The Cold War Was A Conflict

The Cold War Was A Conflict
The Cold War was a conflict in which the main parties were the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).
This conflict lasted approximately forty–five years, and though there was no direct war in between the two nations, there were many repercussions of
the hostilities. Some effects were negative, like the prevention of peace treaties being made between the East and the West, and the weakening of
economies, but some were positive. The Space Race was directly related to the Cold War tensions, and without the competition between the USA and
the USSR over space exploration, many monumental breakthroughs in technology would not have occurred.
Introduction: The Cold War was caused by a number of events and prejudices on the part of both nations. Many events before World War II negatively
impacted relations between the countries, and during the war there were instances that developed tensions, like the delaying of D–Day, which the
USSR believed was a conspiracy plot to weaken their forces. After the war, the attempts of the USSR to expand their territory, and both governments'
solid opposition to the other's ideals caused a rift that only grew over time. Studying the events which developed the Cold War, and the effects that
came with the Cold War will better the understanding of how these conflicts came to be, and possibly prevent history from repeating itself. Realizing
that the feud was not one–sided can aid in developing empathy for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Political Corruption In Timothy Findely's Famous Last Words
Political Corruption in Timothy Findely's Famous Last Words Political corruption is when governments abuse their powers for illegitimate purposes.
Political corruption was evident in World War II by Hitler government because Hitler spoke to mass audiences to tell them to hate Jews and
Communists, and to make a new German Empire that would rule for thousands of years. This connects to the novel Famous Last Words because Hitler
makes a corrupted government and a group of people attempt to make a new government to take over. In his novel, Famous Last Words, Timothy
Findley shows political corruption through the decisions and types of governments and how it affected people during World War II. These suggest that
Findley wants to tell the reader that political corruption can make people want to create their own government to overthrow the existing government.
The Characters the Duke of Windsor and a man called Von Ribbentrop make an alliance to make a government to overthrow Hitler's.... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
They form an alliance because they want leadership in Europe and they think that they are the real leaders. He says that Europe needs " a new kind of
leader––someone like a flag, whose very presence makes us rise. Not a Mussolini, of who we are afraid. Not a Hitler who drives us to our feet. But
an emblem whose magnetism pulls us upward" (180). The Duke compares himself to a flag because he sees a flag as important and something that
brings political pride to people and so people will like him more and he will also be better than other great world leaders. So he decided to create his
own alliance in an attempt to be better than Hitler and Mussolini's. If he could make a successful alliance he could overthrow both the two leaders and
could control and conquer

Is The Right Or Wrong?
Ever since humans stepped foot on this Earth we have been wired into believing what is right and what is wrong. Right and wrong originated with
an opinion, therefore making the world we live in completely flawed. Everything we perceive to be the right thing to do, could have possibly been
the opposite if someone had said so. Today, right and wrong is based off of the majority of society and what we believe affects what we chose to do.
There is no right or wrong, not even morals, just actions. Humans act on impulse and doubt by conscience. The world we live in is corrupted,
therefore corrupting us. Now, I am not trying to justify the actions people commit, yet get a better understanding. For instance, the actions committed
by Japan during the interminable World War II. Japan had become the hand in Germany's back pocket and soon became consumed by Germany's
iniquitous power. Japan was ruled by a man desiring power, yet withheld intelligence unlikely found in others, Michinomiya Hirohito. Too many lives
were lost due to the ignorant and arrogant decisions made by oblivious leaders. Unfortunately, a plunging economy, rising militarism and a series of
political assassinations soon caused a crisis for the pro–democracy movement in Japan. To begin with, Japan's infamous emperor during WWII was
Michinomiya Hirohito. He became the 124th emperor of Japan on December 25,1926 ; until he was passed away on January 7, 1989. Hirohito was
known to have an unimaginable desire for the rise

Why Is The Nuremberg Trial Important
The Nuremberg Trials The Nuremberg Trials started November 20, 1945, and ended October 1, 1946. This was the first trial like this in the history of
mankind, and the Nazis are the ones who started it. "Twenty–four high ranking Nazis went on trial because of the horror that they gave people during
WWII," (History.com 2017). First of all, the trials started because after the war everyone knew what the Nazis were doing, with the Jews and the
Concentration Camps. So when the war was over the other countries in the war could take the people in charge of doing so to the Jews to court. The
countries that took the Nazi group on trial was, "Great Britain, Soviet Union, and the United States" (History 2017). What mostly everyone was put on
trial

Timothy Findley's Famous Last Words
After being recognized as an exceptional writer, Timothy Findley published the novel Famous Last Words in 1981. Findley is known for his novels
featuring "many themes...including war, displacement, and emotional repression" (Quill and Quire 1). Although Findley's works contain these specific
themes, are the narrators of these novels reliable? Usually "A narrative normally begins with an Orientation, introducing and identifying the
participants in the action: the time, the place, and the initial behavior" (Labov 2). Using Labov's reasoning, is Mauberley a reliable narrator whose
word the reader can accept his words as the truth? Labov also states that "For a narrative to be successful, it cannot report only the most reportable
event. It must also be credible...the more reportable, the less credible" (5). The term reportable refers to an "event that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
After falling asleep, the Duke of Windsor has a dream in which "he was alone" (Findley 232). It is evident that Mauberley, the narrator, cannot narrate
another character's dreams. Furthermore, the Duke of Windsor mentions that "he was alone", which proves why Mauberley could not narrate the dream
truthfully.
The reliability of Mauberley's narrative as the truth is considered a lie. Mauberley "narrates several scenes ––encounters between Edward and Queen
Mary, Allenby and Lindbergh, von Ribbentrop and Schellenberg–– at which he was not present, and for which he has no plausible, naturalistic source"
(Scobie 1). Furthermore, Mauberley is a pro–Fascist, which is why people cannot trust him as the narrator.
According to Scobie, on many different occasions within the narrative there is "Mauberley's attraction to Fascism" (1). Fascism is a "right–wing
political system characterized by state control and extreme nationalism" (Fascism). Although Mauberley is not directly labelled a Fascist, he does
however embody many of the

The Invasion Of Poland During The World War II
On September 1, 1939, at approximately 4:45 A.M. Germany commenced their invasion of Poland (Bethell 1). The events that ushered in this invasion
are complex, and help explain Hitler's intentions and goals. The invasion was preceded by Germany's vast re–equipment, as well as its numerous
diplomatic efforts. Hitler's September invasion was predicated on his strong belief that the war would be limited to a single enemy, Poland. Aware
of Germany's economic and militaristic limitations, Hitler did not intend to start World War II when he invaded Poland in 1939. Rather, his plan was
to avoid a world war until the mid to late 1940's. The invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939 was preceded by a significant effort at negotiation
between Germany and Poland. Germany's diplomatic attempts targeted two crucial goals. Their first objective was to persuade Poland to collaborate
with them against the USSR. After being adamantly rejected, Germany's ambition turned towards regaining land lost to Poland in the Treaty of
Versailles. From 1933–1939, German officials persistently presented proposals to Poland to ally against the common enemy, Russia (Budurowycz 20).
After numerous failed diplomatic visits to Poland, Germany visited on January 25–27, 1939 in a final attempt at persuading Poland (Budurowycz 26).
During this visit, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Germany's foreign minister, beseeched Poland to join the Anti–Comintern pact. After the Poles maintained
their inflexible and negative attitude

