6-6-12 Presentation Slides, “Creating Access to Audio & Video Digital Media:
The Variations on Video Project & the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame” Presented by: Karen Cariani, Adam Wead, & Jon Dunn
10.2.14 Slides: “Doing It: Research Results on Non-ARL Academic Libraries Man...DuraSpace
Similar to Presentation Slides, “Creating Access to Audio & Video Digital Media: The Variations on Video Project & the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame” (20)
Presentation Slides, “Creating Access to Audio & Video Digital Media: The Variations on Video Project & the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame”
1. Hot Topics: The DuraSpace
Community Webinar Series
Series Two:
Managing and preserving audio and
video in your digital repository
Curated by Karen Cariani
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
2. Webinar 2: Creating Access to
Audio & Digital Media:
The Variations on Video Project &
the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
Presented by:
Karen Cariani,
Jon Dunn & Adam Wead
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
3. About our presenters
• Karen Cariani, Director, Media Library
& Archives, WGBH Boston
• Jon Dunn, Director, Library
Technologies & Digital Libraries, Indiana
University
• Adam Wead, Systems & Digital
Collections Librarian, Rock and Roll Hall
of Fame
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
4. Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
Adam Weed,
Systems & Digital Collection Librarian
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
5. Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame Library
and Archives
• Hall of Fame was founded in 1985
• Original library was in the Museum, but was
overrun due to space limitations
• Archival materials were moved to off-site
storage
• In 2000, the Rockhall Foundation (NYC) began
a capital campaign
• Raised $10 million
• New facility built at Cuyahoga Community
College Metro campus in 2010
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
6. Library and Archives (cont.)
• Began archival processing and
cataloging in 2010
• Grand opening in April 2012
• 256 processed archival collections
• Over 8,000 cataloged library items
• Free and open to the public 9–5, M-F
• Serves researchers, Museum staff and
anyone who wants to come in
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
7. Library and Archives Staff
• 8 full time staff (permanent)
• Librarians: Director, Public Services
Librarian, Metadata Librarian, Library
Assistant, Systems Librarian
• Archivists: Head Archivist, A/V
Archivist, Assistant Archivist
• 3 project archivists and 3 project
catalogers (2010-2012)
• Interns and volunteers
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
8. Digital Collections: Museum
• No pre-existing asset management system
• No digitization
• No archival processing
• Needed to have something in place by April
2012
• Decided to focus on institutional content first
• Other archival collections from storage were
unprocessed and their contents unknown
• Institutional content had the greatest need for
preservation and access requirements
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
9. Digital Collections: Museum (cont.)
• Approx. 1,500 hours of video in various
tape formats: Betacam, MiniDV,
DigiBeta
• Educational department lectures and
presentations
• Songwriters to Soundmen TV series
• Some induction footage
• No born-digital content (yet)
• Outsourced to vendor for digitization
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
10. Digital Collections: Foundation
• Induction ceremony footage
• Over 800 additional tapes
• Selected 150 for priority digitization
• Remaining tapes can be processed “as
needed” – mostly ISOs and
miscellaneous footage
• Formats include BetacamSP, DigiBeta
and HDCam
• 90 mins to 2 hours each
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
11. Video Content Challenges
• Archival-quality: uncompressed, 10-bit,
4:2:2 chroma video yields very large
files
• 125 GB/hr for SD, the majority of our
content, and 500 GB/hr for HD
• Currently, only 60 hours of priority HD
content from HDCam tapes but 400
total tapes exist
• Future induction footage will be HD
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
12. Access Issues
• Access limited to onsite only
• Surrogate files are primary means of
access: compressed H.264 video
• Uncompressed files only needed for
future transcoding or for third-party
distribution if H.264 video is unsuitable
• Have not had any requests for
preservation video yet
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
13. Storage Solutions
• Tailored our storage system to fit our access
needs: high data volume, low access rate
• Small, surrogate video files are kept on disk,
in a SAN for immediate access
• Uncompressed video files are kept on LTO-5
tape using hierarchical storage so that they
can be moved back to disk when needed
• For archiving, all files are backed up to two
LTO-5 tapes: one stored at the Museum (3 mi.
away), and a second at Iron Mountain in
Boyers, PA
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
14. Storage Pros and Cons
• Start small, grow as needed
• Archiving data to tape is time-consuming
• Ex. 8 TB ingest takes about a week
• Retrieving uncompressed data from tape is
time-consuming
• Requests for large files must be scheduled:
limited hardware resources for multiple
retrievals
• Modular design of our storage system offers
easy expansion should requirements change
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
15. Tools
• Hydra software stack
• Fedora repository
• Large video files are stored as external
datastreams accessible via HTTP
• PBCore for descriptive metadata
• Records are exported to Blacklight for
public access
• Video streamed using open source
software: Wowza with Flowplayer
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
16. System Overview
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
18. Costs and Limitations
• Storage systems represent the bulk of
the monetary costs
• Digitization vendor expenses come
second: George Blood Audio/Video
digitizes our video
• Staff hours spent developing software
(me)
• Staff hours spent cataloging items: one
librarian, one archivist, plus volunteers
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
19. Pros and Cons
• Costs saved through in-house development vs.
