Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920S

Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920s
The exploitation of whales and fish after 1920 was massive and without control. The Discovery Investigation was a committee formed by the British
government with the purpose to make recommendations about sustainable whaling to prevent the collapse of whales. It started in 1925 and provide
information about the amount of whales caught. During this time the commercial interest of the whales and the fishery dictated the behaviour of the
whalers and fishers (Brandon and Clark, 2009).
According to the whaling library, during the World War II the industry of fishing and whaling decrease (OU, 2016). After, it finished the depletion of the
fish and whales continue. Later in 1946, the International Whaling Commission was created with similar
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Whaling Needs to Stop
While you could argue that practically everyone who has gone through the American education system has at least heard of Moby Dick, the whaling
industry, a main element of the topic, is not so well known. Since the 12th century, hunting large mammals has been a very active sport. They would
fish foe whales, looking for the fat to make oil for lamps, candles, and soap.
Hunting whales was not on an industrial scale until the 1890's, and continued until the International Whaling Commission took effect in 1986. The
article refers to the unsustainability of whaling commercially. The number of whales in our oceans has been rapidly reducing in the years that
humans have had access to commercial whaling ships. Hunting an endangered species is highly unethical, because we could, within a generation or
two, see the fall of the largest beings alive today. The whales in our oceans belong to the whole world and not just to Japan and Norway. Even with
the restrictions by the IWC, Japan still continues for "Scientific Research". Scientific Research has recently been deemed illegal in the Arctic water,
but they have completely disregarded all sanctions put against them to try and stop the unethical whaling. Not only that they were importing whale
meat from Norway because of its lower prices there, the whale ban was executed to make all whaling illegal which Japan failed to recognise. 400
whales were killed a year and most of the meat ending up in fish markets and restaurants. The

Lego 's Partnership With Oil Interests And The Destruction...
On July 8th, 2014, Greenpeace released a video criticizing LEGO's partnership with oil giant Shell. The video, which has become a rallying point for
environmental groups, sought to force LEGO to end its partnership with Shell due to Shell's plans to implement offshore drilling in the Arctic. Fearing
that the drilling would lead to a massive oil spill which could destroy the Arctic ecosystem, Greenpeace used the video to garner worldwide attention to
the issue. Painting the relationship between LEGO and Shell as promoting oil interests and the destruction of the Artic gave Greenpeace an
environmental issue that the rest of the world could identify with. Keeping the Arctic and its ecosystem intact is in the interests of people globally,
which made the video advertisement even more potent.
Factual Assertions
Evaluating Greenpeace's ad for factual claims proves to be a tricky affair. Since the medium used is LEGOs, their ability to portray real–life situations
is a little distorted. While this does not take away from the effectiveness of the ad, it makes it harder to determine what is actually factual.
The most obvious factual claim in the ad would be the partnership that has existed between Shell and LEGO. This relationship has been in place
through a series of co–branding deals since the 1960s. LEGO and Shell agreed to create a set of toys that carries the Shell logo and would be sold at
gasoline stations worldwide. The intended effect was to put LEGOs in the hands of more

McDonald's Case Study Essay
McDonald's Case Study
As organizations seeks ways to increase profits by filtering into international markets, many turn to the field of public relations as a way of reaching
cross–cultural markets. Factors such as values, cultural differences, language barriers, beliefs, etc…in order to successfully promote an
organization's products and services. Public relations practitioners have the responsibility to be the mediator between the organizations and public(s).
According to Murphy and Dee (1992), " Public relations makes organizations more effective by building relationships with stakeholders in the
environment that have the potential to constrain or enhance the mission of the organization." This role also involves ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The final stage is the active stage recognizes the problem and organizes something to do about it. According to J.E. Grunig and Hunt (1984) the idea is
to communicate with an aware public before it actively opposes an organization, thus becoming an activist public.
London Greenpeace is an activist group with 3.3 million members in over 22 countries that use highly visible actions to draw media attention to
environmental problems. The London Greenpeace group, a division of Greenpeace, is an independent group of activists that has no involvement in
any political party. This group meets weekly to "share concern for the oppression in our lives and the destruction of our environment. Anderson (1992)
cited that weaknesses in most case studies of activism is that similar case studies should be conducted that examine activism from the perspective of
both the organizations and of the activists groups, which is applicable to this study of the McLibel case. In my research, I came across must more
literature and disseminated information from the small activist group of London Greenpeace versus the large multi–national corporation of McDonald's.
This study also points to the need of more studies that examine the special problems of international communication. The actions of a McDonald's
triggered activist conflict not only in London, but in other different countries as well.
"If public relations

Save The Whales? Crisis Management At Lego
Save the Whales? Crisis Management at Lego
Introduction
Lego President and CEO JГёrgen Vig Knudstorp was surprised when Greenpeace activists, in an attempt to stop Arctic drilling, mounted a campaign
criticizing his popular toy company for its cobranding relationship with Shell Oil. At first, Knudstorp and his executive team at Lego headquarters in
Billund Denmark didn't quite understand Greenpeace's criticism. Was the criticism justified? Why didn't Greenpeace tackle Shell directly? Would
Greenpeace's campaign be taken seriously or would it simply fade away? As Greenpeace beefed up its efforts through social media, Lego's top
management was left wondering how to respond to Greenpeace or whether they should respond at all. And more importantly, executives didn't know
whether Lego should continue its business relationship with Shell.
Lego
Lego, from the Danish words "leg godt" or play well, was founded by Danish carpenter Ole Kirk Christiansen in 1932 (Herman, 2012). Known for
producing iconic studded plastic bricks that were enjoyed by both children and adults, Lego produced more than 30 Lego–based video games and,
through licensing agreements, popular Star Wars and Harry Potter Lego sets (Baichtal & Meno, 2011). Lego also sold a series of Arctic sets
including an Arctic Base Camp, Arctic Outpost, Arctic Helicrane, Lego Ice Crawler, and Arctic Snowmobile. Those sets sold for $89.99, $49.99,
$39.99, $14.99, and $6.99 respectively. Lego's 2014 film, The Lego Movie, grossed more

Essay Humans vs. Nature: Greenpeace
Humans vs. Nature: Greenpeace There are an incredible amount of problems facing the modern world. Sometimes the problems go unnoticed while
other times they get addressed and fixed. That is what has been happening with pollution and other environmental concerns since 1971. In that year, the
organization called Greenpeace was created. Since then the group has jumpstarted many incredible changes dealing with the world around us.
Greenpeace has done a great amount of environmental work with the aim of making the world a cleaner, safer, and better place to live.
Greenpeace began in 1971 when the United States announced that they were going to test ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They have used many creative measures to gain attention of people who would otherwise not notice the environmental problems occurring. Catchy
posters are put in strategic and visible areas where everyone can see their stance on an issue. Greenpeace wants people to notice what they are saying,
form an opinion on it and hopefully agree with them. However, not everyone agrees with them though.
There have been many opponents to Greenpeace since its inception in 1971. Some large corporations dislike Greenpeace because the group can
cause them to lose money when it is made public how much they pollute. For example, one company that was upset with Greenpeace is The Home
Depot, a large "do it yourself" store. Greenpeace was opposed to their selling of wood taken from ancient forests. They organized protests and
created a boycott of Home Depot. Also, officials in the Marshall Islands are upset with Greenpeace because the officials want to raise money for a
study on the disposal of Asian nuclear waste in the islands. (3) If they let a waste site be built, they would end up making a lot of money. Greenpeace
opposed the plan because all nuclear waste is harmful. Furthermore, in December of 1999 a Greenpeace ship was attacked by a Japanese whaling
vessel near Antarctica. (4) The Japanese vessel, the Nisshin–Maru, rammed the Greenpeace ship MV Arctic Sunrise because the Japanese didn't like the
protestors around.