Nuremberg Trials
Where Nazi officials judged fairly during the Nuremburg Trails that followed World War II?
Twenty–four major political and military leaders of Nazi Germany, indicted for aggressive war, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Of the
twenty–four twenty–one were taken into custody and put on trial; these were known as the Nuremberg Trials. These trials started on November 20th
1945 and were the first ever war crime tribunal. The Trials were held by the Allied forces of World War II and were held in the city of Nuremberg in
Bavaria Germany out of the Palace of Justice. Accusations placed against them were for their involvement in the Nazi Party during World War II. Nazi
officials were judged unfairly during the Nuremburg Trails for a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, Julius Streicher was non–military, he was not part of the planning process of the Holocaust, nor of the invasion of Poland or the Soviet
Union. But his role in provoking the massacre of Jews was momentous enough; he was sentenced to death by hanging. Walther Funk, Hitler's
Minister of Economics and was head of the Reichsbank, which funded the economic planning for the war; he was sentenced to Life Imprisonment.
Fritz Sauckel was a general for the allocation of labor. Sauckel was involved in using 5 million laborers that were imported and forced to work. He
was charged with the solicitation of slave labor and sentenced to death by handing. Alfred Jodl was Chief of Operations for the German Army, he was
charged with aggressive war for invasion of the Soviet Union and the destruction of Czechoslovakia. Martin Bormann was known to be uncivilized,
ruthless, and brutal. His whereabouts were unconfirmed during the trials but he made such an impact that he was sentenced in absentia to death by
hanging; his reputation was based on the expulsion of millions of Jews to Poland and the exploitation of Ukrainian women as slave labor.
Going down the list we find Franz von Papen, Vice Chancellor of Germany, he supported views of Hitler but the prosecution had serious difficulties
linking Papen to conspiracy to initiate an aggressive war. He was eventually one of the few that were acquitted. Joachim Von Ribbentrop had
recommended and supported the

Aryan Imperialism
Hitler had special plans for Denmark. He regarded Denmark as a fellow Aryan nation that shared its Nordic roots with Germany. According to Nazi
ideology's scale of racial standing, the Aryan race represented by the German elite was superior. The Nordic race was a close second and "the most
authoritative dogmatists [including Alfred Rosenberg and Joseph Goebbels] of the Nazi creed have repeatedly pointed to Scandinavia as the true home
of the glorious Nordic race." In addition, Hitler also believed specifically that the peninsula that makes up the majority of Denmark, the Jutland, was
mythically the ancestral home of the Nordic race. Denmark would therefore not be treated like another conquered country but as an ally. Instead, it
would ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In response, Hitler received a telegram that simply said, "MY UTMOST THANKS, CHRISTIAN REX." Although the actual German text
("SPRECHE MEINEN BESTEN DANK AUS") was no different than his replies from previous years, Hitler went into a rage. With the
encouragement of some of his advisors in Berlin, Hitler adopted the idea that Denmark had become too defiant and uncooperative in its role as a
protectorate. According to several German officials, such as Gestapo senior official Rudolf Mildner, "And ever since then Hitler hated Denmark."
Ribbentrop ordered Renthe–Fink to deliver a message of protest to the Danish government on September 29 and recalled him immediately back to
Berlin. The Danish envoy stationed in Berlin was also requested to return to Copenhagen. The cordial diplomatic relationship between the two countries
was

The Relation Between Stalin And Hitler
Throughout the course of history, a vast quantity of dictators left their impression on the world as we know it today, each having gained notoriety as a
result of their rapid rise to power and their infamous dynamisms which made them who they are known to be.
The two most notable "leaders" in history who express such qualities are Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and Adolf Hitler from the German Nazi
regime, and these two men, different as they were, displayed symmetric roles throughout their times in control.
The relation between Stalin and Hitler begins with their anonymously parallel childhoods. While pursuing the nature of any dictators dominion, it is
important to review their upbringing, as the study of psychohistory ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler likewise lost a father figure at a young age 2 when he had an unexpected "lung hemorrhage, leaving his thirteen year old son as head of the Hitler
household". 3 In addition to the domestic consistencies between these men in their early stages of life, "neither belonged to the traditional ruling class"
interestingly enough, 4 considering they both came to be two of the most notorious leaders in history. This suggests that both had a climb to
sovereignty unique for that time, as power was traditionally handed down through families or political relations. As for military collaboration between
Stalin's Red Army and the German
Reichswehr, it seen being practiced by the two starting in the early nineteen–twenties.
This relationship was catalyzed by the fact that each party had ultimate access to the interests of the other, as "the Soviet Union wanted access to
advancing military SparkNotes Editors. "SparkNote on Joseph Stalin." SparkNotes LLC. 2005. http://2 www.sparknotes.com/biography/stalin
/ (accessed April 30, 2016). ibid3 Bullock, Alan. Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York: Vintage Books, 1993. 4
Duran 4 technology and military thinking; Germany needed somewhere to develop the weapons and tactical experience it was denied under the
disarmament terms of the Treaty of
Versailles".

The Nuremberg Trials Involvement With The Holocaust
War Crimes Trials
The War Crimes Trials, also known as the Nuremberg Trials, were a series of two
–hundred sixteen court sessions and thirteen trials charging
twenty–four main Nazi party officials, highly– ranked military leaders, doctors and lawyers against their involvement with the Holocaust. The trials
began on November 20, 1945 at the Nuremberg Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Germany, due to its significant connection to the Holocaust, and the
Nazi Party. The trials were conducted by a U.S., French, British, and Soviet military tribunal, and the trials were authorized by the London Agreement.
The charges against those being tried were crimes against peace including planning, starting and waging war; war crimes including violations of laws
of war; crimes against humanity ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On October 1, 1946, verdicts on twenty– two of the twenty– four defendants had been handed down. Twelve of the original twenty– four were
sentenced to death by hanging including Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Martin Bormann, and Hermann Goering.
Bormann was tried and sentenced in absentia, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach was deemed mentally unfit, and too ill to stand at trial.
Goering was sentenced to death, but on the eve of his execution, took a cyanide crystal and died within minutes. Robert Ley, known as the
"undisputed dictator of labor" in Germany, was obsessed with the idea of becoming a martyr, and committed suicide in his prison cell shortly before
his trial began. Ten of twelve were sentenced to death by hanging, and were executed on October 16,1946. The rest of the defendants received prison
sentences from ten years imprisonment to life imprisonment. Chancellor and dictator of Germany, and leader of the Nazi party,Adolf Hitler, was to be
tried in the Nuremberg Trials as well, but had disappeared, later to be discovered that he killed

Molotov Ribbentrop Pact
Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact
The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, colloquially named after the Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov and the German foreign minister Joachim von
Ribbentrop, was an agreement officially titled the Treaty of Non–Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union[1] and signed in Moscow in the
late hours of 23 August 1939.[2] It was a non–aggression pact under which the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany each pledged to remain neutral in the
event that either nation were attacked by a third party. It remained in effect until 22 June 1941, when Germany invaded the Soviet Union.
In addition to stipulations of non–aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol dividing Northern and Eastern Europe into German and Soviet ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
countries occurred from late 1938 to March 1939.[29] The third Soviet Five Year Plan required massive new infusions of technology and industrial
equipment.[27][30]
On 31 March 1939, in response to Nazi Germany's defiance of the Munich Agreement and occupation of Czechoslovakia,[31] the United Kingdom
pledged the support of itself and France to guarantee the independence of Poland, Belgium, Romania, Greece, and Turkey.[32] On 6 April Poland and
the UK agreed to formalize the guarantee as a military alliance, pending negotiations.[33] On 28 April, Hitler denounced the 1934 German–Polish
Non–Aggression Pact and the 1935 Anglo–German Naval Agreement.[34]
Starting in mid–March 1939, the Soviet Union, Britain and France traded a flurry of suggestions and counterplans regarding a potential political and
military agreement.[35] Although informal consultations commenced in April, the main negotiations began only in May.[35] At the same time,
throughout the early 1939,Germany and the Soviet Union had discussed a possibility of an economic deal involving industrial equipment and
armament for the USSR in exchange for raw materials needed for German war production.[36] German war planners had estimated massive raw
materials shortfalls if Germany entered a war without Soviet supply.[37] For months, Germany had secretly hinted to Soviet diplomats that it could
offer better terms for a political agreement than Britain and France.[38][39][40]
The Soviet Union feared Western powers and

Allies To Blame For The Injustices In Ww2 Essay
To what extent should the allies share the guilt for the injustices perpetrated during the 1930s and World War II?
This symposium gave delegates the opportunity to hear and speak on different perspectives of the influential nations or powers that were major aspects
of the World War II. Almost all allied force delegates denied accusations to take any part of the blame for the injustices perpetrated during this atrocious
time and the events preceding. The Axis forced admitted to their faults, but provided strong reasoning of why the Allies should share the blame. Allied
forces denied accusations to take full blame or partial blame for the brutality perpetrated throughout this atrocious time and the events preceding. The
Axis seeked the share of oppression and maltreatment of citizens amid the war, while Allies demanded for the full burden to impose on the Axis, rather
than distribution of blame.
The Allies should share partial blame for the injustices perpetrated during the war, but less significant than the Axis... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Joachim Von Ribbentrop used the reasoning ofGermany's preexisting plight and determination for land to justify the transgression of Germany.
Charles De Gaulle effectively stressed the allies' mistakes through the Treaty of Versailles and the Munich Agreement, and reflected upon the
importance of these and the influence on the World War II. Canada's stance was the pacifist ideal, Carine Wilson articulated the ideal by utilising the
wording of "horrible on both sides through the internment camps", however fully avowed to the siding of the Allies which was decided to end the
war, but provoked the Axis forces, leading to the deaths of Canadian prisoners (Harry Crerar). These all exemplify and highlight the instances of Ally

germany's invasion of poland
The Invasion of Poland (1939):
Germany had lost land to Poland under the Treaty of Versailles.
Many German–speaking people lived in areas that were now part of Poland.
Germany viewed Poles as subhuman and wanted their land for lebensraum.
The Nazi–Soviet Pact ensured Russia would not stop Germany's invasion of Poland.
Hitler thought Britain and France would not keep their promise to defend Poland.
On 1 September 1939 Hitler ordered the German army to invaded Poland.
Britain and France declared war leading to the start of the Second World War.
At 4.45 am on 1 September 1939 the German battleship Schleswig–Holstein opened fire on the Polish garrison of the Westerplatte Fort, Danzig
(modern–day Gdansk), in what was ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler 's annexation of Czechoslovakia breached the written guarantee he had issued to Chamberlain in Munich in 1938, stating that he had no further
territorial demands to make in Europe. Therefore, on 31 March 1939, Chamberlain issued a formal guarantee of Poland 's borders and said that he
expected Hitler to moderate his demands.
Hitler was not deterred, and on 3 April he ordered the Wehrmacht to prepare for the invasion of Poland on 1 September. Hitler was convinced that
Chamberlain would not go to war to defend Poland and that France would lack the will to act alone.
Nazi–Soviet pact
Hitler 's only real concern was that a sudden German invasion of Poland might alarm Stalin and trigger a war with the Soviet Union. Stalin feared a
German invasion and had been seeking an anti–Nazi 'collective security ' alliance with the western powers for many years, but by July 1939 Britain
and France had still not agreed terms.
Poland had also rejected an alliance with the Soviet Union, and refused permission for the Red Army to cross its territory to engage the Wehrmacht in a
future war. Hitler saw his opportunity, and authorised his Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop to enter into secret negotiations with the Soviet
Union.
The result was the signing of the Nazi–Soviet Pact on 23 August 1939. Both Hitler and Stalin set aside their mutual antipathy for national gain and in
particular the restoration of their pre–1919 borders.
Nazi–Soviet pact

Hitler 's

The Iron Curtain During The Cold War
The Iron Curtain symbolized the ideological conflict and physical boundary dividing Europe into two separate areas from the end of world war 2 in
1945 until the end of the cold war in 1991. The term symbolized efforts by the Soviet union to block itself and its satellite states from open contact
with the west and non–Soviet–controlled areas. On the east side of the Iron Curtain were the countries that were connected to or influenced by the
Soviet Union. On either side of the Iron Curtain, states developed their own international economic and military alliances.Churchill's geographical
description of the Iron Curtain was ambiguous as to which side of the Iron Curtain the Soviet occupation zones of Germany and Austria were on –
Churchill described ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Senator from the state of Wisconsin from 1947 until his death in 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public face of a period
in which Cold War tensions fueled fears of widespread Communist subversion. He was noted for making claims that there were large numbers of
Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the United States federal government and elsewhere. Ultimately, his tactics and inability to
substantiate his claims led him to be censured by the United States Senate.
In February 1950, appearing at the Ohio County Women's Republican Club in Wheeling, West Virginia, McCarthy gave a speech that propelled him
into the national spotlight. Waving a piece of paper in the air, he declared that he had a list of 205 known members of the Communist Party who were
"working and shaping policy" in the State

The Airplane Has Changed The Course Of The Western World...
Joshua Poirrier
Mrs. Elliott
English III
9 May 2017
The Airplane Effect Orville Wright once said, "The airplane stays up because it doesn't have the time to fall." The ingenuity of the Wright brothers'
airplane design has changed the course of the Western world forever. The invention of the aircraft positively affected American society by providing a
quicker way of traveling, having an influence on warfare, and implementing a better economy in the United States. When the aeroplane was assembled,
the possibility for travel and exploration became boundless. Before airplanes, the eighteenth and nineteenth century produced the steamboat, the
railroad system, the automobile, and the electric streetcar (Moss). While these were all viable ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This was a result of airplanes evolving throughout the First World War. The success of America and the Allied Powers in World War II was affected
extensively by those fighter jets. They were armed with machine guns and had better engines. Even with the success of the fighter jets, ultimately,
bombers had the biggest impact on America's success in the war. Bombs cleared out squadrons of enemy soldiers in places the Allies could not travel
to on foot. American bombers ended the war by dropping nuclear bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima (Dugdale–Pointon). Adolf Hitler's foreign
minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, wrote that one of the reasons the Allied Powers came out victorious was because of the success of their air
power. Hitler agreed with this (Overy). The flying machine forever affected the world during the World Wars. One of the most notable impacts
airplanes has affected not just America, but the world as a whole. Aviation keeps the whole world connected and in touch. One of the ways aviation
have an effect on the economy today is by providing jobs for the world. There are 56.6 million jobs worldwide associated with aviation in some way. If
the airplane industry were to become a country, it would be the nineteenth most populated country on the earth ("Social and Economic Benefits").
Airplanes also have made an impact on the economy by allowing people to travel throughout the world. This has empowered businessmen to establish
better relationships with others

