Stereotypes In Lady Oracle By Margaret Atwood

Stereotypes In Lady Oracle By Margaret Atwood
I have always wondered, why women accept being treated as objects? Since long time, women have suffered aggressions, insults and humiliation by
men, becoming puppets of them. In this novel we can see that the perfect woman image for men is the one who has a thin body. Why thin? I believe
that a thin woman can be as good as a fat one. I don't understand why society stereotypes a fat body as the worse thing in the world. Worse is to
pretend to be someone you're not or presume more than what you have. Lady Oracle, demonstrate that becoming fat is a rebellion act against the
inequality of genre. We can see it particularly with the main character, Joan's weight breaks with the established standards: "I swelled visibly,
relentlessly, before her very eyes, I rose like dough, my body advanced inch by inch towards her across the dining–room table, in this at least I was un
defeated"(Atwood, 76). As we can see, Atwood utilize some rhetoric figures to emphasize the thoughts of the protagonist. But she was not just going
against society, also to contradict her mother. If we analyze this quote: "I had defeated her: I wouldn't ever let her make me over in her image, thin...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Remember at the begging, Joan start narrating her "fakes death". Well, the name that she takes in her new life is her aunt's name. After the death of
her aunt, Joan decides to move on and start a new life. With the money her aunt left to her, Joan is able to go to England. When she arrives to the
"new life", she meets a man name Paul. Seriously with this I confirm my thought that all happen for a reason. Paul is a man who changes the attitudes
of Joan drastically. Well, he treat her as a child, something that Joan wanted since she started the adolescence. "You must sit down...brought me some
tea and a black–currant tart, slightly squashed. His manner was warm but patronizing, as if I were an unusually inept child" (Atwood,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Oedipus Tragic Flaw Analysis
Oedipus the king has a temper "tragic flaw" it's an anger that leads him to many unknown problems due to killing his own father, king Laius, which
happened at the crossroads, however his violent temper has a good candidate in it which is due to a tragic flaw. Furthermore, Oedipus has "Pride"
which leads to identifying himself as a good character. Oedipus main downfall unwillingness leads to his faithfully fate. Many people don't like him
and accuse him of many things that he hasn't done. Yet, many people support him likeJocasta they encourage him to keep going forward and keep
being open–minded, not to measure himself, and to never give up. However, due to many things he has been accused of Jocasta comforts him by
telling him that there are no truth in oracles prophets and she has plenty of proof. Furthermore, a long time ago an oracle told Laius a story that
supposedly his own son would kill him, yet results came in and said he and Jocasta gave their monthly old son of a shepherd to leave on a hillside to
die with a pin between its ankles. However, he was killed by three robbers not by his own son, one of Jocasta proofs that the oracle was wrong.
Something about her story puts Oedipus into trouble, she said that Laius was killed at an intersection where three roads meet, which reminds Oedipus
of an incident that happened in the past. Furthermore, when he killed a stranger at an intersection where three roads met, he then asks her to describe
Laius, and her details match his memory. However, Jocasta tells him that the only witnesses there are to Laius's death is a herdsman, which he swore
that robbers killed him. Oedipus then witnesses and interrogates them. However, Jocasta helps him to be the bigger and better person. While Jocasta
and Oedipus wait for the man to arrive, they ask why he seems so troubled. Oedipus then talks to her about the story of his past. When he was young
an old man he met told him that he wasn't his father's son. He then automatically and asked his parents about that and of course they denied it.
However, he still had a doubt about that and wondered why the man told him that. Yet, he eventually went to an oracle to find out the truth to see who
his real parents were. When he

The Role of Oracles and Dreams in Herodotus' the History...
usChristina Bramanti
October 5, 2012
CLAS 20105
The Role of Oracles, and Dreams in Herodotus' The History
Throughout Herodotus' The History, Oracles, and dreams play an important role. While the gods have almost no presence throughout the book, the
Oracles and/or dreams are linked to many of the major events. We first encounter the Oracles in Book I, when Croesus asks the Oracles atDelphi if he
should attack the Persians, the Oracle replies telling him (in a very ambiguous way) that if he fights, he will destroy a great empire (7.12).
Unbeknownst to Croesus, the empire he will destroy will be his own. However, this answer from the Oracle is one of the things that convinces Croesus
to attack Persia, in a manner jumpstarting the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Dreams also play a particular role in Herodotus' The History. Like the Oracles, dreams influence people to make certain decisions. And like the
situations with the Oracles, fate also plays a role. These people had these specific dreams because they were fated to make said decisions. The dreams,
possibly, were the only ways to convince them, or to ensure that fate run its course.
So was the case with Astyages, who dreamt of his daughter, Mandane, "making water so greatly that she filled all his city and flooded...all of Asia"
(1.107). Astyages immediately went to visit the Magi who were dream interpreters. Fearing that this meant she would have more powerful offspring,
he married her, not to a Mede, but to a lesser, Persian man. However, fate would not back down. After his daughter was married to the Persian,
Astyages had another dream. "...It seemed to him that out of his daughter's privy parts there grew a vine, and the vine shaded all Asia" (1.108).
Astyages again went to dream interpreters among the Magi, who suggested that this dream meant that Mandane – who was now, in fact, pregnant –
would have a child who would become king in the place of Astyages. This is the point in the story where fate really comes into play.
Much like the story of Oedipus, attempting to control or otherwise act in a way opposed to, fate seems to be exactly what allows for fate to run its
course. Astyages takes the child, a son, when it is born and

How Did Socrates Corrupt Youth
Socrates was a wise philosophical man that was in search of the truth about wisdom. However, his answers of true wisdom and his opinions lead
Socrates to be brought up on charges. Many viewed him as a corrupting influence on other people accused him of forcing his ideas upon others.
Socrates was charged with two charges, the first one was impiety and the second one was the corrupting of the youth. Socrates responded to these
charges by denying the fact that his wisdom and philosophical activities had caused no harm to the society he lives in. Socrates defense against the
charge that he does not believe in the gods is honest and sufficient. Socrates states that the accusers are in the wrong for accusing Socrates that they are
even contradicting... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates questions Meletus, one of the men that accused him of corrupting the youth. During this trial, he says that Meletus only pretends to care and
be serious of things he has never cared about before. Socrates asks him, "do you not regard it as most important how the youth will be the best
possible?" (24 d), and Meletus does not respond at first but then says that the judges and the laws are what shapes the youth to make them better.
Socrates defends himself by saying that the only reason they brought him to trial is because they did not like Socrates ignorance and find him
irritating. Socrates was the only one who cared about teaching the youth because he understood that they were important and they were the future. "For
it would be a great happiness for the young if one alone corrupts them, while the others benefit them. But in fact, Meletus, you have sufficiently
displayed that you never yet gave any thought to the young. And you are making your own lack of care plainly apparent, since you have cared nothing
about the things for which you bring me in here." (25