The Human Fascination Of Whales
Whales have been at the epicentre of human culture for centuries. With many different variations spanning the globe, most cultures have had whales
represented within religion. The first nations worship orcas, whales are often highlighted in the bible and there is even a god resembling a whale in
Hinduism. The human fascination of whales has continued on into today's society. Not only are there films in which whales are the focus, like the
1993 classic Free Willy, but there are even theme parks like SeaWorld and MarineLand, which allow patrons to get up and close with the majestic
creatures and feel closer to the natural world. However, there is a more sinister side to these apparent parks of joy and happiness. As expressed in the
film,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
But the largest storyline focused on is the oil executive J.W McGraw. A scene between McGraw and his wife, Ruth, depict the couple eating dinner
when J.W brings up the fact that the main character Rachel Kramer asked him to use his Hoverboat to break the ice between the strait and the ice
field the whales were trapped under. He said "That woman has got a hell of a big pair thinking that she can ask me for help after the way she
embarrassed me like that. I mean, she 's nuts if she thinks I 'm going to let some hippies use my barge to save a bunch of whales!" However, J.W did
not realise that Ruth had watched a newscast on the imprisoned whales earlier, and empathized with their predicament. To change J.W's mind she
brought up his frustrations with the Greenpeace organisation. She said "Is Barrow near that Arctic wildlife reserve you 're always going on about? That
place you want to drill so bad?". To which J.W replied "That 's a whole other fight. She 's got her tree–hugger buddies in Washington killing me on that
one, too. You know, I spent a fortune and I still can 't get the votes I need to drill.". Ruth continued to provoke his thoughts by saying Can you
imagine what those people would think if you saved those whales?". This sparked a revelation in J.W, he began to say a loud "Yeah, right. If we
started hugging trees, too. I 'll tell you what it would do. It would make it a whole lot harder to make me look like

Rainbow Warrior Research Paper
The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior was an event that truly began when Greenpeace first formed, almost two decades before the bombing in Auckland
Harbour occured. In the late 1960s, the United States government planned to carry out nuclear testing on Amchitka, an unstable island in Alaska which
had a dangerous fault line and was prone to earthquakes and tsunamis after the serious earthquake in Alaska, 1964. A group known as the 'Don't Make
A Wave' committee formed to protest against the nuclear testing on the island. The committee began to make plans for other campaigns against nuclear
testing elsewhere, as well as establishing their first office in Vancouver, Canada. Many of the members then decided to take the next step with their
committee,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Although Greenpeace's campaign in the early 1970s had created positive change for the environment and people by forcing the French government
to move their testing underground, it caused serious conflict between France and Greenpeace. This led to France taking action against the
organisation, by planting two bombs on Greenpeace's 'Rainbow Warrior' when it was docked in the Auckland Harbour before its upcoming journey
into the Murorua Atoll in 1985. The bomb was supposedly intended to make a point and end Greenpeace's protests as peacefully as possible, without
harming anyone. However, Fernando Pereira, a photographer on board the boat, was killed by the second bomb's explosion, and the vessel was sunk.
This outcome led to the event being labelled a 'terrorist attack', both on Greenpeace and New Zealand, as it was initially unclear who the attack was
aimed at. The bombing and its disastrous results would alter the relationships between France, Greenpeace and New Zealand

Essay On Rainbow Warrior
'Operation Satanic' occurred around the time of midnight on July 10th 1985. In the Waimata Harbour on Marsden Wharf in Auckland, New Zealand,
the Rainbow Warrior had visited before leading a group of vessels to Mururoa Atoll to protest against the French nuclear testing that was going to take
place in the South Pacific. The Rainbow Warrior had been the flagship of an international environmental organisation,Greenpeace. The sinking of the
Rainbow Warrior ended with the death of Fernando Pereira, who was a photographer who had drowned on the vessel caused by the explosions in the
boat.
The Rainbow Warrior was a vessel made by Greenpeace and Greenpeace is one of the most famous environmental activists groups in the world. The
ship had been ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
'The DGSE is considered to be one of the world's most respected intelligence
The First Rainbow Warrior that was launched in 1955. agencies, especially in regards to economic intelligence.' The attack on the Rainbow Warrior
was under the operation of the DGSE.
The 10th of July was the date when two bombs exploded and sunk the Greenpeace flagship the Rainbow Warrior. It was visiting Auckland before
leading a protest in Mururoa Atoll against the French nuclear testing in the South Pacific. The Rainbow Warrior was hit trying to "neutralise" the ship
ahead of its planned protest, "French agents had worn diving gear and they had placed two packets of plastic–wrapped explosives to it, one by the
propeller, one to the outer wall of the engine room." The two explosions sunk the Rainbow Warrior and shock the harbour. That night on the
Rainbow Warrior, there had been a birthday celebration, people on board the vessel for this celebration was several crew members and some locals.
At around 11.30 at night, members had been asleep in their cabins, while the others had either left the ship or were up talking over strategies and
plans. Underwater charges had been placed on her hull by French agents who dived underwater, blowing two holes in the ship. The Rainbow Warrior
had sunk almost immediately. The crew all managed to escape, except a photographer named Fernando Pereira, who drowned with the boat.
"The government chose to respond to peaceful protest with deadly force

Argumentative Essay On Whaling
An Exemption For Whaling
For this week's written assignment, I have chosen to address the Norwegian and Japanese positions on permitting whale hunting as a cultural
exemption. As someone who was born in Norway, and has visited several whaling towns, I feel that I have some idea of the importance ofwhaling to
Norwegian cultures and national identity. Although Japan is culturally and geographically a very different place to Norway, I feel that the importance
of whaling to both cultures provides some similarities between the two nations.
1. Do you agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non–endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption?
I find this particular question a difficult one to answer. Whaling is a notoriously cruel method of hunting – "there is no humane way to kill a whale at
sea. Many die a slow, painful death" (Whale and Dolphin Conservation, n.d.). There is also concern from whale scientists about the effect of the hunting
of whales on whale communities and populations (Whale and Dolphin Conservation, n.d.). It cannot be denied that whaling is an inhumane process,
with serious repercussions for the whale species.
However, I do feel that Norway and Japan should be able to exercise their right to self–determination (as expressed in the UN's Universal Declaration of
Human Rights). Both countries argue that whaling is crucial to several of their local communities. The North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission
states

