The Macedonian army under Alexander the Great was highly effective due to its use of phalanx infantry formations, elite cavalry units like the Hetairoi, and siege weapons such as catapults and ballistae. Alexander led his army in major battles including Granicus River where he defeated Darius' forces, Issus where he trapped the Persian army, and the Siege of Tyre where he constructed a massive causeway and used siege towers to breach the city walls. The final showdown was at Gaugamela, where despite being outnumbered, Alexander attacked during the day and was able to rout Darius' army, marking his victory over Persia and allowing him to claim the title of King of Asia.
Naif AlsalemAlexander the Great is also widely known as Alex.docxrosemarybdodson23141
Naif Alsalem
Alexander the Great is also widely known as Alexander III of Macedon. He was the successor of his father, Philip II, to the kingship of the Ancient Greek when he was twenty years old. Most of his time in ruling was spent on unprecedented military campaign through Northeast Africa and Asia. Alexander the Great always won in combat, and he is considered one the most triumphant military commanders in history. This paper discusses the accomplishments of Alexander the Great as one of the world’s greatest military leaders (Nawotka, 2012).
After his father’s death, Alexander assumed his leadership position at the tender age of twenty. He inherited an experienced army and a strong kingdom. He was determined to conquer his enemy and expand his territory. He overthrew kingdoms such as that of Persian King Darius III a win that saw his kingdom stretch to Indus River from the Adriatic Sea. Alexandria earned his authority by conquering his enemies in the battlefield. He founded many cities especially in Egypt some of which were named after his name. In India, he defeated a city and had it named after a horse (Nawotka, 2012). He upgraded his military and went ahead to discover trade routes to and in Asia. Eventually, Alexander had conquered half of all that was known as the world at that time.
In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a great military leader. In fact, he was one of the greatest military commanders ever to live. He took over and dominated many empires from Asia, Africa and Europe. Looking into Alexander the Great helps one understand the history in the light of the strategies leaders employed to make sure they won in battle and expanded their territories.
WHY WAS ALEXENADER CONSIDERD GREAT IN ANCCIENT TIMES ?
.
New works by Peter Green and the late John Keegan are included in this revised and expanded presentation. I'm tempted to do a whole series on Alexander.
Dimensions of Learning is a comprehensive model of learning which offers a set
of instructional strategies that improve the learning process and looks at
learning in terms of five types of thinking processes that can be learnt.
I had the privilege of taking part in a staggered 5-day professional development course in DoL.
The following is the slideshow outlining my action research task associated to the PD.
Naif AlsalemAlexander the Great is also widely known as Alex.docxrosemarybdodson23141
Naif Alsalem
Alexander the Great is also widely known as Alexander III of Macedon. He was the successor of his father, Philip II, to the kingship of the Ancient Greek when he was twenty years old. Most of his time in ruling was spent on unprecedented military campaign through Northeast Africa and Asia. Alexander the Great always won in combat, and he is considered one the most triumphant military commanders in history. This paper discusses the accomplishments of Alexander the Great as one of the world’s greatest military leaders (Nawotka, 2012).
After his father’s death, Alexander assumed his leadership position at the tender age of twenty. He inherited an experienced army and a strong kingdom. He was determined to conquer his enemy and expand his territory. He overthrew kingdoms such as that of Persian King Darius III a win that saw his kingdom stretch to Indus River from the Adriatic Sea. Alexandria earned his authority by conquering his enemies in the battlefield. He founded many cities especially in Egypt some of which were named after his name. In India, he defeated a city and had it named after a horse (Nawotka, 2012). He upgraded his military and went ahead to discover trade routes to and in Asia. Eventually, Alexander had conquered half of all that was known as the world at that time.
In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a great military leader. In fact, he was one of the greatest military commanders ever to live. He took over and dominated many empires from Asia, Africa and Europe. Looking into Alexander the Great helps one understand the history in the light of the strategies leaders employed to make sure they won in battle and expanded their territories.
WHY WAS ALEXENADER CONSIDERD GREAT IN ANCCIENT TIMES ?
.
New works by Peter Green and the late John Keegan are included in this revised and expanded presentation. I'm tempted to do a whole series on Alexander.
Dimensions of Learning is a comprehensive model of learning which offers a set
of instructional strategies that improve the learning process and looks at
learning in terms of five types of thinking processes that can be learnt.
I had the privilege of taking part in a staggered 5-day professional development course in DoL.
The following is the slideshow outlining my action research task associated to the PD.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
Yr11 ahs battles1
1. Alexander the Great
The Macedonian army & the major battles of
his campaign
Year 11 Ancient History
2. The Macedonian Army
INFANTRY
• Phalanx
• Developed by Phillip II & Alexander
• These soldiers fought in close-ranked rectangular formations which
could spear through enemy cavalry and infantry from a safe distance
• Could also be quickly manoeuvred into battle and travel quickly
• Hypaspists
• The elite arm of the Macedonian infantry, armed with spears
• Would protect the right flank of the Phalanx
Phalanx in formation
3. The Macedonian Army
CAVALRY
• Hetairoi
• The elite arm of the Macedonia army
• Regarded as the best cavalry of the Ancient World
• Would dominate other cavalry in battle
• Thessalian Cavalry
• Used short spears and javelins
• Highly manoeuvrable in battle
• Used to defend the left flank of the army in battle
• Light Cavalry and Allies
• Used for reconnaissance, scouting ahead & to fill
lines during an attack or defence
4. The Macedonian Army
SIEGE
• Catapult
• Developed by the Greeks in order to attack and destroy enemy structures
and buildings.
