust your interface entirely
      • Emphasize essentials
    68. “ If I’d have asked my customers what they wanted, they would have told me ‘A faster horse.’ ” attributed to Henry Ford
    69. Thank you!
    70. Resources
    71. Resources
    72. Resources
    73. Resources
    74. Resources
    75. Resources
    76. Resources
    77. Resources
    78. Resources
    79. Resources
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + EducauseEducause Nominate

    custom

    57 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Slides used in a presentation at the Educause Learn more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 57
      • 57 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories