SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Indian Journal of Textile Research
Vol. 8, December 1983, pp.105-110
Influence of Yarn and Fabric Properties on Tearing Strength of Woven Fabrics
I C SHARMA, SUDEEP MALU, PANKAJ BHOWAN & SURENDER CHANDNA
The Technological Institute of Textiles, Bhiwani 125022
Received 28 May 1983; accepted I December 1983
The effect of different yarn and fabric parameters on the tearing strength of fabrics having plain, 2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4-
thread satin weaves and woven using 52' reed and 2/40' polyester-viscose (15/85) warp has been studied. Weft count, weft twist
multiplier and pick level were varied in the plain woven fabrics. It was observed that with increase in yarn fineness, twist
multiplier and pick level, there is a decrease in tearing strength. The effect of yarn withdrawal force, crimp level elongation,
weight/m2 and cover factor has also been studied. Increase in float length increases !earing strength, which is minimum in the
case of plain weave and maximum in the case of 4-thread satin.
Generally, tensile strength is taken as the criterion for
predicting the serviceability of a cloth. Taylor
disagreed with this view and observed that in contrast
to tensile strength, tearing strength is directly involved
in the assessment of serviceability. Tearing is much
more a common mode of failure than fall in tensile
strength in actual wear. Tear strength indicates the
ability of a fabric structure to utilize the properties of
component yarns. The results are dependent on those
very factors which differentiate a fabric from its
component yarn, the geometry of woven fabric making
the greatest contribution to the stress pattern. In other
words, tear strength is more characteristic of the
material in fabric form than in yarn form and cannot
be determined if any of the sets of threads, namely
warp and weft, is removed. Tear strength refers to a
response to non-uniform tensile stresses, causing a
progressive tensile failure of cross yarns along a line,
thread by thread or in small groups of threads.
Krook and Fox 1 studied the effect of fabric count
(both warp and weft ways) on the frequency of waves in
the chart and on the tear strength of fabrics. They
observed that increase in fabric count in the test
direction has little effect on tear strength; any
reduction in the number of yarns in the del resulting
from the decreased del size is almost compensated by
increase in the number of threads/in. However, they
suggested that the strength of a fabric could be
improved through (i) decrease in fabric count, (ii)
increase in yarn strength, (iii) use of smoother yarn,
and (iv) use of open weave.
According to Millard 2 , the factors affecting the tear
strength are : (i) strength of yarn, (ii) smoothness of
yarn, (iii) number of thick places, and (iv) number of
yarn slubs. O'Brien and Weiner3 pointed out the
advantage of plying in that the use of two-fold yarns
gives higher tearing strength than that when single
yarns of the same equivalent count are used. He further
stated that tear strength is directly proportional to
yarn strength.
Morton and Turner4 observed that increase in the
twist factor of component threads increases the tear
strength of fabrics because of increase in thread
strength and decrease in yarn diameter, the latter
allowing a greater degree of freedom to the yarn.
Backer and Tanenhaus5 and O'Brien and Weiner3
showed that tear strength increases with increase in
weave factor, which they defined as the number of
threads per repeat divided by the number of
interlacements in the same repeat. Taylor 7 introduced
a similar factor in his theoretical treatment of rip
strength.
Materials and Methods
Thirteen samples were prepared from a 15/18
polyester viscose blended yarn. Out of these, three
samples were of 2/325, 2/365 and 2/405 counts, three of
3.1,3.4 and 3.7 twist multipliers (TM) and four of 2/365
weft count with 3.1TM but different weaves, viz. plain,
2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4-thread satin. In the remaining
three samples, three different pick levels, viz. 44, 50and
55, were chosen keeping the other three parameters
constant. The warp count of 2/405 and 3.4 TM was
kept constant in all the cases.
Prior to testing, all the samples were conditioned in a
standard atmosphere (RH, 65% and temp. 27 ±2eC)
for 48 hr. Standard test methods as per Indian
Standard specifications6 were used to determine the
yarn and fabric characteristics. For yarn testing, skeins
of 120 yd were prepared and the average count was
tested on Knowle's balance. Yarn crimp values for
warp and weft were measured using a test length of 20
cm on Eureka crimp tester, Type FY-07, applying 109
tension. Single yarn strength and elongation at break
105
INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983
were measured on Instron tensile tester. The cross-
head speed and the ratio between cross-head speed and
chart speed were kept as 110 mm/min and 1.1:1
respectively. Clamping length of 100mm was used and
the fun scale load was adjusted to 10 kg on Instron
tensile tester.
The single rip test method was used for determining
the tearing strength of the fabric. The rip test consists
in mak~ngan initial longitudinal cut part way down the
centre of a strip and then pulling apart the two tails
thus fdrmed, so that the tear proceeds through the
uncut portion of the specimen. The testing machine
used for this purpose may be an inertialess (CRE)
machine or a pendulum type (CRn instrument.
Various dimensions have been used by different
workers. We have, however, accepted the ASTM
specifications as shown in Fig. 1.
In CRE/CR T machine, one tail of the specimen
should ,beclamped in the upper jaw and the other one
in the lower jaw (Fig. 1b) in such a manner that the cut
edge o~the tail is in a straight linejoining the centres of
the clamps, the two tails presenting opposite faces to
the operator. The autographic device attached to the
instrurv.ent indicates a succession of peak values of
tensions corresponding to the successive rupture of
yarn in the course of tear.
Instron tensile tester was used for the single rip tear
test. The cross-head speed and the ratio between CroSS-
head speed and chart speed were kept as 100mm/min
and 2:1 respectively. Clamping length of 100 mm was
used and the full scale load was kept as 10 kg. The
average tear strength of each sample was found from
five observations for each sample.
For determining the yarn withdrawal force, keeping
parity with Taylor's experiment, a strip of fabric (5 in
long and 3 in wide) was taken. leaving 2 in from one
end of the longer sides to allow the specimen to be
gripped by the fabric jaws, and another 0.5 in for a
clearance from the jaw line, a transverse cut was made
across .the width of the specimen. The specimen was
then rv.arked across its width at a distance of 1 in
from the transverse cut and all the crossing threads in
the remaining portion of the specimen were unravelled,
so that the length of each of the freed longitudinal
yarns from the marked line was 1.5 in, the rear end of
the specimen in the fabric form being already gripped
by a pair of fabric jaws. The yarn clamp, initially being
separated from the jaws by a distance of 2 in, was then
moved apart until the said yarn was completely
withdrawn from the strip; the force required to remove
the yarn was recorded in the autographic device. The
average values for all the tests were calculated from 10
observations made for both warp and weft directions.
Results and Discussion
Effect of weft count on tearing strength-The effect
of weft count on tearing strength was studied for three
plain woven fabrics having weft counts 2/365, 2/325
and 2/405 • Data on the tearing strength and count (Fig.
2.)indicate that when the fabric is ruptured in the weft
direction, its tearing strength decreases with increase in
