The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5.docx

The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5
GRADE DETAIL FOR
FINAL PROJECT ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:
THE ROLE OF INTROVERSION AND EXTRAVERSION
PERSONALITY TRAITS ON MARITAL BLISS
Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Created a research question based on a research topic approved
by the instructor and submitted a testable hypothesis. No
hypothesis.
13/15
Submitted citations in the form of an APA-style for five articles
and included a paragraph summarizing each article and
discussing its relevance.
33/40
Ensured that all the articles are from peer-reviewed journals.
20/20
Submitted a title page for the submission.
4/5
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated
ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of
sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
16/20
Total: (Grade)
86/100 (B)
The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss
Research Question

The research question for this topic will be to investigate the
effects of personality traits, that is, introversion and
extroversion on the social life of an individual and success in
marriage and relationships.
Bibliography
Akande, W. A., Adetoun, B. E., Adewuyi, M. F., Akande, T. I.,
E, Ntshanga, L. P., et al. (2012). The Wisdom of Eve: On
Differentiating the Colours of Emotion that May Be Threats to
Good Life. Springer Science & Business Media, 107(3), 531-
560.
This journal investigates the effects of one's personality,
emotions, and reasoning on one's behavior. The research was
conducted through observation of people with different
character traits and how they react in the society and at the
workplace. Using students and gauging them on the Differential
Emotions Scale, the researchers were able to detect attractions
between people of different behaviors and record their results.
The results showed that people tend to be more attracted and
associate with people who are indifferent to them in the context
that an outgoing person will most likely get attracted to a
person with different characteristics. The methodology used in
the research is based on experiments, and most of the
respondents were students. In this context, the results lack
generalizability to all the population of the world. However, the
journal is essential in contributing to the psychological and
personality attributes of a person that affect their behavior.
Huber, V. (2003). Personality, cognitive style, demographic
characteristics and Internet use - Findings from the
HomeNetToo project. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 79-
90.
In this journal, respondents from different classes of life were
investigated and analyzed in relation to their personality and
internet use at home. The rationale for using the internet at
home was fetched in the context that, respondents who used
internet at home more and were with their families show a lot of
misunderstandings and discomfort towards one another. People

from different cultural backgrounds were analyzed, and their
responses recorded over time. The results showed that couples
who had similar personality characteristics were more prone to
avoiding one another and participating in internet use. The
journal fails to connect directly to the personality of the
participants since there were no proper personality
measurements measures used.
Millon, T; Simonsen, E; Birkett,-Smith, M; Davis, R. (2008).
Psycho-paathy and the Five-Factor Model of Personality.
Journal of Personality, 171-201.
In this journal, the researchers investigated the impact of
personality traits on their agreeableness in the society. Two of
the various factors of personality investigated included
introversion and extraversion with analysis of twenty
individuals with such kind of personality traits. , the researchers
concluded that extroverts are more likeable in the society by
persons of all traits because of their humor and other outgoing
traits. In this context, the researchers concluded that introverted
persons are more likely to stay lonely and be unmarried for long
in their lives. However, this journal fails to capture all the
information of other traits that affect marriage bliss. This
journal contributes to the knowledge of personality and the
effects of personality on a personal life altogether.
Sears, D. J. (2011). The Content, Structure, and Outcomes of
Differentiated Pleasure: An Exploration. Journal of Consumer
Behavior and Personality, 236.
This journal focused on the experiences of pleasure and sources
of pleasure from personal traits characteristics through
investigation of personality traits and the extent of marketing
and types of pleasures an individual drew from the workplace.
In the studies, participants with different types of pleasures
were analyzed, and results recorded. In this context, the results
of highly extroverted people showed less pleasure of working in
marketing positions and low outcomes of their results. This
contradicts the main thinking of people that extroverted people
has more differentiated success and happiness in social places.

This acts as a counterargument for the main psychological
ideas.
Winifred, B., & Terman, L. (2006, April 28). Personality
Characteristics Of Happily Married, Unhappily Married, And
Divorced Persons. Journal of Personality., 3(4), 290-311.
This journal answers the question of why marriages break and
why some families are happy while others have major
discomforts and low satisfaction. It was carried out through
analysis of 436 married couples and 116 divorced couples
across a region around Stanford University. The married
couples were given questionnaires to fill up which enabled the
researchers to classify them into two groups one containing
happily married couples and the other least happily married
couples. Through the use of variables, the researchers found low
or negligible correlation between the degree of happiness and
the degree of resemblance between the husband and the wife. In
this context, the research is convenient in bridging the gap of
knowledge relating to how people with semblance match and are
likely to make good relationship and marriage.
REFERENCES
560.
Argosy University (2015) Research Methods, retrieved
from, http://myeclassonline.com/
90.

