In Campofrio Food Group, we think that because of the waste deposit problem, it is important to value each and every one of the garbage that we generate.

1. TEAMS BEHIND THE SUCCESS
ZERO DISCHARGE

2. According to the Ministry of Environment, more than 70% OF THE
WASTE produced in Spain, end its route buried in a landfill.
The European Union maintains through its directives that the ship-
ment of waste to this type of facility, landfills, should be the last alter-
native to consider, since it is the option that produces the GREATEST
NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
Penalties for non-compliance with these standards are very important.
As a consequence of these, the prices of landfill rates are rising to pe-
nalize the deposit of waste.

3. In Campofrio Food Group we think that because of the waste de-
posit problem, it is important to value each and every one of the
garbage that we generate.
From the Department of Environment in CFG, we bet to reduce to
the maximum the amount of waste that goes to landfill.
Departments that have participated: Maintenance, Production,
Purchasing and Environment.
INITIATIVES/ALTERNATIVES
1. Incineration
2. Selective segregation
This was the one that fit better with our environmental manage-
ment policy.This means we have to minimize the LANDFILLS
deposit, by looking for new exits to the different materials deri-
ved from our productive processes.

4. In our VILLAVERDE'S PLANT we have started to segregate
different waste and have been reduced to the maximum of
sending the waste of urban solid waste.
We are making a sustainable management of our residues.
All the waste goes to energy valorization instead of a landfill.

5. Below we can see the amount of garbage that has gone to landfill
during the years 2014 and 2015 in the plant of Villaverde.
JANUARY
YEAR 2014 (Tn) 16,26
16 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14,74 17,14 16,46 16,34 15,06 18,54 19,8 18,54 18,46 19 17
YEAR 2015 (Tn)
FEBREARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
TONS
MONTHS
AÑO
2014
GARBAGE

6. 0
5
10
15
20
TONS
TONS OF GARBAGE TO LANDFILL
EN
ERO
‘14
FEBRERO
‘14M
ARZO
‘14ABRIL
‘14M
AYO
‘14JUN
IO
‘14JULIO
‘14AGOSTO
‘14
SEPTIEM
BRE
‘14
OCTUBRE
‘14
N
OVIEM
BRE
‘14
DICIEM
BRE
‘14EN
ERO
‘15
FEBRERO
‘15M
ARZO
‘15ABRIL
‘15M
AYO
‘15JUN
IO
‘15JULIO
‘15AGOSTO
‘15
SEPTIEM
BRE
‘15
OCTUBRE
‘15
N
OVIEM
BRE
‘15
DICIEM
BRE
‘15

7. JANUARY
YEAR 2014 (Tn) 16,26
16 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14,74 17,14 16,46 16,34 15,06 18,54 19,8 18,54 18,46 19 17
YEAR 2015 (Tn)
FEBREARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
TONS
MONTHS
AÑO
2014
GARBAGE
As we can see in the graphic below the waste that has
been managed as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),
it has ceased to be deposited in landfills and has begun
to be sustainable.

8. During January to October 2014, 171.34 tons of garbage have been managed through
ENVIROTEC.
This has meant a cost of € 6,853.60 for management and € 4,840 for transport, which
makes a total of € 11,693.60.
From November 2014 the waste management is done through SAICA, the cost of this
management was as follows.36.71 Tn have been handled, resulting in a cost of 2610€.
This added to the managed by ENVIROTEC gives us an annual cost of 14,303€.
From March 2015 began to take out the garbage as CSR for energy recovery at SAICA
plant instead of the landfill, this has made us achieve ZERO DISCHARGE of our waste
with the consequent economic savings.
The cost produced in 2015 was € 15,003.It has been managed as of March 2015 as CSR
instead of as junk.
If we had managed during the trash 2015 as we were doing instead of CSR the expense
would have been € 20,821.
Therefore the saving is 5,818 € / year.