This presentation was made by IIED associate consultant Hannah Reid at the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris on 7 December, 2015. It was made in a side event on 'Supporting poor, vulnerable and indigenous communities'. More details: http://pubs.iied.org/17323IIED.html

1. Dr Hannah Reid
The Quality and Quantity
of Climate Finance
reaching the Most
Vulnerable
December 2015

2. In 2014, the Executive Secretary of the
UNFCCC, Christiana Figueres, called local-level
adaptation funding “pathetically insufficient”,
and highlighted the urgent need to deliver
established funds to the local level.
Funds for local
Adaptation
2

3. • Study countries: Barbados, Cambodia, Jamaica,
Mauritius, Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka.
• Funds studied: Special Climate Change Fund
(SCCF), Least Developed Countries Fund
(LDCF), Strategic Priority on Adaptation (SPA),
Adaptation Fund, Pilot Programme for Climate
Resilience (PPCR), Adaptation for Smallholder
Agriculture Programme (ASAP), Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and
United States Agency for International
Development (USAID).
Research Countries
And Funds Studied
3

4. • Project documentation must detail:
– exact locations of proposed activities,
– budgets for each individual activity with as little
consolidation as possible,
– names of executing entities,
– description of each activity,
– communities who will benefit.
Quantity of Funds Reaching
The Local Level
4

5. • Nepal’s National Adaptation Programme of Action
says 80%
• The Kathmandu Declaration on Financing Local
Adaptation to Climate Change says 50%
How Much Should Reach
the Local Level?
5

6. • SCCF project in Sri Lanka that integrated climate
change concerns into an existing community-led
development initiative;
• SPA project in Jamaica that financed community-
based adaptation initiatives through the Global
Environment Facility’s Small Grants Programme
(SGP);
• Adaptation Fund project in Jamaica that used a
national implementing entity (the Planning
Institute of Jamaica);
• JICA technical assistance project in Mauritius.
Which Funds Performed
well on ‘Quantity’
6

7. • Control over how finance was spent varied across
these projects
BUT…
7

8. Assessing the ‘Quality’ of Funds
Reaching the Local Level
8
Equity Funding should target the most vulnerable geographical areas and groups.
Urgency Disbursement should meet urgent needs.
Efficiency Adaptation finance should be spent on local people.
Effectiveness Interventions should reduce vulnerability and guard against maladaptation (i.e.
should not make situations worse).
Transparency Stakeholders must have information on what funding is available, how it is
deployed, and how it is used .
Accountability Actions, measures and processes are dispersed to as local a level as is
practical, and are channelled through a country’s own institutions and
systems.
Sustainability Actions must be environmentally, socially and economically sustainable, with
longer-term and scaling-up implications considered
Flexibility Results should be robust under a range of climate scenarios.
Human Rights Programmes should further principles in the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights.
Participation Planning should involve stakeholders across appropriate levels of governance
and across a civil society.

9. • Accountability: projects lacked clear complaint
and arbitration procedures. More direct access
needed.
• Urgency: delays common.
• Transparency: difficult to access information.
Principles with Room for
Improvement…
9

10. Recommendations:
10
• Apply funding according to 10 principles.
• Project documentation needs improving to
allow for tracking the flow and use of funds.
• Accountability and transparency need
particular attention.
• Community-based processes should be
routinely included in implementation plans.
• Governments should create national
knowledge centres storing information on
adaptation projects.

11. • Briefing paper:
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17323IIED.pdf
• Donors:
More Information
And Thanks
11