Corruption In Famous Last Word Essay
War is a horrific experience made worse by those who try to control it for their own advantage. In Famous Last Words, Timothy Findley creates a
world of intrigue as he describes the tales of conspiracy and corruption for world domination. That made World War II far worse than it otherwise
would have been. This is shown through the relationships of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Benito Mussolini.
The Duke and Duchess of Windsor are prominent people in society, who want more power. The people in the Duke&#8217;s alliance invited Mr.
Coty to join the alliance because, in the Duke&#8217;s words, "From time to time, Monsieur Coty and his friends are useful to us." ...
Von Ribbentrop is a very selfish man who is looking out for his own safety and benefit at others&#8217; expense. "You must always
remember what it is we want&#8230;.and that some of us must fall before we can have it," (263) he says, openly admitting he is
prepared to let others fall for his own personal gain. He wants Schellenberg to join forces with him. Von Ribbentrop says to Schellenberg,
"&#8230;I think you and I might do very well together whatever it is you&#8217;re trying to do alone. So many plots are afoot. We
live in a world of intrigue. One has to be careful not to get caught up in the coil&#8217;s of someone else&#8217;s downfall." (322)
Von Ribbentrop knows that the two of them together can be very successful and that they must be sure not to get mixed with the wrong alliances which
will bring them down. A very conniving man, von Ribbentrop pretends to care about others but is very much in the game for himself.
Joachim von Ribbentrop wants very much so to prevail and is willing to do whatever necessary

Assessing the Relative Importance of the Reasons Why the...
Assessing the Relative Importance of the Reasons Why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to Assassinate Hitler was Unsuccessful This question focuses on an
evaluation of the significant factors that resulted in a failed coup d'etat, which involved an attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler on the 20th July 1944.
For the purpose of this essay a coup d'etat may be interpreted as; ' a sudden overthrowing of government and seizure of power by others' and assessing
the 'relative importance' refers to evaluating the weight of factors in comparison to one another. In order to assess the relative importance of the reasons
for the unsuccessful event, it is essential to consider the failure to... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However it was Claus von Stauffenberg in particular who gave the plotters a sense of moral purpose and the enthusiasm needed in order for it to
have a chance of success. Stauffenberg was essential to the plot as he frequently attended the Fuhrers headquarters, the Wolfscchanze (Wolf's Lair) at
Rastenberg, and since it became clear that Hitler's death was the key to the entire plot, he offered to carry out the assassination attempt himself. Hitler
arranged a conference at the Wolfscchanze on 20th July 1944. The meeting was planned to take place in a wooden hut. Von Stauffenberg arrived with
a briefcase containing a bomb at 10am and after greeting the Fuhrer, he placed the briefcase beneath the conference table, at which the Fuhrer was
present and made an excuse to leave the room. Von Stauffneberg heard the explosion and was convinced Hitler was dead. Assuming this, he
immediately travelled to Berlin, unaware that an officer had moved the briefcase and in effect saved Hitler's life. Oblivious to this, once in Berlin,
Stauffenberg persuaded the conspirators to put their operation plans for a coup into motion. However it

The Nuremberg War Criminal Trials
The Nuremberg War Criminal Trials
In the 1940's, World War Two was drawing to a close, and Nazi Germany, while fresh in the memories of many, was falling apart and was losing
influence. The problem was that many of the Nazi leaders were still out there, including Hermann Goering, the man responsible for starting and
constructing the first of his many Concentration Camps. The case consisted of 13 separate trials for 22 leaders for the Nazi party, and many of whom
received the death penalty. The trials were a symbolic representation of the death of Nazism, and the world uniting for a greater cause and for justice.
The Nuremberg Trials all started when the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and the United States of America issued a joint declaration ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
All of which had a bone to pick with Nazi Germany (Fireside 17–19). In any sense, the trials helped put to rest many of the suspicions of the people
as everybody was given a full and fair trial, and several of the men on trial only suffered minor prison sentences and a few were even acquitted of
the crimes they were accused of. So in conclusion, the 13 trials that would later be infamously known as the Nuremberg War Crime Trials charged
dozens of Nazi criminals with deaths of innocent people, and saw to it that Justice would prevail. The trials, signaling the end of the Nazi's genocidal
reign, helped unite the world and gave closure to those who suffered under Hitler's and Hermann's

The Treaty Of Non Aggression Treaty
The MolotovВ–Ribbentrop pact, named after the Soviet secretary of state Vyacheslav Molotov and also the German secretary of state Joachim von
Ribbentrop, formally the treaty of Non–aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and additionally called the
RibbentropВ–Molotov pact or NaziВ–Soviet pact, was a non–aggression treaty signed in Moscow within the late hours of twenty three August 1939.
The pact 's publicly declared intentions were a guarantee of non–belligerence by every party towards the opposite the others a commitment that neither
party would ally itself to or aid an enemy of the opposite party. Additionally to stipulations of non–aggression, the accord enclosed a secret protocol that
divided... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The pact remained operative till the German government violated it by attacking the USSR on 22 June 1941. On 16 April 1922, Germany and also the
USSR entered the treaty of Rapallo, pursuant to which they renounced territorial and economical claims against one another. The parties further
pledged neutrality within the event of an attack against each other with the 1926 written agreement of Berlin. Whereas trade between the 2 countries
fell sharply when world war I, trade agreements signed within the mid–1920s helped to extend trade to 433 million Reichsmarks each year by 1927. At
the start of the Thirties, the Nazi Party 's rise to power multiplied tensions between Germany and the USSR at the side of different countries with ethnic
Slavs, who were considered "Untermenschen" according to Nazi racial ideology. Moreover, the anti–Semitic Nazis associated ethnic Jews with each
communism and money laissez–faire economy, each of that they opposed. Consequently, Nazi theory command that Slavs within the USSR were being
ruled by "Jewish Bolshevik" masters. In 1934, Adolf Hitler himself had spoken of an unavoidable battle against each Pan–Slavism and Neo–Slavism,
the conclusion in which would result in "permanent mastery of the world", tho ' he declared that they 'd "walk a part of the road with the Russians, if
that may facilitate United States of America." The

The United Nations
Each of the 193 Member States of the United Nations is a member of the General Assembly. States are admitted to membership in the UN by a
decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. Adolf Hitler (20 April 1889– 30 April 1945) was an
Austrian–born German politician who was the leader of theNazi Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP); National
Socialist German Workers Party). He was Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945 and FГјhrer ("leader") of Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945. As
effective dictator of Nazi Germany, Hitler was at the centre of World War II in Europe and the Holocaust. Hitler was a decorated veteran of World
War I. He joined the precursor of the NSDAP,
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler aimed to eliminate Jews from Germany and establish a New Order to counter what he saw as the injustice of the post–World War I international
order dominated by Britain and France. His first six years in power resulted in rapid economic recovery from the Great Depression, the denunciation of
restrictions imposed on Germany after World War I, and the annexation of territories that were home to millions of ethnic Germans–actions which gave
him significant popular support. Hitler sought Lebensraum ("living space") for the German people. His aggressive foreign policy is considered to be
the primary cause of the outbreak of World War II in Europe. He directed large
–scale rearmament and on 1 September 1939 invaded Poland, resulting
in British and French declarations of war on Germany. In June 1941, Hitler ordered an invasion of the Soviet Union. By the end of 1941 German
forces and the European Axis powers occupied most of Europe and North Africa. Failure to defeat the Soviets and the entry of the United States into
the war forced Germany onto the defensive and it suffered a series of escalating defeats. In the final days of the war, during the Battle of Berlin in
1945, Hitler married his long–time lover, Eva Braun. On 30 April 1945, less than