Sears, D. J. (2011). The Content, Structure, and Outcomes of
Differentiated Pleasure: An Exploration. Journal of Consumer
Behavior and Personality, 236.
Shaughnessy, John, Eugene Zechmeister, and Jeanne
Zechmeister. Research Methods In Psychology, 8th Edition.
McGraw-Hill Learning
Solution
s, 2008. [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from:
http://digitalbookshelf.argosy.edu/books/007-7376463/id/ch01;
/ch02; /ch03; /ch14
Winifred, B., & Terman, L. (2006, April 28). Personality
Characteristics of Happily Married, Unhappily Married, and
Divorced Persons. Journal of Personality., 3(4), 290-311.
Final Project Sampling4
GRADE DETAIL FOR:
FINAL PROJECT SAMPLING
THE ROLE OF INTROVERSION AND EXTRAVERSION
PERSONALITY TRAITS ON MARITAL BLISS

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Points
Provided five additional valid references and explained the
reasoning behind their selection.
20
20
Discussed the sampling technique for the proposed study and
included the aspects of generalization, inclusion-exclusion
criteria, and ethical issues as requested in the assignment.
00
25
Provided a detailed outline of the intro/literature review section
of the paper, along with revised hypothesis. No hypothesis.
25
25
Included an APA-style title page and reference page (with at
least 10 references). Make a reference page and use APA format
to cite your references.
06
10
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated
ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of

sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
17
20
Total:
68 (D+)
100
Introduction
Introvert and extrovert, fundamental identity sorts as per the
speculations of the 20th-century Swiss specialist Carl Jung. As
indicated by these speculations, a self-observer is an individual
whose hobby is by and large coordinated internal toward his
own particular emotions and considerations, rather than an
extrovert, whose consideration is coordinated toward other
individuals and the outside world. The common introvert is
timid, scrutinizing, and held and has a tendency to experience
issues changing in accordance with social circumstances.
Unreasonable wandering off in fantasy land and contemplation,
watchful adjusting of contemplations before coming to choices,
and withdrawal under anxiety are likewise run of the mill of the
withdrawn identity. The extrovert, by difference, is described
by cordiality, responsiveness to different persons, action,
forcefulness, and the capacity to settle on snappy choices. This
typology is currently viewed as excessively oversimplified in
light of the fact that nobody can be precisely depicted as

completely loner or extrovert. Most persons fall some place
between Jung's two sorts i.e., they are ambiverts, in whom
introversive and extroversive propensities exist in an unpleasant
adjust and are showed at diverse times in light of distinctive
circumstances. (Kahnweiler, 2013).
Extroversion
The vitality of extroverts is outward, towards individuals and
things. They require a great deal of incitement and frequently
express feelings. They get their inspiration from other
individuals. Their regularly need to change the world (instead
of consider it). Extroverts like mixture, activity and
accomplishment. They do well at school however may discover
University more troublesome. Their disposition is regularly
casual and sure. They are justifiable and available. They have a
tendency to demonstration first and think later. At work, they
looks for mixture and activity and like working with other
individuals. (Kahnweiler, 2013). They lean toward work that
has expansiveness as opposed to profundity. Introvert may see
them as being shallow and pushy. With extroverts:
· Show vitality and excitement.
· React rapidly without long delays to think.
· Permit talking so everyone can hear without positive
conclusions.
· Impart transparently - don't rebuff.
· Concentrate on the outer world, the individuals and the things.

· Permit time for ricocheting around thoughts.
· Take words at face esteem.
· Try not to accept responsibility or choices made.
Introversion
The vitality of self-observers is internal toward ideas and
thoughts. They require minimal outside incitement - and
actually they can without much of a stretch be over-empowered.
It is conceivable that they concentrate all the more on their
internal planets on the grounds that they experience the ill
effects of tangible over-burden in the event that they invest an
excessive amount of energy outside and concentrating on other
individuals. (Millon, Simonsen, Birkett,-Smith, Davis, 2008).
They therefore restrain their own feelings, which can blast if
pushed too far. Instead of attempting to change the world, they
simply need to comprehend it. They contemplate things and
regularly improve at University than they did at school. Their
mentality is saved and addressing and they can appear to be
inconspicuous and impervious. (Fonseca, 2013). They have a
tendency to think before they act. At work they like to work
alone and frequently look for calm for fixation. They have a
tendency to lean toward work that has profundity as opposed to
expansiveness. (Winifred, & Terman, 2006, April 28).
Extroverts may see them as egocentric and latent. There is a
view that loners may go about as they do on the grounds that
they are all the more effectively overpowered by outer boosts,