ability to produce working software
• Atomistic fedora model can work with any kind
of A/V content
• Staffing determines cataloging rate
• Lack of organization make processing
collections time-consuming
• We have a digital “backlog” for content that we
can’t yet ingest
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
20. Future Work/Challenges
• Images and documents: institutional
and from archival collections
• Audio from archival collections
• Models in Hydra to deal with new
content types
• Mapping archival description to Fedora
objects to create coherent finding aids
• Merging physical archival content with
digital
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
21. For More Info
• About Us: http://library.rockhall.com
• Our Catalog:
http://catalog.rockhall.com
• About Hydra: http://hydraproject.org/
• Our Hydra “head”:
https://github.com/awead/Hydra-Rock
Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
22. Variations on Video:
Building the Next
Generation Library Media
Management System
DuraSpace Hot Topics Webinar
Jon Dunn
Indiana University
June 6, 2012
23. Presentation Outline
Background and motivations
Technical architecture
Development roadmap and process
24. Background: Variations
Open source digital music library system
developed at Indiana University
In use at IU since 1996, in various forms
Used at about 20 institutions, mainly for
streaming audio course reserves
variations.sourceforge.net
25. Variations on Video
Educational institutions collaborating with open
source software communities
Led by Indiana University and Northwestern
University Libraries
Goal: Create an open source system to enable
libraries and archives to provide online access to
video and audio collections
26. Variations on Video
Planning grant from IMLS
August 2010 – June 2011
Implementation grant from IMLS
October 2011 – September 2014
27. Variations on Video:
Project Objectives
Develop a digital audio/video management and
delivery system, focused on needs of libraries and
archives
Follow an agile, open source development model
Leverage existing technologies, where feasible
Communicate and market the project broadly to
increase awareness and grow the community of
users and developers
29. Variations on Video:
Motivators
Demand from Variations implementers and other
institutions
Increased video digitization and creation at IU
IU Media Preservation Initiative
IU IT strategic plan: Empowering People
No existing system serves needs of libraries
History of involvement in open and community
source software
Desire to create a sustainable foundation for
Variations development and maintenance
31. Serving the needs of libraries
and archives
Wide variety of audio/video collections, uses, and
access needs
Licensed educational video collections
Video/audio e-reserves
Archival collections
Open access collections
Research and teaching & learning use
Long-term management and access
Tie-in with preservation
32. Variations on Video: Content
Video Live University
digitized Performances produced
from Feature Films video
library Research-
collections related
Video Archival
TV shows collections
Files with Lecture
purchased Series
Faculty-
or licensed produced
streaming video
rights Field
Documentaries
Recordings
33. Existing Products
Institutional and digital library repositories
DSpace, Fedora, Digital Commons, ContentDM
Web video services
YouTube, Vimeo
Streaming servers
Flash Media Server, Real Helix, Wowza, Red5
Classroom lecture capture
Echo360, Mediasite, Opencast Matterhorn
Digital asset management systems
OpenText, NetXposure
Online video environments
Kaltura, Brightcove
34. Variations on Video
Designed to meet needs of libraries and archives
Storage requirements
Streaming
Transcoding
Access control
Media players
Structural metadata / navigation
Ease of use and administration
39. Architecture Revisited
Hydra Framework
Search for free
Rich toolset for quick development
“One body, many heads”
Opencast Matterhorn
Flexible processing pipeline; highly modular
Streaming Server
Flash/RTMP, HTML5/HTTP, and Apple Live HTTP
Streaming all required
Red5 – open source and support in Matterhorn
Flash Media Server – popular and iOS support
40. Variations on Video: Roadmap
Release 0 (July 2012)
Manual video and basic metadata ingest
Transcoding
Search and basic playback in desktop browsers
Release 1 (December 2012)
Desktop and mobile audio/video playback
Clip and playlist creation
Authentication and group-based authorization
Manual and batch ingest
More complete discovery interface
Release 2+ (2013-) …
41. Development Process
Scrum agile approach, based at IU and NU
Single virtual distributed team
Other partners will install, test, and provide
feedback
Transparent planning and development process
Open wiki, Jira, mailing lists
Regular public demos
Engage additional community involvement over
time
42. For more information
http://variationsonvideo.org/
Variations on Video e-mail list
E-mail vov-l-subscribe@indiana.edu to subscribe
twitter.com/varvideo
facebook.com/varvideo
43. Questions?
Jon Dunn
Indiana University
jwd@iu.edu
Adam Wead
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
awead@rockhall.org
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
44. Solutions for
Digital Media Preservation
• DuraCloud is simple, flexible and cost
effective
• DuraCloud offers expandable storage
space as needed for your media files
• Streaming media services available
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series
45. Solutions for
Digital Media Preservation
• Sign up for a free 2 month trial account
today www.duracloud.org
• Priced for every budget
http://duracloud.org/pricing
June 6, 2012 Hot Topics: DuraSpace Community Webinar Series