weft count. This may be attributed to the strength of
the thread, because with increase in the fineness of the
yarn, the number of fibres in the cross-section
decreases and this contributes to lowering of the
breaking strength of the yarn. Thus, with increase in
counts, a corresponding decrease in weft breaking
strength is observed and this ultimately results in
decrease in the tearing strength of the fabric in weft-
wise direction. The statistical relation derived for this
action gives the value of correlation factor as 0.885,
indicating that the observations made are true and the
weft count is closely related to fabric tearing strength.
The value of warp-wise tearing strength, on the other
hand, increases with increase in weft count, because
the breaking strength of the weft in all the three cases is
greater than that of the warp due to the coarser weft
count having more number of fibres in its crass-
section.
The above finding is in agreement with that of
Turners, who found that the higher single thread
strength, usually brought about by the use of coarser
)
3-0
~"-
.........
---'Q,-------- .--
4'4
4·2
&0, WEAVE-PLAIN
WARP COUrvT- 2/365
'" .
4·0 ""'.
E ;::
u~ 3,8 ~7'0
z ~
'"' 3·6 :n
<
i? 3'4 ~
g cr
w 3·2 U16.0
•...
2/325 2/365 2/405
WEFT COUNT
Fig. 2--EfTect of weft count on tearing strength (0-0-0) and weft
elongation (0... 0... 0)
j.--3In--t...•lr·5in ••.
T
I
--t-JAW
JAW2.n •-------1Bin
4.n
1
1
It
T~AR
t
JAW 2in •...• 11·5inr-
(a)
( b)
-Sample preparation scheme
106
SHARMA et at.: INFLUENCE OF YARN & FABRIC PROPERTIES ON TEARING STRENGTH OF FABRICS
Fig. 3-Effect of weft twist multiplier on tearing strength (0-0-0)
and elongation (0... 0... 0)
I7'0
•...
~zw
a:
•...
<Il 6,8
~z
C(
<t
W
•...6·6
WEAVE - PLAIN
WEFT COUNTS - 2/32' ,2/36' ,2/4cT
7'2 .
3-4 3,6 3,8 4,0
WEFT ELONGATION, CrT!
Fig. 4-Relationship between weft elongation and tearing strength
6'4
the yarn (Fig. 3) and this results in decrease in the
thread breaking strength. As observed earlier, increase
in the thread breaking strength increases the fabric
tearing strength and consequently decrease in the
thread breaking strength (with increase in TM) causes
a corresponding decrease in the tearing strength of the
fabric.
Secondly, increase in TM decreases the area of
cross-section of the yarn and thus increases the yarn-
to-fabric friction. Due to this, the force needed for the
withdrawal of yarn from the fabric isincreased and this
results in decrease in the tearing strength of the fabric.
Considering all the facts, it may be concluded that
decrease in tearing strength (with increase in TM) is
due to decrease in elongation and yarn breaking
strength and increase in the yarn-to-fabric friction.
Fig. 3 shows a close relationship between TM and
tearing strength with the value of coefficient of
correlation as - 0.842.
Effect of yarn extensibility-Yarn extensibility plays
an important role in determining the tear behaviour of
a fabric. The number of yarns in the ladder of a del at
the tear locus depends upon the extent of yarn
extension. With increase in elongation of the yarn, the
active number of threads in del increases and hence
contributes more to the system in supporting a higher
load. To better understand the matter, we focus our
attention on Fig. 4 to mark out three values of weft
tearing strength for three different weft counts, viz.
2/325, 2/365 and 2/405, while warp count is constant
(2/405). The values of tearing strength are 7.29, 7.16
and 6.56 kg for weft elongation of 40,37 and 34 mm
respectively. In the first case, the weft thread count was
2/325, which led to higher extensibility of weft threads.
Consequently, the number of threads in del increased
and hence contributed more to the system in
supporting the higher load. In the second case, where
the weft count was increased to the level of 2/365 , the
o -__V:~!_T COUNT - 21365
-"0- _
3·1 3-4 3,7
WEFT TWIST MULTIPLIER
I•...
~Z
LU
a:
•...
<f)
~ 7,0
z
cr
<t
3'2L~
3,8 r 8·0
yarn, causes increase in tearing strength. He also
pointed out that even a slight increase in coarseness
might produce a large increase in the rip test, because
the breakage occurs thread by thread in this test.
Increase in the coarseness of the weft count increases
the tearing strength of the fabric in the warp-wise
direction, because the thread breaking strength of the
weft iscomparatively higher than that of the warp due
to the greater number of fibres in weft cross-section,
whereas increase in weft count decreases the tearing
strength of the fabric in the weft-wise direction due to
the decrease in the number of fibres in weft cross-
section.
It is observed from Fig. 2 that with increase in weft
count, weft elongation decreases and this relationship
is linear. Also, the relationship is statistically
significant, having the value of coefficient of
correlation (r) as 0.81. The effect of weft TM on the
elongation of the threads is shown in Fig. 3. It is
observed that with increase in weft TM, weft
elongation decreases. The values of weftelongation are
38, 37 and 36 mm for weft TM of 3.1, 3.4 and 3.7
respectively. The magnitude of extensibi1ity depends
upon the compactness of threads. With increase in the
compactness of thread, the elongation of the thread
decreases. Since the TM changes from 3.1 to 3.7, the
compactness of weft threads increases and con-
sequently the extensibility of threads decreases. The
correlation between TM and elongation has been
found to be linear and statistically significant, the
value of coefficient of correlation being -0.99. These
results are in agreement with the findings of Weiner 3 .
Effect of weft TM on tearing strength-To study the
effect of twist multiplier on the tearing strength of the
fabric, three different TMs were selected. It isobserved
from Fig. 3 that increase in weft TM decreases the
weft-wise tearing strength of the fabric when the warp
particulars are kept constant. Hamburger 9 also
reported that the most important factor which
influences the tearing strength of the fabric is its
surface or yarn-to-fabric friction. Increase in TM
causes a corresponding decrease in the elongation of
107
INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983
t
o
-'-0
o
9,0
WEAVE-PLAIN
WARP COUN T - 2 /L.OsWEFT COUNT - 2/365
7·5.
WEAVE - PLAI N
WEFT COUNTS-2/32s,2/36s,2/40s
70
~ ~ 10·0
i:60
o
zw
a:
I-
<f1
0' 3·0
~
~a:
o IU"" 5·01- 8,0
a:
..w
I-
6·5
6,0
9·0
I
G85
zw
a:
l-
I,/)
<!> 8,0
z
ex:
..w
I- 7.5
w
I,/)
~I
:i 7,0
..
~
0'
~. 7-01
:I:
I-
oZ
w
a:
I-
<f1 6·5
oz
a:
..
~ 6·0
6'0 7,0 8,0
fits: BREAKING STRENGTH OF
WEFT /WARP WITHDRAWAL FORCE
Fig. 5-Relationship between f/f, and tearing strength
46 50 55
PICKS/in
Fig. 7-EfTect of picks/in on crimp level (0-0-0) and tearing
strength (0 ... 0 ... 0)
crossing points or frictional points per unit area of the
fabric. With increase in pick level, cloth cover increases
and thus the fabric ahead of del jams earlier in the
direction of tear and the extent of yarn movement in
that direction is lesser. This causes the del to comprise
fewer yarns, resulting in a fall in the tearing strength.
This effect may also be explained on the basis of the
cover factor. As the pick level increases in a woven
fabric, its cover factor increases (Fig. 8).The computed
value of coefficient of correlation between tear
strength and fabric density across the direction of tear
2 4 6 8 10
CRIMP, .,.
Fig. 6-Relationship between crimp level and warp-wise tearing.'
strength
extensibility of weft threads decreased, which resulted
in a lower value of tearing strength. In the third case,
the weft count was further increased to 2/40s, which
led to further decrease in the extensibility of weft
threads. This further decrease in weft thread
extensibility reduced the number of threads in the del,
which in turn reduced the tearing strength. Hence, it
may be concluded that with increase in the extensibility