rather than extroverts who have a higher fundamental incitement
limit and need the more instinctive outside incitement to dodge
weariness. With introverts:
· Incorporate acquaintance time with get the chance to know
you and trust you.
· Empower reactions with inquiries as, "What do you think?"
· Utilization surveying strategies for information and choice
making.
· Permit time for deduction before reacting and choice making.
· Make utilization of composed reactions where useful.
· Focus on one-on-one exercises.
· Try not to accept absence of hobby.
Literature Review
At first glance, this mix seems, by all accounts, to be a decent
match. Outgoing individuals are stimulated more when
discussing what they are thinking and feeling, and self-
observers are invigorated more when thinking about what they
are thinking and feeling. (Millon, Simonsen, Birkett,-Smith,
Davis, 2008).Nonetheless, characteristic contrasts exist in how
outgoing people and loners see, transform, and react. These
distinctions can prompt unsurprising issues in correspondence
when certain circumstances are at play. Outgoing people, for
example, oblige outside assertions to feel inside grounded in
their different toward oneself from others. (Kahnweiler, 2013).
At the point when a distinction in recognition or need triggers a

clashed trade, those assertions reach an end. At the point when
this happens, the outgoing person will need to determine the
issue quickly with a specific end goal to regroup. Feeling-
reaction arranged social butterflies encounter a need to
determine that is frequently more prominent than that of most
thinking-reaction situated outgoing people. So as to have the
capacity to determine the issue and regroup, the social butterfly
needs to figure out how to get the introvert to concur with them
a reaction the self-observer can't give if their recognition in
regards to the current issue characteristically varies. (Fonseca,
2013).
Introvert's feeling of self is grounded in the conclusions they
come to in regards to the significance of what they and others
are thinking and feeling. Since these conclusions are
experienced as plainly obvious, as truthful givens, the introvert
may not feel a need to express them (Thomson, 1998). At the
point when a contention emerges with their outgoing
accomplice, the loner will endeavor to clarify why they vary.
Then again, an avocation for contrasting does not meet the
outgoing person's necessity for determining the issue and will
frequently be intruded on so the social butterfly can restate their
own case with expectations of getting the confirmed reaction
they require to resettle. (McCarthy, McCarten, & Sandiford,
2014).
These interferences can undermine the loners' adequacy at

communicating what they are thinking or feeling or reason them
to feel that further exchange is pointless. At the point when this
happens, the contemplative person will for the most part
endeavor to withdraw, an activity that generally further
bombshells the outgoing individual, who won't have any desire
to separate until the withdrawn accomplice concurs with them.
(Seidman, 2013). The circumstance at play here is merciless.
The minute a clashed trade happens in a territory where the
couple commonly varies obliges a reaction from the other to
determine the issue that the other can't give. Accepting these
distinctions to be a matter of decision instead of nature accepts
the other could give that reaction in the event that they needed
to. Hence, when they don't, infers that the other is deciding to
withhold that affirmation for egotistical or terrible reasons.
Crippling level headed discussions result over who is correct
and who is most certainly not. Not able to approve or be
accepted, such couples can wind up in an upset state, detached
from one another, accepting their accomplice to be at deficiency
in circumstances where regular contrasts in discernments,
needs, values, or implications are the genuine guilty party.
(McCarthy, McCarten, & Sandiford, 2014).
Outgoing feeling-reaction situated people can have an
especially troublesome time dividing without determination,
regardless of how ruinous the trades have gotten to be. At the
point when working with couples managing this level of

dangerousness, it is imperative to advise them that when
associations have come to this level of force no important
determination is conceivable. Another territory of common
trouble concerns the end of the workday. Outgoing individuals
are typically stimulated by the occasions of their day,
encounters they will need to impart to their accomplice when
they return home. (Winifred, & Terman, 2006, April 28). This
intelligent procedure is vital for social butterflies to feel joined
with their independent accomplice. Most self-observers begin
the day with a restricted measure of social intelligent vitality.
On the off chance that that vitality is drained before they return
home, they may oblige downtime to reconnect to their selves
before they can successfully associate with their accomplices.
(Walsh, 2012).
Without data needed to have sense out of this effect, outgoing
people regularly encounter their contemplative accomplice's
absence of intelligent vitality as an absence of interest or
minding and feel hurt and get upset. Contemplative people must
choose between limited options in how depleted they are feeling
toward the day's end. Subsequently, when their accomplice gets
annoyed with them for not giving a second thought enough to
interface, they either feel remorseful and terrible (on the off
chance that they are feeling-reaction situated) or get steamed at
being ridiculously assaulted. (Akande, Adetoun, Adewuyi,
Akande, Ntshanga, 2012). One outgoing accomplice