How Is Oedipus Selfish
Oedipus' inner blindness leads to his status as a static character and more ultimately, his downfall. His hubris and oblivion are what lead him down the
path of self–destruction. He constantly refuses to listen to what anyone has to say and this prevents him from ever changing within. Oedipus is a static
character who shows the same consistent personality traits throughout his life. He is selfish, oblivious and callow and men like him do not always
change; sometimes, this can cost them. Oedipus is blind in many ways before he physically blinds himself. He shows excessive pride throughout the
entirety of the play. He believes that he is better than everyone else. He even goes as far as to mock the gods by saying that he did not need them to
solve the sphinx's riddle. He believes that he is above even the gods.
He is oblivious to all the things people tell him. If he doesn't want to hear it, he will not listen. When Teiresias tells Oedipus that he is the killer of
King Laius, he does not believe it. Tiresias clearly and bluntly states the entire truth to Oedipus and Oedipus shows complete and utter disbelief toward
all of it, for the simple fact that he does not want it to be the truth. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He instantly turns on Creon. Keep in mind that Creon is supposed to be Oedipus' best friend. Oedipus assumes that Creon is trying to take his place
as king and accuses him of treachery and treason by making an accusation that he had brought Teiresias there just to make him look bad and make
him believe that he had killed Laius. Creon naturally defends himself by saying that he has no need to be king. He feels no desire for the throne. He
already receives the same amount of respect as Oedipus, minus all the anxiety of his responsibilities. He was completely happy with the way things
had been and Oedipus just needed someone to give blame

The Oracle Financial Cloud Based Upon Multiple Variables...
The oracle financial cloud based upon multiple variables that use technology to impact the business world. Cloud computing is an idea that is
increasingly turning into reality for many companies.
Enterprises, both big and small, are evaluating cloud computing and moving IT infrastructure to the cloud. To achieve the financial goals of the any
organization and be prosperous in today's highly aggressive market; therefore businesses must have services that are secure, reliable, scalable and
available anywhere at any given time, on any device – all while it lowers cost and minimizes integration complexity.
The need to have a more modern, consumer–like experience has raised the bar for most businesses to deliver a level of consumer experience that is
only found in enterprise applications that can be intelligent, information driven, social and mobile, while providing actionable awareness that pushes
collaboration within secure business procedures. In addition, it offers an integrated financial management suite that is designed to streamline, automate
and control an organization's financial management processes from end to end. Moreover, Oracle has leveraged its vast applications to provide
knowledge to modern finance on four key points: simplify, accelerate, collaborate and control.
To begin with, Simplify–Oracle combines its most fundamental components across Oracles financial solutions to achieve a comprehensive solution
that enables its finance professionals with the right

Plato's Apology: Defense Of Socrates
1.From reading "Apology: Defense of Socrates" by Plato, one of the main beliefs Socrates repeatedly stated through out the reading was that one is
wiser than others when he does not think he knows something, that he does not know of. Having that said, I think that the kind of wisdom Socrates
could be referring to here is the wisdom of being humble over the knowledge you carry, or you think you carry. In other words, not taking too much
pride in the knowledge you think you have, because therefore you are not seen as wise person anymore, instead you are seen as foolish, because one
person, no matter how wise they are, cannot know everything. As for example, with death, Plato states in his writing, "After all, gentlemen, the fear of
death ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
No one knows, you see, whether death may not in fact prove the greatest of all blessings for mankind; but people fear it as if they knew it for certain
to be the greatest of evils. And yet to think that one knows what one does not know must surely be the kind of folly which is reprehensible" (28).
Many of us tend to want to prove that one knows what the future holds for us, but only the wisest people, like Socrates, accepts that he is not wise
enough to predict such events, making him not even try to claim that he does. Plato states, "Because neither of us, I dare say, knows anything of
great value, but he thinks he knows a thing when he doesn't; whereas I neither know it in fact, nor think that I do" (23). It was also proved by Plato's
interviews to a group of politicians, poets, and craftsmen that "those held in the highest esteem were practically the most defective, whereas men who
were supposed to be their inferiors were much better off in respect of understanding" (Plato 24). Being the wise person he is did

Analysis Of Plato's Apology
"Wonder is the beginning of wisdom." (Socrates–cite website). Socrates was the wisest person in Athens according to the Oracle of Delphi. In Plato's
Apology we read about Socrates' journey to find a man wiser than him, his trail, and finally his death.
First we will discuss what the Oracle of Delphi is. The Oracle of Delphi is a shrine for the Greek gods that the pageants worshiped. In the Apology the
Oracle of Delphi tells Socrates that he is the wisest man in Athens. Socrates was shocked about this statement so he went on a journey to find a man
wiser than him. During his journey Plato goes around Athens and ask the wisest people he knew questions about logic but realized that they are not
very wise themselves. This is how it is explained ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The first charge against him was that he was corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates responds to this charge by saying "it takes more than one
person to corrupt the youth", and that the youth are eager to learn. The second charge was not believing in the Gods. "But this is just the ingenious
riddle of which I was speaking: the demigods or spirits are gods, and you say first that I don't believe in gods, and then again that I do believe in
gods; that is, if I believe in demigods. For if the demigods are the illegitimate sons of gods, whether by the Nymphs or by any other mothers, as is
thought, that, as all men will allow, necessarily implies the existence of their parents". (The Apology). The people of Athens only put him on trial to get
him to stop pestering

What Was Oedipus's Downfall
Oedipus has had a continuous downfall since the beginning of his life. It is not until the Messenger from Corinth visits, the Shepherd that gave
Oedipus to his adoptive parents is questioned, and the acknowledgment of who he is that Oedipus's downfall really begins. Oedipus fell from a King
that everyone respected and loved to a murderer of his father and a husband to his mother (Scene 4.1118–1123). His downfall was not just his
reputation being ruined amongst his people, but his mental and physical well–being ruined as well. Oedipus is described as not being himself and
"Hunting the wife who was not his wife, the mother/Whose womb had carried his own children and himself/I do not know: it was none of us aided
him/But surely one of the gods

Epictetus Vs Socrates
One piece of advice offered by Epictetus that Socrates would agree with is that "if you want to make progress, let people think you are a mindless
fool about externals, and do not desire a reputation for knowing about them" (#13). Socrates does not try to convince others that he has supreme
knowledge or expertise, nor does he have the desire too. However, since the oracle proclaimed that Socrates is the wisest of all men, he repeatedly
proves to pompous individuals that they are not wise, even though they think they are. Socrates is considered so wise because he consciously admits
what he doesn't know, rather than lying to himself like most other men (Apology, 22 d–e). Socrates would also approve of Epictetus' statements
regarding death.

