David Parker, Publisher and Founder, Lived Places Publishing Dr. Kadian Pow, Lecturer in Sociology and Black Studies & LPP Author, Birmingham City University Natasha Edmonds, Director, Publisher and Industry Strategy, Clarivate Library patrons want to search for and locate authors by particular identity markers, such as gender identification, country of origin, sexual orientation, nature of disability, and the many intersectional points that allow an author to express a point-of-view. Artificial Intelligence, skilled web researchers, and data scientists in general struggle to achieve accuracy on single identity markers, such as gender. And what right does anybody have to affix identity metadata to an author other than the author theirselves? And what of the risks in disseminating author identity metadata in electronic distribution platforms and in library catalog systems? Can a "fully informed" author even imagine all the possible misuses of their identity metadata?

1. Author Identity Metadata:
Why a Small Publisher Can Address a Major Challenge
David Parker, Publisher and Founder, Lived Places Publishing
Dr. Kadian Pow, Lecturer in Sociology and Black Studies & LPP
Author, Birmingham City University
Natasha Edmonds, Director, Publisher and Industry Strategy,
Clarivate

2. AIM - The Publisher Perspective
➢ It must begin with
the authors
➢ Why a small
publisher can
action
➢ Survey Process
and Results

3. The Survey Key Results for Search Enhancement

4. The Survey and LPP’s New Search Facets Next Steps
1. The survey will remain open through July 2024
2. LPP will then deliver the results to the author community
and explain the new facets to be added (up to three
initially) and engage in a dialogue around data collection
and implementation with the LPP author community in
August-September 2024
3. Author identity data collection will begin, strictly author
opt-in, while simultaneous platform development and
catalog record enhancement is underway in September-
October 2024
4. Launch new author identity metadata facets in late
2024/early 2025

5. The Survey and LPP’s New Search Facets Next Steps
New AIM
Facets Here

6. AIM - The Author Perspective: Kadian Pow
Considerations
● The trap of Positivism
○ Current LPP author
○ Interpretivism and reflexivity for the
21st century
● Authorial epistemology is more than subject
knowledge
○ Writing to be understood
○ The work exists in context
● Identity evolves over generations
○ Gen Z reading habits
○ Decolonizing the curriculum efforts

7. AIM - The Author as Reader--Kadian Pow
Reader Perspective:
● Tick boxes vs. trust
● 2 Quick anecdotes
○ The mistaken racial identity of Kristen J
Warner
○ Current research--interracial pairings
and reading/writing ‘race’ in fanfiction

8. Author’s view on the survey results
Different cultural norms
and perceptions impact
results
● Category of ‘class’ is not feasible
● ‘freedom of speech’ as a concept is
not universal
● Anxieties over technology and data
exploitation

9. AIM – The Aggregator Perspective – Tash Edmonds
• Require support to source diverse and representative
content
• Common barriers found within metadata and
discovery
• Need to align author identity metadata with DEI
initiatives
• Additional concerns over outdated terminology in
discovery systems and taxonomies
What libraries are telling us

10. AIM – The Aggregator Perspective – Tash Edmonds
• Enable discovery of expert voices by more than name and affiliation
• Describe and market titles so relevant content is delivered to researchers and libraries
• Represent values of the business, content providers, authors and our customers
• Support inclusive collection development
Considerations
• Legal and ethical
• Role of the aggregator in the discussion – help not hinder
• Ensuring reliability and consent of identification source
• Creating and maintaining robust internal systems to manage evolving identity taxonomies
Challenges

11. AIM – The Aggregator Perspective – Tash Edmonds
11
Aggregator view on survey results
• Survey comments indicative of our own
hopes and concerns
• Country of origin, race, ethnicity and
gender our most requested identities for
collection development
• Continue to work with publishers and
libraries to improve content discovery
• Further develop proprietary taxonomy
using advice from our international DEI
Advisory Board