Why the Soviet Union Signed a Pact of Non-Agression in 1939
International relations of the 18th century were above all concerned with the balance of power, since no one state felt strong enough to attempt a
military conquest of the entire European continent. 1 On the horizon of the 19th century, the development of a rising German enterprise created a
cataclysmic downfall of British, French, and American diplomacy. Above all, while under a firm hand by Joseph Stalin, Russia sought expansionist
ideals just as much as Adolf Hitler did. The failures of British and French negotiations, under previous attempted containment of Germany with a
lackluster Treaty of Versailles, paved the way for Russo–German negotiations that green–lit the eventual invasion of Poland. It was the fundamental
dishonesty of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
9
Since Stalinists were not credited well within the Western populous, Stalin did not abandon the idea of dealing with Germany later due to the West
keeping Russia at arms length.10 On the 2nd of May 1935, the Franco–Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance was brought to light. It did not have a lot of
substance as a treaty, and was put into place in order to consult between each states in time of crisis. Russia hoped that it would be followed, but
Pierre Laval, successor to Louis Barthou preferred reparations to the German state would that would curb any chance of conflict through political
military action. Laval delayed french politics with Russia until the Spring of 1936. LГ©on Blum was the Prime Minsiter of France, and his
government, who were supported by communist deputies were willing to turn political understanding of the German problem into real military
consequences. 1936 to 1937 was an energetic time for Russian diplomacy, by attempting to show a strategic campaign within France, that largely failed
due to French resistance. Yvon Delbos, Frances foreign affairs minister, didn't favour a Franco–Russo alliance because he thought Stalin would coerce
France into a war with Germany, only to progress Stalin's communist ideals. British support was more important to France than Russian support, and
fear of disappointing Britian was a large influence for a lack of alliance made. In fact,

The World Of The Second World War
The Second World War lasted from 1939 to 1945, which involved most of the world 's nations, organized into two opposing military alliances: The
Allies and the Axis. It is considered the most extensive war, with more than 100 million armed forces assembled. The Allied forces placed their entire
economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities at the service of the war effort, destroying the difference between civilian and military resources. It
was the deadliest conflict in human history (Reference), which resulted in over 70 million fatalities caused by military action against civilians, the
Holocaust and the use of nuclear weapons in warfare. This essay concerns itself with why and how the allies won the Second World War. Joachim von
...
There are several reasons for the transformation of Soviet fighting power and morale. Firstly, the soviet army learned a lot from their previous
encounters with the German army. The soviet air and tanks were adjusted to copy the Germans, communication and intelligence, training for officers
and men was improved and the soviet technology was modernized to match Germany 's (reference). Secondly, the pre–war economic planning and
mobilization helped the regime to run a war on an emergency basis, while the very large number of workers and factories allowed the soviets to
reconstruct its armaments quickly (reference). Until 1942 Stalin closely controlled the army. Political officials of the communist party worked
alongside senior officers and reported straight back to the Kremlin, that is the Russian government housing. Stalin came to realize that political control
hold the army back and cut the amount politics influenced the army in 1942. Stalin created a deputy supreme commander who worked under him,
Marshal Zhukov, and stepped back from conducting the war. The Soviet General Staff demonstrated that they could match the Germans on the
battlefield. It was not until later in the war that Stalin began to regain control, when victory was in sight. Furthermore, from 1942 a flow of food and
raw materials continued the Soviet war effort. There was enough food to ensure a meal for every Soviet soldier; most of the Soviet

How Did Joseph Stalin Conquer Poland
The devastating attack on Poland was a major factor that dictated the beginning of World War Two between Germany, Britain, and France. When the
Germans decided that they wanted to conquer Poland, they knew that their actions would provoke the greater superpowers of Europe (Britain and
France), but they were more than ready to combat them. On the other hand, they were more worried about what Russia's Joseph Stalin was capable of.
Ironically, Russia was the one wanting peace when Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Vyacheslav Mikhaylovich Molotov approached German
Foreign Minister Joachim Von Ribbentrop under the direct orders of Stalin on August 23rd, 1939 and suggested the "Nazi
–Soviet Non–Aggression
Pact", which stated that Russia would not intervene with Hitler's ambitious plans to conquer west Poland, if Russia is permitted to invade the east side
(history... and Shirer 521).... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This pact was meant to last for 10 years following the day that it was signed, but was violated by Germany just two years later, on June 22nd, 1941,
when Germany invaded Soviet Union in Operation Barbarossa (britannica...). On September 1st, 1939, at 4:45 am, approximately 1.5 million Germans
troops invaded Poland with the German Luftwaffe (Germany's Airforce) attacking the airbases and the German warships and U–boats attacking and
destroying the Polish naval bases. When Supreme Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler was questioned as to why he ordered the attack on Poland, he
replied that it was a defensive movement on Germany's part, but the majority of the world wasn't convinced with that pity reason, but little did they
know that the answers to their questions would be announced in the future (history...). "[To kill] without pity or mercy, all men, women, and children
of Polish descent or

World Revolution Vs. Soviet Policy
Initially the need for a world revolution dominated Bolshevik ideals to such an extent that foreign policy in the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics) was regarded as unnecessary. Soviet Policy was dominated by conflicting ideologies; the Marxist ideological view, and the Commissariat's
traditional policy theory. By co–operating with both mindsets, the Communist International, or Comintern, was created in order to work towards global
revolution. In 1922, under the control of Vladimir Lenin, the Treaty of Rapallo was signed. This enabled both Germany and Russia to unite and
benefit from one another's trade and security, as well as providing each other with training aid and weapon testing grounds. In 1926, the USSR signed
another treaty with Germany, the Treaty of Berlin, which promised that if either nation was at war with a third power, the other would remain neutral.
However, whilst ties between Germany and the USSR were being created Britain posed as an unwanted burden to the Soviets as it renounced trade ties
and diplomatic recognition of the communist regime. During this, on Russia's Eastern border both China and Japan fought back against their Soviet
counterparts. By 1934, the Soviet Union had joined the League of Nations, a League put in place to attempt to keep peace and relinquish violence
within Europe. With the further rise of Germany's Adolf Hitler, came the Nazi–Soviet Non–Aggression Pact, however the treaty did not last long.
When the Bolsheviks seized

The King 's Speech Analysis
Basic Information The King's Speech was released in the United States in 2010 with its world premiere September 6, 2010, at the Telluride Film
Festival in the United States according to imdb.com. The movie was produced by See–Saw Films, Weinstein Company, The UK Film Council,
Momentum Pictures, Aegis Film Fund, Molinare Investment, Film Nation Entertainment, and Bedlam Productions. The director Tom Hooper won the
Best Director Academy Award for this movie. David Seidler who also overcame a stammer wrote the film. Colin Firth plays the main character King
George VI. Helena Bonham Carter plays his wife, Queen Elizabeth. Geoffrey Rush plays Lionel Logue, the speech therapist, helping King George
overcome a stammer. A theme of the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He speculates after he is dead, David (Edward VIII) will ruin himself in 12 months. His father is impatient with him and barks at him to relax, take
his time, and do it! Bertie later plays the recording given to him by Lionel and hears the flawless reading. The next scene Bertie and Elizabeth are
back in Lionel's office to negotiate his treatment. They ask Lionel to concentrate on the mechanics of the stammer and avoid "personal nonsense".
Lionel disagrees and says dealing with the mechanics is only dealing with the surface of the problem. Bertie asks Lionel to assist with minor
events and they arrange to meet every day. Lionel uses unexpected techniques and after revealing some of his childhood pressures they develop a
friendship. The film shows several exercises and speeches with the King and jumps ahead to 1936. King George the V is dying and both Bertie and
David have been summoned to their father. David complains that his father dying complicates things with is mistress, Miss Wallace Simpson. He
makes his mother's guest wait for dinner while he is on the phone with his mistress. King George V dies that night and Edward VIII becomes King,
he says "now I'm trapped". Bertie meets with Lionel and opens up about the passing of his father and reveals intimate details of his life. He tells that
his father's last words were "Bertie has more guts than the rest of his brothers put together". Additionally,