Oracle Of Delphi To Chaerephon About Socrates
Study Question One: What is the message from the Oracle of Delphi to Chaerephon about Socrates? Early in Socrates testimony he refers to a witness
by the name Chaerephon, he is described as an early friend of Socrates and to all those present at the trial. It is mentioned that he was exiled; however,
he returned. According to Socrates, Chaerephon acted in a rash manner; thus, Chaerephon boldly asks the oracle of Delphi whether any man is wiser
than Socrates. The Oracle of Delphi, also known as the Pythian prophetess, responded saying there was "no man wiser" (Pojman and Vaughn). We then
learn that Chaerephon was dead, but his brother, who was present in court, could testify in support of the claim.
Study Question Three: How does Socrates ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
I think of arrogance as excessive pride or dramatization with one's own achievements. The only blatant case of arrogance to me is when he
proposes "maintenance in the Prytaneum to be a just return" (Pojman and Vaughn). Looking more into the Prytaneum, I found this is where
victorious Olympic athletes ate for free; for Socrates to say he deserves free meals for the rest of his life does sound conceited. This feeling must
have been shared by the jury, by comparing the first vote, determining if he was guilty, to the second vote, which determined his punishment, nearly
80 of those who voted for him to be "not guilty" supported the death penalty shortly after he made that remark. It's hard to say if he was serious
though, all we get is a synopsis, his gesticulations could have indicated that he was trying to lighten up the atmosphere with a joke. Some may
consider the anecdote about him finding out he was the wisest man alive from the God of Delphi to be arrogant; however, he wasn't the one who
seeked the answer, it was his friend Chaerephon. Moreover, he was skeptical to find out that was the case, so he immediately set out to provide counter
evidence to the Oracle. Lastly, emphatically advocating to reproach those who pretend to know something when they know nothing makes it hard to
say he was arrogant; I see his behavior as a healthy skeptic who was hungry for the truth. The death penalty was absolutely unnecessary; unfortunately,
he had more enemies in the jury than friends. As history shows unconventional views are generally suppressed by those with a vested interest, those
who brought charges against him along with his other enemies enjoyed the superior social status that came with inflating one's wisdom, and

Myth Of Mekos
Mekos, a warrior among gods, served a series of oracles known as the Congregation of Intellect. After being struck by a course of flashbacks it was
revealed to him that he was a prosperous war hero who led his army of Aspians to many victories. He was struck down by a ruthless king. During his
siding with death, the oracles resurrected him with an agreement for him to serve the Congregation of Intellect. These oracles created the Law of
Burdening which cast a source of dark magic onto every entity in the land. This magic bound all the organisms including humans to have deformities
which either enhanced or decreased their physical and mental capabilities causing them to all be equal. The oracles created this so they would divide
the power between... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His journey to their lair is met by an immense chasm. Crevices through the ground showed streaks of lava creating bubbles and slowly rising. The oracle
's know Mekos is coming for them. "SHOW YOURSELVES." "ANSWER TO YOUR MALEVOLENT ACTS AND FACE JUSTICE BY THE
RIGHTEOUS GODS!" Earth beneath Mekos starts to tremble and the rocks above him begin to collapse. They keep falling until the ground splits
and separates. There is no more rock to jump on until a large chunk of it falls into the lava flowing to a pit. Mekos immediately unsheathes his
chain only to hook it to a massive boulder and swing across it to the still ground. A debri of hardened igneous that glimmered steamed his way.
Mekos swings his blades and demolishes the barrier. A deep hallway is revealed behind him. He proceeds to run down the hallways not hesitating to
destroy any relics found. Finding the secret door to the lair he doesn't knock. Instead he bashes it open with his foot revealing a small room with
dimly lit candles. A mysterious figure appears from the darkness. "The oracles are not here..." "They have left me to destroy you. You will not stop
them!" with no words Mekos swiftly sways his hand, disemboweling the beast that proposed threat to his quest to defeating the oracles and restoring
the land to its original

Oracles Essay
Ascendants to the Great Seat of Cymurri had for a long time imported their Oracles solely from the Ivory Incubarium, high in the empty pinnacles of
the Zealot's Range, with an up front installment set aside a few minutes of the fetus' origination and the adjust surrendered on conveyance of a develop,
all around prepared prophet to the Gate of the Graven King.
Raised by same Pallid Sybils who reared and birthed them, every single endorsed Oracle were moored by their physical frame to the world we a large
portion of us share; in the mean time, their souls wandered far abroad, scarcely bound by the airiest astral umbilicus. From such astronomical roamings
the prophets would return, talking expressions of flame with tongues of tissue. Their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Graven King, in any case, was an animal of extraordinary reasonableness. He questioned the dedication of his overprudent Advisors. AnOracle of
such irregularity, he contemplated, should be utilized as a weapon to grow his area. He along these lines downgraded his hesitant instructors and
positioned Nerif next to him. With just a limit comprehension of Nerif's ability, he strongly expressed the results he wanted, and urged Nerif into
articulating his desires as prediction.
At initially, everything was well. The Last Graven King bragged that by receiving Fate's pet, he had made a toy of Fate itself. He ought to have
taken it as a notice then when, on the eve of his attack of the Unsated Satrap's domain, he endeavored to pressure a forecast of certain triumph from
his Oracle, just to hear Nerif unobtrusively murmur, "It could go in any case." No firmer proclamation might he be able to drive from Nerif's lips. In
any case, the King was certain about his armed force. The Satrapy was landlocked, inadequately furnished, and closed off from every single
conceivable partner. He took "It could go in any case" to demonstrate that with strategic may on his side, there was little hazard in his arrangement.
Obviously, we now realize that he ought to have taken the sayer's words all the more truly. Indeed, even with watchful investigation of the Annotated
Annals of If, what

Feminism in both "Hamlet" and "Lady Oracle" Essay
The literary works, Hamlet and Lady Oracle, chart both the life's course of their main characters and underline the protagonist's trajectory in some
decisive moments of their existence, when both of them, Hamlet and Joan Foster, need to take some decisions which may change their destinies. In
this brief essay I will try to point out similarities and differences between these two stories taking into consideration a feminist approach. First and
foremost I would like to mention what do I mean by feminist approach and how do I intend to apply it to my essay. Feminism is a political discourse
aimed at equal rights and legal protection for women. It involves various movements, theories and philosophies, all concerned with issues of gender ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In Hamlet the story takes place in a historical past after some important events which take place around the year 1600 in the final years of the reign of
Queen Elizabeth I, who had been the monarch of England for more than forty years and was then in her late sixties. The play, set in Denmark, recounts
how Prince Hamlet exacts revenge on his uncle Claudius, who has murdered Hamlet's father, the King, and then taken the throne and married Gertrude,
Hamlet's mother. The play vividly charts the course of real and feigned madness–from overwhelming grief to seething rage–and explores themes of
treachery, revenge, incest, and moral corruption. On the other hand, there is Lady Oracle.This novel has been written during the second–wave of
feminist movement; second–wave feminism refers to the period of activity in the early 1960s and lasting through the late 1980s. This feminist–wave
movement saw women's cultural and political inequalities as inextricably linked and encouraged women to understand aspects of their personal lives
as deeply politicized and as reflecting sexist power structures. Atwood's novel is a post–modern novel written in 1976, whose heroine, Joan Foster, is a
woman who has faked her own death in order to escape the difficulties created by her compulsive creation of multiple personalities for herself. The

