Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Click or not to click
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Click or not to click

751
views

Published on

Narrated powerpoint on student response systems (clickers)

Narrated powerpoint on student response systems (clickers)

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
751
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. To Click or Not to Click
    By Lynne Butkiewicz
    Course: Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology (EDUC - 7101 – 1)
    Walden University
    Dr. Keith Pratt
  • 2. I talked to teachers and administrators in different school systems about their main challenges within the classroom.
    The next slide goes into the frequent challenges that teachers face in the classroom
  • 3. Getting students’ attention!
  • 4. Keeping students on-task!
  • 5. Engaging All Students Including
    Shy Students
  • 6. Motivating Students
  • 7. Assessing Skill Mastery
  • 8. What are clickers?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4A62QyAUHM
  • 9. Effective Uses of Classroom Response Systems “Creating an interactive learning environment with technology” Vann M. Lassiter
  • 10. Negative
    Problems with clickers. Lack of planning.
  • 11. RESEARCH
    Hines (2005, P.4) research revealed that. “after first-semester final exams, the science and math students scored an average of four to six percentage points higher on test score.”
  • 12. Commericalization
    Below is a list of videos encouraging the use of clickers.
    1.http://www.utexas.edu/academic/cit/gallery/utprofiles/cps/silverthorn/
    2. http://www.engaging-technologies.com/clickers-in-action.html
  • 13. Commericalization
    3. http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k1985&pageid=icb.page29705&pageContentId=icb.pagecontent67719&view=view.do&viewParam_name=clickers.html&state=maximize
  • 14. HELPFUL WEBSITES
    *Writing better multiple choice questions
    http://www.crlt.umich.edu/tstrategies/esgi.html
  • 15. S-CURVE
  • 16. Approach will be centralized with peer-to-peer review and problem centered approach. A change agent will be needed to persuade the opinion leaders (administration) would need to mandate use of clickers to the adopters.
  • 17. BEST PRACTICES
    http://research.renlearn.com/research/pdfs/255.pdf
  • 18. CONCLUSION
    ARE YOU INTERESTED IN CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY, ACTIVE STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND EASY WAY TO ASSESS STUDENTS MASTERY OF A SUBJECT AND IF YOU ANSWER YES TO ANY OF MY QUESTIONS THAN YOU MUST ADOPT CLICKERS QUICKLY !
  • 19. References
    AverMedia. (2009). National Taiwan Normal University finds visualizers beneficial to classroom in research study. Retrieved from http://www.avermedia.com/AVerVision/About_us/News.aspx?de+1&id=4
    AverMedia. (2009). Case study: Broadneck Elementary School, benefits of document cameras
    over other classroom technologies. Retrieved from
    http://www.avermedia.com/AVerVision/About_us/News.aspx?de+1&id=4
  • 20. References
    Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Retrieved from: http://www.educause.edu/content.asp?page_id+666&ID+ERB0403&bhcp=1
    Beekes, W. (2006). The “Millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education: the Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 25-36.
  • 21. References (Continued)
    Burden, K., Atkinson, S. (2008) Evaluating pedagogical affordances of media sharing web 2.0
    technologies: A case study. Retrieved from http://hull.academia.edu/documents/0008/6391/burden-2.pdf
    Fredericksen, E., & Amers, M. (2008). Can a $30 piece of plastic improve learning? An evaluation of personal response systems large classroom setting.
  • 22. References (Continued)
    Hines , L. (2005). Interactive learning environmnt keeps Modesto students engaged. T.H.E. Journal, 33(2), 40-41.
    Kaleta, R., & Joosten (2007, May). Student response systems: A university of Wisconsin system
    study of clickers. Educause Center for Applied Research, 10, 1-12. Retrieved from
    http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/StudentResponseSystemsAUnivers/157592
  • 23. References (Continued)
    O’Donoghue, M., & O’Steen, B. (2007). Clicking on or off? Lecturers’ rationale for using
    student response systems. Ascilite. Retrieved June 14, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/odonoghue.pdf
    Pelton,T., Pelton, F.L. (2005). Helping students learn with classroom response systems. In J. Lang (Ed), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1554-1559)
  • 24. References (Continued)
    Penuel, W., Crawford, V, DeBarger, A., Boscardin, C., Masyn, K. & Urban,T. (2005). Teaching with student response system. Retrieved from: http://cti.sri.com/publications/downloads/teaching_with_Audience_Response_Systems_Brief_Report.pdf
    Zhu, E. (2006,2007). Teaching with clickers: What do students appreciate most about clickers?
  • 25. References (Continued)
    All images above retrieved from Google Images at http://www.google.com/imghp?hl=en&tab=wi