The Molotov Ribbentrop Pact
Whilst the Allied victory of World War II often has considerable connotations with the D
–Day landings of British and US troops, the significant
contributions of the USSR that allowed such events to occur with such success must be acknowledged. The Germans' engagement on the Eastern Front
ultimately gave the opportunity for the Western Allied invasion of Germany to occur, as a large percentage of total German troops were defeated by
the Red Army on the Eastern Front, the Luftwaffe was devastated by endless supplies of enemy Soviet aircraft, and the remaining German divisions
were forcefully divided unequally between the two fronts; leaving the western German defences undermanned and ill–equipped for a successful
resistance against D–Day and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Soviets took approximately 91 000 German troops as prisoners of war after the surrender of Nazi General Field Marshal, Friedrich Paulus.
During July and August of 1943, the Soviet forces were largely involved in the Battle of Kursk, which remains 'the largest tank battle in history' .
The battle involved 940 900 German men and some 2 500 000 Soviet troops ; the Soviets having 7 360 tanks at their disposal in comparison to the
Germans' 3 253 . The Soviet forces recruited the 'entire civilian population of the Kursk region' to assist in the establishment of its defences, resulting in
a defence including barbed wire, automatic flame–throwers, anti–tank and anti–personnel mines placed in a density four times that of Stalingrad's
defences.
'After their defeat at Kursk, the Germans never again looked like they might win the war on the Eastern Front, the theater that held the key to overall
victory in the

A Beautiful Friendship: Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin
The 60th anniversary of one of the most fateful events in world history went unremarked this week. On Aug. 23, 1939 Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin
agreed to what became known as the Nazi–Soviet nonaggression pact. With that, Stalin made World War II possible. Assured that he was protected
from Soviet counter–aggression in the East, Hitler invaded Poland a week later, Sept. 1.
The signal that something was up between the two totalitarian powers had come some four months earlier but European chancelleries overlooked it.
For on May 3, 1939 came the startling news that the Soviet Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov had resigned "at his own request." Litvinov, of Jewish
origin and strongly anti–Nazi, had been replaced by Vyacheslav Molotov. His... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Thus the anti–Nazi parties were rebuffed, on Stalin's orders, when in 1932 they appealed to the German Communist Party to form a united front
against the Nazis. In other words, Stalin wanted the Nazis in power because in a few years, so he believed, they would be ousted and Germany would
eventually fall into his lap.
Revisionist historians have been trying to sell a fairy–tale that Communist Party members wanted nothing but good for the working–class. Their
demurrer: only a handful were spies for Stalin. But these mainstream historians ignore the ignominious role the Communist Party played during those
crucial months of the Nazi–Soviet Pact when France fell in 1940 and Britain stood alone. French Communist Party members sent anonymous letters to
soldiers on the Maginot Line detailing the fictitious amours of supposedly adulterous wives. In America the communists fought conscription;
communist–controlled CIO unions called strikes against aircraft factories to prevent shipment to France or England of warplanes they had paid for.
The Daily Worker called it the "Second Imperialist War," the Soviet dismemberment of Poland an action taken in "the cause of world peace." Earl
Browder, Communist Party leader, called FDR "an unlimited military dictator" who had adopted "the techniques ofAdolf Hitler." Congress was called
the "Hitler Reichstag."
And then overnight the "Second Imperialist War" became a "People's War," when on June 22, 1941, Hitler invaded the USSR–

Essay On Buchenwald Concentration Camp
get water they got poison gas. Everyone in the chamber died, the Nazi's then cleared the chamber and either threw the bodies into a pit that the
people who died dug or the burned them. Sometimes the Nazi's wouldn't even take the people to camps they would have mass executions with
machine guns where the people being shot would go out and the Nazis would make them dig a pit, then take all their clothes off and line up in
groups of 50 or 100 on the edge of the pit. The Nazi's would load their guns and open fire, all would fall into the pit whether they were dead or not,
then the next group would line up and the process was repeated until the pit was full. There was a concentration camp, the Buchenwald
concentration camp. At this camp, there was some really horrible things that happened. This camp was opened in July of 1937 to male prisoners
only. In late 1943 women became a part of this camp. The prisoners were kept in the northern part of the camp while the barracks and administrative
complex was in the southern part of the camp. It was heavily guarded by a string of centuries and watch towers, as well as electrified barbed wire.
The SS oversaw this camp. Often, they shot prisoners in the stables or hanged them in the crematorium areas. A lot of the early prisoners were political
prisoners, however, in 1938 the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Allied forces won WWII effectively destroying the Nazi's power. After the chaos was over the Allied leaders got together and decided that there
needed to be a trial on an international scale because of the crimes against humanity. This is where the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials started. Why
Nuremberg though? The Nazi regime's headquarters was in Nuremberg Germany. It was the easiest place to hold the trials, the Nazi's had conveniently
built enough prison space to house the perspective

What Were The Consequences That Erupted After The Pact...
Introduction What were the consequences that erupted after the pact between Hitler and Stalin? The results of the pacts between Adolf Hitler and
Joseph Stalin were betrayals and battles, which changed the course of the war. If not for the striking similarities between the two dictators, which led
to their downfall, the Axis, Germany, Italy and Japan,would have had the opportunity to win the largest war in recent history; however, due to the
occurrence of the betrayal on Hitler's behalf, the war was turned in favor of the Allies, Great Britain, France and later on the Soviet Union..
Pacts
The first pact written was referred to as the Nazi–Soviet Pact. The pact caught many off guard due to the fact that fascism was the style of government
running Germany, while Russia had a communist form of government. The document had been written at the beginning of the war, August 22, 1939.
The signing of the document was the signal that the war was going to begin. Negotiated by two foreign ministers, Joachim Von Ribbentrop and
Vyacheslav Molotov, the countries came to an agreement, despite the opposing ideals and goals of each country. When the odds of the war were not
in their favor, "they had a change of heart and joined forces" (Ross). The leaders put their mutual hatred and distrust for one another aside in order to
form a mutually beneficial relationship between the countries. The Nazi–Soviet Pact addressed the course of action each country would take
concerning Poland. Hitler

hitler /stalin Essay
Hitler and Stalin will probably go down in history as two of the greatest known evil leaders of the 20th Century. You might ask what could bring two
men to become the menaces they were. What kind of upbringing would cause someone to turnout the way they did?
December 21, 1879 in Georgia, Joseph Stalin is born. Around the time of Stalin's birth Georgia was not the best place to be. They were at a
miserable level of poverty, there was no industry, and they had a 75% illiteracy rate and an increasing crime rate. Stalin was born to peasants. Both
of his parents were illiterate and were born as serfs. His father was a rough, violent drunk who beat his wife and child, and found it hard to make a
living. He ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hitler's attitudes led to his becoming a rabid German nationalist. His ancestors too were peasants, but not serfs. Unlike Stalin, Hitler's early years
were not of hardship and poverty. He was never poor or harshly treated. His father moved up in the ranks in the service and retired with the highest
rank open to a civil servant with his education. He had a secure income and a very high social standing and when he passed away he left his widow and
children well provided for.
Hitler came to power in 1935. His basis of hatred was director towards the Jews. One reason for the hatred towards the Jews was because his mother
was sick with cancer, and it was a Jewish doctor that could not save her. Hitler had no real friends when he came to power, and he killed all of the
ones he did have. Stalin came to power in 1924. They called him, "The man of Many Faces". The people that really knew him as a person were
terrified of him. All of Stalin's generals were in fear of him, but stayed faithful to him. When Hitler attacked, he moved in with precision accuracy
and moved quickly through the town of village he was destroying. Stalin on the other hand took a four to five year period of time to strike all of the
villages and towns. Even in death Stalin was a killer. Stalin was paranoid by an assassination on him. To prevent assassination, Stalin would never
sleep in the same