Hybridity Of Aunty
nothing to do with his actions for choices, in my opinion, it resulted in the choices of his mother and Ifemelu. Aunty Uju seemed to control the way
Dike should act resulting in him not knowing who he is a person, someone who is Nigerian or someone who is black in the United States. This led
Dike to conforming to certain stereotypes, such as what an African–American man should speak and dress, partly due to friends, but also because of the
actions of his mother. Unfortunately, his inability to be able to self–identify, lead to him having an overdose and almost killing himself. After his
overdose, Ifemelu blames Aunty Uju and states, "You told him what he wasn't, instead of what he was" (470). Although overtime after visiting Ifemelu
in Nigeria he seemed to be happier and possibly wanting to change locations.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There is also hybridity not only with the individuals but the political, social and economic life of the country as well. The primary example is when
their conversation between Obinze, Kosi and their elitist friends where they were deciding what schools they would want their children to attend, most
of the schools were based off either British or French education. Obinze seeming annoyed with the conversation states, "Didn't we all got to schools that
taught the Nigerian Curriculum" (35). The hybridity of the actual country is mostly seen when Ifemelu returns to Nigeria, where she is surprised of the
modernity of the country, but because of her hybridity, she also dislikes how the country has not modernized in other

Oedipus The King
The irony in Oedipus the King highlights certain weaknesses in Oedipus, such as his hubris and stubbornness, and foreshadow Oedipus's realization of
his tragic fate.
Irony throughout the play emphasizes certain weaknesses in Oedipus's character such as hubris and stubbornness. These traits enable Oedipus to refuse
the advice of his peers. For example. earlier in the play, Oedipus states to the people of Thebes that those who know the identity of Laius's murderer
should tell him everything. Yet when Tiresias tells him thetruth, he refuses Tiresias's advice and eventually the advice of others throughout the play.
Although Oedipus's determination to pursue the truth can be seen as admirable, the refusal to listen to such advice, especially from

Sixth Epigrams Essay
In the sixth epigram, the speaker witnesses a beautiful lady. We notice that the last epigram takes place within nature as the other two did. The
speaker states, "At last so faire a Ladie did I spie, / That in thinking on hir I burne and quake" (Spenser 1–2). As we are coming towards the last of
epigrams to be analyzed in a Theatre for Worldlings, we come to recognize thatthe speaker has been heartbroken twice in the previous epigrams.
However, once he or she sees a "Ladie" we understand that the speaker is possibly male and that witnessing the woman's beauty makes him "burne
and quake" as he takes notice of her beauty. The speaker's obvious feelings regarding the woman leave him to take notice of her alluring looks which
highlights the speaker interest in vanity. Even though the speaker has already been heartbroken, he cannot look past her charm and elegance as she
walks, "On herbes and floures she walked pensiuely" (Spenser 3). By stating that the lady is walking pensively, the language can suggest that she is
looking inward instead of looking towards external forces such as religion that can save her. The speaker states, "White seemed her robes, yet woven
so they were" which indicates that at first glance the lady seems pure. However, we notice that the lady's rope only "seemed" white which further
indicates towards the reader that something bad is likely to occur in this idealized reality that the speaker is portraying. In the next few lines, we take
notice of the

Leontes Irrational Judgment
Everyone on this earth shows immoral actions and shows irrational judgement from time to time. The Winter's Tale, by William Shakespeare, shows
this through Leontes. The Winter's Tale illustrates that all of Leontes' immoral decisions and irrational accusations originate from private judgement.
Shakespeare shows this by Leontes failing to see the whole and examine the past, to trust the wisdom of authority, and to see recurring patterns and to
trust the many pieces of evidence and testimonies of witnesses that converge to verify the truth. The first point is how Leontes fails to see the whole
and examine the past. Leontes believes that his wife, Hermione, and childhood friend, Polixenes, are having an affair. He believes this because
Polixenes agrees to stay in Sicily only when Hermione asks him to stay. Leontes ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Antigonus, one of Leontes' servants, states "Be certain what you do, sir, lest your justice Prove violence; in the which three great ones suffer,
Yourself, your queen, your son." (2.1.153) This quote is Antigonus telling Leontes that he is overreacting. Antigonus is so sure he is right that he
says "If it prove She's otherwise, I'll keep my stables where I lodge my wife; I'll go in couples with her; Than when I feel and see her no farther trust
her; For every inch of woman in the world, Ay, every dram of woman's flesh is false, If she be." (2.1.160) Paulina, another one of Leontes' servants,
becomes angry towards her king. She says "Nay, rather, good my lords, be second to me: Fear you his tyrannous passion more, alas, Thanthe queen's
life? a gracious innocent soul, More free than he is jealous." (2.3.31) Paulina is convinced that Hermione is innocent. She also tells Leontes "Not so: I
am as ignorant in that as you In so entitling me, and no less honest Than you are mad; which is enough, I'll

A Short Story : A Story?
The next morning, Heather was walking with her maid. She'd been to visit Lady Lucy, and was now returning to join her mother for a visit to
Cousin Milton this afternoon. She returned to the townhouse and changed, meeting her mother in the foyer as their carriage arrived. It was a short
jaunt to their old home. Heather stepped out of the carriage and looked up at the familiar faГ§ade. Her mother took her hand, and they shared the
same worried expression. Cousin Milton had said the meeting was about an urgent matter. Heather loathed the idea of meeting with him for any
matter after the way he had treated them. She understood his need to protect his family, but that didn't explain his heartlessness. The door opened
and Milton's new butler showed them to the drawing room. A pot of tea was served, and then Milton arrived, looking shaken and pale. Heather's
mother set her tea down in alarm and stood. "What has happened? Is it young Debra? Corrinne?" Milton shook his head. "My daughters and my
wife are in peak health, I assure you." He motioned for her to sit. "I'm afraid this meeting is not for a pleasant matter." Heather watched her cousin
carefully, sensing that he was hiding something. She took her mother's hand and squeezed it in warning. "You said it was urgent, go on and tell us
what it is." He pulled on his cravat. "Well, it isn't for me to tell. Lord Brightly–" Her mother shot to her feet. "You were to have nothing to do with Lord
Brightly. You know he is a snake."