Earth First Research Paper
It is pronounced that Earth First! Is a verb, not a noun therefore their tactical choices are always direct action (Earth First! Journal). Intelligence agents
have drawn associations between these groups as they are organized non–hierarchically that have embrace the tactics of public demonstrations. With
their structure being non–hierarchical they reject highly paid professional staff and a formal leadership method (Earth First! Journal). A form of public
demonstrations that they are known for being tree sitting, but when that doesn't stop them they tend to convey direct action. Direct action, meaning to
them the personal, spiritual, and strategic efforts to defend the Earth (Earth First! Journal). Earth First! Is defined by action. They say... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
With mass media, they follow the collective action frames by targeting the problem then attacking with a form of direct action. This makes the viewers
notice what going behind the walls of a company, whether there is animal testing or pollution it will be seen as problematic. Since they might not be
able to persuade the law to help them, then aim to overcome it through some sort of action. Thus, Earth First! Uses framing to help identify their
problem and then the solution to the problem. Identify the perpetrators by name next target them (Earth First! Journal). This is dualism where they try
to persuade people to believe their actions are right since they understand that the declared perpetrators as hurting the environment. In doing so cause it
to where witnessing somebody that is not worthy since they act against their ideologies then it makes their direct action justified. As if the
dehumanization of their target causes somebody to believe it be okay that they are just ending up acting as cruel as their

Negative Impact of Whaling in Japan
Biodiversity often appears as an under the radar issue that is put on the backburner to other environmental problems such as: climate change, ocean
acidification, or ozone depletion. When in reality, it should really be a frontrunner as it explicitly involves all living things that dwell within our shared
biosphere. While the human population did not really start making waves to remedy the endangerment or extinction of plants and animals until the
1970s with laws that included, the Marine
Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act; we have proved that our part in biodiversity is crucial now that we live in the anthropogenic
age. A hot and debated topic on the subject of biodiversity arose with theInternational Whaling Commission
(IWC), an international body that is set on goals to preserve whale stocks and regulate whaling as to help various species recover from near
endangerment. Most all practices of hunting whales were banned along the globe but, exceptions were made in cases such as Japan; for alleged
"scientific" purposes. The focus issues of this paper will stem from the controversy involving whaling, specifically in Japan, because while they justify
their reasons for continued whale hunting, they still walk a fine line in the eyes of anti– whalers and whale–watchers alike.
Commercial whaling was banned by the IWC around 1986 but the hunting still continued under certain expectations. "...Japan, or at least the country's
Fisheries
Agency, says it has the

Civil Case: Greenpeace Vs. Miami-Dade County
Miami Dade County Court, Criminal Misdemeanors Division judge who hears the motion to suppress on behalf of the four defendants. Write an
opinion finding whether the physical evidence and testimonial evidence are admissible at trial or not. And state the law that supports your ruling. Title
of case: Greenpeace v. Miami–Dade County (2003) Type of Action: This is a civil case, where the defendants feel that both Fifth Amendment right to
read them the Miranda warning and Fourth Amendment right to search and seizure was violated by the Miami Dade police department and
Homeland Security divisional officers. Therefore Greenpeace files a lawsuit against Miami Dade County Police Department to have all evidence,
seize to be suppressed. Facts of the Case: in 2003 on the fourth day at the Democratic– republican National Convention (DRNC) which is a huge
week–long event in Miami Dade Florida. This is an event where about five to ten different law enforcement agencies and policy makers and... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Decision: Judgment reversed, on the grounds that law enforcement did not have a search warrant to search the defendants backpack. Furthermore the
defendants did not pose a threat to law enforcement, nor did they the defendants disobeyed the law enforcement command when the officer stop them.
In addition the defendants were never read their Miranda rights before interrogation. Reasoning: The Court further held that the officers' questioning of
the defendants about their reasoning for being at the event during their detention did violate the Fourth Amendment. The officers did not have
reasonable suspicion to question the four defendants. Moreover, the Court had held repeatedly that mere police questioning did not constitute a

Are Greenpeace's Positions on Agriculture Responsible?
First of all, the attitude taken by Greenpeace on agriculture is a responsible one. For example, they have a negative stance on the genetic enhancement
problem. However, some opponents have totally different opinions. Take Patrick Moore as an example, he said that the activists in the environmental
group have no tolerance about the genetic enhanced food (Moore, 2005). It mentioned that there is no evidence show that genetic enhanced food can
be harmful to human health and global environment (Moore, 2005). Therefore, he persisted in his opinion and had a conclusion that promotion of
genetic enhancement will be much helpful for agriculture. "Genetically enhanced crops reduce chemical pesticides, boost yield and reduce soil
erosion" (Moore, 2005). However, it is quiet misleading to say that activists cannot accept it without any reasons. In this case, lacking of evidence does
not mean that genetic enhancement and enhanced food are totally beneficial for environment. On the other hand, (Watson, 2005) mentioned more
about it. It said that environmentalists were really worried about complex and dangerous bacteria due to irresponsible gene combining. Compared with
Moore, Watson provided specific details about the danger of genetic enhancement instead of showing no evidence. To sum up, it is responsible and safe
for Greenpeace to oppose the genetic enhancement because it can be dangerous.
Besides the aspect of agriculture, Greenpeace also makes a good decision about renewable

Social Media and Social Protest
A growing body of literature examines the relationship between environmental protest and news media representation with special emphasis on how
these formations relate to and affect the public and politics.
The nature of our research is such that we are going to use a multitheoretical approach. Space does not permit to review all the work done on this
matter, but we have selected various key perspectives needed for understanding the mechanisms of framing and media bias in the reporting of protest
events. We briefly review the more relevant perspectives that have guided our assessment of the evidence and that were endorsed in our findings.
Protest logic and mediation opportunity structure
Various Studies have showed that media display an inherent bias against social protests, reflecting elite interests, primarily by focusing on incidents of
violence rather than on the message these protest groups try to convey. Eldridge argues that what is being presented as neutral reporting is in fact "an
array of codes and practices which effectively rest upon a cultural imperative to hear the causes of disputes in one way rather than another", meaning
that Media are "not neutral unselective recorders of events" (Oliver and Maney, 2000: 464) Mainstream media predominantly tend to focus on violence
and on the spectacular rather than on the message being conveyed . Protest groups