Henry David Thoreau
Germany On May 8,1945, the unconditional surrender of the German armed forces was signed by Field Marshal Kietel in Berlin, ending World War II
for Germany. The German people were confronted with a situation that they had never before experienced: foreign armies occupied the entire German
territory. The total breakdown of civil administration throughout the country required immediate measures to ensure the rebuilding of civil authority.
After disposing of Hitler's successor as head of state and his government, the Allies issued a unilateral declaration on June 5, 1945, which proclaimed
their supreme authority over German territory. The allies would govern Germany through four occupation zones, one for each of the four powers– the...
Indeed, the ACC had no executive authority of its own, but rather had to rely on the cooperation of each military governor to implement its decisions in
his occupation zone. Given the immense problems involved in establishing a provisional administration, unanimity was often lacking, and occupation
policies soon varied. The French, for instance, vetoed the establishment of a central German administration, a decision that furthered the country's
eventual division. Because they had not participated in the Potsdam conference, the French did not feel bound to the conference decision that the
country would remain an economic unit. Instead, the French sough to extract as much as they could from Germany and from the Saar area for a time.
The Soviet occupiers likewise sought to recover as much as possible from Germany, as compensation for the losses their country had sustained during
the war. Unlike the French, however, they sought to influence Germany as a whole and hoped to hold an expanded area of influence. In their own
zone, the Soviet authorities quickly move toward establishing a socialist society like their own. The United States had the greatest interest in
denazificitaion and in the establishment of a liberal democratic system. Early plans, such as the Morgenthau Plan, to keep Germans poor by basing
their economy on

The Nuremberg Trials: A Brutal Events Of The Holocaust
Introduction paragraph
After the brutal event of the Holocaust the people that committed the crime had to be punished. The allies of the war and Germany came together to
punish the Axis criminals of the war. Many trials took place in many places around the world to punish the Axis war criminals.
How Long After the Holocaust
The post war trials took place before the war even ended, and they lasted very long after. The Axis war criminals had to be punished for the crimes they
committed. The Allies and Germany decided to take action immediately. "Beginning in the winter of 1942, the governments of the Allied powers
announced their determination to punish Axis war criminals." The allies thought it was so important for the criminals to be punished that the hunt for
the criminals still goes on today (War Crimes Trials). From 1942 until now there have been many criminals of the Holocaust brought to trial and
punished. "Between December 1946 and April 1949, US prosecutor tried ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The Nuremberg trials were the largest trials held to punish the Nazis. Nuremberg, Germany was the chosen site for these trials, therefore the name
Nuremberg trials. The Nuremberg Trials took place in 1945 and 1946 (The Nuremberg Trials). "Those individuals directly involved in the killing
received the most severe punishments." Judges from the countries of the United States, France, Great Britain, and The Soviet union presided over the
Nuremberg Trials (The Nuremberg trials). Of the Nazi's convicted twelve were sentanced to death, seven were sent to the Spandau Prison in Berlin
and ten were hung (The Nuremberg Trials). The majority of the major war leaders were convicted in the Nuremberg Trials and the Allies came together
to decide on the punishments of these criminals. The Nuremberg Trials punished many Nazis and Nazi supporters, but many more still remained after
the trials and went into hiding to never be

Invasion Of Poland Research Paper
The Invasion of Poland was a war between Germany, the Soviet Union and Poland. Germany invaded Poland and began with World War II. German
took the victory in 1939. On September 1,1939, The Nazi Germans leader, Adolf Hitler, launched an invasion of Poland that triggered the start of
World War II. The invasion lasted September until October 1939.Germany had a better military force than the Polish before the conflict.
Rather than having a strong defense, Poland troops rushed to the Germans and were captured or killed.
To Hitler, the conquest of invading Poland would Lebensraum, or "living space" for the German people. According to his plan, the racially superior,
Germans would colonize the territory and the native slaves would be enslaved. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The next morning, troops with Poland uniforms within the invasion, damaging Germany's side of the border. The Polish army was hopeless winning
against the Germans. (A&E Television Networks, "Germans invade Poland")
The Polish had a defense called the "West Plan" that was designed before the war.. The Polish army was seemed to be fighting alone trying to defend
western and regions country. The British and French estimated that Poland would be able to defend itself for two or three months.. Polish forces were
stretched along the German border. This strategy left supplies lines poorly protected.
Whereas, Germany's plan would colonize the territory and the native slaves would be enslaved. The expansion of German had begun in 1938.
Germans plan was to invade Poland in three directions. Firstly, the main attack was planned over the western Polish border, which was to be carried
out by Army Group South. These people were to deliver the decisive blow with northeastward into Poland.
Secondly, A second attack was lead by the route from northern Prussia. A second army was planned to attack eastward across the border of Polish
Corridor. These three assaults were converged on Warsaw. (Wikimedia, Foundation

Pope Pius XII and the Jews Essay
The twentieth century was marked by genocides on an monstrous scale. One of the most terrible was the Holocaust wrought by Nazi Germany, which
killed an estimated six million European Jews and almost as many other victims.
During this dark time, the Catholic Church was shepherded by Pope Pius XII, who proved himself an untiring foe of the Nazis, determined to save as
many Jewish lives as he could. Yet today Pius XII gets almost no credit for his actions before or during the war.
Anti–Catholic author Dave Hunt writes, "The Vaticanhad no excuse for its Nazi partnership or for its continued commendation of Hitler on the
one hand and its thunderous silence regarding the Jewish question on the other hand. . . . [The popes] continued ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Germans were likewise displeased with the reigning pontiff, Pius XI, who showed himself to be a unrelenting opponent of the new German
"ideals"–even writing an entire encyclical, Mit Brennender Sorge (1937), to condemn them. When Pius XI died in 1939, the Nazis
abhorred the prospect that Pacelli might be elected his successor.
Dr. Joseph Lichten, a Polish Jew who served as a diplomat and later an official of the Jewish Anti–Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, writes:
"Pacelli had obviously established his position clearly, for the Fascist governments of both Italy and Germany spoke out vigorously against
the possibility of his election to succeed Pius XI in March of 1939, though the cardinal secretary of state had served as papal nuncio in Germany
from 1917 to 1929. . . . The day after his election, the Berlin Morgenpost said: 'The election of cardinal Pacelli is not accepted with favor in Germany
because he was always opposed to Nazism and practically determined the policies of the Vatican under his predecessor.' "[4]
Former Israeli diplomat and now Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Pinchas Lapide states that Pius XI "had good reason to make Pacelli the architect of his
anti–Nazi policy. Of

America's Involvement In World War II
America the Game Changer America's involvement in World War II changed the course of the war and prevented Hitler from completely dominating
Europe. At the dawn of World War II, America was not involved. Situations in the western hemisphere turned urgent and violent as Hitler's army
invaded countries in Europe. While America watched from the sidelines, it aided its struggling allies, Great Britain and France, by sending supplies
(history.state.gov). They placed an embargo on exporting goods to Japan (pearlharbor.org).These actions contradicted America's claim of neutrality in
the conflict with the Axis Powers, Germany, Japan and Italy. These contradictions infuriated the Japanese who devised an attack of revenge on the U.S.
The Japanese bombed... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Specifically, the Battle of Normandy and the Battle of the Bulge were two important fights. The Battle of Normandy, one of the most decisive battles
in World War II, took place on June 6, 1944. Though delayed by bad weather, American, British and Canadian troops successfully landed on five
beaches along a 50 mile stretched coast of France (ddaymuseum.co.uk). Out of at least 150,000 allied troops, 73,000 were American troops
(ddaymuseum.co.uk). There were 61, 715 British troops that landed on the beaches (ddaymuseum.co.uk). America provided enough men to make a
heavy impact. Even with thousands of American deaths, it was less detrimental to them than it was to the Germans, who had a limited amount of
manpower (History Net: Where History Comes Alive – World & US History Online). Without the Americans, the Allies would not have had enough
power to break through German forces. The Battle of Normandy resulted in an Allied victory that boosted both country's spirits, resulting in more
victories over Nazi Germany. Shortly after liberating France, the Battle of the Bulge began. This battle was Germany's last major offensive move to try
and gain control over the West once more (history.com). It is called the Battle of the Bulge because Hitler tried to split up the Allied forces, specifically
targeting the American defensive lines, thus resulting in a bulge (history.com). In his first offensive wave, Hitler threw in a whopping 250,000 German
soldiers to push through 80,000 American troops (history.com). Though all odds were against the Americans, it did not stop them from winning. Days
after Hitler's surprise attack, America brought in aircraft to bomb German forces (history.com). This battle resulted in the defeat of the Germans.
Germany would no longer have any opportunities to gain control over the West. This was Hitler's last effort to gain control but he failed. America
endured the hardships of the harsh

