Click or not to click

963 views

Published on

Narrated powerpoint on student response systems (clickers)

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
963
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Click or not to click

  1. 1. To Click or Not to Click<br />By Lynne Butkiewicz<br />Course: Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology (EDUC - 7101 – 1)<br />Walden University<br />Dr. Keith Pratt<br />
  2. 2. I talked to teachers and administrators in different school systems about their main challenges within the classroom. <br />The next slide goes into the frequent challenges that teachers face in the classroom<br />
  3. 3. Getting students’ attention!<br />
  4. 4. Keeping students on-task!<br />
  5. 5. Engaging All Students Including <br />Shy Students<br />
  6. 6. Motivating Students<br />
  7. 7. Assessing Skill Mastery<br />
  8. 8. What are clickers? <br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4A62QyAUHM<br />
  9. 9. Effective Uses of Classroom Response Systems “Creating an interactive learning environment with technology” Vann M. Lassiter<br />
  10. 10. Negative<br />Problems with clickers. Lack of planning.<br />
  11. 11. RESEARCH<br />Hines (2005, P.4) research revealed that. “after first-semester final exams, the science and math students scored an average of four to six percentage points higher on test score.”<br />
  12. 12. Commericalization<br />Below is a list of videos encouraging the use of clickers.<br />1.http://www.utexas.edu/academic/cit/gallery/utprofiles/cps/silverthorn/<br />2. http://www.engaging-technologies.com/clickers-in-action.html<br />
  13. 13. Commericalization<br />3. http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k1985&pageid=icb.page29705&pageContentId=icb.pagecontent67719&view=view.do&viewParam_name=clickers.html&state=maximize<br />
  14. 14. HELPFUL WEBSITES<br />*Writing better multiple choice questions<br />http://www.crlt.umich.edu/tstrategies/esgi.html<br />
  15. 15. S-CURVE<br />
  16. 16. Approach will be centralized with peer-to-peer review and problem centered approach. A change agent will be needed to persuade the opinion leaders (administration) would need to mandate use of clickers to the adopters.<br />
  17. 17. BEST PRACTICES<br />http://research.renlearn.com/research/pdfs/255.pdf<br />
  18. 18. CONCLUSION<br />ARE YOU INTERESTED IN CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY, ACTIVE STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND EASY WAY TO ASSESS STUDENTS MASTERY OF A SUBJECT AND IF YOU ANSWER YES TO ANY OF MY QUESTIONS THAN YOU MUST ADOPT CLICKERS QUICKLY !<br />
  19. 19. References <br />AverMedia. (2009). National Taiwan Normal University finds visualizers beneficial to classroom in research study. Retrieved from http://www.avermedia.com/AVerVision/About_us/News.aspx?de+1&id=4<br />AverMedia. (2009). Case study: Broadneck Elementary School, benefits of document cameras <br />over other classroom technologies. Retrieved from <br />http://www.avermedia.com/AVerVision/About_us/News.aspx?de+1&id=4<br />
  20. 20. References <br />Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id+666&ID+ERB0403&bhcp=1<br />Beekes, W. (2006). The “Millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education: the Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 25-36.<br />
  21. 21. References (Continued)<br />Burden, K., Atkinson, S. (2008) Evaluating pedagogical affordances of media sharing web 2.0 <br />technologies: A case study. Retrieved from http://hull.academia.edu/documents/0008/6391/burden-2.pdf<br />Fredericksen, E., & Amers, M. (2008). Can a $30 piece of plastic improve learning? An evaluation of personal response systems large classroom setting. <br />
  22. 22. References (Continued)<br />Hines , L. (2005). Interactive learning environmnt keeps Modesto students engaged. T.H.E. Journal, 33(2), 40-41.<br />Kaleta, R., & Joosten (2007, May). Student response systems: A university of Wisconsin system<br /> study of clickers. Educause Center for Applied Research, 10, 1-12. Retrieved from <br />http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/StudentResponseSystemsAUnivers/157592<br />
  23. 23. References (Continued)<br />O’Donoghue, M., & O’Steen, B. (2007). Clicking on or off? Lecturers’ rationale for using <br />student response systems. Ascilite. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/odonoghue.pdf<br />Pelton,T., Pelton, F.L. (2005). Helping students learn with classroom response systems. In J. Lang (Ed), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1554-1559) <br />
  24. 24. References (Continued)<br />Penuel, W., Crawford, V, DeBarger, A., Boscardin, C., Masyn, K. & Urban,T. (2005). Teaching with student response system. Retrieved from: http://cti.sri.com/publications/downloads/teaching_with_Audience_Response_Systems_Brief_Report.pdf<br />Zhu, E. (2006,2007). Teaching with clickers: What do students appreciate most about clickers? <br />
  25. 25. References (Continued)<br />All images above retrieved from Google Images at http://www.google.com/imghp?hl=en&tab=wi<br />

×