The forgotten group member. Finding a question – Is Christine an effective group leader in this case ? why or why not?

1. 55
Loading……

2. 44
Loading……

3. 33
Loading……

4. 22
Loading……

5. 11
Loading……

6. WELCOMEWELCOME
TOTO
OUR PRESENTATION

7. We are:
1. Tanmoy Datta
ID : M5170A012
2.Abdullah Al Mamun Siddiqui
ID : M5170A008
3. Mamun Patwary
ID : M5170A016
4. Md. Abdul Aual Likhon
ID : M5170A020
5. Shah Soliman Bijoy
ID : M5170A004
Group : 04

8. Submitted ToSubmitted To
Dr. Md. Zohurul IslamDr. Md. Zohurul Islam
Deputy Director (Research)Deputy Director (Research)
Bangladesh Public Administration Training CentreBangladesh Public Administration Training Centre
(BPATC)(BPATC)

9. Case Study Topic :Case Study Topic :
The Forgotten Group MemberThe Forgotten Group Member

10. ObjectiveObjective
Finding a question – Is Christine an
effective group leader in this case ? why or
why not?

11. Five group development stages:
1) Forming Stage.
2) Storming Stage.
3) Norming Stage.
4) Performing Stage.
5) Adjourning Stage.

12. Forming Stage
- Establish new relationship and work out tension.
- Opportunities to know each others .
Storming Stage
- React to the situation of conflict and disagreement among each of
them .
- It is a common process for every group especially for those members
who never work together before .
Norming Stage
-Establish general ways of doing things in the group .
-Each member recognizes all members' afford .
-Each member have to understand how to control personal feelings,
ideas, attitudes.

13. Performing Stage
-Start working on the task with high level of self-motivations, team
morale, interdependently.
-Clear direction of the task .
-Complete their designated sections on time .
Adjourning Stage
-The end of the assignment .
-Assignment submitted and peer evaluation .
-Members learn something from it .

14. Key Findings Of This Case StudyKey Findings Of This Case Study
 Five of them Diane, Janet, Steve, Mike and Christine, they
do not know each other and worked together before.
 Although they are taking the same class, Organizational
Behavior, they are only joining their friends during class.
 Of course, they are different in background, culture, believe,
perception and behavior.

15. Christine
 Leader of the group must be able to encounter the conflict based on case to
case.
 She takes responsibility to arrange group meetings, design task for each
member, provide clear direction, deal with conflict and motivate members.
Diane
 Shy people but she may provides high quality opinions while ask in
personally.
 As a leader, Christine may seek for her opinion after group meetings or
through email or social networking.
 Besides that, Christine must be close and improve her relationship with
Diane .

16. Steve
 Encourage group members to prepare before meetings but not
everyone agree on it.
 As a leader, Christine must be able to maintain the harmony among
members.
Janet
 Janet puts more group afford than individuals’ contribution.

17. Mike
 He dislikes group meetings and like to do last minutes work.
 He does not take responsible into the group.
 Christine must closely pay attention and control his behaviors,
and spend more time to guide him to do the assignment.

18. ConClusion
1. Christine has given too much attention towards goal
achievement, and not enough for people concerns.
2. she only has a good relationship with the rest of the group
excluding Mike, because they contribute towards goal
achievement, while Mike does not.
3. Christine needs to show more concern for people under her
command who are falling behind or demotivated in general.

19. Is Christine an effective group leader in
this case ?
Yes
No

20. Is Christine an effective group leader in
this case ?
Yes
 No

21. THANK YOUTHANK YOU
so much for having your great passionsso much for having your great passions