Green Peace
We interviewed Andra Zommers from Greenpeace. The questions we asked were as follows:
1)What is Greenpeace?
2)How is Greenpeace run/structured?
3)Why did you get involved in the environment? (Your motivation)
4)Why Greenpeace?
5)In your opinion, where is the greatest concern?
6)Is there any Spiritual emphasis Greenpeace has or that you personally have?
7)What is Greenpeace's vision for the future?
8)What gives you hope?
Taken from www.greenpeace.ca: "Greenpeace is an independently funded organization that works to protect the environment. We challenge
government and industry to halt harmful practices by negotiating solutions, conducting scientific research, introducing clean alternatives, carrying out
peaceful acts of civil ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Personally, Andra believes that there is a special healing and renewing connection with nature and the spirit. Although not a formal religion, she
believes with many ideas of other religions like karma and reincarnation. Her spiritualism seemed not to be a very big motivation to her. She also
expressed that most people in Greenpeace have no real spiritual emphasis.
Greenpeace's vision is that the researching new solutions and alternate approaches will lead to a green and peaceful future. Specifically, they want to
protect the oceans, ancient forests, get rid of fossil fuels and work towards complete reliance on natural resources and their protection.
Personally, hope comes from seeing one individual change their stance or approach. When people take a genuine interest and change in their lives it
gives hope for the larger battle. The organization keeps going because of the results and solutions that come about from their existence. Their protests
and campaigns have been the source of many changes and even affecting the United Nations. One example is that they introduced a new fridge cooling
system called greenfreeze. The old coolants harmed the environment, and even after bans the replacements were just as bad. Now almost all fridges use
the greenfreeze system, which was invented by greenpeace, but not patent so other companies could use it without charge.
I learnt a lot about Greenpeace the organization. I had preconceived notions that they were political

The Greenpeace Mission Essay example
GREENPEACE.ORG
Humans and nature live together on the planet earth. Unfortunately, humans have destroyed much of our own environment. There are groups of people
who stand up and fight big corporations and other contributors that pollute and destroy the environment. Greenpeace is one of these organizations.
They fight against many problems concerning our environment. Their organization is worldwide and they have had a great impact on conserving our
global community.
How did Greenpeace originate? In 1971 the United States announced that it would test nuclear weapons on Amchitka Island. Many individuals were
disturbed in hearing this news and they boarded a fishing vessel to sail across the North Pacific to protest the testing, which ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Ancient forests are the homes for millions of plants, insects, mammals and many other species. When their homes are no longer there, they will be
forced into extinction without their natural environment. Also, when ancient forests are destroyed the world's climate is directly impacted. When they
are destroyed they release enormous amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. The 1997 fires in Indonesia's rainforest added as much carbon to the
atmosphere as all the coal, oil, and gasoline burned that year in Western Europe.2 The logging industry is the principle contributing factor to these
fires.3 This is a huge problem that is going to have an effect on the human population in the upcoming years. Ecotimber is the answer that Greenpeace
has for the problems of the destruction of ancient rainforests. It is the perfect win win situation.4
What is ecotimber?It is manufactured in the Solomon Islands. The people have an area of land set aside where there are forest reserves, garden land,
and harvest area. Trees are felled with minimal damage and portable mills are used where the trees fall. The people regenerate forests and the
community shares the profits of the ecotimber. This timber is used to build houses, wood floors, decks and furniture. This is a great way to conserve
the ancient forests that are still left throughout the world.
The burning of resources causes global warming. Global warming is the dramatic weather changes around the world, which in turn

The Greenpeace Ship, The Rainbow Warrior
On the 10th of July 1985, the Greenpeace ship, the Rainbow Warrior was anchored at Marsden wharf in Auckland New Zealand. Ready to confront
French nuclear testing in the Moruroa atoll.
In an attempt to counteract the protests and campaigning of the flagship that represented New Zealand 's movement against nuclear testing in the
Pacific, France bombed and sunk the Greenpeace vessel the Rainbow Warrior. The bombing simply done to prolong threats against France's nuclear
testing in the pacific, and to allow for their nuclear testing to run smoothly without protest. Without Greenpeace protest, attention to France's nuclear
testing would be minimised and allow for them to continue without dispute.
Operation Satanique, code name for the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, used by the french foreign intelligence services, was the first state terrorism act
on New Zealand soils.
By arriving to New Zealand on yacht, the Ouvea crew were able to illegally bring into New Zealand the two limpet mines used to sink the Rainbow
Warrior. In diving gear two of the DSGE agents (Directorate General for External Security), just minutes before midnight attached two separate bombs
to the The two explosives were placed deliberately on the hull of the ship, just below water line to inflict as much damage possible to the 40 metre
long ship.
Both bombs were detonated ten minutes apart. The first bomb went off at 11:38 pm, the first explosion was intended to encourage any on board to
evacuate to safety.

Greenpeace: Social Dynamics In Vancouver In The 1960's
Greenpeace is a well known organisation, iconic for their bold and tenacious environmental campaigns surrounding nuclear weapons testing, whaling,
logging and seal hunting. While these campaigns have had significant impact and have achieved many victories they also have an exclusionary nature.
The political events taking place in the late 60's greatly determined the nature of those who joined and showed interest in organizations such as
Greenpeace. The gender and class dynamics forming in Vancouver at that particular point in history led Greenpeace to target very specific issues, and
to shape their campaign and image in very particular and non inclusive way. This essay will examine the social dynamics in Vancouver in the 60s,
which led to the formation of Greenpeace, as well as how it altered their persona and actions, specifically in the Amchitka and harp seal campaigns.
Vancouver attracted a very specific demographic. Being home to a top university, it drew in a selection of middle... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In order to achieve this goal greenpeace manipulated the media to gain support of the masses. Greenpeace villainized the Newfoundland sealers,
many of which still haunted by using traditional methods selling not only the skin but also using the meat. The ban and strict control around sealing
managed to remove the main source of income for families that only average $8000 annually. While financially this was devastating to many it's also
important to acknowledge the cultural damage inflicted. Sealing was held an important place in Newfoundland as it was the core of many
communities, an inspiration for art and music, as well as a tradition that was passed from one generation to the next. But, none of this was
acknowledged and no worth was given to their way of life. Instead the Newfoundlanders were openly ridiculed as seen in an interview with Paul

Aspen Skiing Company Alliance with Greenpeace
Aspen Skiing Company is being drawn into a risky alliance with Greenpeace led "Kleercut" about boycotting Kimberly–Clark industries. This report
will focus on the major stakeholders involved in this case and my personal action plans to help avoided a negative backlashing from the environmental
groups and the public.
What is a stakeholder? Business Today defined Stakeholder as "A person, group or organization that has interest or concern about an organization."
(Businessdictionary.com paragraph 1) In this case, the key stakeholders are Aspen Skiing Company and Kimberly–Clark industries. The boycott was
about how Kimberley–Clark industries engaged in sub–stranded environmental practices. Basically the company was green washing the industry; by
proclaiming it was an environmental friendly company, while at the same time destroying the forest trees in other countries.
ASC (Aspen Skiing Company) annual profit around 9 billion dollars a year. It's the front runner in environmental movement within the ski industry. It
was gaining respect in the environmental community. It was the firsts ski resort to buy into renewable power and took care of replanting its natural
surroundings. It's CEO Pat O'Donnell was the former president of an environmental education center.
ASC was spending billions of dollars to find way to cut down on destroying their natural surrounding
Joining the Boycott was a risky move for ASC. Even though, it was the leader in the environmental movement, the

