Conclusions on Geolocation

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Conclusions on Geolocation - Presentation Transcript

    1. Conclusions Sebastian Rahtz and Janet McKnight July 2009
    2. Physical mapping Google and Microsoft and all the mapping companies are getting better all the time, but we think physical location collection will be needed for a few years yet.
    3. Time and politics The time and political dimensions of geolocation must always rely on specialist local knowledge
    4. Joining up the dots Integration with local data sources depends on knowledge of institutional data identifiers
    5. Thank you • mailto:erewhon@oucs.ox.ac.uk • http://erewhon.oucs.ox.ac.uk • http://oxforderewhon.wordpress.com

    + iwmw iwmwiwmw iwmw, 3 months ago

    custom

    256 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    One of presentations given in "Where's the Universi more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 256
      • 251 on SlideShare
      • 5 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds
    • 5 views on http://iwmw.ukoln.ac.uk

    more

    All embeds
    • 5 views on http://iwmw.ukoln.ac.uk

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events