Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Loading in …3
×
1 of 7

Designing wild meat alternative projects

0

Share

Download to read offline

This presentation by Stephanie Brittain was delivered during the online event 'Why eat wild meat? Insights from Africa and lessons for COVID-19 responses' on Wednesday, 4 August.

The event explored why people eat wild meat and how to design interventions that can help improve sustainability and safety.

Stephanie Brittain is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oxford focusing on local knowledge and drivers of wild meat consumption in Cameroon.

More Related Content

You Might Also Like

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Designing wild meat alternative projects

  1. 1. @StephBrittain Credit: Stephanie Brittain Designing wild meat alternative projects Project preferences from Cameroon Dr. Stephanie Brittain University of Oxford @StephBrittain
  2. 2. @StephBrittain Scenario-based interviews in four villages with differing characteristics Interviewed 171 people from 171 households On-the-ground research: site & methods
  3. 3. Scenarios allow us to explore how people would engage with different projects, and what the projects impact on hunting and consumption of wild meat could be. 7 scenarios presented: o Current situation (baseline scenario) Then, six scenarios offering fish rearing and chicken farming projects at different scales: o Food only at household level o Food + income at household level o Food + income (plus community benefit element) community level Two key questions A) How would each scenario affect your rate of wild meat consumption over the next 5 years? (e.g., increase, decrease, no change), and why? B) How would each scenario affect your rate of wild meat hunting over the next 5 years? (e.g., increase, decrease, no change), and why? Scenarios
  4. 4. 5 10 15 20 1−Baseline 2−fish (consum ption only) 3−chicken (consum ption only) 4−fish (consum ption & incom e) 5−chicken (consum ption & incom e) 6−fish (consum ption & incom e com m unity) 7−chicken (consum ption & incom e com m unity) Odds Ratio Activity Consumption Hunting Probability that each scenario will reduce wild meat hunting and consumption Results- predicted reduction in hunting & consumption
  5. 5. @StephBrittain o Projects offering food & income result in much better predicted reduction in household hunting and consumption o Household scale projects result in greater predicted reductions in hunting & consumption o Alternatives project designers should consider how culturally accepted the alternative offered is- will it replace wild meat as a food or will it act as an additional income instead? o Poorly designed alternatives may result in a waste of financial resources, a failure both for biodiversity and for people. o Predictive approaches such as scenarios have the potential to help inform and refine the design of alternatives projects before they are implemented. Conclusions
  6. 6. NEW: Guidance for alternatives project design We must better consider rural people’s food security and their often-ignored preferences, if we are to design acceptable alternatives that achieve both social and conservation goals. In five steps, the guidance explains how practitioners can help to develop the right project for the community in which they work, and support communities to develop their own sustainable alternatives to illegal and/or unsustainable hunting. We urge practitioners to use the tool and are looking for projects to put the tool into practice @StephBrittain
  7. 7. Thank you @StephBrittain www.iccs.org Dr. Stephanie Brittain Stephanie.brittain@zoo.ox.ac.uk

×