Death Penalty Debate

Cleary Death Penalty
Death to the Death Penalty Contrary to popular belief, the death penalty's approval ratings have decreased throughout the years, as a study executed by
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg explains how only three states administer the death penalty these days. Capital punishment has worked for a few years to
scare those who desire to commit a federal crime, but because the usage continually diminishes (despite in a few states), why would the government
keep the death penalty if it costs them millions per year? Cleary, the best option remains: to eliminate this form of punishment once and for all. Carlos
Moreno, a Supreme Court justice in the state of California explains how the process of court proceeding and the time imprisoned and the method of ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
States like New York and New Jersey repealedcapital punishment after their citizens spent over $170 million on cases where no executions were
made, according to a study done by Richard Dieter. The money could have been spent elsewhere, like making public education environments more
comfortable or buying more supplies for public service jobs, like the police force and the firefighters.
Even Pope John Paul II believes that capital punishment must be eradicated from societies, as he stated how an end to the death penalty proves as an
essential part of a culture of life. With his millions of followers, he gained support over the years to eliminate the form of punishment. Punishment
which leads to the murder of a human being.
On the other hand, a copious amount of religions and people reckon that the death penalty proves as a just form of punishment. In Christianity, people
died for crimes, like coming out as a homosexual, having sexual relations before marriage, and worshiping other gods. Considering these sins, which
they did, and living by the saying, "An eye for an eye" drove them to believe that the sinners must be put to death. While these quotes have truth to
them, murdering a human, even if one figures another deserves it, is never the answer to
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Abolishing Death Penalty
The future of the death penalty lies unclear in the cross–country battle over whether or not it should be abolished. The death penalty should in fact be
abolished because of the extreme costs and painful time involved to house and execute inmates, the indecision of which method of execution is the
most humane, and the increasing number of innocent inmates being wrongfully executed.
The number of death sentences peaked at about 315 in 1996, but last year dropped to only 73. In addition, the number of prisoners on death row
dropped 17% from 3,593 in 2000, to 3,000 in 2015(Wolf and Johnson 1). Despite this rapid decline in the amount of death sentences and prisoners
awaiting execution, 31 states still retain the death penalty, with only seven ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
is that no states are seeking to reinforce the death penalty. For example, California houses 25% of the nation's 3,000 death row prisoners and the $137
million dollars the state spends on maintaining capital punishment has led to the states disliking. One aspect of capital punishment that has displeased
average American citizens is all the attention on death row prisoners, making rock stars out of killers. Many believe the money and attention should be
spent on more serious issues like disease or poverty or even on the struggling families of the victims. However, the crime rate jumped 122% from 1963
to 1980, and maybe that is why capital punishment is needed. The fear of being executed will diminish the amount of murders and crimes in the
country, and that if we protect guilty lives then innocent lives will be given up in exchange. But by reinforcing the death penalty, innocents could be
wrongly executed. Take for example Anthony Ray Hinton. Hinton spent 30 years on Alabama's death row after being convicted for two murders at
age 29. But due to a defense lawyer's mistakes in 1985, he was granted a new hearing and was found innocent. After being freed he said, "I spent 30
years on death row for something I didn't do." This supports my argument in that if all this time and money is spent on protecting the death penalty to
come to a clear verdict, than there should never be a wrong conviction. The risk of wrongful convictions is greater if the

The Death Penalty Is Wrong
The Wrong Execution Even though the crime rate is rising, the death penalty is not the effective way to eliminate the crime. The death penalty should
be abolished because it is not a deterrent to crime, an innocent person might be executed by mistake, and it is inhuman and degrading treatment. First,
the death penalty is not a deterrent to crime. There is no relevance of murder rate between the U.S. states with and without the death penalty. While
twenty five U.S. states have the highest crime rate, the death penalty is legal in twenty out of these U.S. states. The most of criminals' mindset is
mentally ill and not logical about consequences. Since most of the death row inmate is from the poverty–stricken and disadvantaged community,

Death Penalty Dbq
Throughout history, many governments were implementing the death penalty unfairly because of the unjust rulers, such as the Romans and the
Ottomans. For example, they were executed people who were demanding for their rights. Furthermore, the penalty ways were very ugly and inhumane.
To be more precise, Romans used the saw to cut up the accused into two halves and this execution–style was the favorite of the Roman emperor
Caligula. Also, Ottomans were using the stake in the death penalty to make the victim suffer as long as possible before he died. However, with the
passage of time and the progress of nations, these types of executions faded. Recently, international organizations such as human rights organization and
Amnesty International organization ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In some countries, executions are not only for criminal reasons, but also because of religious and racial bias. Racial discrimination began in terms
of using people with black skin as slaves and servants for the rich. The racist practice against black Americans is an important example that
explains how blacks were persecuted. This policy began in the United States after the American Civil War and emerged the racist legislation that
supports the control of whites in the late nineteenth century. This situation made blacks angry for the loss of their rights and tough punishments up
to execution because of racial grounds. Blacks began to resist this policy before World War II. Then, black American leaders have appeared like
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X and called for changing the racial laws. Martin Luther King was one of the most famous advocates of the
abolition of the death penalty and he said that death penalty is against the best rule of new criminology. In her article, "The Death Penalty: What
Would Dr. King Do?" (2012) Moye commends that Dr. King utilized the ethic of peacefulness to social change. At its embodiment was a profound
appreciation for the human poise in all individuals, including the oppressor and the culprit. Martin Luther King means that every human has the right
to live and no one can take this right except God. On the other hand, racism has directly affected the civil rights of blacks and indirectly on their
lives. For example, judgments for certain crimes against blacks are strict compared with whites and it may reach to penalty. Not only blacks around
the world are suffering from racism, but also people in occupied countries such as Palestine. This is another type of using the violence and executions
for religious reasons. Since 1967, Jews occupied Palestine and declared that the land is theirs then they