• Uses a range of tensions to hurl large and heavy objects at designated
targets
• According to historian Diodorus Siculus, this siege weapon was first used in
399 BCE
• Ballista
• Similar to catapult, but uses large
arrow shaped projectiles
5.
6. Battle of Granicus River (334)
Lebrun. Source: Encyclopedie Larousse Illustre 1898.
7. Battle of Granicus River (334)
Alexander leads his army across the Hellespont to
meet Darius’ forces led by Memnon of Rhodes
History Channel,
Battle of Granicus
12. Siege of Tyre
Tyre
◦ Strategic coastal of Persia
◦ Largest & most important city-state of Phoenicia
◦ 40 000 inhabitants (c332)
◦ Situated on an island 800 metres off the coast of the
Mediterranean mainland
◦ Supported by Persian fleet (based in Carthage)
Map of Mediterranean
14. Siege of Tyre
Cause of siege
◦ Alexander needed to secure
the city in order to restrict
Persian naval movement
along the Syrian coast
◦ Within the city walls also
stood a temple to the Greek
god of Heracles – son of Zeus
◦ Alexander promised that all
the inhabitants would be
spared if the Macedonians
could make a sacrifice
◦ Tyrians refused = SIEGE!
Heracles – god of
Extraordinary
strength, courage,
ingenuity, and
sexual prowess
15. Siege of Tyre
Siege Strategy
◦ Using a natural land bridge no more than 2 metres deep
Alexander order his troops to build a 800 metre long
causeway directly to the island city
◦ Using boulders and lumber from a Lebanese forest the
Macedonians spent 8 months constructing the platform
◦ Alexander was determined to crush the city
16. Siege of Tyre (332) Dept. of History, United States
Military Academy
18. Siege of Tyre
Battle
◦ Once the causeway was ready Alexander built two 50
metre tall siege towers equipped with catapults and ballista
siege machines to break through the city walls.
◦ He surrounded the city with use of 80 Macedonian ships
and 120 allied ships from Cyprus
According to Quintus Curtius
Rufus 6,000 fighting men were
killed within the city and 2,000
Tyrians were crucified on the
beach. The others, some 30,000
people, were sold into slavery.
19. Questions
Video – the Siege of Tyre
◦ Questions
1. How high were the walls of Tyre?
2. What devices did the Tyrians use to defend themselves
before the city walls were breached? List at least two.
3. What sort of issues did Alexander and the Macedonians face
when constructing the causeway?
4. How did the siege of tyre benefit Alexander on his
campaign?
5. List some anomalies between the video and what has been
discussed in class.
20. Gaugamela
◦ A flat plain decided on by King Darius III of Persia where he
could deploy his numerically superior forces
◦ He most commonly accepted opinion about the location is
(36°22′N 43°15′E / 36.36°N 43.25°E / 36.36; 43.25), east of
Mosul in modern-day northern Iraq – suggested by Sir
Aurel Stein in 1938 (see his Limes eportrpp. 127–1)
Battle of Gaugamela (331 BCE)
• Marks the final
showdown between
Alexander and Darius
• The winner to become
the King of Persia
22. Motivation & cause
◦ Alexander had conquered Greece, Macedonia, the
Mediterranean coastline and Egypt and sought to continue
east into Asia via Syria
◦ He needed to defeat Darius III in order to truly become the
King of Asia, Persia and Macedonia or “Lord of Asia”
23. Battle of Gaugamela
Size of the Persian
force
◦ Warry estimates a total
size of 91,000.
◦ Welman estimates a
total size of 90,000.
◦ Delbrück (1978)
estimates a total size of
52,000.
◦ Engels (1920) and Green
(1990) also estimate the
total size of Darius' army
to be no larger than
100,000 at Gaugamela.
Darius’ army also included
• 15 trained Indian elephants
• Scythed chariots (above)
• 1500 archers
26. Battle of Gaugamela
Time of attack
◦ Macedonian army v. Persian force
37 000 units v. 53 000 – 100 000 units (modern estimates)
◦ Alexander’s forces were terribly outnumbered – Daruis III
had expected him to launch his attack during the night so
his units would not be intimidated by the sheer size of the
Persian force
◦ Alexander wished to face the Persians during the day
◦ On the eve of the battle Persian troops stayed up all night
on watch whilst Alexander’s had rested and slept
29. Battle of Gaugamela
"For a short time there ensued a hand-to-hand fight; but
when the Macedonian cavalry, commanded by Alexander
himself, pressed on vigorously, thrusting themselves
against the Persians and striking their faces with their
spears, and when the Macedonian phalanx in dense
array and bristling with long pikes had also made an
attack upon them, all things together appeared full of
terror to Darius, who had already long been in a state of
fear, so that he was the first to turn and flee."
The Battle of Gaugamela (Book III, 7-16) By: Arrian (Lucius Flavius Arrianus)
30. Battle of Gaugamela
Aftermath
◦ Darius had managed to escape the battle with a small core
of his forces remaining intact.
◦ Persia had been split in two
Alexander controlled the West,
◦ The Persian satraps (provincial governors) decided to have
Darius killed & pronounced Alexander ‘Lord of Asia’
◦ When Alexander discovered Darius murdered, he was
saddened to see an enemy he respected killed in such a
fashion
31. Battle of Gaugamela
Video – The Battle of Gaugamela
◦ Questions
1. By what means did Darius upgrade his forces in
preparation for the battle?
2. What reasons did Alexander give to his general
Parmenion to attack in the day rather than the night?
3. How affective were the Persian Scythe chariots and why?
4. At what point does Alexander order the left flank to push
forward?
5. How does this battle define Alexander as a successful
strategist?