The Unknown Slaughter : Animal Slaughter
Xandria Minnitt Eng. 132 Sec. 1 Dr. Deal Spring 2015 The Unknown Slaughter Many people in the United States view dolphins as something more
than just another aquatic creature. There is something very human like about them; their intelligence, curiosity, and kindness are all characteristics
that people can appreciate. To many people across the world dolphins are the fun and loveable mammals of the sea; and most of all, humans are
fascinated by their intellect. However, all across the globe dolphins are being slaughtered at a mass rate. Not only are they being killed, but they are
being tortured as well, dying slow and painful deaths at the hands of various hunters. This is because many people in other countries are unaware of the
truth... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Governments in countries such as Japan and Denmark are covering up the mass killings of the innocent creatures. People are convinced that
dolphins are being killed in a peaceful calm manner. The dolphins are being brutally murdered from September till March in areas such as Taiji,
Japan. The dolphins are being first captured by dive fisheries. According to, "Dolphin Meat Obtained In Japan Drive Fisheries", a dive fishery is
capturing fish (dolphins) by luring them to a cove or a harbor such in Tajii or Denmark. After they are lured into a secured area the dolphins are
brutally hacked, stabbed and attacked with spears. Often childlike screams come from the dolphins as they are being brutally murdered. The people
need to be educated that dolphins are in fact being killed a ferocious death at the hands of greedy hunters. Researchers at Save Japans' Dolphins report
that, upon being stabbed they do not die instantly, they instead choke on their own blood or suffocate because their blow holes are filled with their
own bloody water because they are not strong enough to resurface to dive. Often it takes minutes for them die. The slaughter of dolphins is also known
as "pest control". According to, Facts about the Dolphin Slaughter, people have been manipulated into believing that dolphins are eating all of the
native fish. The dolphins are not

Essay about Whale Hunting By the Makah Tribe
Whale hunting has been a way of life for the Makah Tribe for more than 2000 years. They have traditionally depended on the whale meat to survive
as well as they have utilized the whales blubber and oil. The dependence on whale hunting has caused the whale to be an integral part of the Makah
culture. The whale is in their songs, dances, designs and basketry. It has given them a disciple and pride in their tribe. Yet for the past seventy years the
Makah has been prevented from hunting due to the gray whale, the whale they hunt, being on the endangered list. In 1994 the gray whale was removed
form the endangered list opening the possibility of the Makah Tribe to hunt again. Yet this possibility has caused anti
–whaling organizations ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This treaty's importance to the Makahs is due, to what they feel as, their need for their culture to be able to hunt. They believe that without hunting
integrated into their culture their people have grown restless and lack discipline and pride. The also attribute many of their health problems to the lack
of sea mammal meat in their diet. They believe "that the restoration of whaling will help restore that discipline and pride" as well as help physically.
The Makah realize that people are concerned that if they resume whale hunting that the gray whale will suffer the possibility of extension again. Yet
the treaty carries stipulations on what and how many whales they can kill. The Makah can only kill up to five adult gray males in migration per year.
The are not allowed to hunt a calf or a mother with a calf. With the species having its largest population ever at 22,263 and increasing 2.5 percent every
year, the Makah's hunt will not threaten the gray whale with endangerment.
Anti–whaling organizations argue that if the Makah are allowed to hunt that they should not be able to hunt the migrating males, only those in
"permanent residence." Yet Makah Tribal Chairman Greig Arnold replied "Whaling is dangerous enough just to go, and then to add all these
stipulations just makes it more dangerous." These stipulations would force the Makah to hunt in the ocean in December or early spring when the seas
are high and the weather is

What Makes Up The Organization Greenpeace?
No matter someone's political view, personal beliefs, or behaviors, it is undeniable that the Earth is slowly crumbling as it ages and humans have
some part in that. We leave our carbon footprint all over the world, especially America. Fortunately, there are many people out there that are working
on trying to fix the mistakes of others and are helping to clean up this Earth. Some of these people are what makes up the organization Greenpeace. It
has a background of being a leading organization in the country. Like OD, Greenpeace is focused on education, having a long range prospective,
looking for creativity in their volunteers, and working together as a group. Background Greenpeace is one of the leading non–profit organizations in
the country and the world. This organization has managed to become incredibly popular since the 1970's when the organization first started.
Greenpeace all began because of a determined group who wanted to stop nuclear testing. It has since then grown into an organization whose purpose
is to peacefully serve the environment, whether it is locally, nationally, or globally. Greenpeace is made up of leaders such as Executive Director,
Director of Online Strategy, Chief Operating Officer, etc. Those leaders also combine with volunteers from the community to help create a difference
in the world. These people have been focused on saving the artic, preserving many different forest across the world, and protecting animals from the
whales to the bees.

Leading Independent Drilling Organization: Greenpeace
Greenpeace
"Greenpeace is the leading independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global
environmental problems and to promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future." The mission at Greenpeace is to make people
aware of environmental issues in a peaceful campaign and fight towards working towards a better environment. Currently, Greenpeace is working
towards issues such as protecting forests from deforestation, fighting global warming, protecting oceans, living toxic–free and defending democracy. All
these issues are contributing to a poor environment that Greenpeace is trying to prevent. They support acts such as "No New Drilling Act of 2010"
which ultimately creates support towards an anti–drilling legislation in the house and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The more awareness they gain, the more their message will be spread and changed. Greenpeace is a resourceful group only gaining contributions
from donations and not soliciting from government, political candidates or corporations. These individual contributions and support from over 2
millions members are the backbone of support for the group. Greenpeace targets the EPA(an executive branch department). It is the most
comprehensive agency, since virtually every executive department that has some environmental authority. Unfortunately Lawsuits do happen and
people turn on a group for bad portrayal from the media. Shell sued Greenpeace for blocking a shipment of oil in protest of oiling drilling. This
turned people against Greenpeace since they lost the lawsuit and had to pay a fine. Overall, Greenpeace is a very successful group. They forced one
of the most powerful oil companies out of the arctic, and convinced Obama's administration to stop oil drilling in the Arctic for 2 years, which is a big
step in the right direction. Unfortunately this once very successful group is drastically falling in funding and is not making much of a difference as