The Death Penalty
The Death Penalty
Do you oppose or do you reject the Death Penalty? If you don't know, here is my opinion. "The racial breakdown for these stanced to death since
1977 is a follows: 48.6 percent white, 40.9 percent Black, 8.9 percent Hispanic, and 1.6 percent other. 1976 is 56 percent White, 33 percent Black, 7
percent Hispanic and 2 percent other, from the website called DeathPenalty.porcon.org. "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines
imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." said the Book, History Alive! The United States, written by Hart published in 2010, ISBN:
978–1–58371–931–2. I support the Death Penalty, it deters crimes, also The Bible says, "An eyes for an eye." ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
"Afterwards that the Execution finally allows her a measure of peace. Our pain will never go away, but the evil man had gone away now," from The
Death Penalty Debate by: Adam Liptak published on February 5, 2007. Committing crimes can hurt a loved one of that person and that the person will
be hurt forever because someone killed them for no reason or maybe a reason. When giving the Death Penalty people are loosing friends and family,
this may show that committing a crime is scary because you don't have a second

Death Penalty Is Wrong
Furthermore, the death penalty should be dismantled because research has shown that criminals have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to the
death penalty when later evidence comes up that proves their innocence. To illustrate,
"Since 1973, at least 121 people have been released from death row after evidence of their innocence emerged. During the same period of time, over
982 people have been executed. Thus, for every eight people executed, we have found one person on death row who never should have been convicted.
These statistics represent an intolerable risk of executing the innocent" ("Innocence").
To have even one person sentenced to death, let alone convicted of a crime and locked away for life is unacceptable. There should be additional ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, "Examining the death penalty from a human rights perspective not only highlights the impact of denying the most basic right on all other
rights but also demonstrates why the only "solution" to the death penalty is to permanently end its use. If the injustices and practicalities associated with
capital punishment could somehow be erased–the costs cut, the racial and class biases removed, and all possibilities for "error" eliminated–the
government still cannot do it because it violates fundamental human rights. A human rights based approach does not take issue with the accuracy,
technique, or timeliness of an execution. It provides a strict standard with which to say simply and unequivocally–the death penalty is wrong" ("The
Death Penalty Is a Human Rights Violation"). Even with eliminating the major sticking points that most opponents use, as stated above, to justify why
the death penalty should be abolished, there still leaves the moral and ethical stance that the death penalty is plain and simply against the basic human
right to life. Equally important, "The judge found, however, that evidence from execution logs showed that six of the last eight prisoners executed in
California had not stopped breathing before technicians gave the paralytic agent, raising a serious possibility that prisoners experienced suffocation
from the paralytic, a feeling much like being

Dehumanizing Death Penalty
The death penalty is proven to not deter criminals from committing a crime punishable by death. There are many arguments on whether the death
penalty should be legal, but the debate boils down to personal morals. The death penalty is immoral. Criminals will act on their drive, with no thoughts
about future consequences. The death penalty not only hurts the criminal, but it affects the criminal's family. The family already had to experience what
it felt like to see a loved one take an innocent person's life. This causes emotional unnecessary emotional distress for the family and those close to the
person on death row. Murdering the criminal will only put the family through even more unnecessary trauma. Furthermore, humans are not pets. The
human race should not be able to put others down in the sense of death. It is dehumanizing for the person sentenced to death and the executioner. There
should not be a job in the United States where, in the job description, it states that you will kill someone. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If so many people murder, why aren't there more people on death row? Who chooses who gets the death penalty and who does not? To my knowledge,
there is not a manual detailing the exceptions of murder to avoid the death penalty. A jury should have to obtain irrefutable evidence of a murder but
that usually does not happen. Innocent people can be wrongly convicted and executed. Mental illnesses should be taken into consideration when
assigning convicted murderers to death row. A mentally ill person that has committed acrime that has put them in jail should be in a mental psych ward
for rehabilitation to help

Death Penalty Outline
Topic: The Death Penalty (Against)
Purpose: To show people the cons of the Death Penalty and to convince them to take action against it.
Thesis Statement: (See item "C.")
I.Introduction (Attention Step)
A."Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment."
J.R.R. Tolkein
What happens when the mistake is discovered after a man has been executed for a crime he did not commit? What do we tell his mother, his father, his
widow, or even his children? No apology could comfort the friends or family of a man who was executed whom was innocent. Nothing can bring a
man back from death.
B.The death penalty is currently legal in 35 states; including Oklahoma and Texas. Since 1976 there have been 1,384 executions carried out. Oklahoma
is ranked number 2 in executions at 110, and Texas has executed the most people... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Body
A.Economics
1.The problem is, it costs more to execute an inmate than life imprisonment. For example, In Texas, a death penalty case costs taxpayers an average of
$2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years. If the 515 executions hadn't
occurred, and these offenders were sentenced life imprisonment without the option of parole, Texas tax payers could've saved approximately $790
million.
2.New Jersey, for example, laid off more than 500 police officers in 1991. At the same time, it was implementing a death penalty which would cost an
estimated $16 million per year, more than enough to hire the same number of officers at a salary of $30,000 per year.
3.In Texas, the early release of prisoners has meant that inmates are serving only 20 percent of their sentences and re–arrests are common. On the other
hand, Texas spent an estimated $183.2 million in just six years on the death penalty. The money used for the death penalty can easily be used to keep
dangerous criminals

Is The Death Penalty Fair
The death penalty has been used since the 13 colonies. This replaced the form of many other harsh punishments It is a consequence that is harsh but
to some necessary. I believe that the death penalty is fair in all ways. The beneficial reasons are morality, deterrence, and cost of death vs. life inprison.
As human beings we decide what makes our decisions right and wrong. Also shown through good or bad behavior. If you receive thedeath penalty as
your punishment, you deserved it. If you take somebody life, then yours should be taken as well. The "victim" should see how it feels and get a
consequence for his repulsive actions. These individuals should be removed from society. If one recognizes the fact that their existence is going