Emotions In Sophocles 'Oedipus The King'
Man's emotions can cloud their judgement and rational thought. Oedipus Rex, from the play Oedipus Rex, is portrayed at the beginning of the play as
a king that is well respected among his citizens, though his dangerous emotions keep him from being the great king everyone in Thebes thinks he
is.вњ” The character of Oedipus Rex is someone that cares a lot for his people possessing great intelligence, however, is hindered by his inability to
keep his pride and wrath in check.вњ”
Oedipus possess intelligence,вњ” which he uses to help his people to the best of his abilities. Oedipus's intelligence is evident right at the beginning of
the play when the priest mentions Oedipus is the one who "saved [them]/ From the Sphinx" (848).вњ” None of the people ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Oedipus's conversation with Teiresias is the turning point in Oedipus's character, showing that Oedipus possesses a darker sideвњ” that destroys all the
good he has built. When the two first start talking with each other, they are polite with each other though things quickly dissolve when Teiresias refuses
to tell Oedipus the truth. Oedipus becomes enraged and quickly blames Teiresias for aiding in the murder of Laios. Oedipus is swift to lose himself to
emotion, which impedes on his ability to think reasonably about the situation at hand. When Teiresais finally states that Oedipus is the killer, Oedipus
quickly refutes, saying that Teiresias has "spat out infamy" (857). Oedipus wastes little effort in belittling Teiresias's statement and does not give is a
second thought. The fact that Oedipus does not consider that he is the murderer shows that even with his intelligence, his wrath blinds him from seeing
the truth and contemplating if the situation is possible. Oedipus sees himself as a great, caring, king towards his people and can not accept that is his
anything less than that. With his argument with Creon in the second scene, Oedipus is unwilling to accept any of Creon's point, despite the fact that
Creon has logic behind his words. Oedipus responds with only his emotions,вњ” stating, "it is [Creon's] death [he]

Under the Night Sky, Story Excerpt
After spending a whole night under the sky, my clothing became quite dirty. Fortunately I brought some change, but I hadn't found a place to dress
myself yet. Furthermore, I also wanted to take a bath. This morning my stomach went to a strike. Mrs. Belgium's waffles only survived for one
day, so I had to shake my brain to find food. The thing was... Where is this? If I have to describe, I was in a glamour city. A city filled with many
artistic ornaments, and people passing around the streets (that made me feel even clumsier). In a place, I found a free newspaper stand that also
provides free map, tend for the tourists, it seemed. I took one. After examining the map... France!? I'm in France! Ah, who cares? Actually, knowing
where I was now wouldn't help too much. The thing I should do is...look for a place for obtaining money and food. I checked my bag. What should I
sell now to survive...? I decided to sell my phone. That hand phone was turned off, and the trademark (as with my other belongings) weren't clear
where it came from. People should wanting to pay this, I suppose...though. I found an electronic shop, and obtained some buck of franc after a lot
negotiating. With that money, I went to the minimarket to buy the cheapest bread and a box of milk. Alright, for this moment, I was saved. Now... I
found a very beautiful park, and found a public toilet nearby. ––––––––––––––––––––––––– Refreshed, I sat on the bench and re–examined my map.
Can I find my position and

Socrates Defense Essay
The accusers, Meletos, Anytos, and Lycon, are all young and trying to make a name for themselves. They begin by telling everyone not to be
deceived and to take caution because Socrates is a "clever speaker". According to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that he
speaks the truth. He is on trial for two items, which include, corrupting the youth and impiety. Socrates tells everyone that he has no experience with
the court and he will speak the way he is used to by being honest and direct. Socrates explains that his behavior is from the oracle of Apollo at Delphi.
The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. He could not believe ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The other possibility is that he does not corrupt them at all. Third, in frustration, Meletos accuses Socrates of being nonbeliever, at the same time he
claims Socrates teaches new gods. Thus, Meletos contradicts himself. Socrates argues that fear of death is foolish, because it is not known if death is a
good or an evil, thus there is no reason to fear death. Socrates claims that his mission is in service to God.
Socrates does not throw himself on the mercy of the court. Many would bring in their children to win pity. However, he does mention that he has three
young children and he tells the jury about their responsibility to ignore the appeals to pity and judge the truth. Despite Socrates' speech, the jury finds
him guilty as charged. Meletos proposes death as punishment. Instead, Socrates proposes retirement in a home for benefactors of the state. He
examines possible penalties: death, imprisonment, a fine, or exile. The jury sentences him to death. Socrates remarks that his internal, guiding voice,
which at times would warn him to refrain from certain actions, had not once interrupted his actions in his defense. If Socrates finds that they believe
themselves to be wiser than they really are, he points out their mistake, thus educates them and himself.
[Socrates], " For if you put me to death, you will not easily find such another, really like something stuck on the state by the god,

Who Was Responsible For Oedipus's Downfall
Oedipus' stubbornness led to his downfall because he thought he was always correct and didn't like listening to others. He was a static character
because he was overconfident and refused to believe anyone's opinion above his own . By not listening to anyone when the truth came out, he was hurt
emotionally and physically. Oedipus was a man of power and wealth who suddenly falls.
Oedipus saves Thebes from the curse of the Sphinx and becomes the king. Oedipus travels to Delphi to speak with the oracle to learn the truth about his
parents. The oracle tells him that he is going to murder his father and have sexual feelings for his mother. Oedipus thinks his parents live in a different
town but they do not. Oedipus killed his father and married his mother. Now Creon returns with the oracle's news in order for the plague to ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Oedipus asked Tiresias for help but Tiresias refused to tell what he knows. Oedipus begins accusing Tiresias of Laius's death. In turn, Teiresias
accuses Oedipus of being the killer and talks about the bad things that are going to happen to Oedipus. By Oedipus being short tempered he becomes
angry and tells Tiresias to leave. Jocasta tells Oedipus not to worry about the prophecies because she was once told a prophecy and it didn't come true.
Oedipus is stressed out about Jocasta's remarks because he killed a man he thought was Laius.
Oedipus then looks for the shepherd. Oedipus learned from an oracle that he was to kill his father and marry his mother. Jocasta has told him not to
worry about the prophecies. The messenger tells Oedipus that his real parents aren't Polybus and Merope, and that the messenger gave Oedipus to a
couple when the shepherd offered him an abandoned baby. Oedipus wants to know more about his birth which is a result of him being stubborn.
Jocasta wants him to stop. At first, the shepherd doesn't want to tell Oedipus about it however, he tells what he

Analysis of [My Lady Walks...] Essay
When Henry Constable attempts to describe his "lady", he paints the reader an image of love, pureness, and of natural beauty. In his sonnet, "[My
lady's presence makes the roses red]", Constable talks to the various body parts of his "lady", claiming that they inspire envy into flowers and that his "
lady" is in fact the source of the power for the flowers. Using this personification of the flowers, Constable shapes his sonnet as one that is
complementing and treasuring his "lady", however, a deeper examination into the tone of his work shows a much more intriguing side of this sonnet
and of Constable's feelings toward his "lady". A line–by–line dissection of this sonnet shows the multitude of personification and imagery used by Henry
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This creates distance between the speaker of the poem, who is assumed Constable, and this god–like woman. It is then mentioned that this woman is
also the catalyst for the purple color of the violets, though unlike the previous flowers, this is not due to an emotion, but rather "the blood she made
my heart to shed" (line 8). This is the first mention of beauty not directly caused from the woman, but rather a product of the woman's actions onto the
speaker. This plays a critical role in the tone of the sonnet and the location in the sonnet (end of the second quatrain) is a hint to the importance of this
line. The third quatrain returns to the power this woman has on the beauty of the flowers. In lines 9–10, all of the flowers owe their sweet smell to the
breath of this woman and then in lines 11–12, the woman has the actual power to grow the flowers. She is once again displayed with godlike powers
and the ability to warm the ground and encourage the growth of the seeds simply by looking at the flowers. Constable's "lady" is not only the reason
why flowers became beautiful, but is not the explanation for why the flowers even exist. In the last couplet, the second mention of beauty not directly
caused by this woman is present. In lines 13–14, the key ingredient for flower–growth is supplied not by the woman's beauty, but rather from the tears
that she