of threads, tearing strength increases.
Effec,t of withdrawalforce on thread strength-Data
on the tearing strength and the ratio between the
breaking strength of weft (f) and the withdrawal force
of wefti(f.) are presented in Fig. 5. It is observed that
tearing/strength increases as the ratio off/fs increases.
This is in agreement with the finding of O'Brien and
Weine~3, that breaking strength divided by the pull-
out force for the opposite set of thread is directly
propor,tional to the tearing strength, because with
ultimate increase in the yarn withdrawal force, the del
limits itself within a smaller area and depth, bringing
fewer yarns into action. Obviously, the supporting
capacity of the del system is reduced and a lower
tearing strength is recorded .
Effect of crimp on tearing strength-It is observed
from Fig. 6 that the crimp has a linear relationship with
the tearing strength of the fabric with the value of
coefficient of correlation as -0.99. This is in
agreement with the finding ofWeiner3 , who reported
that the crimp of the threads in a cloth causes a
reduction in the case of slippage that arises from a
higher crimp because of the yarn bent to a greater
extent. With a lower crimp, the area of contact among
the threads would be smaller and the frictional
resistance to the movement would be less.
Increase in pick level increases the crimp level (Fig.
7) and thereby the elongation also increases. Increase
in elongation becomes the root cause of decrease in
tearing strength, as stated earlier. Another factor
influencing the crimp is the weave. The number of
times!the weft changes its face in I in also affects the
crimp level. The weft in a plain woven fabric changes
its face for the maximum number of times and thus has
the highest value of crimp, while reverse isthe case with
4-thread satin. Due to this, the withdrawal force of
thread, or the thread pulling out force, is maximum in
the case of plain weave and this results in a lower value
of fabric tearing strength compared that for 4-thread
satin. It may be concluded that the tearing strength of
fabric has a linear relationship with the crimp level.
Effect of fabric density-The effect of change in
fabric density (pick/in) on the warp tear strength is also
shown in Fig. 7. The pick levels used were 46, 50 and
55, while the ends/in was constant (52) in all the three
cases. It is observed that increase in fabric density
along the tear direction increases the number of
108
SHARMAet a/.: INFLUENCE OF YARN& FABRICPROPERTIESON TEARINGSTRENGTHOF FABRICS
x
9·0
o
o'"
oX
• 8,0
:x:
t-
el
Z
LU
a:
tii 7·0
el
Z
a:
...
LU
t- 6.0
128 130 132 134 136 138
WEIGHT 1m2
Fig.9-EfTect ofweighton warp-wisetearingstrength(0-0-0) and
weft-wisetearingstrength(x-x-x)
a
WEAVE - PLAIN 0
WARP COUNT-2/40s
9.0~WE FT COUNT-2/36 s
0·048 0,050 0-052 0,054
RECIPROCAL OF CLOTH COVER FACTOR
Fig. 8-Relationship betweenreciprocalof cloth coverfactor and
tearing strength
elongation is followed by increase in the weft-wise
tearing strength of the fabric.
(2) With increase in pick level, there is a
corresponding decrease in the warp-wise tearing
strength.
(3) The tearing strength is directly proportional to
the thread breaking strength.
(4) The tearing strength increases with decrease in
the thread pulling out force.
(5) Increase in float length increases the tearing
strength, thus giving a high value of tearing strength in
the case of 4-thread satin as compared to plain or twill
Table I-Effect of Weave on Tearing Strength
Sample
WeaveWarpWeftWarpWeft
No.
pulloutpullouttearingtearing
force
forcestrengthstrength
g
gkgkg
I
1/1 Plain36506.887.16
2
3/1 Right12187.938.34
hand twill 3
2/2 Right10168.418.54
hand twill 4
4-Thread8148.789.35
satin
Conclusions
(I) Increase in weft count causes a corresponding
decrease in the weft-wise tearing strength due to the
less number of fibres in the cross-section. Increase in
weft twist multiplier decreases proportionately the
weft-wise tearing strength of the fabric. Increase in
is negative. This finding is in agreement with that of
Backer10, who reported that the tearing strength of a
fabric is closely related to the reciprocal of the cover
factor.
Effect of weight on tearing strength-The
relationship between weight/m2 (warp-way and weft-
way) and tearing strength is shown in Fig. 9. The
relationship is seen to be linear. It may be concluded
that with increase in weight/m2 or weight per unit area
of the fabric, there is a corresponding increase in the
tearing strength of the fabric as well as in the weft
direction. This finding is in agreement with that of
Ganatra and Munshi 11 .
Effect of weave on tearing strength-While studying
the effect of various weaves, it was observed that the
tearing strength of the fabric increases with increase in
float length. This is in conformity with the findings of
Hamburger9, who found that a fabric having longer
floats generally has a higher tearing strength than the
one having shorter floats. He also observed that plain
woven fabrics exhibit the minimum tearing strength
due to the greater number of intersections in the weave.
Apparently, the plain intersection provides better
binding than that obtained by the passage of yarn
merely from one end of the cloth to the other; the result
is presumely due to the greater mutual yarn pressure
which must exist at the plain intersection.
In a weave with many crossovers/in, the gripping
section between the warp and weft threads has been
found to be high and thus increases the ratio between
the yarn withdrawal force and the yarn breaking
strength in opposite direction over what it would have
been for a fabric with longer floats. This.increase in the
pullout force resulting from the weave reduces
considerably the tear strength of the fabric (for a given
yarn strength and texture). Thus, the plain weave has
been found to be weaker than 2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4-
thread satin. A looser weave with longer floats also
allowed a greater trellis type distortion. The
magnitude of the tearing strength also depends upon
the type of material used, yarn construction and other
'cloth parameters, as discussed earlier. The 2/2 twill has
higher tearing strength than 3/1 twill, because it has
lower value for the pullout force. The weave affects the
tearing strength of the fabric, because it is closely
related to the float length and the pullout force, which
have direct influence on the tearing strength of a fabric
(Table I).
109
INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983
structures. The tearing strength of 2/2 twill is higher
than that of 3/1 twill, as the withdrawal force for 3/1
twill is·higher.
(6) Increase in crimp decreases the tearing strength
of the fabric.
(7) The tearing strength of the fabric is dependent
upon the inter-yarn spacing or cover factor.
(8) With increase in wt/m2 of a fabric, tearing
strength increases in both warp and weft directions.
(9) The ratio of single thread strength to the pullout
force for the opposite set of threads is directly related
to the tearing strength.
Acknowledgement
The authors express their thanks to Prof. R.C.D.
Kaushik, Director TIT, Bhiwani, for permission to
110
publish this paper. They are also thankful to the
personnel of Bhiwani Textile Mills, Bhiwani, for their
cooperation.
References
I Krook C M & Fox K R, Text Res J, 15 (1945) P389.
2 Millard F J, J Text Inst, 38 (1947) T419.
3 O'Brien W E & Weiner L I, Text Res J, 24 (1954) P241.
4 Morton W E & Turner A J, J Text Inst, 19 (1928) T189.
5 Backer S & Tanenhaus S J, Text Res J, 21 (1951) P635.
6 Indian Standard specifications IS:2693 (Indian Standards
Institution, New Delhi).
7 Taylor H M, J Text Inst, 50 (1959) Tl61.
8 Turner A J, J Text Inst, 11 (1920) 181.
9 TeixeiraN A,Platt M M & HamburgerW J, Text ResJ,25(1955)
838.
10 Backer S, Text Res J, 22 (1952) 435.
II Ganatra S R & Munshi V G, Indian J Text Res,S (1980) 108.

