1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/koenvereeken/2088902012/

3. • Supports UK academic
libraries by providing a
single point of access to
e-journal usage data
• Assists management of
e-journals collections,
evaluation and decision-
making
• Provides statistics to
ensure the best deals
for the academic
community
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nostri-imago/3137422976/

4. • > 142 libraries live
• All UK higher
education
institutions are
welcome to
participate (160+)
• 10-15 new libraries
per month
throughout 2011
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellf/3910635234/

5. 20 Publishers / Platforms
AAAS / HighWire
American Institute of Physics (AIP)/ Scitation
Annual Reviews / Atypon
BioOne / Atypon
BRILL / via ingentaconnect
BMJ Publishing Group / HighWire
Edinburgh University Press (EUP) / Atypon
Elsevier
Emerald / Emerald Insight
Future Medicine Ltd / Atypon
IOP Publishing / IOPscience
IOS Press / Metapress
Nature Publishing Group (NPG) / MPS
Oxford University Press (OUP) / Oxford Journals
Project MUSE / Project Muse
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) / MPS
SAGE / HighWire
Springer / Metapress
Taylor & Francis / Atypon
Wiley-Blackwell
3 Gateways and host intermediaries
Ebsco EJS
Publishing Technology (ingentaconnect)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27205670@N00/543219767/
Swetswise

6. Some slight modifications…

7. • Standardized Usage
Statistics Harvesting
Initiative (SUSHI)
• M2M way of
gathering statistics
• Replaces the user-
mediated collection of
usage reports
• SUSHI server to
gather data from JUSP
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ragingwire/3395161474/

8. COUNTER usage reports
JR1
• Journal Report 1:
Number of Successful
Full-Text Article
Requests by Month and
Journal
JR1a
• Journal Report 1a:
Number of Successful
Full-Text Article
Requests from an
Archive by Month and
Journal
/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bionicteaching 2920562020/

9. JUSP report type JUSP report title
Journal level reports • JR1 and JR1A reports
• JR1 reports inc. gateways and host intermediaries
• JR1 reports excluding backfile usage
Summary reports • SCONUL return
• Summary of publisher usage
• Summary use of gateway and host intermediaries
• Summary use of backfiles
• Tables and graphs
• Which titles have highest use
• Number of titles and requests in usage ranges
Experimental reports • Titles included in deals (year/multiple years)
• Compare deals
• NESLi2 deals
• Titles vs NESLi2 deals
• Individual journal search and usage
• Breakdown of publisher usage (title and year) &
(title and date range)

14. • How much are the subscribed titles being
used?
• How much are other titles in the deal being
used?
• Does usage show that the deal offers better
value than individual subscribed titles?

16. • Accounting for nil usage
• Does the JR1 report contain titles that are
not available in the collection the library
subscribes to?
• Does the JR1 report contain titles that are
no longer part of the current deal e.g.
name changes, publisher changes?

17. ‘Publisher X’ - JR1 for 2011 for a library with the
‘Basic Collection’ :
Titles in the ‘Premium Collection’ in the JR1 498
Titles in the ‘Basic Collection’ 206
Titles in the JR1 not available to the Library 292
59% of titles in the JR1 are not in the library’s deal
and will show nil use.

18. • Gathering feedback
and monitoring use
• Surveys
• Visits
• Ongoing dialogue

19. • More publishers
• More trend analysis
• More sort options
• Integration with other
statistics packages

20. "Evidence-based library decisions rely on the timely analysis of usage
statistics. JUSP has quickly matured into a highly valued service largely due to
the team's skill in solving problems and presenting complex data within a
clear and well-structured user interface.”
“The project has a real community feel to it, in that it actively responds to
user input and I think it is a really good example of collaborative working -
something we should be striving towards to avoid us needing to reinvent the
wheel! I think the team has worked very well with libraries in seeking their
input.”
“We like the fact that with JUSP you know the data is proactively being
checked and verified.”
"The more publishers you can get on board the better! The JUSP portal is
already proving to be invaluable to us."

21. • Single point of access to data
• Automation provided by SUSHI
offers time saving benefits
• COUNTER compliant usage data
available for aggregated returns
• Report comparisons across
publishers, years and platforms
• Flexible methods of viewing data
through tables, charts or graphs
• Inclusion of intermediary stats
• Data checked and quality assured
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tal_axl/4317091958/l

22. • Access to the JUSP portal
• Ability to engage in evidence-based discussions with
your customers about usage and value for money
• Recognition from libraries of your customer service
credentials in supporting an initiative like JUSP
• Ensuring customers have a complete record of usage
including usage through intermediaries

23. • Providing support and
guidance to the
community
• Knowledge sharing
• SUSHI client available
as free, open source
software
• Ongoing consultation
with libraries and
publishers
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shareconference/5422273956/

24. http://jusp.mimas.ac.uk
Email: jusp@mimas.ac.uk
http://www.flickr.com/photos/oberazzi/318947873/