Fall Of Oedipus Rex
Carved into the entrance of the Oracle at Delphi are two phrases, words of advice and caution for "Know yourself" and "Nothing too much". Delphi
plays an important part in the story of Oedipus, the oracle is where the all–important prophecy is twice delivered and where the kings of Thebes seek
solutions for the people's torments. Oedipus's fatal flaw is that by seeking to fulfill his duty as king and his own natural curiosity he has learned too
much about himself.
These closing lines follow the same general path as the play itself. First it regresses to Oedipus's cleverness and strong leadership of Thebes,
reminding the audience of the great king he had been before his fall.
"Dwellers in native Thebes, behold this Oedipus
Who solved the famous riddle, was your mightiest man.
What citizen on his lot did not with envy gaze?"
In class, we've talked about how Aristotle viewed the tragedy as the way in which the average Athenian could feel horrific and extreme emotions
they could not in their daily lives, so they could leave feeling cleansed. Oedipus Rex would infect its spectators with a sense of dread of the inevitable
reveal to Oedipus of his true parentage. People like to feel dread in their entertainment. As they say everyone loves a good trainwreck, they love them
even more when they can see them coming. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They knew that what they were walking into. They knew that Oedipus was the killer he sought. They knew that he had married his mother. They
knew that the blind prophet Tiresias was telling the truth. For the audience, this play is waiting game a slow horrific reveal. When they see Oedipus
presented in the first act of the play as a wise and noble king, they know they're going to watch his family, his kingdom, and very sanity be torn
asunder. They're watching an ancient Titanic. They know the iceberg is coming, they're just waiting for those on the ship to see it too, so the ship starts

Socrates' Trial Essay
Socrates' Trial
In 399 B.C., Socrates, a seventy year old man, was brought to trial. He faced several accusations of different sorts. Initially, the court had pronounced
Socrates guilty. However, because the law had no penalty ordained for his offense, it was required of Socrates to propose his own penalty, or to take
the one suggested by Meletos, the death penalty. When the time had come for Socrates to state his defense, he addressed each of the accusations made
against him, one by one, in attempt to absolve himself from wrong doing. The first accusation Socrates chose to contest declared that he was a student
of natural philosophy. This meant that Socrates was believed to be one who sought to replace mythical explanations of ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
When the court called upon the parents and kinsmen of those Socrates had supposedly corrupted to testify, though many were present at the trial,
none came forward. Because of this, Socrates believed that he had not corrupted others, for if he had, they would surely seek revenge and be glad
to testify against him, given the chance. Socrates truly felt that people enjoyed listening to his stories and spending time with him. He claimed that
it was never his intention to teach anyone, only to discuss issues with those who cared to listen. Socrates was also accused of being an atheist, or
one who does not believe in a god. This indictment was contradicted as the elderly man justified to the court his belief in spirits and other gods. He
said it was not possible for a man to believe in divine things and spiritual things, as he did, and yet, not in gods and spirits and heroes. In other
words, Socrates said that the belief in qualities implied the existence of those things to which the qualities corresponded. To further illustrate this idea,
he used an example involving horsemanship, or the quality of riding horses well. If this quality existed, then horses must also exist since
horsemanship would not be possible without them. Therefore, if Socrates believed in spirits, as Meletos's affidavit affirmed, he must have also
believed in spiritual beings, or gods, as well. And because he did, Socrates could not have been an atheist after

Why Is Socrates Wrong
Socrates is known as the "father of Western philosophy". In his teachings, he encouraged people to question life and not listen to what they were told.
He inspired people to search for answers, and reject popular beliefs. As a result, Socrates was brought to trial by the dikasts (male jurors) on two
charges. Socrates had three premises that all led to the conclusion of him not being innocent and the charges being false.
First, Socrates defended himself against the charge of corrupting the youth in Athens. Socrates explained that he would be also be harming himself if
he was intentionally corrupting the youth. Socrates was surrounding himself with people who would follow his beliefs, not people he was trying to
corrupt. In the bible it says, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His father was Sophroniscus who was a stone mason. Socrates learned from his father while receiving a basic Greek education. After working for his
father for a few years he pursued philosophy. Socrates's married Xanthippe and they had three sons together. Socrates cared more about the youth of
Athens's than his own sons. This shows that Socrates was not devoted to his family, but cared about his teachings. This also proves that Socrates was
not committing a crime, but doing what he felt was his calling.
It is impossible to claim that Socrates is guilty of the crimes he was charged with. Socrates did not act intentionally. He thought he was doing what he
was called to do and felt he was inspiring people to think in a new way. His teachings go against the norm which many people did not agree with.
Socrates accepted his punishment of a death sentence (drinking hemlock) since he knew he died a hero. He showed no remorse for his actions, but
instead mocked the jurors after he was sentenced. This shows that Socrates knew his punishment was a joke since he committed no crime. Socrates
believed, even before he died that he did the right thing by speaking out against the authority. Plato said, "Such was the end of our friend, a man, I
think, who was the wisest and justest, and the best man I have ever known" (Phaedo,

Blinding Himself In Oedipus The King
In Oedipus Rex Exodos the main character Oedipus blinds himself by impelling his eyes with his wife's brooch. He does so when he sees that
Iokaste, his mother and wife , has hung herself. He can not face the cruel sight of her dead body informs of him and the realization that his horrible
fate has become true. By blinding himself, he believes that he will rid himself from seeing the evils he has suffered and caused. Oedipus' act of blinding
himself is an act of weakness, because he believes that by losing physical sight, he will also be freed from the burden of his evil doings when he
possessed eyesight. But once he loses his eyesight he gains an insight on all that he was trying to ignore. He realizes that he fulfilled his tragic fate and

How Is Socrates Worthless
Socrates has made people despise him throughout Athens partly because of his method of discussion, which entails using cross–examination to answer
important philosophical questions. He believes God has ordered him to investigate if human wisdom is worthless. (Pg 27, 23b). Socrates begins his
investigation after the Oracle of Delphi claimed that no one was wiser than Socrates. (Pg 26, 21 a–b).
At first, Socrates was confused by the claim. Socrates says that he is very conscious that he is not wise at all. (Pg 26, 21b). He reluctantly began
investigating what the Oracle meant by this grand claim. (Pg 26, 21b) Socrates believes what the Oracle actually meant when he said that no one was
wiser than Socrates, is that human wisdom is worth little or nothing and he uses his name as an example. (Pg 27, 23 b). When examining the quote,
"This man among you, mortals, is wisest who, like Socrates, understands that his wisdom is worthless." (Pg 27, 23b) one may possibly reach the
conclusion that anyone can be the wisest if they understand their wisdom is worthless.
The investigation began reluctantly, as was aforementioned, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, Socrates wants to put his trust in the justice of what he says and he does not want the people of Athens to expect to anything else. (Pg
22, 17b–c). Later on, Socrates mentions how he could have used appeals to emotion, instead of logic and honesty, to convince the people of Athens that
he was innocent but he did not because he respects them. (Pg 38, 34c–e). Following this line of logic, then one could suppose that Socrates, in fact, did
believe what the Oracle had said was true. Therefore, it should be understood that Socrates believed that his investigation was due to Oracles' claim.
Furthermore, one should not infer that Socrates was searching for the meaning of human wisdom from his