More Related Content

What's hot

Process control in weaving
Process control in weavingProcess control in weaving
Process control in weavingVijay Babu Gaur
 
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2AtiqFaysal
 
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovens
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovensAbhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovens
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovensAbhishek Rana
 
Auro textile Trainning report
Auro textile Trainning reportAuro textile Trainning report
Auro textile Trainning reportJAGMOHAN Raj
 
Compare among pilling tester
Compare among pilling testerCompare among pilling tester
Compare among pilling testerAzmir Latif Beg
 
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)Azmir Latif Beg
 
Comparing rolar and rotary printing
Comparing rolar and rotary printingComparing rolar and rotary printing
Comparing rolar and rotary printingHaseeb Ahmad
 
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)Vasant Kothari
 
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles Stentering machine
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles    Stentering machineFinishing 1: Padding Mangles    Stentering machine
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles Stentering machineVijay Prakash
 
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)KEVSER CARPET
 

What's hot (20)

Jigger dyeing machine
Jigger dyeing machineJigger dyeing machine
Jigger dyeing machine
 
Yarn twist
Yarn twistYarn twist
Yarn twist
 
Process control in weaving
Process control in weavingProcess control in weaving
Process control in weaving
 
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2
stiffness,Handle,Drape properties of fabric ,Fabric property TTQC-2
 
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovens
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovensAbhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovens
Abhi rana)5. wet laid nonwovens
 
Finishing process and parameters
Finishing process  and parametersFinishing process  and parameters
Finishing process and parameters
 
Colour fastness
Colour fastnessColour fastness
Colour fastness
 
Auro textile Trainning report
Auro textile Trainning reportAuro textile Trainning report
Auro textile Trainning report
 
Compare among pilling tester
Compare among pilling testerCompare among pilling tester
Compare among pilling tester
 
Nonwoven web formation rajesh
Nonwoven web formation   rajeshNonwoven web formation   rajesh
Nonwoven web formation rajesh
 
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)
Wrinkle resistance finishing (Wrinkle free)
 
Heat setting
Heat settingHeat setting
Heat setting
 
Beam dyeing machine
Beam dyeing machineBeam dyeing machine
Beam dyeing machine
 
Comparing rolar and rotary printing
Comparing rolar and rotary printingComparing rolar and rotary printing
Comparing rolar and rotary printing
 
Drawing and texturising
Drawing and texturising Drawing and texturising
Drawing and texturising
 
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)
Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST)
 
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles Stentering machine
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles    Stentering machineFinishing 1: Padding Mangles    Stentering machine
Finishing 1: Padding Mangles Stentering machine
 
BRAIDING.ppt
BRAIDING.pptBRAIDING.ppt
BRAIDING.ppt
 
FIBER LENGTH
FIBER LENGTHFIBER LENGTH
FIBER LENGTH
 
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)
FRICTION SPINNING TECHNOLOGY, (M.S)
 

Similar to Woven fabric tear strength

Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of Friction
Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of FrictionExperimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of Friction
Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of FrictionKEVSER CARPET
 
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristics
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn CharacteristicsInfluence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristics
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristicsiosrjce
 
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabricEffect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabriceSAT Publishing House
 
