2. Evaluation and Control
Are integral components of the managerial function
for three reasons:
a. Both enable policy-maker to address the
problem of resource allocation and help in prioritizing
objectives and choosing methods for achieving
them.
b. The evaluation findings may be used as
basis for justifying on-going projects and programs.
c. Result of program review and audit help
pinpoint responsibility for success or failure.
3. Control
Control as a basic function in managing an
enterprise is concerned with the task of
seeing to it that what is performed is kept
within the prescribed management
channels to achieve organization
objectives and desired result.
4. Why the Need to Control
Control implies organizing task in a way that
those who will perform the functions will do so
efficiently and well.
5. Control Process
a) Establishing a standard based upon the plan –
this means constructing a criteria for evaluating
performance or an accountability chart which
defines the limits permissible.
b) Measuring work accomplished, on-going or in
progress.
c) Taking corrective action.
6. Evaluation
This is a process of assessing result, output per
manpower expended, quality and quantity of
product produced, impact and effectiveness of a
program, and managerial efficiency.
7. Two Kinds of Evaluation
Performance Evaluation – Appraisal of performance
focuses on the individual employees
Program Evaluation – Evaluation of a program seeks to
determine the extent to which the program achieves goal.
8. Instruments currently used for employee evaluation
a) Graphical Rating Scale – the evaluation criteria
of this instrument include quality and quantity of output.
b) Alteration Ranking Method – the employees
are ranked based upon a certain criterion.
c) Forced Distribution Method – employees are
input in different categories using a pre-datermined ratio.
9. Sample of Ranking Scale
Graphing Scale
________________________________________________
Level of Performance________________Point Value____
Outstanding 4
Very Satisfactory 3
Satisfactory 2
Unsatisfactory 1
12. Who should Evaluate?
a) Immediate Supervisor or Unit Head
b) Peer
c) committee
d) self
13. Program Evaluation – Evaluation of a
program seeks to determine the extent to the
program achieves goal.
14. Two efficiency measures
a) Cost-Benefits – which tags a monetary value
to program outcomes
b) Cost Effectiveness – which employs more
qualitative standard of efficiency.
15. Two Variants of Evaluation of Efficiency
a) Program Monitoring – which aims to find
out whether performance matches program
objectives and reaches out the target clientele and
provides for the intended beneficiaries.
b) Discrepancy Evaluation - which is
primarily used with MBO (management by
objectives).
16. Evaluation is summative if it looks into the
result of the program after its installation.
Evaluation is formative if audit is made for the
purpose of improving the program.
17. Evaluation Problems – Evaluation of a program
or of performance has both built-in problems and
those arising in the process of implementation.
Program Evaluation in the Philippines
In the Philippines, development is perceived
primarily as socio-economic growth.
18. Based on relationship with other projects, these
may be:
a) Independent Project – that which can be
implemented without need for implementing other
projects.
b) Mutually Exclusive Project – that which,
when implemented, will preclude the
implementation of other projects.
19. c) Complementary Project – that which will
require the implementation of other projects to
attain certain development objectives. It is a
component of an integrated area development
package.
20. Project development is a cycle of
activity with three general phases
Pre-investment Phase
Implementation Phase
Post Investment Phase
21. Administrative Communication
Communication is an integral element of an
organization. Through the communication
process, a person makes know his ideas and
feelings to others.
Communication enhance coordination, improves
working relationship and facilities the integration
of the inputs of the different component units of
an organization.
24. Components of a Communication
System
A good communication system should have the
Following:
1) Communicator
2) Something to be communicated
3) Transmission Procedure
4) Recipient
5) Desired Response
25. Communicating with the Clientele
A public service-oriented organization
communicates with its clientele in a more
manifest way by undertaking programs and
projects for the clientele community.