CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned Content80.0% Evolution of Nursing Practice Over Time and Resulting Changes to Scope of Practice and Approach to Patient Care 10.0% Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time and how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the approach to treating the individual is not presented. Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is incomplete. A partial summary of how scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is presented. There are major inaccuracies. More information is needed. A general explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Some information is needed for clarity. An explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is discussed. Minor detail is needed for clarity. The explanation is accurate and captures all significant aspects.  A thorough explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is discussed in detail. An insightful account of the evolution of nursing practice and its influence on scope of practice and patient care is presented. Comparison of Differentiated Practice Competencies of ADN and BSN 15.0% The differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN are not compared.  An incomplete comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice is unclear. There are significant inaccuracies. More information is needed. A general comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are summarized. Some information is needed for clarity or support. A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is nursing is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are described. Minor detail or rationale is needed for clarity or support. A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is clearly presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are described in detail. The narrative demonstrates a strong understanding of differentiated competencies and scope of practice for the ADN and BSN. Use of Patient Care Situation to Describe Differences in Approach to Nursing Care Based Upon ADN and BSN Education 20.0% A patient care situation illustrating the difference between ADN and BSN in decision making and approaches to patient care is not presented.  Summary of patient care situation is.

1. CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory
(75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent
(100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned
Content80.0%
Evolution of Nursing Practice Over Time and Resulting
Changes to Scope of Practice and Approach to Patient Care
10.0%
Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time and
how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the
approach to treating the individual is not presented.
Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is
incomplete. A partial summary of how scope of practice and
approach to treating the individual have changed over time is
presented. There are major inaccuracies. More information is
needed.
A general explanation of how nursing practice has changed over
time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to
treating the individual have changed over time is summarized.
There are some minor inaccuracies. Some information is needed
for clarity.
An explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time
is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the
individual have changed over time is discussed. Minor detail is
needed for clarity. The explanation is accurate and captures all
significant aspects.
A thorough explanation of how nursing practice has changed

2. over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to
treating the individual have changed over time is discussed in
detail. An insightful account of the evolution of nursing
practice and its influence on scope of practice and patient care
is presented.
Comparison of Differentiated Practice Competencies of ADN
and BSN
15.0%
The differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN
are not compared.
An incomplete comparison of the differentiated practice
competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences
between ADN and BSN scope of practice is unclear. There are
significant inaccuracies. More information is needed.
A general comparison of the differentiated practice
competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences
between ADN and BSN scope of practice are summarized. Some
information is needed for clarity or support.
A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the
ADN and BSN is nursing is presented. Differences between
ADN and BSN scope of practice are described. Minor detail or
rationale is needed for clarity or support.
A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the
ADN and BSN is clearly presented. Differences between ADN
and BSN scope of practice are described in detail. The narrative
demonstrates a strong understanding of differentiated
competencies and scope of practice for the ADN and BSN.
Use of Patient Care Situation to Describe Differences in

3. Approach to Nursing Care Based Upon ADN and BSN
Education
20.0%
A patient care situation illustrating the difference between ADN
and BSN in decision making and approaches to patient care is
not presented.
Summary of patient care situation is incomplete or is not
relevant to illustrating the differences in decision making or
approach to nursing care based upon ADN and BSN education.
Summary of relevant patient care situation is presented.
Differences in decision making and approach to nursing care
based upon ADN and BSN education are generally described.
Difference between ADN and BSN scope of practice is
summarized. More detail is needed for clarity and support.
Relevant patient care situation is described, including
differences in decision making and approach to nursing care
based upon ADN and BSN education. Difference between ADN
and BSN scope of practice is described. Minor detail is needed
for clarity.
Relevant patient care situation is thoroughly described. The
differences in approach to nursing care and scope of practice
based upon ADN and BSN education are described in detail.
Narrative demonstrates insight into patient care, decision
making, and differing approaches between ADN and BSN.
Application of Evidence-Based Practice and RN-BSN Education
in Nursing Care
20.0%

4. Significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how
the BSN supports its application is not discussed.
The significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and
how the BSN supports the application of evidence-based
practice is partially discussed. The discussion contains
significant inaccuracies.
A summary of the significance of evidence-based practice to
nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of
evidence-based practice is presented. The discussion contains
minor inaccuracies; or, more evidence or rationale is needed to
support claims.
A discussion on the significance of evidence-based practice to
nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of
evidence-based practice is presented. Some evidence or
rationale is needed to support claims.
A discussion of the significance of evidence-based practice to
nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of
evidence-based practice is thoroughly presented. Strong
evidence and rationale is provided to support claims.
Communication and Collaboration With Interdisciplinary Teams
to Support Patient Outcomes
15.0%
A discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate
with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and
more effective patient outcomes, is not presented.
An incomplete discussion of how nurses today communicate and
collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports
safer and more effective patient outcomes, is presented. The

5. discussion contains inaccuracies and fails to demonstrate the
importance of working with interdisciplinary teams.
A summary of how nurses today communicate and collaborate
with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and
more effective patient outcomes, is presented. The summary
generally illustrates the importance of working with
interdisciplinary teams. Some information is needed for
accuracy or to support claims.
A discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate
with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and
more effective patient outcomes, is presented. Overall, the
discussion illustrates the importance of working with
interdisciplinary teams.
A detailed discussion of how nurses today communicate and
collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports
safer and more effective patient outcomes, is clearly presented.
The discussion is well supported and strongly illustrates the
importance of working with interdisciplinary teams.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose5.0%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.

6. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.
Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction5.0%
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim
in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.

7. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
2.0%
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken;
lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.

8. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
3.0%Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage100%