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabricEffect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabriceSAT Journals
 
uniformity ratio.pdf
uniformity ratio.pdfuniformity ratio.pdf
uniformity ratio.pdfzeinenessre1
 
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarn
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarnEffect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarn
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarnMD. Rizwan Hasan
 
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Journal of Engineered Fibers and FabricsJournal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Journal of Engineered Fibers and FabricsPARESHPD1977
 
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics IJERA Editor
 
stretch recovery of knitted fabric
stretch recovery of knitted fabricstretch recovery of knitted fabric
stretch recovery of knitted fabricSanjoy Ray
 
Tensile properties of fiber
Tensile properties of fiberTensile properties of fiber
Tensile properties of fiberShaharia Ahmed
 
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weft
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different WeftComparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weft
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weftijsrd.com
 
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)ShabujHossain
 
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance  Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance Azmir Latif Beg
 
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...CrimsonpublishersTTEFT
 

Similar to Woven fabric tear strength (20)

yarn count in friction spinning
yarn count in friction spinningyarn count in friction spinning
yarn count in friction spinning
 
Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of Friction
Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of FrictionExperimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of Friction
Experimental Study Of The FrictionalPproperties Of Friction
 
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristics
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn CharacteristicsInfluence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristics
Influence of Gas Yarn Singeing On Viscose Spun Yarn Characteristics
 
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabricEffect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
 
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabricEffect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
Effect of count and stitch length on spirality of single jersey knit fabric
 
uniformity ratio.pdf
uniformity ratio.pdfuniformity ratio.pdf
uniformity ratio.pdf
 
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarn
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarnEffect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarn
Effect of variation of process parameters of ring spun yarn
 
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Journal of Engineered Fibers and FabricsJournal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics
 
Evaluation of physico mechanical properties of 1×1 interlock cotton knitted f...
Evaluation of physico mechanical properties of 1×1 interlock cotton knitted f...Evaluation of physico mechanical properties of 1×1 interlock cotton knitted f...
Evaluation of physico mechanical properties of 1×1 interlock cotton knitted f...
 
Effect of stitch length on physical and mechanical properties of single jerse...
Effect of stitch length on physical and mechanical properties of single jerse...Effect of stitch length on physical and mechanical properties of single jerse...
Effect of stitch length on physical and mechanical properties of single jerse...
 
Linear density_AyBee Marwat
Linear density_AyBee MarwatLinear density_AyBee Marwat
Linear density_AyBee Marwat
 
A04460107
A04460107A04460107
A04460107
 
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics
An Investigation on Different Physical Properties of Cotton Woven Fabrics
 
Crimp & Crimp Interchange
Crimp & Crimp Interchange Crimp & Crimp Interchange
Crimp & Crimp Interchange
 
stretch recovery of knitted fabric
stretch recovery of knitted fabricstretch recovery of knitted fabric
stretch recovery of knitted fabric
 
Tensile properties of fiber
Tensile properties of fiberTensile properties of fiber
Tensile properties of fiber
 
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weft
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different WeftComparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weft
Comparison of some of Denim Fabric Properties produced with different Weft
 
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)
Textile testing &amp; quality control 1(presentation)
 
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance  Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance
Effect of stitch length on abrasion resistance
 
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...
Crimson Publishers- Bursting Strength and Extension for Jersey, Interlock and...
 

Recently uploaded

Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slidespraypatel2
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksSoftradix Technologies
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions
 
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your Budget
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your BudgetHyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your Budget
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your BudgetEnjoy Anytime
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAndikSusilo4
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhisoniya singh
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Slack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 SlidesSlack Application Development 101 Slides
Slack Application Development 101 Slides
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other FrameworksBenefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
Benefits Of Flutter Compared To Other Frameworks
 
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping ElbowsPigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
Pigging Solutions Piggable Sweeping Elbows
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
 
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your Budget
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your BudgetHyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your Budget
Hyderabad Call Girls Khairatabad ✨ 7001305949 ✨ Cheap Price Your Budget
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & ApplicationAzure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
Azure Monitor & Application Insight to monitor Infrastructure & Application
 
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptxVulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
 
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | DelhiFULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
FULL ENJOY 🔝 8264348440 🔝 Call Girls in Diplomatic Enclave | Delhi
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 