Barbaric Death Penalty
Coretta Scott King once stated, "An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life.
Morality is never upheld by a legalized murder". This quote demonstrates how taking a person's life because they took someone else's does not justify
the crime. For multiple centuries the death penalty was used as a way to execute criminals who have been convicted of capital offenses. Sixty–four% of
the United States still use capital punishment while the other 36% have abolished it because they felt it was a cruel and unusual punishment. This topic
controversial due to advocates who believe it is a deterrence and opponents' who believe that it is barbaric. The death penalty should be banned ... Show
The death penalty is hypocritical and sends a false message to society by using continuing to use this type of punishment. Just because a criminal killed
or committed murder does not make it right for them to execute the person. "The U.S. Constitution's Eight Amendment contains just sixteen words:
"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." (Bessler 193) According to Jane Doe,
board of director for ending Utah's death penalty, she believes that all current methods of execution are unconstitutional and should be revoked
immediately. Capital punishment will always be known as heartless form of consequence until it is

Death Penalty In Texas
The death penalty is the punishment of execution. The death penalty was authorized by 32 states, the Federal Government, and the U.S. Military.
Throughout the years, the method of the death penalty has changed. Not only has the way it is performed been altered, but also the way our
presidential candidates view the death penalty. For example, when George Bush was governor of Texas in the 1990s, he approved executions. He
sent some to death who might have been innocent. Death sentences in Texas have dropped nearly 80% since 1999. In 1977, Oklahoma became the
first state to adopt lethal injection as a form of execution. Lethal injection is the primary method used. On December 2, 1982, Charles Brooks
became the first person executed by lethal injection in Texas. Besides the deadly injection, the electric chair nicknamed "Old Sparky," was also an
execution method. Texas, along with Louisiana, Ohio, and Illinois used the electric chair. The electric chair was in use from 1924 until 1964. Old
Sparky was said to have taken 361 prisoners life's (TexasTribune).... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
history. During his administration he has executed 279 people (TCADP). Donald Trump is not only a conservative, but big supporter of the death
penalty. After two police officers were shot and killed, Donald Trump said, "The death penalty. It should be brought back and it should be brought
back strong. Now these two people are just gunned down by these two thugs, and I will say thugs, and they should get the death penalty absolutely."
Donald has also said, "100% of the people executed will never commit another crime." Observing these two quotes, Donald Trump's view on the death
penalty can be seen as very strong (Donald

Death Penalty In Texas
Did you know that since 1976, there have been a total of 518 executions in Texas alone? However in 2014 Texas only executed ten people. This is
because they are seeing how much of a mistake the death penalty is. The death penalty is a useless form of punishment. The cost of it vastly
overshadows that of the costs for life without parole, also yearly more and more death row inmates are being exonerated (released), and lastly it fails to
deter criminals from committing crimes.
The costs of dealing out the death penalty are much more expensive than just giving life sentences. This expenses happen are due to the safeguards that
are given to death row inmates by the constitution. These safeguards include giving two trails, one for being proven guilty ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
David Bow, a law professor, even stated, "The death penalty does not deter and in fact costs more than non–death penalty cases. The only real reason is
retribution." The University of Colorado even did a study, showing that a whopping 88 percent the leading criminologists believe that the death penalty
does not deter. To add on to that, 78 percent of those also stated thatmurder rates are the same in states with the death penalty and without it. (Death
penalty proves to be an inhumane act of moral justice). So if the death penalty, does not deter criminals from committing their acts and is just done
as a way of revenge for victims' families why would the government waste money on it? Why not even just save a few million by giving the power
to decide if the criminal should die to the families themselves like they do in Iran. The life of Balal, was saved by the victim's mother when she
decided against the death

Raising The Death Penalty
In America, the death penalty is a highly debated topic. In the debate "should the death penalty be abolished," Diann Rust–Tierney and Joshua Marquis
argue this issue. Although the death penalty system is prone to error and discrimination, space the death penalty should not be abolished because win
the executions started to raise the murder rate began to drop in America and that scientists have proven that the death penalty is a definite deterrent to
murder. There have been many errors and discriminatory problems when it comes to the death penalty. In the article, it states "Finally, there's the fact
that the system is prone to human error and discrimination" (Rust–Tierney 22). After new evidence is found, there are many more trials, and a lot of
the people have been freed. Many people believe that if you kill someone, you should not get the same punishment as what you did. Finally, if the
murder victim is white or poor, they have a higher chance of getting the death penalty.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Many people believe that the executions are an excellent way to decrease the homicide rate. Many people believe that the executions are an
extraordinary way to reduce the murder rate. In the article, it says "During the first decade of the 21st century, there was 26 percent more executions
in the U.S. than in the last decade of the 20th century"(Marquise 23). The article also says "During the same period, our murder rate decreased by 24
percent" (Marquis 23). According to this, it shows that the death penalty works and is a magnificent way to reduce

Death Penalty Cost
If morals are not enough of a reason to abolish the death penalty, cost sure is. Cost can be measured in both money form and in lives. There is no
doubt that the legal is system is costly. From the juries, lawyers, and judges trails can be pretty expensive. One might ask is there a cost difference
between life in prison and sentencing one to death? There most certainly is. Numerous numbers can be found on such debate and majority will with no
doubt tell you, "executions are just too costly, and that society would be better to substitute life–without–parole sentences for lethal injections"
(Muhlhausen). Millions of dollars are used to take care of inmates both on death row and in prison for life but by far, more money is put into death
penalty

Constitutionality Of The Death Penalty
Death Penalty
"Death is not only an unusually severe punishment, unusual in its pain, in its finality and in its enormity, but it serves no penal purpose more
effectively than a less severe punishment; therefore the principle inherent in the clause that prohibits pointless infliction of excessive punishment when
less severe punishment can adequately achieve the same purposes invalidates the punishment."1
The use of death as a punishment for one's crimes is not a new concept in early American history. Up until the 1960s, the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth
Amendments to the United States Constitution have permitted the use of death as a penalty to those who committed heinous crimes. However, the
fundamental legality of the death penalty is being ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The death penalty was heavily influenced by the British when the early European settlers came to the new world. The first recorded execution on
early American soil was the execution of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia on December 1st, 1608. Kendall was
executed by the means of a firing squad for suspicion of being a spy for Spain and treason.4 A couple years later, Sir Thomas Dale, governor of
Virginia, enacts the "Divine, Moral and Martial laws" in 1611. The Virginia colony was organized as a corporation, with a charter direct from the
kind of England and stock holders. This corporation failed due to inability to partner with the Indians, constant war, and growing food crisis leading
into starvation and despair. Sir Thomas Dale was chosen to be the new leader of the Virginia Colony, arriving in 1610, with a new set of laws for the
colony. The laws consisted of 88 articles, and in short, the laws enacted severe punishments for minor offenses like stealing grapes, killing chickens,
and trading with Indians. Examples of the punishments would be starvation, burned alive, broken bones, or even shot to