Greenpeace And Earth First !: The Radical Environmental...
Summary: For almost 50 years radical environmentalists have banded together using a variety of different tactics to destroy and vandalize the private
property of individuals and corporations that encroach on the natural environment. From monkey–wrenching to arson, these eco–warriors will do
almost anything to protect mother earth from greedy individuals. However, many failed attempts and a negative stigma from the general public show
that although their intentions are good, the actions are immoral and disadvantageous to the modern environmental movement.
Background: The radical environmental movement started in the 1970s with two groups, Greenpeace and Earth First! as major influences.
Greenpeace formed to address the issue of whaling and nuclear testing, they took matters into their own hands by directly addressing the issues on the
front line. Earth First! started a few years later in 1979, This organization pioneered the use of publicity stunts and vandalism to display their concern
on environmental issues. Using sabotage for an ecologic reason is referred to as eco–tage, and has inspired other groups to do the same, often targeting
logging, and development projects.
A more extreme party emerged in the late 1980s known as the Earth Liberation Front. ELF used arson along with classic methods like monkey
wrenching and tree spiking to show their ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This could encourage lawmakers and politicians to cooperate with organizations that focus on legislation like the Sierra Club and Surfrider. It could
be a bit like a "good cop, bad cop" kind of relationship. If radical groups continue to inflict damage, then moderate groups could ask publicly for the
attacks to stop. This would give lawmakers and politicians a reason to act side with the moderate, civilized environmental

Persuasive Speech On Greenpeace
Greenpeace The world we live in today is dying. From the pollutants in the air and water to the litter on the ground, we as humans and organisms
living on this world are actively aware of how we are harming it, yet we continue to do the same. No matter if you believe this affects climate change
and global warming or not, it is common knowledge to know the actions we take every day, whether its driving to work or school, burning your trash,
or the abundant use of plastic, affects the environment. So long as we continue to hurt our environment we continue to worsen the air we breathe, the
water we drink, and the homes of all wildlife. Greenpeace is a non–governmental environmental organization dedicated to bringing awareness to this
destruction ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A few activists began to protest since the testing was on fault line and they feared it might cause an earthquake leading to a tsunami. These activists
were the founders of the "Don't Make a Wave Committee" which would turn into Greenpeace. The name came during one of their meetings when one
of the members, Irving Stowe, "flashed the peace sign – as was his custom – and said 'Peace'. On that occasion, the usually rather quiet Canadian
ecologist Bill Darnell made the off–hand reply: 'Make it a green peace.'" Wife of a US Navy veteran, Marie Bohlen came up with the idea to sail a
boat out to the testing site to protest by mere presence. They funded this by hosting a concert and recording that concert on to CDs. Roughly sixteen
thousand people attended the concert and they raised over $23,000. They used this money to charter a ship and went to sail out to the site to prevent
the testing. The US Navy intercepted them preventing them from accomplishing their mission, but upon return they learned that the media caught
wind of this story and the group and their mission gained a lot of public attention. They were unable to prevent that test fire, but the rest of the tests
that were planned after that were cancelled and the island was later declared as a bird sanctuary. ("History," n.d.) This was just the beginning of a very
influential movement, one that will spread across the

Write An Essay On The Greenpeace
Introduction The book started off with the authors childhood where he grew up a logging camp owned by his father in Ontario and this is where
he got his love for natural world and then he went to a good high school where he got a love for science and that would grow into a lifelong dream
he would follow to the university and he got his under grad in eycolys and them he decide he was going to travel to the united states for his grad
school and made a trip around the country in is VW bus and started in the universities of st lues and that was when the Vietnam war was in full
swing and the draft was a scary thing so he traveled around the country kind of under the radar and then ended up back in Canada and this was the
1st time in history that educated people where moving back to Canada where in the past and now many educated people move to the states where
taxes are lower and jobs pay higher salary's then in the Canada they had a word for this and... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They had been meeting in the basement of a local church where they had been coming up with idea of how they can change the world and make it
more "green" before that word was a house hold thing. On this advancer they had rented a big boat to sail from the west coast of Canada up to the
island of Alaska to stop the testing from taking place this was a lot harder said than done. They got stuck in a storm and then was intercepted by the
coastguard and where sited for not having their pass ports but went back to international water and go this all on camera and was broadcasted on the
local news station and they thought they had stopped the testing but years later they found out that it was wrightin in the reports there was a technical

The Bombing Of The Rainbow Warrior
Introduction
The bombing of the Rainbow Warrior was a significant event in the history of New Zealand. It was the first ever act of terrorism in New Zealand.
On July the 10th 1985 two French spies planted 2 bombs on Greenpeace's the Rainbow Warrior. At 11:38pm the first bomb went off blasting a hole
about the size of a car. Then at 11:45pm the second bomb went off. Photographer Fernando Pereira drowned when the vessel sunk as after the first
blast went off he went a tried to retrieve his camera equipment. This tragic event had a lot of consequences as not only did it kill Fernando it also put
fear in the minds of New Zealanders because it was the first ever act of terrorism in the country. This report will describe what was happening leading
up to the event with the nuclear free legislation starting to take effect in New Zealand at the time and also the cold war was starting to heat up again. It
will also describe what the Rainbow Warrior was used for before the sinking of it when it was with Greenpeace and when it was with UK ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. The report will also explain what happen on the day of the bombing and the trial of the two French spies. It will also
describes in the report the consequences of this act of terrorism to the relationship of ANZUS and the nuclear free legislation. The report will also
analyse the significance of the bombing to New Zealand with the many people affected by this act of terrorism.
What was happening in the

Whale Persuasive Speech
To many, the thought of eating whale meat might seem strange, as they are not accustomed to consuming this kind of meat, while to others eating cow
(beef) is a strange and cruel thing to do. Around the globe, there are different ways that individuals support themselves financially, and different foods
that are consumed. Cultural practices are what sets each group of people apart and make us unique, neighboring counties should not be allowed to
change century–long practices as they see fit. Per the WDC "Whaling is cruel and unnecessary and must stop. Commercial whaling is effectively
banned. Trade in whale products is forbidden. Yet, every year, Japan, Norway and Iceland kill around 1,500 whales between them. They defy
international bans and global opinion and they hunt whales even though there is little demand for the meat." (WDC, Whale and Dolphin Conservation,
2017) Since the WDC, Whale and Dolphin Conservation, was founded in the US and eating whale is not a part of its culture, it comes across as cruel.
The question that one needs to ask is what difference is there in catching a whale for food versus catching mackerel or consuming beef? A mackerel is
a non–endangered species, but yet it is allowed. Japan and Norway should be allowed to continue their practices on a cultural exemption. Sovereignty
can be defined as supreme and independent power or authority in government as possessed or claimed by a state or community (Dictionary.com, 2017).
With the