Woven fabric tear strength

  • 1. Indian Journal of Textile Research Vol. 8, December 1983, pp.105-110 Influence of Yarn and Fabric Properties on Tearing Strength of Woven Fabrics I C SHARMA, SUDEEP MALU, PANKAJ BHOWAN & SURENDER CHANDNA The Technological Institute of Textiles, Bhiwani 125022 Received 28 May 1983; accepted I December 1983 The effect of different yarn and fabric parameters on the tearing strength of fabrics having plain, 2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4- thread satin weaves and woven using 52' reed and 2/40' polyester-viscose (15/85) warp has been studied. Weft count, weft twist multiplier and pick level were varied in the plain woven fabrics. It was observed that with increase in yarn fineness, twist multiplier and pick level, there is a decrease in tearing strength. The effect of yarn withdrawal force, crimp level elongation, weight/m2 and cover factor has also been studied. Increase in float length increases !earing strength, which is minimum in the case of plain weave and maximum in the case of 4-thread satin. Generally, tensile strength is taken as the criterion for predicting the serviceability of a cloth. Taylor disagreed with this view and observed that in contrast to tensile strength, tearing strength is directly involved in the assessment of serviceability. Tearing is much more a common mode of failure than fall in tensile strength in actual wear. Tear strength indicates the ability of a fabric structure to utilize the properties of component yarns. The results are dependent on those very factors which differentiate a fabric from its component yarn, the geometry of woven fabric making the greatest contribution to the stress pattern. In other words, tear strength is more characteristic of the material in fabric form than in yarn form and cannot be determined if any of the sets of threads, namely warp and weft, is removed. Tear strength refers to a response to non-uniform tensile stresses, causing a progressive tensile failure of cross yarns along a line, thread by thread or in small groups of threads. Krook and Fox 1 studied the effect of fabric count (both warp and weft ways) on the frequency of waves in the chart and on the tear strength of fabrics. They observed that increase in fabric count in the test direction has little effect on tear strength; any reduction in the number of yarns in the del resulting from the decreased del size is almost compensated by increase in the number of threads/in. However, they suggested that the strength of a fabric could be improved through (i) decrease in fabric count, (ii) increase in yarn strength, (iii) use of smoother yarn, and (iv) use of open weave. According to Millard 2 , the factors affecting the tear strength are : (i) strength of yarn, (ii) smoothness of yarn, (iii) number of thick places, and (iv) number of yarn slubs. O'Brien and Weiner3 pointed out the advantage of plying in that the use of two-fold yarns gives higher tearing strength than that when single yarns of the same equivalent count are used. He further stated that tear strength is directly proportional to yarn strength. Morton and Turner4 observed that increase in the twist factor of component threads increases the tear strength of fabrics because of increase in thread strength and decrease in yarn diameter, the latter allowing a greater degree of freedom to the yarn. Backer and Tanenhaus5 and O'Brien and Weiner3 showed that tear strength increases with increase in weave factor, which they defined as the number of threads per repeat divided by the number of interlacements in the same repeat. Taylor 7 introduced a similar factor in his theoretical treatment of rip strength. Materials and Methods Thirteen samples were prepared from a 15/18 polyester viscose blended yarn. Out of these, three samples were of 2/325, 2/365 and 2/405 counts, three of 3.1,3.4 and 3.7 twist multipliers (TM) and four of 2/365 weft count with 3.1TM but different weaves, viz. plain, 2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4-thread satin. In the remaining three samples, three different pick levels, viz. 44, 50and 55, were chosen keeping the other three parameters constant. The warp count of 2/405 and 3.4 TM was kept constant in all the cases. Prior to testing, all the samples were conditioned in a standard atmosphere (RH, 65% and temp. 27 ±2eC) for 48 hr. Standard test methods as per Indian Standard specifications6 were used to determine the yarn and fabric characteristics. For yarn testing, skeins of 120 yd were prepared and the average count was tested on Knowle's balance. Yarn crimp values for warp and weft were measured using a test length of 20 cm on Eureka crimp tester, Type FY-07, applying 109 tension. Single yarn strength and elongation at break 105
  • 2. INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983 were measured on Instron tensile tester. The cross- head speed and the ratio between cross-head speed and chart speed were kept as 110 mm/min and 1.1:1 respectively. Clamping length of 100mm was used and the fun scale load was adjusted to 10 kg on Instron tensile tester. The single rip test method was used for determining the tearing strength of the fabric. The rip test consists in mak~ngan initial longitudinal cut part way down the centre of a strip and then pulling apart the two tails thus fdrmed, so that the tear proceeds through the uncut portion of the specimen. The testing machine used for this purpose may be an inertialess (CRE) machine or a pendulum type (CRn instrument. Various dimensions have been used by different workers. We have, however, accepted the ASTM specifications as shown in Fig. 1. In CRE/CR T machine, one tail of the specimen should ,beclamped in the upper jaw and the other one in the lower jaw (Fig. 1b) in such a manner that the cut edge o~the tail is in a straight linejoining the centres of the clamps, the two tails presenting opposite faces to the operator. The autographic device attached to the instrurv.ent indicates a succession of peak values of tensions corresponding to the successive rupture of yarn in the course of tear. Instron tensile tester was used for the single rip tear test. The cross-head speed and the ratio between CroSS- head speed and chart speed were kept as 100mm/min and 2:1 respectively. Clamping length of 100 mm was used and the full scale load was kept as 10 kg. The average tear strength of each sample was found from five observations for each sample. For determining the yarn withdrawal force, keeping parity with Taylor's experiment, a strip of fabric (5 in long and 3 in wide) was taken. leaving 2 in from one end of the longer sides to allow the specimen to be gripped by the fabric jaws, and another 0.5 in for a clearance from the jaw line, a transverse cut was made across .the width of the specimen. The specimen was then rv.arked across its width at a distance of 1 in from the transverse cut and all the crossing threads in the remaining portion of the specimen were unravelled, so that the length of each of the freed longitudinal yarns from the marked line was 1.5 in, the rear end of the specimen in the fabric form being already gripped by a pair of fabric jaws. The yarn clamp, initially being separated from the jaws by a distance of 2 in, was then moved apart until the said yarn was completely withdrawn from the strip; the force required to remove the yarn was recorded in the autographic device. The average values for all the tests were calculated from 10 observations made for both warp and weft directions. Results and Discussion Effect of weft count on tearing strength-The effect of weft count on tearing strength was studied for three plain woven fabrics having weft counts 2/365, 2/325 and 2/405 • Data on the tearing strength and count (Fig. 2.)indicate that when the fabric is ruptured in the weft direction, its tearing strength decreases with increase in weft count. This may be attributed to the strength of the thread, because with increase in the fineness of the yarn, the number of fibres in the cross-section decreases and this contributes to lowering of the breaking strength of the yarn. Thus, with increase in counts, a corresponding decrease in weft breaking strength is observed and this ultimately results in decrease in the tearing strength of the fabric in weft- wise direction. The statistical relation derived for this action gives the value of correlation factor as 0.885, indicating that the observations made are true and the weft count is closely related to fabric tearing strength. The value of warp-wise tearing strength, on the other hand, increases with increase in weft count, because the breaking strength of the weft in all the three cases is greater than that of the warp due to the coarser weft count having more number of fibres in its crass- section. The above finding is in agreement with that of Turners, who found that the higher single thread strength, usually brought about by the use of coarser ) 3-0 ~"- ......... ---'Q,-------- .