State Data: Graphical Analysis
Assignment 7
Variables:
Population: In thousands
Income:
Illiteracy:
Life.Exp: Life expectancy
Murder:
HS.Grad: High school Graduation Rate
Frost:
Area:
state.abb:
state.area:
x: Latitude:
y: longitude:
state.division:
state.name:
state.region:
Honor Code:
Questions:
1. Make a histogram of Population variable using hist function. [4]
2. Color the above histogram yellow, increase number of breaks to 25. [4]
3. In the above histogram, add x label = Population, main = Distribution of State Population. Describe the distribution: Is it symmetric, right skewed, or left skewed? [4]
4. Make a Bar graph to show the distribution of state.region variable. [4]
5. Customize the above bargraph and color the bars red, blue, green, and yellow [4]
6. Scatterplot of Murder (y-axis) vs Frost (x-axis). [4]
7. Customizing the scatterplot in #6, x label = Frost, y label = Murder, main = Murder vs Frost. Is the form (linear or nonlinear), direction (positive or negative), strength (strong or weak)? [5]
8. Scatterplot matrix of Population + Income + Illiteracy + Life.Exp + Murder + HS.Grad + Frost + Area. Life.Exp has negative relationship with which two variables? Illiteracy has positive relationship with which variable? [5]
9. Make boxplots to compare distribution of HS.Grad across state.region. [4]
10. Color the above box plot red, blue, green, and yellow. [4]
11. Add x label as Region, Y label as High School Graduation, and main as High School Graduation across Regions. Which region has the highest median graduation rate? Which region has the lowest median graduation rate? [5]
12. Add varwidth = T in the above boxplots to display difference in number of observations. [3]
4/27/2018 https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview 1/3
Description:
Total Possible Score: 19.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the foundation or project for social good.
Proficient - Describes the foundation or project for social good. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially describes the foundation or project for social good. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the foundation or project for social good; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the foundation or project for social good is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses how the foundation reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete.
Proficient - Discusses how the foundation reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially discusses how the foundation reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete. Relevant details are
missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss how the foundation refle.
State Data Graphical AnalysisAssignment 7VariablesPopu.docx
1. State Data: Graphical Analysis
Assignment 7
Variables:
Population: In thousands
Income:
Illiteracy:
Life.Exp: Life expectancy
Murder:
HS.Grad: High school Graduation Rate
Frost:
Area:
state.abb:
state.area:
x: Latitude:
y: longitude:
state.division:
state.name:
state.region:
Honor Code:
Questions:
1. Make a histogram of Population variable using hist function.
[4]
2. 2. Color the above histogram yellow, increase number of breaks
to 25. [4]
3. In the above histogram, add x label = Population, main =
Distribution of State Population. Describe the distribution: Is it
symmetric, right skewed, or left skewed? [4]
4. Make a Bar graph to show the distribution of state.region
variable. [4]
5. Customize the above bargraph and color the bars red, blue,
green, and yellow [4]
6. Scatterplot of Murder (y-axis) vs Frost (x-axis). [4]
3. 7. Customizing the scatterplot in #6, x label = Frost, y label =
Murder, main = Murder vs Frost. Is the form (linear or
nonlinear), direction (positive or negative), strength (strong or
weak)? [5]
8. Scatterplot matrix of Population + Income + Illiteracy +
Life.Exp + Murder + HS.Grad + Frost + Area. Life.Exp has
negative relationship with which two variables? Illiteracy has
positive relationship with which variable? [5]
9. Make boxplots to compare distribution of HS.Grad across
state.region. [4]
10. Color the above box plot red, blue, green, and yellow. [4]
4. 11. Add x label as Region, Y label as High School Graduation,
and main as High School Graduation across Regions. Which
region has the highest median graduation rate? Which region
has the lowest median graduation rate? [5]
12. Add varwidth = T in the above boxplots to display
difference in number of observations. [3]
4/27/2018
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
1/3
Description:
Total Possible Score: 19.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the foundation or project
5. for social good.
Proficient - Describes the foundation or project for social good.
Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially describes the foundation or project for social
good. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the foundation or
project for social good; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of the foundation or project
for social good is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses how the foundation
reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete.
Proficient - Discusses how the foundation reflects the personal
values of the celebrity or athlete. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially discusses how the foundation reflects the
personal values of the celebrity or athlete. Relevant details are
missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss how the foundation
reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete; however,
significant details are missing.
Non-Performance - The discussion of how the foundation
reflects the personal values of the celebrity or athlete is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.
6. Distinguished - Thoroughly explains how the foundation or
project is an example of leadership integrity.
Proficient - Explains how the foundation or project is an
example of leadership integrity. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially explains how the foundation or project is an
example of leadership integrity. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how the foundation or
project is an example of leadership integrity; however,
significant
details are missing.
Non-Performance - The explanation of how the foundation or
project is an example of leadership integrity is either
nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes how the foundation or
project enhances the celebrity’s image.
Proficient - Describes how the foundation or project enhances
the celebrity’s image. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially describes how the foundation or project
enhances the celebrity’s image. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe how the foundation
or project enhances the celebrity’s image; however, significant
details are missing.
Non-Performance - The description of how the foundation or
project enhances the celebrity’s image is either nonexistent or
lacks
7. the components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Thoroughly describes if integrity and image
management are compatible.
Proficient - Describes if integrity and image management are
compatible. Minor details are missing.
Basic - Partially describes if integrity and image management
are compatible. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe if integrity and
image management are compatible; however, significant details
are
missing.
BUS119.W2A1.04.2014
Describes the Foundation or Project for Social Good Total: 2.00
Discusses How the Foundation Reflects the Personal Values of
the Celebrity or
Athlete
Total: 2.00
Explains How the Foundation or Project is an Example of
Leadership Integrity Total: 2.00
Describes How the Foundation or Project Enhances the
Celebrity’s Image Total: 2.00
Describes If Integrity and Image Management are Compatible
Total: 3.00
8. 4/27/2018
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
2/3
Non-Performance - The description of the integrity and image
management are compatible is either nonexistent or lacks the
components described in the assignment instructions.
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail
the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information
necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient - Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered,
delivering enough relevant information for an adequate
understanding.
Basic - Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering
minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations - Briefly recognizes the issue to be
considered, but may not deliver additional information
necessary for a
basic understanding.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive
content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the
context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
9. Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover
ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a
whole.
Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content but does not
apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall,
content
assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated
or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute
toward
the development of the written work and may distract the reader
from its purpose.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and
organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and
grammar.
Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax
and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work
contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to
understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics,
such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few
errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of
syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written
10. work
contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently
throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper.
However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting
throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA
requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA
formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout
difficult to
distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the
required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the
required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three
quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at
11. least one half of the required number of correctly formatted
pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues Total: 1.00
Written Communication: Content Development Total: 2.00
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 2.00
Written Communication: APA Formatting Total: 1.00
Written Communication: Page Requirement Total: 1.00
Written Communication: Resource Requirement Total: 1.00
4/27/2018
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
https://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
3/3
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of
scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support
ideas. All
sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly
within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to
support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and
12. cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support
ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on
the reference page are used within the body of the assignment.
Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources
that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not
be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used
within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted
correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the instructions.
Powered by
Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources
Source type What is it? Examples Best used for
Scholarly
A source written by scholars or academics in a
field. The purpose of many scholarly sources is
to report on original research or
experimentation in order to make such
information available to the rest of the
scholarly community. The audience for
scholarly sources is other scholars or experts
13. in a field. Scholarly sources include references
and usually use language that is technical or at
a high reading level.
*Note: Different databases may define
“scholarly” in slightly different ways, and thus
a source that is considered “scholarly” in one
database may not be considered “scholarly” in
another database. The final decision about
the appropriateness of a given source for a
particular assignment is left to the instructor.