Greenpeace: Creating a Greener and More Peaceful World
Intro Greenpeace is an international non–governmental organization dedicated to protecting the environment globally. They are committed to using
non–violent action and forcing solutions to create a greener and more peaceful world. "Greenpeace's goal is to ensure the ability of the earth to
nurture life in all its diversity" (greenpeace.org). They also work to protect animals and their habitats, as well as promote disarmament and peaceful
settlement of disputes. They are a completely independent organization with absolutely no political or governmental influence. They have several
ongoing campaigns that are working toward a better and brighter future for the environment. This paper is going to discuss the history, structure, goals,
and future of Greenpeace on the international scene.
Origins
In 1971, a small group of activist set sail from Vancouver, Canada, in an old fishing boat to protest US nuclear weapons testing in Alaska. From this
mission Greenpeace was first established. Amchitka, Alaska is one of the world's most earthquake–prone regions; it is also a refuge for three thousand
endangered sea otters and other wildlife. The founders of Greenpeace set sail in the Phyllis Cormack to put a stop to the underground weapons testing
that was further endangering the animals and hurting the environment. Their boat was intercepted in the process, and the mission was a failure, but
people still saw their vision and interest had been sparked. Later that year the testing was

Greenpeace, Earth First, And Animal Liberation Front
The environmental movement has been growing, there are many Environmental Organizations that are trying to do that right thing and take care of our
Earth. Greenpeace, Earth First, and Earth Liberation Front/Animal Liberation Front are three of these organizations. This movement would be nowhere
without Rachel Carson, her book Silent Spring, has been given recognition to starting the environmental movement. There are both "liberal" and more
"conservative" groups in this movement, but without that balance it could be difficult getting much done. Each of the groups have a different way of
approaching the problem of environmental injustice. The first group is Greenpeace. Greenpeace is a global environmental organization. Greenpeace is
best known... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring was the start of the environmental movement. She was the whistleblower on DDT in the 1960s. DDT was a
harmful chemical that was being used as a pesticide and to try to cure and prevent Polio. She believed that we needed to better control the chemicals
that we were using and she warned about sciences ability to alter nature, which she was able to prevent in some ways (Silent Spring Video). There are
many levels to the environmental movement. Some organizations, like ALF and ELF are very radical, while others like The Sierra Club are a bit more
conservative (Environmental Organization notes). Having this ying/yang gives people who want to get involved with helping out a lot of different
options. In conclusion, Rachel Carson's Silent Spring set up the structure of the environmental movement. There are so many different groups and
organizations in the environmental movement, this variety is good, whether they are conservative or liberal, they are fighting for the same thing, to
stop environmental injustices of some

Save The Whales Vs Save The Makah
The topic of whale conservation and the Makah people's economy is not something that some audiences would jump at reading nor is it an easy
topic to research and discuss in a formal paper. The techniques and strategies that authors use to write a paper that is worthy of a person's time
differ from author to author but the main core of a paper is similar in most aspects. When it comes to researching the Makah economy a person must
do so in a way that is purposeful and targeted at a specific audience; the three articles I read do just that. With a similar purpose of sharing economic
and legal issues that the Makah people face, to an audience of professionals in a similar field, these three articles are able to raise similar questions
about the... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Michael Marker's article was biased towards the Native American way of life and the article depicted the media and education system is a negative
light. For example the article told a story about a boy whose mother came into his classroom to talk about Native American whaling and culture but
the parents got angry with her saying that she was promoting a religion. The principle of the school had to apologize to the families and promise an
"event" like it would never occur again. This story showed the negative side of education and sharing culture and the author did not depict both sides
or give an explanation he simply said that the parents were wrong.
Despite the bias that exists in the article "After the Makah Whale Hunt" the article still addresses economic issues and is thus still similar to the other
articles. Michael Marker's article still talked about how whale conservation changed the Makah's economy just as the other two articles did. The
article still talked about the legal implications of the governments, and publics, action, to speak for the Makah people. Marker's article simply used a
different approach where he talked about the people while the other articles talked more about the numerical and legal

Marketing and Nestle Essay
The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention
A Case Analysis
Communication is faster than ever due to the advent of the Internet and social media which are venues for forum, interaction and information/issue
dissemination, Today, nearly half a billion people around the world utilize the Internet. In the United States alone, about 155 million Americans access
the Internet at home, with some citizens accessing the Internet only at work. Internet use by consumers in other countries, especially Japan (49 million
users), the United Kingdom (29 million), Germany (36 million), Brazil (25 million) and France (31 million), has escalated rapidly. (Ferrell, Thorne, &
Ferrell, 2012). The increasing number of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Nevertheless, the food and beverage industry has been relatively less affected when compared to other industries. This is mainly attributed to the
fact that food products continue to be essential to consumers in spite of the slowdown. A comparison between the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones US
Food and Beverage Index in 2008 is testimony to the resilient nature of this industry. In 2008, the S&P 500 declined 37.6 percent against a fall of
22.9 percent by the Dow Jones US Food and Beverage Index. (IMAP, 2010). Second, people are becoming more health–conscious and are now
demanding nutritious products in which Nestle has the capability to produce. Company's response to these major opportunities is superior. However,
reputational attack initiated by Greenpeace could damage Nestle's franchise value and could result in loss of business and consumer trust. My analysis
of the surrounding opportunities and threats is presented in tabular form below:
Table 2. External Strategic Factor Evaluation
Key External FactorsWeightRatingWeighted ScoreComments
(Rating Values)
Opportunities:
1.Resilient food (and beverage) industry
2.Increasing importance of health and nutrition
40%
20%
4
4

1.6
0.8
1 –poor response
2 –average response
3 –above average response
4 –superior response
Threats:
1.Reputational attack from across social media sites40%10.4
Total100%2.8Conclusion:
Firm's strategies take advantage of

The Environment And Its Impact On The Environment
Americans became concerned about the environment in the latter part of the 20th century. Victory over Nazi–Germany was a result of
industrialization; however it was detrimental for the environment. With industries booming, meant more pollution affecting natural resources. DDT
was helping to save millions of lives from fatal disease, but there was minimal evidence as to how harmful this insecticide was for both humans and
animals. Throughout the 1960's new research was discovered as to the impacts destroying the environment. Activists as well as politicians began to
incorporate the value of protecting the environment into mainstream events. This gave the perfect opportunity for new organizations to arise, which
over a dozen did. The most influential one being Greenpeace as it was the first organization to spread awareness about environmental issues, and is now
the largest organization promoting a green and peaceful world.
A decade before Greenpeace was established, leading environmentalist and biologist, Rachel Carson, published Silent Spring which shed light for the
first time on the effects of pesticides. It challenged the belief that insecticides would not be harmful for people and animals. The impact
industrialization had on the environment and on people's health, such as smog and pollution, was also brought up in the book. In the latter part of the
1960's, Ralph Nader, a consumer activist, helped to make the environment a mainstream issue by ensuring that everybody