Athenian Democracy and Divination Essay
Athenian Democracy and Divination
Divination was a prevalent feature in Archaic Greece, as it provided objective advice, to assist people in making appropriate decisions in problematic
predicaments. In certain situations its ambiguity allowed decisions to be postponed, or blame to be assigned to others. Divination was also used to
explain matters that seemed unexplainable, such as crop failure or drought. This is illustrated in the Homeric epics, which depicts numerous oracle
interpreters, such as Calchas, consulting oracles on domestic, as well as, military decisions. Divination was a guiding authority in ancient society.
However, during the fifth and fourth century BC, the democratic ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, when the Athenians suggest to the Melians that they should become allies with them, against the Spartans, the Melians state:
'Гўв‚¬В¦We trust that the gods will give us fortune as good as yoursГўв‚¬В¦'[3]
In contrast, the Athenians dismiss the protection of the gods, and state:
'This kind of attitude is not going to be of much help to you in your absurd conquest for safety at the moment'.[4]
Thucydides portrays the Athenians in an arrogant light, which suggests that they will get their comeuppance for such sacrilegious opinions.
Furthermore, Thucydides also highlights the scientific approach that the Athenians have towards their domination of the Peloponnese, suggesting that
it is the 'law of nature', that they should conquer as much as they can. The rise of freethinking, that the democracy had established, had lead to the
neglect of the gods. In comparison, Xerxes, in his conquest to dominate Greece, complies with a dream that is sent from the gods, which indicates to
him and Artabanus that he should continue with the Persian wars.[5] Herodotus, writing in the early fifth century, highlights the importance of
following divination, whereas, Thucydides, writing in the later fifth century, focuses on decisions made by the people.
The Sicilian expedition, from 415BC,

Society In Pre Colonial Society
Pre–colonial society were easy to gain control of because they did not want to fight or have any war so they decided on peaceful arrangements. Their
religion also made it easy for colonizer to gain control because they were very superstitious and would always need to consult the oracle before doing
anything. Pre–colonial society was easy to gain control of since there was no one to lead the clan in unity since they went off titles. The people of
pre–colonial society were very oblivion so they would give the colonizers anything that they would ask for. The elements of pre–colonial society that
made it vulnerable to the colonizers were that they were unwilling to fight, superstitious due to their religion, had no leader and were oblivion. The
Village of Umuofia was peaceful and the people were not willing to fight for any reason and if it was possible they will rather settle it with a
peaceful settlement. In the second chapter, the village of Umuofia had a problem with the village of Mbaino since one of Umuofia daughter was
murdered in Mbaino and they gave them a choice to either have a war or to give up a fifteen–year–old and a virgin of their own to replace the
murdered daughter of their village (11). The villages did not want to go to war with Umuofia when they have a problem because that village is known
for having strong men and so they will rather decide on a peaceful settlement rather than go to war with them and loose. This gave the colonizers easy
control of the

Socrates The Apology Analysis
In this week's reading, The Apology, Socrates expresses some strong views on wisdom and death. This essay discusses some of these views,
specifically in regards to wisdom despite Socrates professions of not being wise.
In Socrates professions of not being wise, he tells a story of his quest to find one wiser then himself. Socrates explains that as he has met with men of
various professions that thought themselves to be wise and that were considered to be wise by others. Through examining those men in his various
meetings, Socrates finds that the people who have great reputations and believe themselves to be wise are actually less wise than those with lesser
reputations and less arrogance. He states, "I found that the men most in repute were all but the most foolish; and that others less esteemed were really
wiser and better.",
In many of his encounters with self–professed wise men, Socrates realized that this ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Socrates believes that real wisdom lies with the gods, and human wisdom is worthless. As an example of this, Socrates shows that when the Delphi
said that he was the wisest person, he did not mean Socrates as an individual, but instead as an example of a person who realizes that human wisdom
is worthless. Socrates claims that he gained his reputation from having human wisdom, and not from any divine intervention. However, he believes
that it is divine duty to spread wisdom. He believes this whole heartedly, stating that if were to be released with only one condition as to stop teaching
he would respond with, "Men of Athens, I honour and love you; but I shall obey God rather than you, and while I have life and strength I shall never
cease from the practice and teaching of philosophy..." It is clear as to what Socrates regards as a priority; wealth and honor are trifling concerns next to
the pursuit of truth and the perfecting of the

Wisdom In Plato's Apology
The concept of human wisdom is fundamental for an understanding of the "Apology" In Plato's writings, Socrates is describing his practice of
philosophy as a response to the Delphic oracle's famous statement that "no one is wiser" than he is. Socrates at first regards the oracle's exclamation
as a riddle, since it paints a meaning that contradicts an image of himself: "What is his riddle? I am very conscious that I am not wise at all; what then
does he mean by saying that I am the wisest?" (Dan Futter). There are interpretations that have offered insufficient resources for explaining how
Socrates could have been humanly wise before Apollo's oracle, when Socrates believed incorrectly that he was not wise at all. I argue that a reasonable
interpretation ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Oracle responded, "There was no man wiser than he". Socrates was caught by surprise because he never thought of himself as being wise wisest
of all. Socrates also explored out to test the oracle's statement, to see if what was said was in fact the truth to himself. He approached a man that was
seen by the public to be very wise and knew everything of everything. He then proceeded to question the man to see if he was a wise as he thought
himself to be. Socrates tried this method on another man, that said to be even wiser than the man before. The same thing outcome happened in both the
men. He tried this method on many people and found out that everyone wisdom (including his own) was little or worthless. Socrates learned that to
know everything, is to know nothing, and expect that not knowing everything is

A Comparative Analysis On SocratesTruth Or Lies?
"Truths? Or Lies?" "A Comparative Analysis on Socrates Argument." Arrogant is the best term to describe Socrates. Socrates was over
–critical of
others, and too fixated on his own philosophical prowess to care about the consequences his actions may have produced. As well as Socrates had the
qualities of a man who saw no error in what he was doing because he thought he was above average men, and thought he was a benefit to society against
what others claimed. These examples of Socrates' character are understood as the reason Socrates is arguing that his "old accusers" are the most
dangerous ones. Socrates has; over the years, demeaned, embarrassed, and criticized others throughout Athens. This discord created a plethora of
tension and antagonism throughout the educated community. Furthermore, this level of discord maybe interpreted as the dominant point behind
Socrates incarceration. Additionally, being the center of such conflict creates a narrative of dishonesty and dissension that Socrates accusers are using
to fuel their argument. Arguments ones based on old bias themes. Themes of greed, revenge, and contempt are the foundation to Socrates argument that
his old accusers are the most dangerous because they have had years to defame him and create a narrative that slanders his identity. The Narrative
behind Socrates' accusation is important to note. Socrates' accusers present him to society as a destructive, uncouth old man who has no regard for
anyone but