Scholarly Journals
• Journal of Management Information
Systems
• American Journal of Public Health
• Early Childhood Research Quarterly
Scholarly Books (published by a university
press or other high-quality publisher)
• Shari’a Politics: Islamic Law and
Society in the Modern World
• The Grand Design: Strategy and the
U.S. Civil War
• The Hidden Mechanics of Exercise:
Molecules That Move Us
Journal articles:
• Recent research on a topic
14. • Very specific topics or narrow
fields of research
• NOT good for an introduction to
or broad overview of a topic
Books:
• In-depth information and research
on a topic
• Putting a topic into context
• Historical information on a topic
Peer Reviewed
A publication that has gone through an official
editorial process that involves review and
approval by the author’s peers (experts in the
same subject area). Many (but not all)
scholarly publications are peer reviewed.
*Note: even though a journal is peer reviewed,
some types of articles within that journal may
not be peer reviewed. These might include
editorials or book reviews.
**Note: some publications (such as some
trade journals) can be peer reviewed but not
scholarly. This is not common.
See “Scholarly Journals” above
Books go through a different editorial process
15. and are not usually considered to be “peer
reviewed”. However, they can still be
excellent scholarly sources.
See above
Credible
A source that can be trusted to contain
accurate information that is backed up by
evidence or can be verified in other trusted
sources. Many types of sources can fall into
this category.
*Note: The final decision about the
appropriateness of a given source for a
particular assignment is left to the instructor.
See above. Also:
• Newspapers
• Magazines
• Books
• Trade journals or publications
• Government websites
• Websites from educational
institutions (like universities)
16. • Websites or other publications from
reputable organizations (like the Mayo
Clinic)
• Encyclopedias (general or subject)
Many websites could be considered credible.
The more information provided about the
source, the more likely they are to be credible.
Look for information about the author and/or
the organization, how recently it was
published, the intended audience, the
intended purpose, and whether there is
evidence of bias.
• Basic/general/background
information about a topic
• Current events
• Local news
• Statistical data
• Information about specific
organizations or companies (look
at the organization’s or company’s
website, or look for articles in
newspapers or trade journals)
• Government information
• Information about popular culture
• Opinions or commentaries
17. • Topics of general interest
Ashford University Library, June 2015, CR 0130415
4/27/2018 Week 2 - Assignment
https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/22687/assignments/4523
91?module_item_id=1146348 1/3
Week 2 - Assignment
Effec�ve Leadership
Three of the leaders profiled in Chapter 2 (Mother Teresa, Bill
Gates, and Oprah Winfrey) have started
foundations, schools, or other projects to support causes they
believe in. Conduct online research of a
favorite celebrity or professional athlete who has also set up a
foundation or project for social good.
In your paper:
Describe the foundation or project for social good.
Discuss how the foundation reflects the personal values of the
celebrity or athlete.
18. Explain how the foundation or project is an example of
leadership integrity.
Describe how the foundation or project enhances the celebrity’s
image.
Describe whether integrity and image management are
compatible.
The paper:
Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not
including the title and reference pages)
and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford
Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct
thesis statement.
Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
Must use at least three scholarly sources, including a minimum
of two from the Ashford University
Library, in addition to the text. Wikipedia is NOT an acceptable
source.
Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to
APA style as outlined in the
Ashford Writing Center.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric
19. (http://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
) for the criteria that will be used to
evaluate your assignment.
Waypoint Assignment
Submission
http://ashford.waypointoutcomes.com/assessment/4680/preview
4/27/2018 Week 2 - Assignment
https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/22687/assignments/4523
91?module_item_id=1146348 2/3
This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window
The assignments in this course will be submitted to Waypoint.
Please refer to the instructions below
to submit your assignment.
1. Click on the Assignment Submission button below. The
Waypoint "Student Dashboard" will open
in a new browser window.
2. Browse for your assignment.
3. Click Upload.
4. Confirm that your assignment was successfully submitted by
viewing the appropriate week's
assignment tab in Waypoint.
For more detailed instructions, refer to the Waypoint Tutorial
(https://bridgepoint.equella.ecollege.com/curriculum/file/dc358
708-3d2b-41a6-a000-