Death Penalty In Australia
Introduction:
The debate for re–establishment of the death penalty in Australia has been ongoing since the 1973abolishment of capital punishment in Australia.
While capital punishment was first abolished in Queensland on the 3rd of July 1922, the last state in Australia was New South Wales to formally
abolish the death penalty for all crimes in 1985. Ronald Ryan was the last man executed at Pentridge Prison in Australia. On the 3rd of February
1967, Ryan was hanged after being convicted of the shooting death of a prison officer during a prison escape from Pentridge Prison, Coburg and
Victoria in 1965. The death penalty is not an effective punishment for all cases and there has not been any solid evidence stating that it is a more
effective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A serious crime like murder generally centres on the idea of justice and what the punishment is for. Most who agree to bring back capital punishment
believe that the only way to punish someone for taking another person's life is to take their life by sentencing the death penalty. Another very
common argument to bring back the death penalty is deterrence. Australia will become a safer country if the death penalty was brought back as it
would simply deter people from committing a serious crime like murder or rape. If a murderer is imprisoned without the possibility of parole, they
may bring danger to staff or other prisoners. There are many more arguments for the death penalty, which include, overpopulation of prisons and even
closure to the family of the

Death Penalty Controversy
During the 11th century, the first cases of established death penalty laws were formed. During this time period William the Conqueror initiated
execution by another human being, only in the cases of a murder trial. The extermination of one life would result in the consequences of another
murder, but in the eye's of the law; it was justified. In 1976, the United States Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty, as of 2014 more than 1,300
people were sentenced to death. In those hundreds of deaths, 1 in 25 innocent people have been killed. Though not in violation ofthe United States
Constitution's Eight Amendment, the lethal injection is for societies criminals who have committed the most shocking crimes and is viewed as most
logical. According ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to a study, "Opponents of the death penalty believe that no one deserves to be executed. Again, it's an honorable position, but a difficult one
to defend politically in a country where the death penalty is popular". Though used in history before, it was not until now that the death penalty was
seen as controversial and in today's society; has created so many different disputes. So much controversy over this topic has been created even though
only one third of the many countries in the world has legally allowed the death penalty. Some example of countries and states that legally have the
death penalty would include, the United States, Iran, Kentucky, California, Missouri, and Japan. However, many countries stand by the idea that the
death penalty is a type of cruel and unusual punishment. Some of these countries argue that the death penalty is an act against God, in a religious view
on the subject. Other simply do not have the funds and cannot keep up with the amount of money that capital punishment requires. Over the years so
many countries have abolished the death penalty and through that other countries are either in motion of removing the death penalty from their laws or
have not sentenced an inmate to their death in many years. The movement to get rid of the death penalty is slowly making its way around the

Pro Death Penalty
The Death Penalty, first established in the 18th Century B.C, is a punishment of execution for those who are legally convicted of capital murder. The
death penalty is legal in 32 U.S. states. The death penalty should not be legal in America because it does not deter crime effectively, it is very costly,
mistakes could be made, and it is unconstitutional.
Many questions arise from this punishment because there is no real justification. The death penalty should not be legal because it does not deter crime
effectively as it should. There is no credible evidence that capital punishment deters crime. The death penalty advocates that it would deter crime but
that is not the case. Studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that executions deter ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Keeping the death penalty would make Americans wary of how their government is running. Many of the amendments contradict with the penalty. For
example, Amendment 5 states, "No person shall be held for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand
Jury" (Death Penalty). Another example of an amendment which contradicts with death penalty is amendment 8. Amendment 8 states that, "excessive
bail should not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted" (Death Penalty). This is a prime example of how
the death penalty contradicts the constitution because death is not only a cruel punishment but also unusual. Another example of how the death
penalty is unconstitutional is the investigation done by CNN. CNN found out that a judge even disagreed with the death penanty, "a federal judge said
Wednesday the system is so broken it unfairly leaves inmates with uncertain fates, often for decades." (Almasy). "In his decision, Santa Ana–based
Judge Cormac J. Carney vacated the 1995 death sentence of Ernest D. Jones, who petitioned the court to determine whether his death sentence was
valid" (Almasy). This means that the judge does not know whether convicted of capital

Death Penalty Is Wrong
Death penalty, also referred to as capital punishment is a subject that is highly debatable and it always raises serious discussion. Most nations show a
great split on the public's opinion on death penalty. However, there are still a few countries that uphold it while others abolished it. Death penalty was
employed in the ancient Greece by the Romans for a wide range of offences including murder, arson, rape and treason. It has also been sanctioned
various times by some major religions in the world. However, death penalty is wrong and immoral. This essay describes why death penalty is wrong
based on moral, psychological and social grounds. In conclusion, the essay gives an account of how different countries in the world abolished this
immoral act. When considering death penalty on moral grounds, this sort of punishment is wrong because there is no individual who has the right to
ultimately decide who dies or lives. This is according to one of the Ten Commandments from the Bible which states that no one should kill. However,
most people argue that when an individual takes away another person's life, they lose the right to live. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Citizens may also be impressed by the strong stand by the government against the violent criminals. It would be wrong for people to think that because
the government is killing prisoners, life is cheap. In a social perspective, authorities would like death penalty to work as a warning to the potential
criminals. However, in different countries where death penalty is in use, the rate of murder is still high. Figures indicate that crime rates have indeed
increased in countries that use death penalty as a