Direct and Indirect Methods of Communication with the Gods...
Both directly and indirectly, the Ancient Greeks communicated with their gods through various methods that ranged from oracles and seers to
sacrifice. The oracles of ancient Greece were consulted on issues ranging from serious community matters to private healing and served as a conduit
for communication between the mortals and the gods. Seers and oracles were an important part of Ancient Greek divination through which the gods
provided with insight of events to come. In addition, sacrifice at the hearth or public bonfires were used as a means of direct communication with the
gods in order to convey prayers to the heavens.
In terms of indirect communication with the gods, one of the most famous methods was consulting an oracle. One of the most popular oracles of
Ancient Greece was the Oracle of Delphi. People would journey for days to visit this oracle and hear the wisdom of the gods which she received
through a gift from Apollo, the god of prophecy. Receiving a prophecy was a lengthy process which started with the oracle bathing in the spring of
Castalia and drinking from another nearby stream. A priest would then determine if Apollo was present by pouring ice water on a goat. If the goat
shivered the oracle was ready to give the prophecy, and if not then Apollo was not present and therefore she was not ready to deliver a prophecy
(Pythia Prophecies, 2014). When she spoke, the pythia would be seated on a tripod over a small opening in the ground, the opening released gases

Why Is Socrates Foolish
Is the great civil rights activist a fool for being persistent in what they believe? They would argue that you are foolish in your decision to not be
persistent. So who would we be to declare Socrates a fool? Before you can truly make a solid decision on whether or not you believe Socrates is
foolish, you must have a brief understanding of Socrates' mindset. Socrates is put in a sticky position where he must decide if he will be true to
himself or to his passion. Socrates' belief in justice is firm and directly correlates to his decision to stay in Athens and be persecuted. Socrates
character is a reminder of maybe the greatest civil rights activist ever. Rather than viewing Socrates as foolish, I believe he is a hero in his own right.
After a solid understanding of what Socrates was trying to accomplish even in his willingness to accept his crueler punishment, you will see that
Socrates is far from foolish. Socrates is actually really wise, and may have just been the wisest of his time.
The question could easily be, are you a coward for not wanting to accept your fate? The most effective way to evaluate this question is if you equate
this situation to a more modern and up to date situation in your own life. People do not often give their true opinion on things until the situation ... Show
This may surprise you, but they share quite a few similarities. They both knew that they were committing what would be considered unjust acts to man.
They both had options to evade the punishments. They were both willing to sacrifice themselves for the betterment of others. This comparison may
strike many as over the top, but the point can surely be proven with their similarities. There is a principle of selflessness that is apparent in both figures,
by them both having knowledge that they could get in trouble, and continuing to do what they felt to be the right

Oedipus Opening Statement
Opening Statement: Oedipus's blindness, dethroning and his family's devastating end are all credited to his flawed character and his error in
judgment. He's foolish for thinking he could tempt fate, he's vane for thinking he can change fate and he's blind for not realizing what fate had in store
for him. His foolishness, vanity and blindness resulted in his own tragic downfall.
Evidence:
On his quest for the murderer of Lauis, people are reluctant to speak, telling Oedipus the past is better left alone. Upon speaking with Tiresias, Oedipus
is warned not to pry into theses matters and let Tiresias leave with his burden of the truth: "Let me go home; So shalt thou bear thy load most easily–If
thou wilt take my counsel– and I mine." Also in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He is blind to the truth about his own life. Tiresias, a blind prophet, points out Oedipus's blindness and plants doubt in Oedipus's mind. But Oedipus
ironically mocks the prophets loss of sight, causing the prophet to lash out explaining, "And since you have reproached me with my blindness, I say–
you have your sight, and do not see what evils are about you, nor with whom, nor in what home you are dwelling. Do you know from whom you are?
Yea, you are ignorant that to your own you are an enemy, whether on earth, alive, or under it" (15). Earlier on in their conversation he even alluded to
the truth by saying that "You live together with those nearest you, and see not in what evils plight you stand," adding also that "Your bane is no–ways
Ceron, but your own self"

Knowledge In Oedipus The King
In the Bible, the Fall happens because of the crave for knowledge by human beings. In Oedipus The King by Sophocles, Oedipus' immense need for
knowledge causes him to not be able to see clearly his foreseen destiny. He is a man who knows who he is and he knows the power of knowledge, but
this battle for knowledge that he seeks drives him to be blind. Oedipus deals with the human struggle for knowledge. Oedipus' knowledge of himself
creates a sense of superiority. Oedipus tells Tiresias, "I came, know–nothing Oedipus, I stopped the Sphinx" (24). He refers to his knowledge as the
reason Thebes is able to defeat the Sphinx. He knows that he is a smart man, he uses that reasoning to say why men cannot accuse him of murdering
Laius. Ironically,

Oracle Vapors In Ancient Greek
Exercise 2.5
In the origins of Greece, ancient Greek mythology and sources have explained incidents of the oracles of Delphi. The Delphic oracles were primarily
female prophets who were told to have inhaled certain vapors from a spring in the temple of the Greek god, Apollo, which allowed the prophets to
serve as a supernatural connection to the specific God. Despite the historical evidence that supports the idea of the mysterious oracle vapors, modern
day archeologists and geologists rejected the idea completely. Many of the rejections are due to the lack of archeological findings of vapors at Delphi.
Two men by the name of Jelle Zeilinga De Boer, a chemist, and John Hale, an archeologist, had then stepped up to study both the geological... Show
From the Greek government standpoint, if they allow De Boer and Hale to proceed with their research, they would not have to worry about cost
because both men are willing to do the research for free. If anything, the Greek governments has nothing to lose, and should not have a problem
with allowing the two scientists to carry out their research. By granting Hale and De Boer the freedom to go on with their research, Greece would
be able to gain potential benefits. If Hale and De Boer are successful in proving emission of ethylene gas from the oracle at Delphi, it will provide
Greece with more historical value and significance of the Apollo temple.
Moreover, Greece will even be able to discover whether or not the faults under Delphi contained ethylene and prove the idea that the Oracle of
Delphi may have inhaled the fumes in order to make prophecies. Lastly, to find where De Boar and Hale precisely mention the benefits and costs of
their research in their proposal, it can easily be pointed out under the "Background" section. In the "Background" section, De Boer and Hale provide
their audience with basic background information on the Oracle at Delphi, the vapors released from the temple, and evidence that goes against the
original historical Greek

Stereotypes In Lady Oracle By Margaret Atwood

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Traci Webb

More from Traci Webb (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Stereotypes In Lady Oracle By Margaret Atwood