-- 4'4 4·2 &0, WEAVE-PLAIN WARP COUrvT- 2/365 '" . 4·0 ""'. E ;:: u~ 3,8 ~7'0 z ~ '"' 3·6 :n < i? 3'4 ~ g cr w 3·2 U16.0 •... 2/325 2/365 2/405 WEFT COUNT Fig. 2--EfTect of weft count on tearing strength (0-0-0) and weft elongation (0... 0... 0) j.--3In--t...•lr·5in ••. T I --t-JAW JAW2.n •-------1Bin 4.n 1 1 It T~AR t JAW 2in •...• 11·5inr- (a) ( b) -Sample preparation scheme 106
  • 3. SHARMA et at.: INFLUENCE OF YARN & FABRIC PROPERTIES ON TEARING STRENGTH OF FABRICS Fig. 3-Effect of weft twist multiplier on tearing strength (0-0-0) and elongation (0... 0... 0) I7'0 •... ~zw a: •... <Il 6,8 ~z C( <t W •...6·6 WEAVE - PLAIN WEFT COUNTS - 2/32' ,2/36' ,2/4cT 7'2 . 3-4 3,6 3,8 4,0 WEFT ELONGATION, CrT! Fig. 4-Relationship between weft elongation and tearing strength 6'4 the yarn (Fig. 3) and this results in decrease in the thread breaking strength. As observed earlier, increase in the thread breaking strength increases the fabric tearing strength and consequently decrease in the thread breaking strength (with increase in TM) causes a corresponding decrease in the tearing strength of the fabric. Secondly, increase in TM decreases the area of cross-section of the yarn and thus increases the yarn- to-fabric friction. Due to this, the force needed for the withdrawal of yarn from the fabric isincreased and this results in decrease in the tearing strength of the fabric. Considering all the facts, it may be concluded that decrease in tearing strength (with increase in TM) is due to decrease in elongation and yarn breaking strength and increase in the yarn-to-fabric friction. Fig. 3 shows a close relationship between TM and tearing strength with the value of coefficient of correlation as - 0.842. Effect of yarn extensibility-Yarn extensibility plays an important role in determining the tear behaviour of a fabric. The number of yarns in the ladder of a del at the tear locus depends upon the extent of yarn extension. With increase in elongation of the yarn, the active number of threads in del increases and hence contributes more to the system in supporting a higher load. To better understand the matter, we focus our attention on Fig. 4 to mark out three values of weft tearing strength for three different weft counts, viz. 2/325, 2/365 and 2/405, while warp count is constant (2/405). The values of tearing strength are 7.29, 7.16 and 6.56 kg for weft elongation of 40,37 and 34 mm respectively. In the first case, the weft thread count was 2/325, which led to higher extensibility of weft threads. Consequently, the number of threads in del increased and hence contributed more to the system in supporting the higher load. In the second case, where the weft count was increased to the level of 2/365 , the o -__V:~!_T COUNT - 21365 -"0- _ 3·1 3-4 3,7 WEFT TWIST MULTIPLIER I•... ~Z LU a: •... <f) ~ 7,0 z cr <t 3'2L~ 3,8 r 8·0 yarn, causes increase in tearing strength. He also pointed out that even a slight increase in coarseness might produce a large increase in the rip test, because the breakage occurs thread by thread in this test. Increase in the coarseness of the weft count increases the tearing strength of the fabric in the warp-wise direction, because the thread breaking strength of the weft iscomparatively higher than that of the warp due to the greater number of fibres in weft cross-section, whereas increase in weft count decreases the tearing strength of the fabric in the weft-wise direction due to the decrease in the number of fibres in weft cross- section. It is observed from Fig. 2 that with increase in weft count, weft elongation decreases and this relationship is linear. Also, the relationship is statistically significant, having the value of coefficient of correlation (r) as 0.81. The effect of weft TM on the elongation of the threads is shown in Fig. 3. It is observed that with increase in weft TM, weft elongation decreases. The values of weftelongation are 38, 37 and 36 mm for weft TM of 3.1, 3.4 and 3.7 respectively. The magnitude of extensibi1ity depends upon the compactness of threads. With increase in the compactness of thread, the elongation of the thread decreases. Since the TM changes from 3.1 to 3.7, the compactness of weft threads increases and con- sequently the extensibility of threads decreases. The correlation between TM and elongation has been found to be linear and statistically significant, the value of coefficient of correlation being -0.99. These results are in agreement with the findings of Weiner 3 . Effect of weft TM on tearing strength-To study the effect of twist multiplier on the tearing strength of the fabric, three different TMs were selected. It isobserved from Fig. 3 that increase in weft TM decreases the weft-wise tearing strength of the fabric when the warp particulars are kept constant. Hamburger 9 also reported that the most important factor which influences the tearing strength of the fabric is its surface or yarn-to-fabric friction. Increase in TM causes a corresponding decrease in the elongation of 107
  • 4. INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983 t o -'-0 o 9,0 WEAVE-PLAIN WARP COUN T - 2 /L.OsWEFT COUNT - 2/365 7·5. WEAVE - PLAI N WEFT COUNTS-2/32s,2/36s,2/40s 70 ~ ~ 10·0 i:60 o zw a: I- <f1 0' 3·0 ~ ~a: o IU"" 5·01- 8,0 a: ..w I- 6·5 6,0 9·0 I G85 zw a: l- I,/) <!> 8,0 z ex: ..w I- 7.5 w I,/) ~I :i 7,0 .. ~ 0' ~. 7-01 :I: I- oZ w a: I- <f1 6·5 oz a: .. ~ 6·0 6'0 7,0 8,0 fits: BREAKING STRENGTH OF WEFT /WARP WITHDRAWAL FORCE Fig. 5-Relationship between f/f, and tearing strength 46 50 55 PICKS/in Fig. 7-EfTect of picks/in on crimp level (0-0-0) and tearing strength (0 ... 0 ... 