Abolish Death Penalty
Fifty eight countries in the world participate in the use of the death penalty, in 2010 the United States ranked fifth in having the most executions even
though only thirty five states in the US legalized it. The death penalty is inhumane and you can argue it violates the constitution by using cruel and
unusual punishments, that said The death penalty has many flaws with the system and it it should be abolished because it has a risk of discrimination
and wrongful execution, it is not effective, and the cost of the system. The United States should abolish the death penalty because there is a chance of
wrongful execution and discrimination. In 2011 Illinois became the 16th state to abolish it, the main reasons were because the governor believed...
The death penalty was established in the eighteenth century BC, two main reasons the death penalty was put into place was with the hope of
reducing capital crime because of the result being in death and the believe that criminals who did a crime so bad that qualify for death row did not
deserve to live, but that system is no longer believed to be effective anymore. According to U.S Newswire fifty seven percent of police chiefs
agreed that the death penalty does little to prevent violent crimes because perpetrators rarely consider the consequences when engaged in
violence(2). The death penalty is also ineffective because ninety percent of offenders can not afford an adequate criminal defence lawyer. This shows
that only ten percent of offenders are getting the right defence against higher punishments and charges. Some people argue that the death penalty is
effective because people who qualify for death row deserve to die, but many can also argue that the death row violates the constitution by using
inhuman and crucial punishments. People also use the quote "An eye for an eye" but would anyone really be left on earth if that was the case?
Times are different now then they were back in the eighteenth century, slavery was abolished in 1865, segregation was abolished in 1964, why have
we not abolished a system that was put into use when segregation and slavery were believed to be

Affordable Care Act Tax Penalties Essay
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
DS Financial Advisors, Inc.
Keywords: find a tax preparer, find a tax professional for (category), tax preparer, accountant
Affordable Care Act Tax Penalties
When the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into legislature in 2010, it had a large impact on every American. If you are a citizen
of this country, you face the possibility of a penalty if you do not have the proper health insurance coverage. At DS Financial Advisors, Inc., we are
here to help you determine if you are a tax payer who is facing one of these fines. Our skilled team of accountants and tax preparers in Pennsylvania
know all of the details related to the Affordable Care Act, and how they may influence your next years tax return.
What is the Affordable Care Act
This health insurance coverage program was designed to lower the costs of health care while increasing the productivity and results seen by patients.
Stipulations set forth with the Affordable Care Act ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to receive health coverage. At the same time,
hospitals and doctors offices are expected to streamline their costs while continuing to provide above average services. Doing these two things in
combination allows public and private health insurance systems to offer coverage to Americans at a reduced rate.
To facilitate the entire program, citizens are forced to either have health coverage of some sort, or suffer a financial penalty. There are some exceptions

Is The Death Penalty Ineffective
The Death Penalty: An Ineffective Alternative Punishment Is 21st century United States still in the dark ages when lawbreakers sentenced to death
were executed? The United States still practices capital punishment, even though most western industrialized countries have abolished the death
penalty. In 1972, the U.S Supreme Court abolished the death penalty in the United States. However, according to the Death Penalty Information
Center (DPIC), as of July 1, 2015, the death penalty is legal in 31 states, with Texas leading in the number of executions. Which raises the question:
has the death penalty really served its purpose? The death penalty has not only proven to be a financial burden on taxpayers, it has also been confirmed
to be ineffective ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, statistics have shown that the death penalty is applied racially and discriminatorily. Three out of five murder cases in which the victim was
white and the defendant was black resulted in the defendant receiving a death penalty. Professor Katherine Beckett of the University of Washington
reechoed this fact by stating that, jurors in Washington "were four and a half times more likely to impose a sentence of death when the defendant
was black than they were in cases involving similarly situated white defendants." So where is the justice that advocates of the death penalty are
imploring? Moreover, the rich are more likely to escape a death penalty than the poor. The DPIC has reported that most defendants in capital cases
cannot afford an attorney. Thus, if equal justice for all is anything to go by, then justice should be equally distributed regardless of race and economic

Death Penalty Satire
The Death Penalty Burn the heretic, behead the traitor, euthanize the murderer. Capital punishment by death has always resided in our society in
countless different forms. The question is not whether it is right or wrong, for that brings an endless debate over it, but how and why certain factors
allow it to be different in different countries, some to the extent of even abolishing it. How liberal a country's people and government are, also adding
the fact of what type of government is present, are the key factors that shape each country differently and determine the presence of the death penalty.
The type of government in a country plays one of the biggest roles in determining the presence of the death penalty. The decision of the government...
However, it is still ultimately a combination of different situations that determine the how influential each factor is in determining the presence of the
death penalty. India, even though it was a great British colony influenced by many European ideals, still has the death penalty in use. In this case the
Enlightenment ideals were not enough of an influence, especially when the British in India had formerly codified hanging for capital punishment. Now
crime, the initial event that created the death penalty is being used to argue against the penalty, as many now argue that the penalty is ineffective in
deterring crime, and that a large reason for the support of the penalty comes out of ignorance of the ineffectiveness and the errors of capital
punishment. We can now see that every situation is different for every country, the United States have it in practice today, the same with China with
the highest amount of sentences every year, the Middle East ties it to religious laws, Europe that has totally abolished it, and the countless other
countries that just do not take it into action anymore. In the end it still is up to the governments, to see if we the people will have a say in our country's

Outline For Death Penalty
Intro Paragraph & Thesis: For the death penalty. (written)
For the death penalty
Four persuasive arguments for why I am for the death penalty.
Not for the Death penalty.
Three arguments that are against the death penalty.
Conclusion paragraph clarifying my position and address potential arguments made against my position.
When someone commits a Part I crime, the world is in difference on how the law enforcement and justice systems should handle the criminals
punishment. Should the criminal be put on death row or should they spend their life rotting away in a cell? I believe, given the terrible acts that some
members of the society commit against innocent people, the death penalty must exist. For some, families, friends, and even communities ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
First, it tends to be very hypocritical. People tend to be against the death penalty because it seems misfitting that a nation would condemn the practice
of murder by committing the same act. To some, it seems by executing the criminal we are dishonoring the right of life by taking it. It's true, we aren't
killers and we don't want to be labeled as a killer either, but depending on the seriousness of the crime it may be the best option to execute.
Second, prison tends to be known as "Hell on Earth." Depending on the crime one has committed, they could be in more danger staying in prison than
being executed. If not executed, there is a large chance they could either be greatly harmed or killed inside the cell. In many prison's a "code of honor"
has been formed that requires inmates to kill certain offenders.
Lastly, it doesn't teach the condemned anything. Most criminals are sentenced to life in prison, which then prevents them of their freedom and from
doing what they want to do. It is a punishment, and we do it, hoping that they will learn from it. To put it simply, we cannot restore a criminal to the
normality of life by killing them

