The document discusses the implementation of a data exchange infrastructure by the e-Government Center of Moldova, highlighting challenges such as excessive documentation demands and slow internal processes due to lack of real-time data. It outlines needs for automated decision-making, secure connections, and effective data management for improved interoperability. Future plans focus on simplifying connection processes, modernizing public services, and promoting data exchange for better service delivery.

1. Implementing Data Exchange
Infrastructure in Government
Artur Reaboi
Enterprise Architect
e-Government Center of Moldova

2. About e-Government Center
• CIO of the Government of Moldova
• Operational from 2011
• Reports to Prime Minister
• Responsible for e-Government strategy
• Implementing e-Government as a Platform
• Follow us on http://egov.md

3. MConnect
Interoperability Platform

4. The problem (1 of 2)
Too many public services are asking for too
many documents issued by different
governmental organizations.

5. The problem (2 of 2)
Internal government processes tend to take
longer because there is lack of real-time
information.

6. Governmental data exchange needs
• Automated decisions based on authoritative data
– Not a document exchange!
– Abstracted/virtualized data sources
• Access to real-time data
– Data synchronization only for analysis in one cluster
• Life events distribution instead of synchronization
– Enabling a pro-active government

7. Governmental data exchange needs
• Enable a clear process for new connections and
their change management
• Ensure secure connections
• Control access to restricted data (personal,
commercial secret, etc.)
• Abstract technical differences
• Enable technical advances

8. Interoperability common obstacles
• Agreeing on a responsible body for
implementation
• Defining data exchanges before reengineering
involved business processes
• Seeking for acceptance from authoritative data
sources to expose data
• Ensuring proper SLA (especially HA)
• Ensuring sustainability of data sources

9. Ways of connecting systems
• Direct, ad-hoc, without any governance
• Just recommending some common standards
and hoping for the best
• Using a distributed but uniform solution based
on local adaptation servers
• Using a centralized hub and responsible
organization

10. Moving from this…

11. … to this

12. Distributed vs Centralized

14. Deployment
• NGINX Plus cluster (active/passive)
• WSO2 ESB cluster: 1 manager and 2 workers
• WSO2 ESB Analytics cluster (2 servers)
• Microsoft SQL Server cluster for persistence
• SVN cluster for deployment sync
• MLog (Elasticsearch) used for selective logging
• MPass used as SSO to management consoles
• MAccess used as UI for some data access

15. Results
• Around 30 public authorities involved
• More than 65 web-services in production
• Estimating around 25 M messages in 2017
• Scalable throughput: 400 signed msg/sec/node
over https and with logging
• Added latency: up to 100 ms

16. Lessons learned
• Interoperability is a journey
• Implementation is faster when centralized
• Implement generic services with data providers and
publish life events from source
• Establish a sustainable team of integration specialists
• Ensure a long-term relationship with solution vendor

17. Future plans
• Clarify and simplify the connection process
– Promote Interoperability Law
– Implement interactive Semantic Catalog, including:
• Semantic assets management
• Electronic requests for new data exchanges
• Defined data categories and SLAs
• Lean more on event-based data exchange scenarios
• Modernize public services using data exchange

18. Connection Process (1 of 2)

19. Connection Process (2 of 2)

20. Public services modernization
20
RATIONALIZATION REENGINEERING DIGITIZATION DELIVERY
Eliminate obsolete
services
Consolidate related
services
Identify life scenarios
and business events
Review and simplify
general legal
framework
Business process
automation
Mechanisms to apply
and deliver services
online
Mechanisms to check
application status
Inter-agency data
exchange
Multiple delivery
channels
Deliver central
services locally
Customer-centered
delivery
Quality and delivery
standards
Continuous
improvement
Administrative
streamlining
Business process
optimization
Eliminate un-necessary
documents
Review and simplify
specific legal
framework
COORDINATION AND PROGRAM/PROJECT MANAGEMENT
MONITORING AND CONTROL
COMMUNICATION, TRAINING AND MARKETING

21. Thank you
egov.md wso2.com iello.md