0) crossing points or frictional points per unit area of the fabric. With increase in pick level, cloth cover increases and thus the fabric ahead of del jams earlier in the direction of tear and the extent of yarn movement in that direction is lesser. This causes the del to comprise fewer yarns, resulting in a fall in the tearing strength. This effect may also be explained on the basis of the cover factor. As the pick level increases in a woven fabric, its cover factor increases (Fig. 8).The computed value of coefficient of correlation between tear strength and fabric density across the direction of tear 2 4 6 8 10 CRIMP, .,. Fig. 6-Relationship between crimp level and warp-wise tearing.' strength extensibility of weft threads decreased, which resulted in a lower value of tearing strength. In the third case, the weft count was further increased to 2/40s, which led to further decrease in the extensibility of weft threads. This further decrease in weft thread extensibility reduced the number of threads in the del, which in turn reduced the tearing strength. Hence, it may be concluded that with increase in the extensibility of threads, tearing strength increases. Effec,t of withdrawalforce on thread strength-Data on the tearing strength and the ratio between the breaking strength of weft (f) and the withdrawal force of wefti(f.) are presented in Fig. 5. It is observed that tearing/strength increases as the ratio off/fs increases. This is in agreement with the finding of O'Brien and Weine~3, that breaking strength divided by the pull- out force for the opposite set of thread is directly propor,tional to the tearing strength, because with ultimate increase in the yarn withdrawal force, the del limits itself within a smaller area and depth, bringing fewer yarns into action. Obviously, the supporting capacity of the del system is reduced and a lower tearing strength is recorded . Effect of crimp on tearing strength-It is observed from Fig. 6 that the crimp has a linear relationship with the tearing strength of the fabric with the value of coefficient of correlation as -0.99. This is in agreement with the finding ofWeiner3 , who reported that the crimp of the threads in a cloth causes a reduction in the case of slippage that arises from a higher crimp because of the yarn bent to a greater extent. With a lower crimp, the area of contact among the threads would be smaller and the frictional resistance to the movement would be less. Increase in pick level increases the crimp level (Fig. 7) and thereby the elongation also increases. Increase in elongation becomes the root cause of decrease in tearing strength, as stated earlier. Another factor influencing the crimp is the weave. The number of times!the weft changes its face in I in also affects the crimp level. The weft in a plain woven fabric changes its face for the maximum number of times and thus has the highest value of crimp, while reverse isthe case with 4-thread satin. Due to this, the withdrawal force of thread, or the thread pulling out force, is maximum in the case of plain weave and this results in a lower value of fabric tearing strength compared that for 4-thread satin. It may be concluded that the tearing strength of fabric has a linear relationship with the crimp level. Effect of fabric density-The effect of change in fabric density (pick/in) on the warp tear strength is also shown in Fig. 7. The pick levels used were 46, 50 and 55, while the ends/in was constant (52) in all the three cases. It is observed that increase in fabric density along the tear direction increases the number of 108
  • 5. SHARMAet a/.: INFLUENCE OF YARN& FABRICPROPERTIESON TEARINGSTRENGTHOF FABRICS x 9·0 o o'" oX • 8,0 :x: t- el Z LU a: tii 7·0 el Z a: ... LU t- 6.0 128 130 132 134 136 138 WEIGHT 1m2 Fig.9-EfTect ofweighton warp-wisetearingstrength(0-0-0) and weft-wisetearingstrength(x-x-x) a WEAVE - PLAIN 0 WARP COUNT-2/40s 9.0~WE FT COUNT-2/36 s 0·048 0,050 0-052 0,054 RECIPROCAL OF CLOTH COVER FACTOR Fig. 8-Relationship betweenreciprocalof cloth coverfactor and tearing strength elongation is followed by increase in the weft-wise tearing strength of the fabric. (2) With increase in pick level, there is a corresponding decrease in the warp-wise tearing strength. (3) The tearing strength is directly proportional to the thread breaking strength. (4) The tearing strength increases with decrease in the thread pulling out force. (5) Increase in float length increases the tearing strength, thus giving a high value of tearing strength in the case of 4-thread satin as compared to plain or twill Table I-Effect of Weave on Tearing Strength Sample WeaveWarpWeftWarpWeft No. pulloutpullouttearingtearing force forcestrengthstrength g gkgkg I 1/1 Plain36506.887.16 2 3/1 Right12187.938.34 hand twill 3 2/2 Right10168.418.54 hand twill 4 4-Thread8148.789.35 satin Conclusions (I) Increase in weft count causes a corresponding decrease in the weft-wise tearing strength due to the less number of fibres in the cross-section. Increase in weft twist multiplier decreases proportionately the weft-wise tearing strength of the fabric. Increase in is negative. This finding is in agreement with that of Backer10, who reported that the tearing strength of a fabric is closely related to the reciprocal of the cover factor. Effect of weight on tearing strength-The relationship between weight/m2 (warp-way and weft- way) and tearing strength is shown in Fig. 9. The relationship is seen to be linear. It may be concluded that with increase in weight/m2 or weight per unit area of the fabric, there is a corresponding increase in the tearing strength of the fabric as well as in the weft direction. This finding is in agreement with that of Ganatra and Munshi 11 . Effect of weave on tearing strength-While studying the effect of various weaves, it was observed that the tearing strength of the fabric increases with increase in float length. This is in conformity with the findings of Hamburger9, who found that a fabric having longer floats generally has a higher tearing strength than the one having shorter floats. He also observed that plain woven fabrics exhibit the minimum tearing strength due to the greater number of intersections in the weave. Apparently, the plain intersection provides better binding than that obtained by the passage of yarn merely from one end of the cloth to the other; the result is presumely due to the greater mutual yarn pressure which must exist at the plain intersection. In a weave with many crossovers/in, the gripping section between the warp and weft threads has been found to be high and thus increases the ratio between the yarn withdrawal force and the yarn breaking strength in opposite direction over what it would have been for a fabric with longer floats. This.increase in the pullout force resulting from the weave reduces considerably the tear strength of the fabric (for a given yarn strength and texture). Thus, the plain weave has been found to be weaker than 2/2 twill, 3/1 twill and 4- thread satin. A looser weave with longer floats also allowed a greater trellis type distortion. The magnitude of the tearing strength also depends upon the type of material used, yarn construction and other 'cloth parameters, as discussed earlier. The 2/2 twill has higher tearing strength than 3/1 twill, because it has lower value for the pullout force. The weave affects the tearing strength of the fabric, because it is closely related to the float length and the pullout force, which have direct influence on the tearing strength of a fabric (Table I). 109
  • 6. INDIAN J TEXT. RES., VOL. 8, DECEMBER 1983 structures. The tearing strength of 2/2 twill is higher than that of 3/1 twill, as the withdrawal force for 3/1 twill is·higher. (6) Increase in crimp decreases the tearing strength of the fabric. (7) The tearing strength of the fabric is dependent upon the inter-yarn spacing or cover factor. (8) With increase in wt/m2 of a fabric, tearing strength increases in both warp and weft directions. (9) The ratio of single thread strength to the pullout force for the opposite set of threads is directly related to the tearing strength. Acknowledgement The authors express their thanks to Prof. R.C.D. Kaushik, Director TIT, Bhiwani, for permission to 110 publish this paper. They are also thankful to the personnel of Bhiwani Textile Mills, Bhiwani, for their cooperation. References I Krook C M & Fox K R, Text Res J, 15 (1945) P389. 2 Millard F J, J Text Inst, 38 (1947) T419. 3 O'Brien W E & Weiner L I, Text Res J, 24 (1954) P241. 4 Morton W E & Turner A J, J Text Inst, 19 (1928) T189. 5 Backer S & Tanenhaus S J, Text Res J, 21 (1951) P635. 6 Indian Standard specifications IS:2693 (Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi). 7 Taylor H M, J Text Inst, 50 (1959) Tl61. 8 Turner A J, J Text Inst, 11 (1920) 181. 9 TeixeiraN A,Platt M M & HamburgerW J, Text ResJ,25(1955) 838. 10 Backer S, Text Res J, 22 (1952) 435. II Ganatra S R & Munshi V G, Indian J Text Res,S (1980) 108.