Monroe Doctrine Research Paper
The United States has tried to stay out of foreign affairs for the majority of it's history. Desire for non–involvement goes as far back as the nation's
creation in the 18th century. The most prominent policy for this topic is the Monroe Doctrine. This particular policy stated that the United States would
recognize the internal affairs of European nations or their colonies but not get involved (Monroe). The mentality of a non–intervention was extremely
prevalent in pre–World War II America. Not only did most citizens want to not go to war, but the people in high offices wanted to avoid the conflict.
United States policies from 1937 to 1941 regarding foreign aggression focused on economics, national security, and democratic values in an effort ...
The United States Congress still held on to the ideals presented in the Monroe Doctrine. They believed that getting involved with nations outside
of the Americas would invoke a lack of peace in the realm of the western hemisphere (US Congress). Yet it was becoming more apparent as time
past that if the United States did not get involved, there would be a possibility that other democratic nations would be taken over by the power of
Nazi Germany and Japan. The New York Times explains how America was ultimately the one power that could face these enemies and if they did
not, the planet would become dominated by fascist regimes (New York Times). President Franklin D. Roosevelt tried and succeeded in getting the
American people to want to go to war by promoting the ideal of spreading democracy. He states, "'We Americans are vitally concerned in defense of
freedom. We are putting forth our energies, our resources and our organizing powers to give you the strength to regain and maintain a free world'"
(Roosevelt). Effects of wartime rallying calls like this can be still seen today, as many of the wars since World War II have been fought in an attempt
of spreading democracy. Another way of promoting democracy was seen after America joined the war. As the United States started laying the
groundwork for how future Europe would be after victory they were able to create policies to make the nations of the continent more democratic.
According to the Atlantic Charter penned by Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt, their respective nations did not want to see any sort of
territorial changes unless the people of the area consented (Churchill, Roosevelt). This showed that they wanted the citizens to ultimately decide the
fate of their nation's, culture, and way of life. Promoting and spreading democracy

Comparing Joe Stalin and Adolf Hitler Essay
Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler, these two men have forever changed the history of the world. Josef Stalin or Uncle Joe Stalin as his country knew
him, was seen to the Russian people as a savior and a heroic leader. Adolf Hitler was known as the `Father of the Final Solution', which killed nearly
six million of the sick, gypsies, Jews, homosexuals, and handicapped. Stalin and Hitler were both evil men who gained their power by manipulating
others to get what they wanted. Both men were cold and calculating when it came to getting what they wanted. These two men had no respect for
human life and did not have a problem killing people who stood in their way. They promised the people of their country a new world with a bright
future; however,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They felt it necessary to permanently remove any and every one who stood in path during their rise to power. Both were blinded with imaginary
thoughts and visions of their fantasy world. They were unstoppable when it came to what they wanted. They were fueled by distorted and hateful
views. Neither of the two men thought twice about killing someone, it did not matter whether it was friend, foe, or even family.
The two men were similar in countless ways. Both men came from poor families and did not have father figures present for most of their lives. They
both lived in fantasy worlds where everyone knew them as the heroic leader. Hitler and Stalin were able to get what they wanted by bullying those
around them. The two men constantly spread terror, intimidation, and violence throughout their countries. They were murderers of countless innocent
people who only crime was being in their path to the top. These men worked day and night to inflict pain and cruelty upon the citizens of their countries.
Although Hitler and Stalin were similar in many ways, they had differences among them. Adolf Hitler, even though he was extremely vile and cruel,
ladies found him attractive. These ladies were said to be amid his most significant benefactors giving to him money and jewelry to help his political
career. Josef Stalin was not just the opposite of a ladies man. He was left facially disfigured by a childhood case of smallpox and had cripple left arm
that was due to

Germany Post War Trials
The Postwar Trials The number of deaths that occurred due to the national socialist regime in Germany is truly massive: up to six million Jews, seven
million Soviet citizens, three million Soviet prisoners of war, 1.8 million Poles, 312,000 southern Slavs (Croats, Bosniaks, and Serbs), 250,000
disabled persons, around 200,000 people of Romani descent (Gypsies), 2,000 Jehovah's Witnesses, and an undetermined number of homosexuals and
political opponents ("Documenting Numbers of Victims of the Holocaust and Nazi Persecution"). Leaders of the victorious Allies realized that the Nazi
soldiers and leaders responsible for these deaths would need to be punished. This duty to punish the guilty evolved into the postwar trials, which
influenced the way... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The trials of leading German officials were held before the International Military Tribunal, known as the IMT. From October 18, 1945, to October 1,
1946, the IMT tried twenty–two "major" war criminals on charges of crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The lead
prosecutors were from the United States, United Kingdom, France, and the USSR ("War Crimes Trials"). Some of the defendants were Hermann
Wilhelm GУ§ring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm
Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl DУ§nitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz
Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin Bormann, Franz von Papen, Arthur Seyss–Inquart, Albert Speer, Konstantin von Neurath, and Hans Fritzsche ("Trial of
the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal"). Twelve of those tried were sentenced to death, including Hermann GУ§ring,
Hans Frank, Alfred Rosenberg, and Julius Streicher. The IMT sentenced three defendants to life in prison. The IMT also gave four defendants prison
sentences ranging from ten to twenty years long. Three defendants were acquitted ("War Crimes

How To Write An Essay On The Nuremberg Trials
Nuremberg Trials Final Draft
J.E.B. Spredemann once said, "Choices made, whether bad or good, follow you forever and affect everyone in their path one way or another." This is
especially true for the war criminals that were involved in the Holocaust. The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials that consisted mostly of
criminals that led Nazi Germany during World War II with a goal to punish them for the crimes they had committed. The trials are named after the place
at which they were held: Nuremberg, Germany.(Writers at United States Holocaust Memorial Museum) This was the place chosen for this due to the
Nazi roots that led to this place. They were held within the years of 1945 to 1949.(Writers at World Encyclopedia) The first parts of the trials was
specifically reserved for only twenty–four Axis nation criminals.(The History Learning Site) These are the most famous parts of the trials because it
judged the people that were behind the mass murder known as the Holocaust. The Nuremberg trials consisted of thirteen different trials. (Writers at
History) There were a total of eight judges that decided the verdicts of the criminals. (New World Encyclopedia Contributors) The most famous of
these trials was the very first. It was a trial for the actual criminals, while ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(New World Encyclopedia Contributors) These men were all prominent Nazis. They either played a large part of the war, the Holocaust, or both. These
are not the men that you would like to mess

The Cold War Was A Conflict

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tonya Strongheart

More from Tonya Strongheart (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Cold War Was A Conflict