Non State Actors Essay
Environment now become a global issue. For that reason, non–state actors such as: NGOs and activists participate to solve this problem. However,
their participations are almost affecting population's idea or cooperating with firms and even lobbying policies (O'Neil, 2009). These actions can be
considered as effort of non–state actors, but not directly protect environment. Therefore, non–state actors alone is not enough to deal with
environmental problems that require a dependence of them on state actors. This essay will present, analyze the functions of non–state actors and will
illustrate the relation between them and states. It cannot be denied the important role of non–state actors in order to tackle environmental issues.
Firstly, the propaganda tools and persuasions are an effective method of non–state actors in almost case for influencing people and businesses about the
importance of protecting the environment. According to D'Estries (2015), environmental NGOs such as: WWF or Greenpeace recognized the attraction
of social media, especially Facebook, hence, they used this as a tool to present their environmental campaigns and get a lot of 'like' button. This button
is an evidence of the concern of a large of population about the environmental issues and it can influence their idea of protecting the environment. In the
article "environmental activism, environmental politics and representation: the framing of the British environmental activist movement", Newlands
(2013)

Whaling Should Be Banned
Aside from radical protests against whaling, other NGOs such as Greenpeace have "peacefully protested" the ongoing whaling, by avoiding "fleet
wars" the SSCS partakes in. By 1973, Greenpeace confronted whaling fleets in response to the decline of blue whales and other species. In the midst
of a peaceful battle to defend the whales, Greenpeace snapped a photograph of a dead sperm whale, burdening the public to the IWC in requests for
justice. Responding to the incident in 1979, the IWC established the Indian Ocean Whale Sanctuary as a conservation measure, and in 1982 the IWC
declared a Global Moratorium. The desire of the IWC to conserve their image of "anti–whalers" driven them to act immediately from the accusations
over Japan. The establishment of the moratorium was a plan to cease commercial whaling in 1986 and in 2003 to allow for the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Countries such as Norway, Iceland and Japan declared an objection to the moratorium (1982). By declaring an objection to the moratorium the
countries are allowed to practice commercial whaling under their own regulation, while abiding to the rules of the International Convention
established by the IWC (IWC). However, in the midst of the objection, Greenpeace activists came across one of the first provable cases of corruption
that highlighted Japan as a suspect. In 2010 two of Greenpeace's activists known as "The Tokyo Two" exposed Japan's "scientific" whaling program by
uncovering a whale–meat scandal.
The "Tokyo Two" gentlemen uncovered one of the most controversial scandals in the history of whaling– commercial whaling. While the JWA's
"Object" statement reads: "We are concerned with people having the wrong perception of whaling", lack of credibility grew once the "The Tokyo
Two" busted their corruption. In 2008 the two of Greenpeace campaigners from Japan exposed corruption in the whaling industry. According to
Greenpeace, 'prime cuts of whale

Climate Change : Causes And Effects Essay
Climate change:
Climate change is caused mainly by increase of human activity and industrialisation. For example, activities such as driving cars, farming, burning coal
and cutting down forests produce greenhouse gases – mainly carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide which are emitted into the atmosphere, which
create a layer of greenhouse gases around the earth and trap the sun 's heat.
The earth over its 4.5 billion–year history has naturally fluctuated from ice ages to extreme droughts, however in the last 10,000 years or so, the
climate became much more stable and sustainable for human beings to live. However, in the past 50–100 years, particularly in the 21st century, with
increased human activity like agriculture, transportation, etc, green houses gases have increased majorly and have caused extreme events such as
increased floods, storms, cyclones, droughts and landslips. The weather is not only warming up but is also becoming much colder in areas in an
extremely fast rate.
Climate change is occurring worldwide, as it is effecting the earth directly. However, these are areas on Earth that are already feeling the impact of
climate change more than others. For example,
Satellite measurements have showed that the waters of Australia 's Great Barrier Reef have warmed by 0.2 degrees Celsius on average over the past
25 years which have led to a decline in the amount of seafloor covered in coral. A 2012 study published in the journal Proceedings of the National

Greenpeace and Politics
Greenpeace is an organization which often collides with governments in countries all over the world in its attempt to stop things like global warming,
deforestation, overfishing and more. Greenpeace tries to reach their goals by direct action and lobbying. This is the part where they often collide with
the governments.
My questions about this topic are:
–What conflicts does Greenpeace have (or did they have) with the government and corporations in the Netherlands and governments and corporations of
other countries in the world?
–How exactly does Greenpeace influence governments and corporations?
–What influence does Greenpeace have on governments and corporations?
I want to answer these questions by first telling a bit more about ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They did this in several ways, they for example placed warning signs under more than 64 signposts of cities in middle and south Netherlands.
Greenpeace activists also visited cities and spoke to councilors and they dumped 'nuclear waste' in several places. By now, more than 75 cities said
'no' to nuclear waste and the energy company Delta declared in January to have put the plans for a second NPP on hold. They declared it was not
feasible anymore to built a second NPP. However, minister Verhagen still wants a second NPP, though he does not seen to get much support anymore...
– In December 2011, Greenpeace campaigned in the harbor of IJmuiden against harmful giant ships which was about to set sail to the waters
West–Africa. Because of overfishing in the European seas, ships like these now have to go to other seas because they cannot catch enough fish in
European seas anymore.
The ships against which Greenpeace was campaigning was part of the Pelagic Freezer–Trawler Association (PFA). This is a company which is
established in the Netherlands and is a partnership of several Dutch fisheries. PFA got more than 142 million euro subsidy from 2006 to 2011 on. the
last five years more than 142 million Euros in European subsidies. Subsidies which are paid from tax money paid by European inhabitants.
Greenpeace wrote the amount of money which one of the largest fishing ships in

Conservation And Management Of Wildlife
Executive summary
"The Greatness of nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated" – Mahatma Gandhi
Unfortunately, we often hear the news about the illicit wildlife trafficking or illegal wildlife trade. Wildlife seems to be traded all around us. It is
used not only as pets and trophies but also for food, leather, home decorations and medical purposes.
Wildlife is an important part of ecological community as it plays an important role in the environment. I know that conservation and management of
wildlife is a very complex issue, but to save wildlife, we should take some positive actions, which requires changes in our life style and changes in our
general way of thinking so that the future generations of both wildlife and human can enjoy it.
Any actions threatening wildlife and its habitat must be banned right now.
Introduction
Today more and more wildlife is becoming extinct or in danger of extinction for various reasons. There are different types of wildlife exploitation,
with varying effects on the welfare of the animals involved< worldanimal.net, n.d>. However, we should notice that wildlife is killed and exploited by
us. In other words, Human beings are destroying the planet.
Recently, I saw an article on the New Zealand herald, which was about whaling carried out by Japan. Despite the global ban of commercial whaling,
Japan has insisted it decided to kill 333 whales a year in order to find out how the marine ecosystem is

Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920S

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920S

Similar to Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920S (13)

More from Tiffany Miller

More from Tiffany Miller (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Exploitation Of Whales And Fish After The 1920S