Death Penalty Race
The death penalty is not handed out lightly. With this being said, what are the factors of determination of the death penalty? There is difficulty
saying the death penalty is not determined by race. This day in age, race in relation to the death penalty is a widely debatable topic. There are several
cases in the U.S. where race has come into question as a factor of the death penalty decision. Race is indeed a factor in the decision of the death penalty.
There are numerous cases, statistics, and educational studies in fact proving this statement. According to the death penalty information center online, as
of November 09, 2016, 31 states implement the death penalty. Although these 31 states implement the death penalty, 4 of these states have... Show
Troy Davis was executed on September 21, 2011, his case is just one of many causing uproar in the U.S. Not just this case alone proves the injustice
and racism surrounding the death penalty in the country. Duane Buck is an additional victim in the injustice of the judicial system when it comes to
race. Duane Buck broke down the front door of his ex–girlfriend, Debra Gardner's house. In the house was Debra Gardener, her two children, Kenneth
Butler, his brother, Ebnezer, and Phyllis Taylor who is Buck's sister. Gardner and Buck's relationship ended approximately a week before this.
When Buck went to Gardner's house that early morning, he argued with Gardner; struck her; proceeded to grab some of his things and left. He came
back the same day with a rifle and shot gun, and again broke down the door. Buck fired at Ebnezer but missed, he escaped through the back door. He
then shot Taylor and she fell to the ground, but survived. She managed to pick herself back up, after listening to several more shots go off. Taylor then
discovered Kenneth Butler's body in the hallway. Meanwhile, Gardner's 11–year old son was hiding in the closet and listening to him confront Butler.
After he shot Butler,

Death Penalty Controversy
The debate on whether capital punishment is an effective way to prevent or reduce crime is a source of constant controversy. Supporters of capital
punishment believe that it can be used to prevent future crimes. People against this topic, on the other hand, think that "an eye for an eye" mentality is
barbaric and goes against basic human morals. Capital punishment, more commonly referred to as the death penalty, is the judicially decreed execution
of a prisoner as punishment for a serious crime, often called a capital offence. In the United States, capital punishment is limited under the eight
amendment of the Constitution and is used mainly for aggravated murders committed by mentally competent adults. The death penalty is currently a
legal ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This concern is heightened due to the fact that once the death penalty is carried out, the process is irreversible. Take the case of Cameron Todd
Willingham for example, who was convicted of starting a house fire in 1991 which killed his three young daughters. Willingham was given a lethal
injection in 2004, even after the fact that arson experts had debunked nearly all physical evidence in the case. Although today we have modern tools of
science, such as DNA testing, there is still a chance that an individual put on death row can be innocent. "Between 1973 and 2014, 150 inmates were
released from death row after new evidence demonstrated that they have been wrongly convicted" (Mallicoat

Outline On Death Penalty
Controversial Topic Summaries I decided to choose the topic of the Death Penalty and forms of Capital Punishment. My first article talks about what
exactly the Death Penalty is. The official definition of Capital Punishment is "Imposition of a penalty of death by the state." The background of the
death penalty has been around since ancient times, but in the year 2004, most countries have exiled the idea of the death penalty. As of now, 36 states
have reinstated the idea of capital punishment and the death penalty. Most capital sentences in the United States have been cause from murder cases.
The death penalty can only be given through the decision of the jury on the case and not the judge. According to the article, there hasn't been an
execution

The Death Penalty For Juveniles
The death penalty for minors differs greatly from the death penalty for adult. The law that minor could be put on death row was decided to rule against
the eighth amendment. The eighth amendment prohibits the act of "cruel and unusual punishment" which putting minors on death row breaks. On
March 4, 2005 the law that minors could not be put on death row for their actions was set into place. The new laws say, "They cannot punish a minor by
death penalty and they cannot punish someone for a crime they committed as a minor." For example Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death
row until 2005 when the laws were changed. He stole seven dollars, kidnapped, tied up, and pushed his neighbor off a railroad trestle; killing the
young woman. He should have been sentenced to death row, but because of his age, seventeen, he was not put on death row. In fact he was not even
sentenced to life with parole. He got re–sentenced to life without parole. The new laws helped a total of seventy–two juvenile offenders. it helped
twenty–nine in Texas, fourteen in Alabama, five in Mississippi, four in Arizona, four in Louisiana, four in North Carolina, three in Florida, three in
South Carolina, one in Nevada, and One in Virginia. They were all taken off death row and sentenced to life without parole. There is also a science
behind why minors, anyone below the age of eighteen, cannot be put on death row. The National institute of Mental Health, the UCLA's Department of
Alexander 2

Damages On The Form Of Penalties
DAMAGES IN THE FORM OF PENALTIES
Section 73 and 74 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872 (referred as ICA, 1872 hereinafter) provide the basic structure for enforcement, non performance
and breach of contract. This paper deals with provisions regarding "penalties" on breach of the contract by one of the parties. Since sections 73 and 74
of the ICA, 1872 talk about the damages to be awarded in the case of breach and such damages shall be predefined in the contract while drafting the
same and such pre estimation shall be just and of reasonable nature. Hence making the damages Liquidated.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
When parties by contract assess the damages to be paid irrespective of the actual damage are categorized as liquidated damages. Liquidated damages
can be dictated to flow in two ways
1.Either by paying the sum of money due stipulated to the other party. Or
2.By forfeiting the amount already paid by the party who breaches the contract
Liquidated damages are a genuine "pre estimate of damages".
DAMAGES
According to the section 73 of the ICA, 1872 the word damages has been used
Section 73 of the ICA, 1872 says that
"Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract. – When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to
receive, form the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual
course of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when

