Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Week 1: Social media and government
1. technology in the public sector
week 1: social media and government
Northwestern University MPPA 490
Summer 2012 - Greg Wass
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 1
2. • Introductions
• Course overview
• Learning objectives
• Group projects
• Grading
• Questions
• Social media and government
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 2
3. • Course overview
1. Social media and government
2. Public safety and criminal justice IT
3. (no class)
4. Health and human services IT
5. ERP and shared services
6. Education technologies
7. Open data and big data in the public sector
8. The digital city
9. IT governance and funding
10. Group projects
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 3
4. • Learning objectives
– Understand current use of technology in
government and education.
– Complete a group project on a technology in the
public sector topic of choice.
– Identify trends and future direction for use of
technology in public sector.
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 4
5. • Grading
– Participation in class and on Blackboard
discussion board (25%)
– Midterm exam (25%) (July 23)
– Group project (plan/resources/draft/final) (25%)
– Final exam (25%) (week of August 20)
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 5
7. Social media and government:
Does it make a difference?
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 7
8. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 8
9. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 9
10. Drawing by
Margaret Hagan,
accessed at
http://www.razblint.com
6/17/12
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 10
11. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 11
12. #ows
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 12
13. “Do digital tools enhance democracy? (They)
probably do not hurt in the short run and might
help in the long run—and they have the most
dramatic effects in states where a public sphere
already constrains the actions of the
government.”
– Clay Shirky, “The Political Power of Social Media” in Foreign
Affairs
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 13
14. “The instruments of social media are well suited
to making the existing social order more
efficient. They are not a natural enemy of the
status quo.”
-Malcolm Gladwell, “Small Change” in The New Yorker
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 14
15. How can government use social media and
“choice” to engage and involve citizens?
(This is a different question from “Does social
media drive social change?”)
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 15
16. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 16
17. !
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 17
18. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 18
19. From The Power of Social Innovation:
Are we heading towards a new kind of “social
mediated” government?
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 19
20. Leveraging social media for change
– Provide new, attention-grabbing ways for
individuals to mobilize fellow citizens.
– Devolve access to information from
“experts” to citizens.
– Gain access to and post providers’
performance and financial data.
Source: Stephen Goldsmith, The Power of Social Innovation, 2010
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 20
21. Tapping into a shared identity
– Activate citizens by tapping into a shared
goal or interest.
– Meet people where they are (e.g., church,
school) to tap into existing identity.
– Mobilize families around the notion that
something is wrong by showing something
right.
Source: Stephen Goldsmith, The Power of Social Innovation, 2010
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 21
22. Building trust and commitment
– Solidify a reputation for reliability.
– Furnish the activated group with tools and
direction to build broader public support.
– Hold elected officials accountable.
Source: Stephen Goldsmith, The Power of Social Innovation, 2010
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 22
23. Engaging the public
“…one unrepaired broken
window is a signal that no
one cares, and so
breaking more windows
costs nothing.”
--George L. Kelling and James Q. Wilson, “Broken
Windows,” The Atlantic, March 1982.
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 23
24. How can technology help increase the
relative # of people who care about an issue
and want to get involved (and reduce the
relative # of squeaky wheels)?
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 24
26. Increasing public participation via “e-democracy”
people who care people who care but
and are involved who aren't involved
squeaky wheels
people who
don't care
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 26
27. Examples:
•Crowdsourcing park design
•Interactive budgeting: Cook County, City
of Chicago
•Open board appointments: Illinois
•Open data, apps
•Other?
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 27
29. Potential positive effects of technological
innovation on government:
•Transparency trust
•Government as a platform, not just
service deliverer
•Real public participation
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 29
31. “An innovation, to be effective, has to be simple and it
has to be focused. It should do only one thing,
otherwise it confuses. If it is not simple, it won’t work.
Everything new runs into trouble; if complicated, it
cannot be repaired or fixed.
“All effective innovations are breathtakingly simple.
Indeed, the greatest praise an innovation can receive is
for people to say: ‘This is obvious. Why didn’t I think of
it?’”
-- Peter F. Drucker
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 31
32. Source for graphics on following pages: The Public Innovators Playbook, Deloitte, 2009
6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 32
33. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 33
34. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 34
36. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 36
37. 6/18/12 technology in the public sector week 1 37
Editor's Notes
From YouTube debates and candidate Facebook pages to breaking news on Twitter, the impact of social media is already well noted by candidates running for political office. But does activity in social media influence voters during an election? As candidates prepare their social media strategies for the 2012 elections, NM Incite took a look back at four races during the 2010 midterm elections to measure the impact of social media on voters. Is there a correlation between election winners and their social media impact? In three out of four races, the most frequently mentioned candidate on social media won the seat. However, the share of online buzz for each winning candidate was often higher than their percent of votes, demonstrating a strong correlation but not necessarily a causal relationship between social media and election results. For example, in the race for California’s Senate seat Barbara Boxer had the most online buzz (55%) but won by a slight smaller margin of votes (52%). Does more buzz lead to higher voter turnout? Overall voter turnout during the 2010 midterm election was higher on average compared to prior midterm elections, but buzz doesn’t appear to be a driver of voter turnout. In fact, the two states with higher levels of voter turnout also had the lower levels of online buzz about their candidates. In each contest, online buzz was high immediately following primaries, then dipped before peaking during the week leading up to Election Day. Which party generated the most buzz? Interestingly, when combining the buzz from all four races, conversation about Democrats and Republicans was split equally with each party capturing 50 percent of total buzz. This matched the split in election results, with each party winning two of the four races examined in this analysis. Methodology: This analysis looked at 50 days of online buzz beginning 9/14/2010 and ending on election day 11/2/2010 in four statewide races (two U.S. Senate seats, two State Governors) in different states: Senate – California: Barbara Boxer vs Carly Fiorina Senate – Florida: Marco Rubio vs Kendrick Meek vs Charlie Christ Governor – Ohio: John Kasich vs Ted Strickland Governor – Maryland: Martin O’Malley vs Bob Erlich