You will design a patient education tool that can be used by nurses for teaching patients using computer applications. You will then present your tool to the class and explain the purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes. DUE DATE:  Total Points: 200 Patient Education Project Tool Rubric - 100 points Points 18-20 14-17 10-16 0 Comments Use of Computer Applications Creative,   innovative, effective use of computer applications Effective use of computer   applications Ineffective   use of computer use of applications Lacking   use of computer applications Organization Extremely   well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from   one idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the   effectiveness of the project Well   organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one   idea to another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of   the project Somewhat   organized; ideas were not presented coherently and transitions were not   always smooth, which at times distracted the audience Choppy   and confusing; format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were   abrupt and seriously distracted the audience Content   Accuracy 100 % of   the facts are accurate  99-90%   of the facts are accurate  89-80%   of the facts are accurate Fewer   than 80% of facts are accurate Research Went   above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to   what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance   project; and utilized variety of resources to make project effective Did a   very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full   potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the   initiative to find information outside of school. Used   the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any   additional resources Did   not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the   topic Creativity Was   extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly   enhanced the project Was   clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented Added   a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate them   throughout Little   creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked   “zip” Patient Education Project Class Presentation Rubric: 100 points Points 18-20 14-17 10-13 5-9 0-4 Comments Voice Speaker uses appropriate pitch,   volume, and rate of speaking. Articulation excellent. Hasty conversational style;   does not interfere with volume or articulation. Communication is unhampered. Low volume; hasty   conversational style compromises artic.

1. You will design a patient education tool that can be used by
nurses for teaching patients
using computer applications.
You will then present your tool to the class and explain the
purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of
applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness
of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.
DUE DATE:
Total Points: 200
Patient Education Project Tool Rubric - 100 points
Points
18-20
14-17
10-16
0
Comments

2. Use of Computer Applications
Creative, innovative, effective use of computer applications
Effective use of computer applications
Ineffective use of computer use of applications
Lacking use of computer applications
Organization
Extremely well organized; logical format that was easy to
follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and cleverly
conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the
project
Well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed
smoothly from one idea to another and conveyed; the
organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project
Somewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and
transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted
the audience

3. Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow
transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the
audience
Content Accuracy
100 % of the facts are accurate
99-90% of the facts are accurate
89-80% of the facts are accurate
Fewer than 80% of facts are accurate
Research
Went above and beyond to research information; solicited
material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal
ideas and information to enhance project; and utilized variety
of resources to make project effective
Did a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided

4. to their full potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance
project; at time took the initiative to find information outside
of school.
Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did
not consult any additional resources
Did not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact
gathering on the topic
Creativity
Was extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique
approach that truly enhanced the project
Was clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented
Added a few original touches to enhance the project but did
not incorporate them throughout
Little creative energy used during this project; was bland,
predictable, and lacked “zip”

5. Patient Education Project Class Presentation Rubric: 100 points
Points
18-20
14-17
10-13
5-9
0-4
Comments
Voice
Speaker uses appropriate pitch, volume, and rate of speaking.
Articulation excellent.

6. Hasty conversational style; does not interfere with volume or
articulation. Communication is unhampered.
Low volume; hasty conversational style compromises
articulation and communication.
Speech difficult to hear or understand; communication is
severely compromised.
Speaker is inaudible, and/or speech is garbled, impeding
communication.
Gestures and Audience Engagement
Eyes, hands, facial expression, and body language all
coordinate to support communication.
Eye contact is adequate. Facial and body language are neutral.
Eye contact and facial expressions are minimal; gestures and
body language distracting.
No eye contact; speaker is stationary, or is supported by
lectern.

7. No eye contact, speaker is rigid, head down, or is unable to
continue.
Speech Content
Introduction explains the purpose of the tool, previews speech.
Body clearly explains how you created it and the reasoning for
choice of tools.
Conclusion ties presentation together.
Speech is prepared, organized into an introduction, body, and
conclusion, with minimal transitional devices.
Speech is obviously prepared and researched, but has no
discernible intro, body, and/or conclusion and lacks
interlocking thoughts.
Speech has an impromptu effect, with no discernible parts or
transitions; is obviously poorly researched and unprepared.
Speech is unprepared, not researched, and is obviously an
impromptu presentation.

8. Evidence Support
Research used from appropriate sources
Research used, but not from appropriate sources
.
No research support provided
Length of presentation
Presentation is 5-10 minutes in length
Presentation is <5 minutes or>10 minutes in length
You will design a patient education tool that can be used by
nurses for teaching patients
using computer applications.
You will then present your tool to the class and explain the
purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of

9. applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness
of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.
DUE DATE:
Total Points: 200
Patient Education Project Tool Rubric - 100 points
Points
18-20
14-17
10-16
0
Comments
Use of Computer Applications
Creative, innovative, effective use of computer applications

10. Effective use of computer applications
Ineffective use of computer use of applications
Lacking use of computer applications
Organization
Extremely well organized; logical format that was easy to
follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another and cleverly
conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the
project
Well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed
smoothly from one idea to another and conveyed; the
organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project
Somewhat organized; ideas were not presented coherently and
transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted
the audience
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow
transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the
audience