Death Penalty Cost
Human Lives are Not the Only Cost of the Death Penalty The death penalty is the highest possible sentence a criminal can get, and it is also the most
expensive and time consuming. From 1976 to 2011, 1,264 executions took place in the United States; one lethal injection averages $1.26 million. A
single trial can lead a local government into financial instability and pull money from other important government services. This paper demonstrates the
high cost consequences of the death penalty to states, taxpayers, and personnel working within the justice system. It also analyzes the reason behind
why people in poverty are more likely to receive the death penalty when they commit a capital crime than the upper class.
The states that still use ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Jack Todd, who has several academic achievements including, Assistant Director of Communications for Kent Denver School, Content Director for the
Borgen Project, and an Editorial Intern for Premier Media Group, wrote an article in Borgen Magazine, titled Poverty and Capital Punishment. The
article states, "...legal systems inherently favor those who can afford good lawyers, who are educated and who can post bail. Accordingly, the
International Bar Association (IBA) reports that in nearly all of the 58 nations that still use capital punishment, wealthy defendants are at a distinct
advantage to their poor counterparts." Of twenty–one nations in 2012, there were 682 executions performed and a vast number were people who came
from poverty. According to the same Borgen Magazine Article, statistics say 80–90% lived in poverty before committing their crime, according to the
same Borgen Magazine article. The caliber of lawyers that are appointed to poor people typically consists of extremely unreliable and undedicated
people. The Death Penalty Information Center document states, " In many cases, the appointed attorneys are overworked, underpaid, or lacking the
trial experience required for death penalty cases. There have even been instances in which lawyers appointed to a death case were so inexperienced
that they were completely unprepared for the sentencing phase of the trial." In

Immorality Of The Death Penalty
The Immorality of The Death Penalty The death penalty, or generally known as capital punishment, alludes to discipline by demise which is
condemned by a state or lawful system. The primary at any point recorded execution to happen in the American Colonies was in 1608. Albeit
correctional code contrasted from settlement to state, capital punishment was rehearsed in provinces like New York and New England. By the time the
settlements picked up autonomy following the Revolutionary War, each of the "provinces had comparative demise statutes covering illegal
conflagration, theft, injustice, kill, homosexuality, thievery, burglary, assault, horse
–taking, slave resistance, and falsifying" (Stein 4). At the point
when the First Congress assembled in 1790, they confirmed criminal statutes that permitted the death penalty for felonious violations, for example,
assault and murder. The men of the First Congress likewise drafted the Bill of Rights what's more, U.S. Constitution. The Eight Amendment gives that
"inordinate safeguard might not be required, nor exorbitant fines forced, nor pitiless and unordinary disciplines caused" ("U.S. Const."). When the
Eight Amendment composed, there were at that point the death penalty laws set up. Along these lines, to supporters of capital punishment, the eighth
amendment's disallowance of "merciless what's more, uncommon discipline" does not have any significant bearing to state supported executions.
Because of the outrageous idea of the

Death Penalty Outline
As citizens of the United States, we must recognize how important it is that the Justice System is fair. We have a common commitment as part of
society to abide by the laws the government lays down for us. Because of this, it's essential that all laws and punishments within the justice system are
fair, otherwise, we all get punished, regardless of our arrest record. If a criminal is caught, they must be punished fairly, or else our democracy will
become one of two extremes, an anarchy or dictatorship. This is why it's so important that death penalty is abolished, it's unconstitutional and everyone,
regardless of race, deserves a just punishment.
Body Paragraph #1:
All people deserve the American fundamental right to an equal and just punishment.

The Death Penalty In Australia
Introduction~ The death penalty has always been one of the most debated issues in Australia. In most countries in the developed world, the death
penalty is illegal. I, however believe that the death penalty is an important way of keeping all Australians safe.
Body 1~ The crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, stealing and murder are awful. We can prevent these from happening by bringing back the
death penalty, by following this adjustment their will be minor crimes being held. In my opinion If someone murdered an innocent victim they should
therefore, be killed there is no question about it. The death penalty can deter people from committing serious crimes and therefore make Australia a
safer country.
Body 2~ The death penalty is

Pro Death Penalty
Still today, the death penalty is a major controversy in numerous states all over the United States. It's hard to grasp the idea of putting another human to
death. The death penalty is an execution style punishment which is usually used against criminal's who have committed a horrific crime. The are many
arguments that the death penalty goes against the eighth amendment, which was struck down by the Supreme Court. I believe that the death penalty
should be abolished everywhere in America. I think it should be abolished because it still isn't proven to deterrent future murders, it's used unfairly, and
there is a risk of executing the innocent. The death penalty can be replaced with life in prison, suffering in prison for the rest of their ... Show more
This is truly why life sentence in more effective in the end. After a criminal is sentenced it can eventually leak out that that inmate is actually
innocent. If we execute that inmate, we can't get his life back once we find out he actually was found not guilty. If we sentence them to life, we can
release him when we find out the facts that he was not guilty the whole time. The courts can technically face many consequences for this because they
did not uncover all the evidence before they executed the inmate. Once you take away a life there isn't any going back to fix it. There has been
countless errors in the court system that have resulted in innocent deaths. This can cause families to lose their loved ones, or children to lose their
parents when it could have been