communicated with significant anxiety, "You run off and
connect with others throughout the day and after that return and
have no time for me!" once more, every obliges a reaction from
the other they accept can be given when it can't. These
misperceptions of importance and purpose can prompt a
pervasive condition of disengage that influences each aspects of
their life together. (Seidman, 2013).
When most couples comprehend the genuine reason for their
trouble, they find themselves able to viably alter. The standard
determination originates from partitioning their nighttime time
down the middle with the contemplative person, getting their
downtime initially, trailed by the outgoing individuals' joining
time. (Fonseca, 2013). A third region of potential trouble is
found in the outgoing individual/contemplative person couple's
social life. Outgoing individuals are invigorated by cooperation
with others and ordinarily have a bigger system of companions
in both their own and expert lives than their thoughtful
accomplice; companions they will need to get together with all
the time. (Sherman, 2013).
Who is Who?
While a contemplative person's system is normally littler, these
connections have a tendency to be of long standing. The
recurrence of contact, regardless, will normally be controlled by
the measure of vitality the introvert has accessible for
connecting. Parts of life partner and guardian may constrain the

recurrence with which they are capable or willing to associate
with their companions. Weeks, months, or even years may pass
by without contact and not disturb the closeness of these bonds.
Social butterflies are frequently irritated by the recurrence of
their independent accomplice's hesitance to partake in social
exercises that are so fundamental to the outgoing individual
feeling stimulated and occupied with life. This hesitance is
regularly seen as being narrow minded, solitary, or as not
enjoying their companions. These recognitions can prompt
profound feelings of disdain. (Walsh, 2012).
Introvert don't comprehend why the outgoing accomplice
continues needing to fill their down time with social
engagements that further deplete them. From the loner's
viewpoint, they are gotten stuck a twofold scrape. In the event
that they say no, they are deciding to be egotistical, solitary,
and/or destructive. In the event that they consent to partake,
however are not able to produce enough social intelligent
vitality to fulfill their extroverted accomplice's desires, they are
deliberately destroying the experience for their accomplice.
This problem can prompt profound situated feelings of hatred
crosswise over time. Gotten in a misinterpretation of decision to
appear as something else, every winds up needing to protect
their entitlement to be the way they regularly are an avocation
that unavoidably nullifies the regular and ordinary intuitive
needs of the other. (Sherman, 2013).

When most contemplative person/outgoing individual couples
comprehend that characteristic contrasts are the genuine guilty
party, they find themselves able to modify and oblige. On the
off chance that the outgoing accomplice requires more social
collaboration amid the week than their contemplative
accomplice can give or take part in, they can decide to fill this
need by getting together with companions without their
accomplice's investment. Illustrations incorporate getting
together with companions for supper or a motion picture, or
taking an interest in a book club. (Walsh, 2012).
Concerning weekends, alternating as a rule makes a difference.
The introvert may decide to stay home and play Scrabble with
their accomplice when the ball is in their court, and the social
butterfly may arrange a supper party for companions when the
ball is in their court. By alternating, each gets the chance to do
what they would want to do a fraction of the time, without
needing to guard their entitlement to do as such. When most
couples that consolidate an outgoing individual with an
introvert understand that characteristic contrasts exist in how
every sees, organizes values, and reacts contrasts that are
common, typical, and not subject to change they find
themselves able to oblige and bargain in territories that had not
been conceivable in the recent past. The significant support in
such manner seems to originate from comprehension that their
accomplice is not deciding to contrast; there is no

demonstration of plan to get their own particular manner at play
when the circumstances said in this article become possibly the
most important factor.
REFERENCES
560.
Argosy University (2015) Research Methods, retrieved
from, http://myeclassonline.com/
Doff, A., Puchta, H., Thaine, C., Stranks, J., & Lewis-Jones, P.
(2015).Cambridge English Empower Intermediate Student's
Book. Cambridge University Press.
Fonseca, C. (2013). Quiet Kids: Help Your Introverted Child
Succeed in an Extroverted World. Sourcebooks, Inc..
90.
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J., & Sandiford, H.
(2014). Touchstone Level 4 Full Contact (Vol. 4). Cambridge

University Press.
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide
for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Shaughnessy, John, Eugene Zechmeister, and Jeanne
Zechmeister. Research Methods In Psychology, 8th Edition.
McGraw-Hill Learning

The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5.docx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5.docx

Similar to The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5.docx (20)

More from ssusera34210

More from ssusera34210 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Role of Introversion vs. Extroversion on Marital Bliss5.docx