11. Content Accuracy
100 % of the facts are accurate
99-90% of the facts are accurate
89-80% of the facts are accurate
Fewer than 80% of facts are accurate
Research
Went above and beyond to research information; solicited
material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal
ideas and information to enhance project; and utilized variety
of resources to make project effective
Did a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided
to their full potential; solicited adequate resources to enhance
project; at time took the initiative to find information outside
of school.
Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did
not consult any additional resources

12. Did not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact
gathering on the topic
Creativity
Was extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique
approach that truly enhanced the project
Was clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented
Added a few original touches to enhance the project but did
not incorporate them throughout
Little creative energy used during this project; was bland,
predictable, and lacked “zip”
Patient Education Project Class Presentation Rubric: 100 points

13. Points
18-20
14-17
10-13
5-9
0-4
Comments
Voice
Speaker uses appropriate pitch, volume, and rate of speaking.
Articulation excellent.
Hasty conversational style; does not interfere with volume or
articulation. Communication is unhampered.
Low volume; hasty conversational style compromises
articulation and communication.

14. Speech difficult to hear or understand; communication is
severely compromised.
Speaker is inaudible, and/or speech is garbled, impeding
communication.
Gestures and Audience Engagement
Eyes, hands, facial expression, and body language all
coordinate to support communication.
Eye contact is adequate. Facial and body language are neutral.
Eye contact and facial expressions are minimal; gestures and
body language distracting.
No eye contact; speaker is stationary, or is supported by
lectern.
No eye contact, speaker is rigid, head down, or is unable to
continue.
Speech Content

15. Introduction explains the purpose of the tool, previews speech.
Body clearly explains how you created it and the reasoning for
choice of tools.
Conclusion ties presentation together.
Speech is prepared, organized into an introduction, body, and
conclusion, with minimal transitional devices.
Speech is obviously prepared and researched, but has no
discernible intro, body, and/or conclusion and lacks
interlocking thoughts.
Speech has an impromptu effect, with no discernible parts or
transitions; is obviously poorly researched and unprepared.
Speech is unprepared, not researched, and is obviously an
impromptu presentation.
Evidence Support
Research used from appropriate sources
Research used, but not from appropriate sources

16. .
No research support provided
Length of presentation
Presentation is 5-10 minutes in length
Presentation is <5 minutes or>10 minutes in length
here is the other format.
You will design a patient education tool that can be used by
nurses for teaching patients
using computer applications
. You will then present your tool to the class and explain the
purpose, how you created it, reasoning for your choice of
applications, and provide current evidence of the effectiveness
of this patient education. This presentation is 5-10 minutes.
Assignment File(s)
Patient Education Project and Presentation
[Word Document]

17. Rubric
NM 208 Patient Education Project Tool
NM 208 Patient Education Project ToolCriteriaRatingsPtsThis
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Computer
Applications
20.0
to >17.0
ptsHigh ProficiencyCreative, innovative, effective use of
computer applications17.0
to >14.0
ptsModerately High ProficiencyEffective use of computer
applications14.0
to >10.0
ptsProficient PointsIneffective use of computer use of
applications10.0
to >0
ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientLacking use of
computer applications
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
20.0
to >17.0

18. ptsHigh ProficiencyExtremely well organized; logical format
that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to
another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the
effectiveness of the project17.0
to >14.0
ptsModerately High ProficiencyWell organized; logical format
that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to
another and conveyed; the organization enhanced the
effectiveness of the project14.0
to >10.0
ptsProficient PointsSomewhat organized; ideas were not
presented coherently and transitions were not always smooth,
which at times distracted the audience10.0
to >0
ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientChoppy and confusing;
format was difficult to follow transitions of ideas were abrupt
and seriously distracted the audience
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Accuracy
20.0
to >17.0
ptsHigh Proficiency100 % of the facts are accurate17.0
to >14.0
ptsModerately High Proficiency99-90% of the facts are
accurate14.0

19. to >10.0
ptsProficient Points89-80% of the facts are accurate10.0
to >0
ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientFewer than 80% of
facts are accurate
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch
20.0
to >17.0
ptsHigh ProficiencyWent above and beyond to research
information; solicited material in addition to what was
provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance
project; and utilized variety of resources to make project
effective17.0
to >14.0
ptsModerately High ProficiencyDid a very good job of
researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential;
solicited adequate resources to enhance project; at time took the
initiative to find information outside of school.14.0
to >10.0
ptsProficient PointsUsed the material provided in an acceptable
manner, but did not consult any additional resources10.0
to >0

20. ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientDid not utilize
resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the topic
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreativity
20.0
to >17.0
ptsHigh ProficiencyWas extremely clever and presented with
originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the
project17.0
to >14.0
ptsModerately High ProficiencyWas clever at times;
thoughtfully and uniquely presented14.0
to >10.0
ptsProficient PointsAdded a few original touches to enhance the
project but did not incorporate them throughout10.0
to >0
ptsLow-Level Proficiency/Non-ProficientLittle creative energy
used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked
“zip”
20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Previous
Next