The Death Penalty Is Wrong
Sean Shen
Mr. Todd
Languages and Literature, E–8, Research Paper
April 20th 2018
The Death Penalty is Wrong The death penalty has been considered one of the most severe punishments by governments. However, recently, many
people have rebelled against the death penalty. The death penalty is an act that is similar to being ruled under fascism instead of democracy. Under the
rule of democracy, citizens are responsible for the acts of other fellow citizens, which can be inferred that crime is caused by the lack of responsibility
in society. The victim's loved ones suffer due to the victim's death. It is understandable that they would want the murderer dead, but society often does
not work that way. People need to think on behalf of the society.... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
First of all, the opposing view states that if the death penalty did not exist, then it could have a tremendous effect on society. However, that is not
true. If there were no death penalty, we would still have other punishments that were used like life imprisonment. There are other forms of physical
punishment such as whipping. This type of punishment would be able to take the place of the death penalty because the death penalty is just too
extreme. In truth, criminals need a second chance in their life for them to succeed. Here is a quote: "Hoang Vu (attempted murderer) and Terrell
Carswell (cocaine trafficking and robbery) were next, pulling Burden off the deputy while David Schofield (aggravated assault and battery) grabbed
Moon's radio and called for help." (cracked.com). This shows how a prisoner who has committed a crime helps the officers in prison. If they had a
second chance to integrate into society, they would live better lives without damaging society. If we look at the problem on behalf of society, isn't it
one of our responsibilities to forgive rather than taking everything from them? A democratic society is when you are responsible for other people's

Death Penalty Thesis
This research paper is on mentally retarded (intellectually disabled) offenders and the death penalty. The death penalty is the highest punishment
handed to criminals. Capital punishment plays an emotional role in the United States; it affects ethics and questions cruelty in our society. In this
paper, I delve into what the death penalty is, the difference between mentally retarded and mentally ill offenders, also, how past court cases have
shaped and impacted the death penalty today regarding its sensitive issues. The amalgamation of adult crime, juvenile crime, sexual offenses, murder,
the mentally ill and mental retardation can lead to potential complications on what is justified as right, regarding the death penalty. Furthermore, some
agree ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mental retardation is a disability that occurs either in the womb, at birth or during childhood, before the age of eighteen. When these individuals
become criminals by law, is it fair to treat them the same way we would treat a criminal with an average IQ, who revel in the crime and receive
pleasure from evil? The death penalty as a whole is a very delicate situation. According to Lee and Hall (2017), "Although the death penalty was
viewed as an acceptable form of punishment at the time the U.S. Constitution was created, it did not take long for various states to begin to limit or
even ban such practices" (p.

Theorems Of A Penalty Kick
Now, how do these two theorems help in analysing a penalty shootout?
Let us first see what a penalty kick is? When do players receive a penalty kick?
Penalty kick is a direct free kick that is taken from the penalty spot which is 12 yards from the goal. Only the goalkeeper is allowed to stand between
the player taking the penalty kick and the goal. All other players need to stand behind the penalty taker. Penalty kicks are performed during normal
play. They are awarded when a foul that is punishable by a direct free kick is committed within the offending player's own penalty area. Similar kicks
are made in a penalty shootout in major international tournaments such as the World Cup to determine which team is victorious after a drawn match.
So the striker lines up with the ball in front of him. He runs forwards and kicks the ball towards the net and the goalkeeper tries to stop it. ... Show more
Although the goalkeeper dives after the striker has kicked the ball, he cannot actually wait to the ball comes off the foot to decide which way to
dive–because the ball moves so fast, it will already be behind him by the time he finishes his dive. So the goalkeeper must pick his strategy before
observing any relevant information from the striker.
This type of game is actually very common. Both players pick a side. One player wants to match sides (the goalie), while the other wants to
mismatch (the striker). That is, from the striker's perspective, the goalkeeper wants to dive left when the striker kicks left and dive right when the
striker kicks right; the striker wants to kick left when the goalie dives right and kick right when the goalie dives left. The same case happens in
basketball where a shooter wants a defender to break the wrong way to give him an open lane to the basket, while the defender wants to stay lined up
with the ball

Abolishing Death Penalty
What is Being Done?
There are currently a number of Non Governmental Organizations dedicated to the task of abolishing the death penalty. National watchdogs like the
Death Penalty Information Center collect and publish national statistics on the death penalty yearly and document all individuals executed in the United
States. Though no large movement has been created by DPIC the work done by the organization had made it easier for abolitionists to collect
information that would otherwise be inaccessible to the general public. This aids in the expansion of true information about the death penalty and
humanizes those on death row by allowing individuals access to case and trial information. Large international organizations like Human Rights ...
It has been proven that a prisoners fundamental rights and freedoms are infringed not only at the time of execution but also during their stay on death
row. Exposure to unfit living conditions and torturous, degrading acts has shown that the death penalty is not just capital punishment but instead cruel
and unusual punishment. This is why I recommend the international community rise up and push for an international ban of the death penalty in all
circumstances, including wartime. Though this is the goal of many NGOs, I believe it is going to take a strong collective push by the international
community in order for countries like the United States to ever change its legislation. An organized campaign that calls for the boycott, divestment and
sanction of the United States until it aligns with international values places pressure not only on the economy but also the U.S. reputation fighting for
human rights. While international protocols have used abolitionist rhetoric to protect the rights of prisoners facing death, these protocols are not
legally binding and are often optional for States. This is why a stronger tactic must be used against superpower countries that often don't sign or ratify
treaties that impact national affairs. Increased access to information should also be a priority as the United States continues to medicalize the practice
to hide its cruelty. In this case, knowledge is power and by sharing accounts of life on death row in the united states as well as the true barbaric nature
of executions, it become hard for the international community to turn a blind eye to the abuse. Information sharing is also important for abolitionist
countries as well to ensure the practice of the death penalty never returns. This is especially true for countries like Canada, where we are heavily
influenced by United

Death Penalty Decline
Also "offenders aged fifteen and younger at the time of their crimes was unconstitutional" ("introduction to the death penalty"). This shows that there
are many factors that prevent a person from getting the death penalty and these limitations protects them from it. In recent years, "the United States
numbers of death sentences are steadily declining from 300 in 1998 to 106 in 2009" ("introduction to the death penalty"). This shows that the usage of
the death penalty is declining and many people are not being punished with the death penalty. This also shows that the death penalty is still being used
in certain crimes in the United States. This is showing that the death penalty might not be used as much in the future.
There are many ways that

Death Penalty Debate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Sunshine Blackburn

More from Sunshine Blackburn (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Death Penalty Debate